Introduction

From the2002Years from now, we [1] In the Law School of Zhejiang Gongshang University to teach a workers congress (hereinafter referred to as the "meeting") is a bottom-up, stand on solid ground of the city grass-roots democratic experiment form. I have personally participated in this experiment, and from first to last is an active promoter, heart of the observer and record the faithful.

The experimental resistance mainly from our boss -- law school leadership. In this regard, we proceed from the overall situation of national political system reform, according to the Central Committee of the party conference resolution spirit, do a lot of persuasion, education and criticism of the work of leadership, guide them to correct the attitude, enhance understanding. Specifically, for the reason of leadership, we take the initiative to do persuade and communication work, strive for the understanding and recognition of their; to be savage and absurd, obstinate obstruct democracy at the grassroots level leadership, then serious criticism, forcing them to make concessions, the democracy at the grassroots level step forward.

We first take3Years through the hospital leadership wanton card teachers proposal, control procedures to meet the practice, adopted by the US teachers own drafting meeting rules. So, non official, from the ordinary teacher's proposal has been able to SMOOTH OPERATOR on the faculty meeting to discuss and vote; once through the, will become the SFRC resolution. Then, for refusing to comply with this resolution conference of school leadership, we in the Faculty of his public criticism. Criticism and to what extent, what time the initiative to criticism and criticism are in our hands, do not need to consult with anyone. These rights are of our own to fight, not who gift. The formation of such a pattern in a state-owned units, is not an easy thing. We also regularly carried out all the teachers to democratic evaluation of hospital leadership, and the evaluation results reveal to the public. Recently, we passed the Congress spokesman system, reporting to Congress of faculty, staff will be the spirit of publicity. Now, we are promoting financial openness and financial supervision of the hospital leadership.

This is a profound social experiment, because the experience is of universal significance. Small but complete.; nearly one hundred people in the school of law is a microcosm of China society. In the course of grassroots democracy, in contradiction of the vortex, the interaction of various forces, the pros and cons, firm and shaken, warm and cold, integrity, independent and cater to please, all kinds of characters, all kinds of face, have everything that one expects to find; from the leadership to the masses, each people play their real role.

 

The first session of the first meeting

2002Years, Hangzhou Institute of Commerce [2] The Congress party decided to set up in the school of law, School of foreign languages, computer science, the development of Logistics Corporation four staff number of two college. Law school faculty meeting is scheduled for10At the end of the first meeting. This is a pose, as a mere formality, who also not too seriously. But some of our elected representatives of teachers long-term care and research of national political system reform, for this is an opportunity, immediately decided to pick up the chicken feathers LianJian, the school of law as a social reform of laboratory, the democratic construction of city community experiment.

Law school leadership will also attaches great importance to the teachers, although they consider angle different from us. First of all, this is the school Party committee assigned the task, when the school leaders will visit inspection; secondly, it is the first time two college teachers' Congress, will set an example for other two colleges and two college level more representative conference. So whether it is on, on, or foreign, is the hospital leaders show their ability and prestige of the opportunity. Therefore, the hospital leadership decided to set up the5A preparatory group for the drafting5They want to file. Their special meeting of the preparatory group members. Members have been elected representatives of teachers, and suitable for the job. For the leadership responsibilities, they particularly stressed the need to pick a few dare to speak for people to do this thing, after much deliberation, they assigned me, Wu Dongxian, Zhou Dagang3Personal, and appointed me as leader. It should be said, we3The individual was relatively dare speak. This shows that hospital leadership not only pay attention to the conference is very sincere, subjective. Because the designated5A team led by Deputy Secretary of the Party branch of the Jin Shideng group could not complete the drafting work, so in the end cross only the rest of us4A group. In addition, the agenda the meeting is also very full, a total of3Afternoon:10Month29Day (Tuesday);11Month5Day (Tuesday);11Month9Day (Saturday). According to the regulation of the school, on Tuesday afternoon, four belong to political learning time, not in class.

Each member of the preparatory group although in fact is led by the specified, drafting out files to represent the proposal form is submitted to the conference. That is to say, the leadership of the designated this fact and not many legal significance, its leadership, and without specified representative spontaneously gathered together to draft proposal is the same in the legal sense.

Wu Dongxian and Zhou Dagang happened to be on a business trip, not in Hangzhou. Time is pressing, we group the drafting work by my a person to do. Leadership responsibility is not1A file, but12A file, according to the president, vice president, secretary, deputy secretary, director of general office, director of the Department and so on, a total of12A post. But I don't need a figment of drafting, because President Ranzalin downloaded from the Internet to other schools have issued this12An ordinance to me as a manuscript. He recognized these papers. I understand his meaning is not tired to do too big change, not even to direct hand in can. But I think if you do, you have to. So I put it12A file read a series, the feeling is some ambiguity, Mandarin cliches, very boring; from the legal professional point of view, such a thing is done, a loss of my occupation self-esteem, especially against the original intention of my practice of grassroots democracy. So I carefully modify, mainly to remove some useless things, and provides financial disclosure, reduce administrative meetings, multi service for teachers so that teachers can concentrate on teaching and scientific research and so on to increase according to the actual situation of our hospital. Because of the tight schedule of time, I only modify the four or five files, are for the top leaders, including President, secretary, director of general office, deputy are preserved in manuscript. After modification of Zhou Dagang to come back, I will show him, he will agree and support. We can according to the prescribed time to the hospital leadership.

School leaders are not satisfied with these modifications, decided not to print, but does not tell us the preparatory group. Until10Month29On the afternoon of the opening of the meeting, each representative seat, see in front of the conference documents, I found we4A preparatory group for drafting documents only they also3A team in our group, the drafting of the leadership responsibility regulations is the card out.

1:30First preparatory meeting by meeting agenda. The leadership asked no opinions, no applause by. I raised my hand and said "there", ask why on the agenda are not arranged on behalf of free speech. General Party branch secretary Lu Jiexiong said on the spot to accept my advice, and will report to the presidium to increase this agenda. Thus, this agenda gradually become the law school faculty meeting of the Convention, it is like a wedge into a closed body originally airless, tiny holes that fresh air through the wedge play gradually into a series of progress, so as to help promote the future. I asked second questions, asked why we group drafted documents not in advance, and even a hello don't. Leadership explained that the draft is not mature, so the next meeting to consider. Don't say hello because the job is busy, too late to say hello. My heart one Zheng: immature who say? Is leadership or conference? If the proposal on behalf of no procedural safeguards, can screen led by arbitrary, Congress must become the Convention, it must struggle. So I ask what place do not mature. Leaders expressed the hope that the next communication.

Week just have also questioned the agenda, he is the professional, pay more attention to the rules of procedure, such as voting, leaders said on the spot will be taken to a secret ballot on some important documents. This is a crucial point, it provides guarantee for the later represents a free vote. Zhou Dagang then no one else further questioning, everyone applauded the adoption of the agenda.

Then the meeting was officially opened. The first two rows are VIP seat, to many people, including the leadership of the school, outside of the unit attendance, these people have to say a few words, then go. Unnecessary and overelaborate formalities after in the past, began to enter the topic. The first is the Dean made a report, and then to the3A proposal that (our group's proposal was the card out). The main purpose of the conference is to pass this3A proposal and "law school teaching staff representative assembly work implementation details" (hereinafter referred to as "the" implementation rules ""). Then the delegates divided5A discussion of this report and4A want to file. Because the time has not much, so11Month5On the afternoon of discussion will continue to. [3]

The leading card proposal, I decided to use the opportunity to speak on behalf of free teacher criticized the practice. The conference has a time limit, in principle does not exceed15Minutes, so I will speak into two parts. A part of attack leading card proposal according to the actual situation of this Jiaodai Hui emerged, as the General Assembly speech; another part is the discussion of pure theory, as a written statement, does not occupy the time of the meeting. Written speech topic is "written in two college faculty meeting on the occasion of the establishment", I in addition to distribute at the meeting, also contribute to the magazine, hope school promote. [4] I will be writing speeches for office, ask them to represent the number of copies38Copy. But11Month5On the afternoon before the discussion began to hospital do I want to take a statement printed, hospital office staff Xu Tong told me: "leadership to confiscate your manuscript, not allowed to print." As the afternoon panel discussion the time was near, not looking for leadership theory, I will return to the team, to break the news to everyone said, most people have no reaction, Zheng Wanqing only said one sentence: "the confiscation of wrong, too much."

Group discussion began shortly after President Ranzalin and Secretary Lu Jiexiong, came to our group I and Zhou Dagang communication. My head with the first sentence is: "why do you want to take my written statement?" The secretary made a ha ha: "what is this? Don't speak so bluntly." Then sent word to Zhou Dagang. I know, the two leaders not to negotiate, because they have decided not to our proposal. The so-called communication, it is a gesture to show respect for the leadership, we. According to the common sense, since the leadership to do this step, give enough face, we also should not say anything. But I don't want to face, but dry facts, promote grass-roots democracy solidly. Different ideas, different purposes, they can hardly be avoided conflict.

Just for weeks, leading to said, the first to engage in such meeting, no experience, there is little error also hope that understanding. This is the truth, too, is a very good opening. We first discuss the nature of the congress. I said: democracy as a political form, it is the essence of power relation and the balance of power between officials and people. The conference is an extension of the system of people's congresses at school, the purpose is to effective supervision on your leadership of our people. Zan Lin Ruan president opposed, he said "it is western bourgeois things, what we are doing in the socialist." Zhou Dagang unhappy beside not slow said: "the teacher said and our constitution textbook writing is the same, but our book is national textbooks, is the socialism." [5] Ruan president does not understand the constitution, listen to Zhou Dagang said, know I made a mistake, a little embarrassed, just change the subject. He said the relationship between the public and the leadership is consistent, not confrontation, a unit like one family, have common interests, everyone together to get things done. I said: "you say half of; leadership and the interests of the masses is both consistent and contradiction, unity of opposites, this is the dialectics." I then insisted that they say why card proposal, they are still not very mature, the next time. In general China, leadership is not mature, don't say you write Nothing is right., people should get back. But I don't, I continue to ask what place do not mature. Leadership immediately words. Later, Lu Secretary pointed out that the proposal requires the speech time not too long, the president of the people too, rules must be general, should not for personal.

I said: This is called on the wrong. Dean meeting speech really too long, one or two hours talk down, and not so much content, a waste of everyone's time. Some people even doze off under. Zhu Rongji made the government work report how much time? Provisions must be of practical relevance to be useful. The Dean shall correct the wrong speech long.

The Secretary asked: what if later leadership does not have such drawbacks? Shall not excess? This doesn't mean that you specified is personal?

I said: No. No such disadvantages if future leadership, provided there is no harm. But his speech is not an individual phenomenon, there will be the leader has the same shortcomings, so shall not excess. Besides, even if it is just a Ruan Dean person, such a provision is necessary, because he is now in the stage. He does not do, can bend the rules to delete. If you think this is for the individual, it is necessary for man.

The problem I finally and continental Secretary keeps consistent, no tanlong. In fact, the problem is not in this one, I have added provisions are targeted, leadership is not happy, just feel shy to say. For example, in financial affairs, leadership is not happy. Also, I want to administrative service for teachers, administrative total hope teachers to go on an errand for them, which in itself is a contradiction, how will lead to?

The leaders go, Zhou Dagang and I returned to their own team to participate in the discussion. After the debate, I first find the Secretary for they confiscated written speech, he said that in the dean. I turned around to find the dean's office, extending a hand to the dean said: "the speech draft, give it back to me." He hesitated, opened the drawer, take out a speech and handed it to me, said: "you are really bang the drum for sb. ah." I think he made in the above3Bars, asked what he meant, he said some of the problems these references, I know he is lack of research on these questions, so don't argue with him, turn and walk away. Since in the copier not to use, I have to copy shop to India, but Dean row3Gang is very troublesome. Because I was his printer is broken, this page is using a floppy disk Kaodao half paper other printers, a copy of this. Because do not want to re print, trouble, I went with a scratched3Gang draft out printed38A, a total of76Page, ready to9Sporadic day conference.

The second day noon, Ruan, call me, continue to explain card proposal: "the establishment of the preparatory group of the drafting of the leadership responsibilities that we consider not, because the Secretary's duty shall be made by the school Party committee to decide, Dean responsibility is decided by the president, the Congress does not belong to the scope of authority." I said: "even so, its total suggestion right. Not say Congress can't discuss. Now the school is not such a provision? In its resolution form suggested just fill the blank. The leadership of the school if you agree, don't become you." The president did not have a view, the tear, remind me to speak carefully, speak of "the three represents". I know he means well, probably afraid I returned from America tell bourgeois democracy, in violation of the four cardinal principles, not only against me, they also have to bear the responsibility of leadership. In fact, I just want to make democracy at the grassroots level experiment, don't want to touch the high-voltage wire. But in part for his remind respect, I was not in the original "speech, Three Represents" with a few words of "Three Represents", and also used to prove the correctness of our proposal and the proposal they card irrational.

11Month7A study of a political afternoon, we focus on Civil and commercial law department. Then Wu Dongxian is away on official business has come back, I will draft a few duties to give it to her, she was very support. I discuss with her school, finance affairs is advocated, we change is consistent with the school spirit, whether can find the school Party committee reflect for a moment, let the leaders don't law school card proposal. She said, "well, if the school leaders are saying, School of law, the leadership will certainly listen." I said, "that we go to find, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow morning." (according to the agenda9On the afternoon of the last session of Congress). But she says she just something, "you go too." I will not make her.

The morning of the second day, I'm a man go to the school party secretary Wang Guangming, but he was on a business trip, only Zhang Xihua Secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission, I think anyway, secretary, so he told Secretary Zhang said. He's support, especially financial disclosure, schools have a formal document, he also gave me. I put the file read by home, find the rules than our proposal in detail, much more professional. But there is no a grade two college to do according to this document, and the schools are not carefully check, supervise the implementation, probably tokenism, cope with the above. Secretary Zhang after I left for school called. Law school leadership is very angry with me, that I went to school to tell them. In fact, I just want to use the school Party committee to push, is completely on the wrong things. At the end of the semester, and Yang Lei came to my house, said to me, then went to law school leadership of Party committee, accused the us to break away from the leadership of the party. I said, "I have never spoken, they say." Yang Lei said: "the problem is you don't have a chance to explain." I said no problem ", do not give a chance to explain the party will listen to it, not with us; otherwise it will give a chance to explain." These of course are another story.

11Month9On the afternoon of the day is the last meeting. According to the agenda, the election produced3Standing committees: proposal and democratic management committee, welfare committee, research committee. Zhou Dagang and I, Wu Dongxian, Yang Lei, Liu Jianmin5Individuals were selected as members of the proposal and democratic management committee. In the4A file before the vote by the team reported to Congress on behalf of group discussion, free speech is arranged together, actually I am a person. Group leaders report to speak more conventional, first is must under the leadership of the work, and then some suggestions, it is also quite tactfully. And I'm free speech tone and they are completely different, not a word of apology, went straight to the theme. I will speak about the nature and purpose of the meaning of democracy, the Congress, comparing the meeting is not qualified, not a good start (because the overall evaluation first, then leadership speech said "we had a successful meeting", the laughter of a). And then the specific problems existing in the conference, especially the leading card the proposal of the problem one by one analysis and criticism. Some irony, mockery and ridicule to identify by name the person's leadership. (speech text see annex a). Finally, I summarize the specific tasks of its direction and everyone is as follows:

Fellow Deputies, we are all teachers in Colleges and universities, and learning methods. Just imagine, if the establishment of a democratic system with an air of importance, in the middle of those of us who are not so, construction of democratic legal system of the whole China what hope is there? So, every one of us should truly concerned about the country's future and destiny, to a determination: the democratic construction at the basic level Chinese should begin from me, start from the unit where I. If we can set up a relatively perfect system of democracy, the law school then, we have the whole Hangzhou business school faculty meeting construction to set up an advanced example. Our successful experience to the province and even the national radiation. We should so little ambition, made so little ambition. A democratic China should be in the hands of our generation has begun to take shape.

This speech be close, There was no parallel in history., because whether Congress or other, in Hangzhou Institute of Commerce history has never seen such a phenomenon: an ordinary teacher at the conference so bold, so open to criticism and accused the leadership. I set a precedent.

It also raised a very important question: promoting forms of democracy at the grassroots level. People used to talk about and complaining in private, not willing to express different opinions at the meeting, or dare not openly and leadership opinion. But democratic politics is the public legal battle, is the activities on the ground instead of the underground struggle, no cabal. You can say, but in the end have to get to open expression of views, so that everyone on the base of information to vote. Therefore, the democracy at the grassroots level to start a prerequisite is to dare to face the leadership, the leadership of the surface to say "no", otherwise no democracy. As an intentional agents on these issues, I start to see, so can do. Naturally, in a short period of time is very difficult to get people to agree.

After I finished the printed38Written speech on a seat on the left side of the front (originally the VIP VIP departure, after each meeting those seats are still empty), tell everyone to save the time and give a written speech, on behalf of the interested can come and get them. (the written speech, see Appendix two).

After the end of Dean represents the speech, speech. He said: "the teacher criticized me long Zhu, it is because I am the level is low, no way, so now I will speak a bit longer," he then spoke for almost an hour, probably in order to not accept my criticism.

After the finish of the president3A preparatory group for the drafting of the3Proposal and implementation details "vote".3Proposals are "law school course scheduling rules", "law school attendance rules", "law school scientific research to promote the way". "Implementation rules" is considered to be a constitutional document of the meeting, which belongs to the organization law of nature, is the hospital leadership from the schools will copied, basically is the name schools will change into the college faculty meeting, so there is no set up a preparatory group. Voting problems which files should be by secret ballot, which files need only vote by show of hands, even applauded by. Leaders felt course scheduling rules and promote the scientific research methods can be controversial, secret ballot; two other documents do not. I think it quite reasonable, so there is no opinion. But Zhou Dagang put forward the "implementation rules" should also be anonymous voting, I understand the characteristics of Zhou Dagang, he is very careful, is also engaged in the constitution, "the detailed rules for the implementation of" one by one to see him, but I could only stare at the direction of Congress, I have no rules, out of his confidence, I immediately said support: "just right, should be by secret ballot vote." The atmosphere is a little nervous. So the presidium meeting to discuss, other representative recess.

I went to the toilet, Yang Lei followed, said "it is not easy, no one would dare to say." I told him: "this is the general direction of reform, so this head must be opened, a tiger must touch. When I first touch, it may jump Baizhang high; second times to touch it just jump50Cubits high; and then third times, fourth times, had been feeling down, it becomes a low, touch later won't jump, even feel very comfortable. One day you suddenly stop not touched, it but not accustomed to, say 'Oh, today this ass itch, how no one to touch?'" Speak I have small urinal down, right hand pull the pants zipper, with his left hand gesture in the air, held to the highest one hundred feet, down to the chest said50Zhang, and then down. Yang Lei was laughing, said "this is the word, but not to others." I told him it was a mental habit, need to slowly change, do not change, Chinese no hope.

The short end of the recess, the presidium decided:4A file of all the secret ballot vote. The bureau is mainly led by the control, the decision should also is the meaning of leadership. Be honest, this meeting from the beginning of the preparatory to the now, two leading law school, Ranzalin and Lu Jiexiong are quite liberal. Even the card out of our proposal, in their view is also the scope of leadership of things, even so, they have to communicate, agreed to increase the free speech agenda, now agree that the secret ballot, can saying is give enough face. According to the China officialdom unspoken rule, everything they do is compliance, and our behavior is derailed. [6] I understand all this. But I think is still the direction question: if the proposal they can card, Congress had no right to know and the right to vote, became the leader can be pushed around. So we must change the unspoken rule -- whether the proposals submitted to the general assembly to discuss the decision does not belong to the hospital leadership. In this regard, my statement in the general assembly from two aspects of theory and practice to make the key argument.

Anonymous voting results out of leadership expectations: "scientific research" and "rules" to attendance by narrowly; "implementation rules" and "course scheduling rules" by a narrow vote. Although this results in my opinion is very normal, but in many people's eyes is not normal, they think that Congress pass the bill appears, is of epoch-making. So he made news, spread.

The secretary. Secretary and President, is written in advance a greeting is very brief, speech. There is a saying that "we had a successful meeting", caused the laughter. But the secretary is very witty. He said, "you do not laugh. The reason I say conference was a success, a success, is because there are different views, this is a manifestation of democracy. This will not good?" So they will not laugh. Whether Secretary intentionally or unintentionally, he this sentence is I and Zhou Dagang's behavior made sure: since there are different views the meeting is going well, then there is no different opinions may not so good; but we disagree is made a good contribution to the meeting.

But although the words say so, leadership was still very Wohuo, because the two files did not pass, they feel lost face, and all the blame on my speech. Later it was said that in private discussions, that if I don't speak,4A file will pass. On the estimation of the leadership, I have a different feeling. Because the teacher privately to "course scheduling rules" great views, the main income of teachers is particularly sensitive to the class fee, course scheduling problem, estimated that the rules do not pass. I only care about the system construction of teachers' Congress, especially leading card proposal of the problem, do not care too much about course arrangement, because listen to others to say rules have problems, I voted against it, actually I did not make it clear that the rules have what not good. And the detailed rules for the implementation of "" I voted in favor of the.

After the meeting I to take my written statement, so wait until the last to go; leadership are waiting until the last to go. Speech basically did not move, only took5A, including one mention tea for the meeting students away,30Many teachers only4The individual took this manuscript, and most of them are in recess leadership at the meeting of the presidium unseen cases take, that quite a few people or so numb and indifferent, or even take a leadership speech are afraid to see, not to mention the critical leadership mistakes. I will rest33Copies of all take. When I walked down from the stairs, to meet with several representative in the downstairs later came up again, is about to go upstairs to have what thing. Because usually met greet each other, so I will take the initiative to greet them, strangely they pretended not to see me, turned away. I was surprised, a head to see Dean behind me, the heart see light suddenly: these represent in deliberately avoided me, because they need to draw a line with me in front of the leadership. I think of the anti rightist struggle of those rightists misery -- not only in political hit, but also be deserted by one's followers in the society, the heart be filled with a thousand regrets.40Over the years, today's political environment has been much more than that of liberal, but people's political quality and psychological quality seems to be little progress. I remembered the previously seen in the textbooks of Philosophy in the word: the ideology of the ruling class is always the dominant. Not only in a country is such, this is so in a unit. Then for a period of time, I am very tactful: as long as the leaders present, don't take the initiative to greet others.

On behalf of all the evening dinner, Zhou Dagang refused to go, the same reason and not to take the gift. I advised him: "have a meal, a gift, you will be able to buy? Go ahead, according to eat rice, gifts, take democracy will do." Just listen, say with smile: "this is your style." Later, Yang Lei advised him: "go ah! We win. To celebrate the victory!" Zhou Dagang then went to eat the dinner.

In order to make the conference "constitution" -- "implementation rules" to the Secretary, Lu Jiexiong did a lot of work, adopted a certain opinion representative proposed, cannot be adopted to explain. Secretary I talked about this with the individual, I nodded, because of course scheduling rules to rules and that I will vote against the no comment, I only ask leaders don't card proposal. The Secretary didn't know I would vote for votes on the first ballot. After work,2003Years1Month14On the afternoon of the law school, convene an interim meeting, smoothly through the "implementation rules".

We in the Congress on the fighting soon spread to the students. Especially the two speeches I (an oral and a written), is said to have circulated still students. One day in the evening, I give01Students of Teaching Co law, and they asked me in class: "the teacher, I heard you lost, right?" I remember Yang Lei said to Zhou Dagang, we won, but students say we lost, presumably because they know our proposal from my speech will eventually be the card out because of it. But my voice told them firmly: "struggle, fail, then struggle, fail again, until the victory, this is the necessary way to grow all new things. Our school teachers, a determination to crack tip opening angle, the road ahead for the democratic construction at the basic level of the Chinese." The students of two classes of applause. If say, teachers not only to teach, but also had passed, so I can not guilty to say, this is how we teach the body mass.

2003Years10Month14On the night of Tuesday, law01(4) classmates asked me to answer they encountered in learning and life problems and doubts. They generally feel that the future is boundless, no future. "After graduating from university where and how, what do you do?" "Society is so corrupt, what can we do?" We all feel without what strength, lack of learning motivation. Some students said "feel". With no ambition at all, no sense of social responsibility, do not care about the country's future and destiny, is this generation of young people generally mentality and phenomena. What is the meaning of life? What is the purpose of life? We are not clear.

They are curious about me, asked many questions about my personal problems. I answered truthfully, and on their doubts about their opinions and positions. They responded very warmly, from6Half to nearly11Points until the end, and unable to part from some. The preacher's point of view, it should be said that the effect is good.

By the discussion about influence, followed by,00Level3This class students call, saying they will hold two generation (Student Congress and Tuandai will), met with some specific problems want to ask me. I was busy at that time, no time. Because of these problems with constitutional law and administrative law color, I suggest they find Zhou Dagang and Luo Wenyan two teachers, because of their professional counterparts, classes are good. They said they had to find Zhou Dagang talked about, but some problems still want to ask me. I fail to beat, but about a go at night. The students a lot, their opinion is mainly aimed at was in charge of Student Affairs Secretary of gold Shideng, thought he was the development of Party members, students and the mission of the organization of the cadre appointment and election procedures and other issues do not fair, not democracy, asked me what should they do. I say "is very simple, according to the procedure. You should begin with gold teacher consultation, the consultation fails you will find Lu Jiexiong secretary and President Nguyen Chan Lam; if not you will find the school leadership; or if not, even if, because find down the cost is too high." Discussion of the problem is less than10Minutes of the time, I want to go, but students retain, they said there is a lot of confusion, including study, job, life, love and other issues, the results again4An hour.

Soon after, two generations will be held. I hear students for democracy, dissatisfaction with the voting rules and so on, is probably the US Congress fallout. Gold Shideng so to me a lot, I think to stir up the student disturbances. In fact, I did not say to the student what for him, and I don't want to spend that time, it is repeated requests by teachers and students of my responsibility restraint not refuse.

2003Years4In August, Ranzalin resigned as president, to be replaced by Lu Jiexiong, the total stand up to the Deputy Secretary Jin Shideng, two vice president Kong Qingjiang and Ma Guixiang remain unchanged. Once I was in the bathroom I met Lu Jiexiong, he said to me:"3A committee proposal and democratic management committee as the name suggests to do something, you'd better choose a responsible person, call director, convener or other what all can, you yourself, so contact work convenient. In addition, you'd better draw up a committee work rules, make teaching acting meeting to discuss the." I feel he is very convincing, with several other people say.

After a day of political learning, I and Wu Dongxian, Yang Lei, Liu Jianmin meet to elect a responsible person, Zhou Dagang is away on a business trip. They3People push me, I just push the week, they also all agree. Zhou Dagang came back, I told him, he had no objection, but this sort of thing is no personal interests can figure, only the contribution and sacrifice. Next is the drafting of our work rules, Liu Jianmin wrote the first draft. I feel so officialese, will be drafted in the second draft, to Zhou Dagang. He felt no, and wrote the third draft. Finally, we need to hold a meeting to discuss a draft choice, we are going to spend a day at the weekend are time. But5It's hard to about, in order to open the meeting, about a long time to settle down.5A weekend of Nov, driving by Yang Lei, will5People get meijiawu. Everyone agreed to Zhou Dagang's manuscript to manuscript, discussing the changes on that basis. Week just drafted rules3Parts: bill processing, democratic supervision, financial supervision. I feel the democratic supervision may have difficulty, the leadership will conflict, whether the proposed first to the two part proposal and financial, but Wu Dongxian and Liu Jianmin said they had practiced in the Administrative Cadre Institute of politics and law, no problem. So I also agree with the. We from the morning10A.m., detailed discussion, dissent, all that possible, repeatedly argued, hammer, agreed by Zhou Dagang recorded at noon; every man out of his own pocket farmers at home to eat meal, and then continue; has been busy in the afternoon4Before the end of o'clock. When sent me home at Yang Lei drive, has5More.

Due to busy wait for all sorts of reasons, we (the Wu Dongxian seems not in) until the second semester to the office to find Lu Jiexiong dean to discuss business, we have been finalized by the "rules", then the annual meeting time is coming (the last time2002Years10End of month. Other affairs but Lu Dean busy with school and home, do not want to hold annual meeting. Zhou Dagang said Congress "implementation rules" to write once a year, you should perform. The president said "it is not necessarily", a word to Zhou takong back. Other people are not silent, I said the sentence: "the key is to look at the leadership does not pay attention to." Dean said: "on, on." This short dialogue is full of China characteristics. Week just young, junior, Dean wouldn't take him seriously, he put his true opinion rejected. I'm older age, seniority, Dean respect more, though I offend leadership than just more than weeks, President Zhou Dagang more advice for me. In fact, I mean it was clear: Zhou Dagang is right, but you do not accept the leadership, that you do not attach importance to teachers' congress. So I said see you leadership attention do not pay attention to. But I am not say without mincing words to say to Zhou Dagang and he was wrong, so he doesn't want to be with me in conflict. But I did not say without mincing words to reject him, but also out of respect for. Lu Jiexiong is not the law origin, but North Chinese graduate, but over the years I have been worship Chinese Department of Beijing University, so there is a natural affection for land; plus he was a few years older than I, according to the national conditions. Also the respect, so I don't want to make him too embarrassed. If the old Ranzalin, the young, I'm sure directly denied. Because I did not directly deny, Zhou Dagang was always picking on me, more than once said "I told no one support, others don't, you Miss Zhu also did not support." In response to the president ", is" after, I further give the school example, said the school faculty meeting once a year, unshakable. Dean pointed out the school this year to use several specific files to cope with the above inspection, mean school on time is a matter of expediency. This truth is not. Schools will each time, this is a matter of expediency, is past and future is a matter of expediency? But anyway does not agree with the law school dean held on time's annual meeting.

Since leaders refused to convene, we to convene an interim meeting of the detailed rules for the implementation of "program" provisions, convened by the 1/3 representative signature.04Years3Month2Afternoon, I printed5A "working rules" draft and convene an interim meeting of the proposal, the political study were to get Department signatures. But we were surprised to discover the delegates doubts have refused to sign, to three (Economic Law) a, they did not see, there was no one signature, such materials also give I lost; we two (Civil Law) that, given the other two colleagues at Wu Dongxian and I signed, they all refused to sign. After President Lu Jiexiong signed, only with a lot of people sign. But after 1/3 signatures collected on behalf of routine should be called general Party branch, responsible for the gold Shideng still not promised to call. We also have no way. From the leadership to the masses, there is widespread doubts about the folk started things, always feel that is not normal, suspect that you have what not to be divulged to. This should be the present stage our country people including teachers in Colleges and universities, the general state of mind.

After this week, just with me on how to promote teachers' Congress, concrete is propelled to a point. He thinks should seize the leadership without meeting on time problem urged the leadership to abide by their own set out "implementation rules"; and I think we should first break leading card proposal this point. He said the two together can focus better, I said, a little effect also explains: the meeting is open, what time, don't we need to raise; leaders must face, must be accountable to the above, you don't hurry, they also want to open, can use force; important is quality, open must have content, it must ensure that the proposal SMOOTH OPERATOR, this is the experience of previous meeting; like the schools will, although all open every year, is a rubber stamp, have what meaning? But Zhou Dagang does not agree with me.

I insist is actually consistent strategy thought. In physics, the size of the pressure and stress area is inversely proportional to. The pressure limited conditions, in order to increase the pressure, must reduce the stress area. In an extremely stubborn system from down to Shangdi to promote reform, points less as well. In the nine three society, I also early to the leader suggested that: "find a point (instead of two or more), combined with other7Democratic parties together, extensive propaganda to the masses, lasting pressure is applied to the school, until the ideas were adopted, implemented so far; and then together to celebrate, ask: what is the next point?" The nine three leadership is the identity of Ideological and the strategy, with the other democratic parties to communicate, but no response. Similarly, in its issue, because the power is limited, I feel a little push effect than push two good.

Of course, if just to lead and to promote, I would vote for him, support and optimistic attitude, which I think he knew. But I understand his meaning is not only to my support, but I like the impact card proposal as forced to boost annual congress held on time, I feel not so much energy.

 

The first session of the second meeting

Initiates the temporary meeting shortly after the abortion, leading finally decided to hold its second meeting. Yang Lei consulted with me, said the leadership election is approaching, the land Jiexiong age has come, outgoing, replaced by Kong Qingjiang, the Congress is as a mere formality it, don't push, after the leadership to stabilize again. I asked him: "leadership stability is not stable what relation with us to promote grassroots democracy?" He can't say. I said: "you're confused, this is a good opportunity to promote. Leadership in the card bill. The more they are unstable, the easier we push up." [7]

So, we have already finalized "proposal and democratic management committee work rule" handed in. The first is the gold Shideng concerns, said: "you this democratic supervision, but also released, not so good I am afraid." This response as early as I expected. This is also the original committee meeting I suggest why this matter postpone. So, I want to do some compromise, asking "if the parts removed, can?" He said no comment. But then the hospital leaders find our proposal committee who talk time (the time I don't), persuade them to financial supervision is removed, or simply don't this proposal. I am very angry. Because I insist to mention, a complete file was deleted lose one's beyond recognition, only a few proposal processing rules, and that several articles for leadership can card proposal is not speak in detail. The two part is deleted, and later by Zhou Dagang, Wu Dongxian and Liu Jianmin for the three person, the leadership made a compromise, is the first place we draft financial open and democratic appraisal of the content of the two part sealing up, do not let everyone see, just let everyone in the meeting voted to the two part content. I feel this is very ridiculous. In the final analysis, this is still a leading control Bill Gate, card proposal of the problem. I am determined to continue to shock.

Because Zhou Dagang was on the "implementation rules" provisions have some views, but in practice also appeared a lot of new problems, such as the representative of the meeting, read out what to do, to do, and so on, details are not provided, so I suggested he drafted a revised "implementation rules" proposal. He readily agreed, after the writing to me, I suggest to add a sentence: "the proposal through Congress and democratic management committee proposal according to the rules of finishing by the convener unified issued to the Congress, no person shall obstruct." He added. But leaders saw the word the whole proposal all card out, don't let Congress discussion. If we work rules or negotiation results, also can not criticize the proposal leading card, card week just this proposal is cold, which makes me later criticize simply, because the shock of my goals is the card bill.

2004Years5Month20Day (Thursday) afternoon, law school second Jiaodai Hui opening. Because I hate leadership card on behalf of the proposal, so in the agenda of the session of the preparatory meeting with President Lu Jiexiong argued, the atmosphere is not very harmonious. While there was a small episode, someone asked Lu Jiexiong of dean's work report shall represent the vote, because the debate not bottom, by all delegates vote by secret ballot to decide whether I should vote, the vote was to vote.

As mentioned before, the proposal and democratic management committee work rules that include3Parts: bill processing, democratic appraisal and financial disclosure. Now the democratic appraisal and financial disclosure is deleted, only let you in the sight of the contents of the case the vote to such content, so submitted to the assembly through discussion is only a few proposal handling rules. But since there are proposals submitted, sponsors must do that. So Zhou Dagang as the person in charge of the committee were scheduled for a description of the proposal. Originally, this is a good chance to attack leading card proposal, but he only said a minute, said like this proposal did not what to say. Just as simple and honest, never blush. Know I know that he is very angry, even angry, so-called "the proposal" is the leading card lose one's beyond recognition proposal, but most of the representatives do not understand, do not care about the conference, not to notice he was angry, and he did not know what to say. I feel his lack of political experience, will not work, because the two or three words on that occasion is not in place. He will lead to card proposal antecedents and consequences, on behalf of all the sequence of events to explain clearly, so that we can win the sympathy and support in the secret ballot. Especially with me in front of the preparatory meeting of foreshadowing, he should be more fuel, contrast the atmosphere, let everybody see why we're the real reason angry, so as to put pressure on leadership card proposal practices, so that more and more people do not approve of this approach. But he could not be an easy job to do, to miss such a good chance.

Because the incoming president Kong Qingjiang, the Dean work report to Congress by a vote of the problem is more concerned about, so he checked the Ministry of education after the meeting1985The interim regulations issued by the university teachers and our law school own Congress "detailed rules for the implementation of the provisions of" its authority: the dean of the report on the work of "deliberative discussion is", the personnel management rules and regulations is "considered by", "to the staff welfare is a review decision", which he decided to the Dean reports "discuss" no vote, only the "by" and "decision" just need to vote. This argument is justified. But on the other hand, these statements are fuzzy, the Teachers Congress system is still in the exploratory stage, since that "consideration", vote on it. Also, even if it is against the majority, but is a meaning representation of that meeting, the outcome of the deliberations of this report is you don't agree with you, but this does not mean that the report is invalid, because Congress had no more right. Just as the Zan Lin Ruan Dean said Congress has no right to decide the leadership responsibilities and I replied "we do a resolution of advice can always be right" is the same reason. The problem is that the meeting is to make decisions, to vote, it should be voted on, need not inconstant in policy. Zhou Dagang after reading the articles, that Kong Qingjiang's interpretation, expressed support for. He has a pure legal mind, from the motivation to individual character are very pure, no utilitarian heart; even if very angry about his proposal was the card out, still be able to uphold justice.

23Day (Sunday) to discuss in the Blaupunkt group the afternoon tea, the presidium meeting, Kong Qingjiang put forward again, the report does not need to vote on the issue, several leaders of course all support him, Zhou Dagang also support, Wu Dongxian was the only person who argue, be hopelessly outnumbered, the presidium make not voting decisions. Logically speaking, the presidium conference has no power to change the decision. I am not a member of the presidium, but on the way home Wu Dongxian to say to me. I know that, on the wrong things, especially from the power of leadership, attacked one or two times is of no use, must constantly criticized, maintain a lasting pressure, attention, otherwise it is impossible to open the gap. I told Wu Dongxian I want to criticize them well in the meeting. She expressed support, said to be criticized; but she learned something, go to.

25Daily (Tuesday afternoon) is the last day meeting. The leadership of the first announced the presidium of the resolution, said of the dean of the report is not to vote, I put forward the presidium has no right to change conference has made the resolution. The debate is fierce, and then pull to the interpretation of the provisions. Zhou Dagang spoke in support of the leadership of the interpretation. He make a careful and detailed analysis, speak very clearly. I was in his anger and funny: how to lead the card bill, you speak so subtle and simple; and support from the leadership to the but again speak so clear and in place, one does not leak? Zhou Dagang's speech played a very big role, so that the conference debated the situation clearly tend to lead the side. Finally, there is no longer a secret ballot, just a show of hands, Xie Zhidong and I are the only two people raise their hands to stick to the original resolution. Wu Dongxian, if so, up to three tickets. This is the secret ballot and vote difference. People dare not openly against the leader's opinion.

Then each group report and the freedom of speech. Because of Wu Dongxian's absence, I proxy her as leader, group discussion and report, would like to speak freely, the two together, can fully guarantee the time. My words very fierce. After putting the basic facts, I pointed out that the leadership of the Congress (the Ministry of education regulations85Issued) basic attitude is wrong: "for those who have provisions for their own authoritarian grip on, even for the expansion of understanding and interpretation, and for democracy is required to pay no heed. This violates the basic spirit of regulations. In order to maintain their own authoritarian, dictatorial powers, democracy required to suppress the masses, so clumsy tactics to make excuses, is really ridiculous, pathetic, pathetic!" [8] For the leadership to the prescribed time limit for free speech, as I pointed out in no man free speech case should be encouraged to speak freely, and not to limit it, and asked: "you lead your speech was long and smelly, never one to limit the time, while the partial partial to limit free speech on the staff representative the meeting time, what is the reason?". The problems of the school of law, especially the divided in public opinion situation, I put the dirty water splashed in leaders, said that it was caused by the leading card proposal, "your card out people's political enthusiasm", make everyone downhearted. Because I heard in the card proposals others take leadership, play the Jackal to the tiger, so for most people, the "fear of offending the leadership, if I wear shoes", "want to obey and not to offend to curry favor with the leadership,...... Hope that the leadership gifts at the appropriate time point advantage to him "expressed understanding," to those skilled in the speculative reason and bootlick trick, who comes to power he will make every attempt to curry favor with the who, who beat up "people were attacked; and remind Leadership:" don't flatter you, shoot to you ass people will be good. A lot of time to lead his character is not bad, is it around to curry favour with snobs. Also such examples Chinese history? A unit, so that more people, atmosphere is definitely not up, the democratic construction at the grassroots level is impossible. The fashion should not be encouraged. (the speech text in Appendix three).

In my speech, people There were many discussions. Afterwards, unable to agree on which is right. The evaluation of the negative is the branch leading gold Shideng et al are given, say I'm making personal attacks. There is no personal attacks, the above citations should be self-evident. However, I feel is the environment in turn for the better, because I have not come across like02It was to avoid things, I have been avoided by the God of plague rise to the common people everybody can accept. Especially when the law school office in8In the building, near my home, I went to the number is more, so it should be more accurate. Many proverbs Chinese are an expression of be worldly-wise and play safe life wisdom and philosophy, such as "s rafter first rotten", "gun fight bird" and so on, but not conversely proverb to describe when the root exposed rafters no rotting, or bird has not killed, it is destructive to the existing order and Reform impetus is enormous. Especially when it tells a simple truth, and unremittingly to say, will be to block progress leading to the formation of a moderate but increasing pressure, finally will break through the obstacles, the reform to advance one step forward.

After the meeting, I further thinking of many and its related people and things, especially Zhou Dagang. From the first meeting until now, he is besides me for law school teachers will do most people, but also put the most sincere, the most pure man. But the meeting from the performance point of view, he is still immature, gas sink not to live in politics. I think, suddenly to the spirits, wanted to have some fun and hard, then wrote a song for his free verse, entitled "warriors of the dead", poetry is as follows:

A brave fighter, although many fires, but face danger fearlessly. To attack, carry the world before one; a swift and fierce attack, victory at. Who knows the change processes, the traitor force behind, anti, a fatal blow. See that tall body, shaking a few times, then collapsed. Blood all over the floor. Castle Peak to cry, the earth with tears.

This is obviously very exaggeration, what is said: you traitor ah, I am in front of war, but you stabbed me with a knife, good ache, I was dead! There is a sequence of poems, pointing out the purpose of slapstick fun. But in order to get the joke, I put the order to leave, only to the text. Zhou Dagang is learning mathematics, [9] May not be used in literary exaggeration, feel my nonsense, what a sacrifice? For I called him a traitor, he is very angry, back, answer back sarcastically, "said: you don't speak as well as a piece of junk, unqualified law, what kind of poetic bullshit? [10] He did not criticize wrong, I do not write poetry, but he is blind, the text together. See him angry, I put the preface to his theme, meaning:"...... Between friends, the subject of ridicule, but also adds a life of pleasure." Just look after the certificates to apologize to me.

 

The first session of the third meeting

2005The autumn of the year, the law school Party branch to begin preparations for the third congress. News is10Month Yang Lei collective of Huzhou or Anji what the local tourism to law school in the toilet, parking on the road told me, because he is the Party branch committee member, so know early. I was busy writing, on hearing the news, immediately stopped all work, then the "implementation rules" changes, trying to completely negate the leading card proposal approach. At that time, the hospital leadership has changed, Kong Qingjiang served as president, the original branch responsible for the gold Shideng already out, new to the general Party branch secretary Chen Weiren. Chen lf school work more than a year, showed a higher level of thinking and understanding, and to speak the truth, so well reflected in the teachers.

If the first meeting, Zhou Dagang's proposal is to do piecemeal modified words to "implementation rules", so this time I modification is thoroughly to remould oneself. The original rules text25A provision in the20A modified, delete or merge, and adding the15Provisions. The most important change is to increase the "Congress chapter proposal", clear on behalf of the proposal the proposal Committee after preliminary examination directly submitted to the conference voting, any hospital leaders no longer card. New draft rules (see attachment four) drawn up after, I have asked for a dozen personal opinion, then more than 10 made clear explanations for these modifications, wrote "on 'law school faculty meeting the detailed rules for the implementation of revised draft' instructions" (see Annex five). This shows that the first sentence: "the democratic construction at the basic level in China's reform, political development and stability of the points," I "for the development of the Chinese nation will play a fundamental role." After two years in the "17" political report indicating the grass-roots democracy as "basic project". The two paper generally used the word "basic", also can have similar views.

10Month31Day, I these two files together to Chen is reviewed, please he proposed amendments. He looked after not to mention what opinion, (or exactly can't find out what's wrong with my heart, because the hospital leaders do not want to modify the rules,) took to the school Party Committee Organization Department leadership, Organization Department looked after and did not find out what went wrong, also praised the sentence: "what is in the law, write something out of the ordinary." It is prudent, organization department and the two documents submitted to the provincial Trade union. Provincial trade unions have what reaction I don't know, but you can be sure there is no negative reaction, otherwise been banned. Go to this step, I know the political barrier has been, the next step is to law school leadership this off, because Chen is telling me, President Kong Qingjiang still did not agree, but Lu Jiexiong old president outgoing also find Chen Weiren, hope he will be my proposal card out, not to be submitted to the Conference for discussion.

Chen is decided according to the procedure to go, first give the presidium.2005Years12Month7Afternoon, Chen is called to say, yesterday afternoon the Presidium4Leadership and school three people meeting, determine12Month31Day third Jiaodai hui. We think that the "implementation rules" modifications should wait until second Jiaodai Hui, and should not be in the first session of the third meeting; and, by modifying the rules soon, this is not necessary, so they rejected. That night I contacted Liu Jianmin, he said that just discuss, should not be a formal resolution. He also proposed on the Internet to solicit proposals, Chen is adopted his views, and the name will be five people in our proposal the Commission announced, in order to accept the proposal.8Morning, I found the old humanness, he suggested that I proposed to the proposal form.

Interestingly, "implementation rules" provisions of the presidium consists of party card industry leaders and representatives of group leader, and the meeting of the presidium is unexpectedly has left the former president Lu Jiexiong and former president of the union Wu Gaoqing (former Secretary Jin Shideng did not attend, because from the current hospital) and Secretary excluded, just to attend the presidium the meeting. Because they understood in this Jiaodai Hui in the members of the presidium is unchanged. This is obviously wrong understanding of the provisions of the rules. I asked Chen is pointed out the mistakes, they re consider, correct the wrong understanding of the presidium. Error correction of the presidium member composition occurred in our favor change. I analyzed the new Bureau of personnel, a total of7Individuals, including Yang Lei, Liu Jianming and Wu Dongxian are all members of our proposal to the Commission, is also the second proposal jointly sponsor, so is the iron ticket. Just to get one vote, it can form a majority in the presidium. I thought of Fang Fujian, and his contact, but because, his attitude is not positive. Because Liu Jianming and him, me and Liu Jianming, hope he do party work in Fujian.

12Month16Morning, I in the office printingSmith v. Van GorkomOne case, listen to Chen is that Wu Dongxian and I thought that democracy should be different, to engage in. My heart "click" one, back and Wu Dongxian contact, she said that is not the case, she is the only teacher Zhu a proposal, if the card out of it, that all the more there is no enthusiasm. She also reminded me not to put Liu Jianmin and Yang Lei these people as iron ticket, must tell them in advance. At night, I call Liu Jianmin, he tells me, the day Kong Qingjiang this Jiaodai Hui can only have a regulation, so is the constitution, cannot be modified in meetings. Then Liu Jianmin stressed that Congress is not the same as with the National People's congress. I told Liu Jianmin: "the same; Kong Qingjiang ignorance, there's no; any meeting can amend the constitution." But all of a sudden I said do not know what year changed what, on contact with the week just. He is the professional, mentions, modification time and meeting the constitution to life, back to my email. I said, "well, I repair the little minions and." Just smile.

The presidium of the actual voting that day, the situation is better than I expected, is almost overwhelming opinion agreed to my proposal will be discussed and voted on by the National Chiao Tung university. After the presidium clearance, President Kong Qingjiang began to read my proposal, that some modification is not appropriate. Secretary Chen Weiren told me: representative of my proposal also criticism, think I'm naive: China so big, you can engage in democratic? It is a fool's errand.

At the opening of the meeting two days before the party, government, school, the three leaders again and I discuss, put forward two deputies to the proposal, may produce too much of the proposal, the threshold should be set higher, for example5Personal. I said, the actual situation is the proposal too little, but if the leaders believe that, then the provision5Personal line. Secretary of leading Party and government must equal after the election, don't choose to do? I can attend. But leaders seem reluctant to. I thought for a moment, agreed to in the old way of the party and government leadership as a representative of the two main, not after the election. About leadership cannot card proposal of the problem, the Secretary asked if people get a Falun Gong's proposal to do? I said it was too rich, provisions must be realistic pertinence, this may not be realistic. My bottom line is: negotiations on other issues can compromise, concession, but rejected the proposal on the issue of a leading card can not give, otherwise everything will be meaningless. Leadership is proposed9Revision opinions, I although the inside of the heart does not agree, but the8Have done a compromise,7The overall acceptance, one each for a step, but the denial of never to yield an inch of ground card proposal. We argued for an hour, I was the dean and secretary. Liu Jianming is the chairman of the trade union, sat on the side not to utter a single word, I know he was supporting me, just dare not say. Finally, the president had to agree to the draft amendment rules Congress discussion. I went back home, will our negotiation results in the relevant rules in the articles of cash, and made amendments to the "rules" in the corresponding section, then returned to the office, the revised rules finalized and instructions submitted to the Secretary, and the outcome of the negotiations for cash bye laws one one to him. The Secretary said after watching the satisfaction, finally receiving down, make office issued. From the morning10Point to begin negotiations, and having done so, already approached the afternoon4O'clock.

I went home to call the outcome of the Zhou Dagang, he said very good, did compromise are worth. Then, I sent mail will be reporting to Wu Dongxian and Yang Lei, they are all members of our proposal to the Commission, a review of proposals duties. They are satisfied with the result.

2005Years12Month31Day, law school third session of Congress was held. The preparatory meeting through the agenda without any dispute, everything goes smoothly. But the school in a formal meeting began in law school leadership, school Party committee Li Jinchang in a congratulatory speech to remind us not out of "Chinese conditions". This makes me alert. The heart has done in private and public debate that prepare for two possible alternatives, and see how things develop and change. But Li Jinchang walked on, say generally, and do not necessarily represent the school leadership team, can not ignore.

In relation to the school, I always insist on do not touch the policy. I often play it with my friends: for example, when your bedroom is not clean don't dump to clean the front hall and room. The strength of democracy at the grassroots level is very weak, only prejudiced criticism, key breakthrough, a firm foothold and gradually expand, absolutely can't attack range is too wide. As the law school faculty meeting, we have to fight for democracy in the law school within the power. Only when we are well established in the law school range, and have reached an agreement, we can advance to the school. Due to the strategy of school leaders from first to last, not to interfere with us, and the law school's leadership also feel shy out of school leadership to help them, because that would make it their incompetence: how do you even own problem is difficult? Visible, as long as we don't give trouble, general school leadership is not interference; because we are advocating things such as financial supervision, is in line with the school spirit, at least not violated, school leaders might also like to see the state of mind. After sober analysis, I feel Li Jinchang today said a sentence like this, should be out of friendship and for law school leadership maximum limit to speak, the school will not further interference.

Then president Kong Qingjiang made working report, trade union chairman and director of General Office of Liu Jianming financial report, on behalf of the proposal proposal that people do. Moderator Chen is give me half an hour to speak of time (and I most need only20Minutes), let me do a detailed explanation to the conference according to the proposal that has been issued. This is so far the only time I speak is not limited by time, liberal style that Chen is secretary. But I don't want to take the assembly so much of the time, originally only want to make a brief speech, do not want to repeat the content has been issued, but since the host so that, I'll make short of long, please representatives provide details about the draft and the draft of the revised instructions two documents on the spot, I pointed out several key modification of place, let them see the rest. So spend5Minutes. And then I transferred to a few pre prepared need to focus on the description and explanation of the problem.

I said: "at the two session of the past have led to manipulate and control program, a hard card masses proposal approach. The reason is not mature proposal card. But you think not mature, but I think it is very mature. What is not mature to mature by the general assembly, said to calculate, not by one or a few leaders have the final say. You have put the proposal card out, not to look at, not only to the sponsors do not respect, but also deprived of rights and voting rights convention. This meeting what democracy? Therefore, this change is to solve the problems already. The emphasis is to correct the previous leading card bill wrong practices, to ensure that all opinions of the masses can be SMOOTH OPERATOR to get Congress to come up, up to the general assembly to make decisions. Draft set up special 'Congress chapter proposal', in the procedure made specific provisions on this issue."

Because the leadership does not have a card of our proposal, so I changed the previous two meeting fierce critic, in turn praised the work they do and the open attitude, "for they shall be highly appreciated and fully affirmed in the new posture its construction are presented. We are eagerly awaiting in law school formed a benign cycle be lively and vivid, interactive, the political situation."

The Organization Department of the Party committee leadership heard from Chen is there for us to praise and they reported to the provincial trade union thing, I feel that in favor of canvassing, because many representative if official letter officer. But my personality don't like tear the banner do, so prepare a speech to write and delete, delete and add, hesitated for a long time, finally still is put in the. I'm telling you, this is a proposal and leadership agreed, on consensus product. The leadership had also tried to object, and through the normal procedures for voting to reject a proposal, so we have nothing to say. But I say, they are not so good in the meeting expressed opposition, because I say is true. After they had privately agreed to the meeting expressed opposition, there's a promise and then deny in succession. And I said and leadership, not only can seal the leadership of the mouth, but also pull some representative ticket.

For two old humanness secretary told me to reflect, criticize me naive and think Chinese democracy can only be carried out from top to bottom, I feel there are two possibilities, one is someone intentionally censure, two is the sincere question. But no matter what kind of situation, should be given a clear answer from theory, otherwise the words will not ring true is impossible. I thought of Mao Zedong led the revolutionary struggle, Lin Biao put forward the thought of Jinggangshan during the period of "sincere question how long can the red flag". If Mao Zedong don't write "sparks of fire, can start a prairie fire", to give a clear explanation in theory, it is impossible to unite the people, unable to carry on the struggle at that time. Therefore, I speak mainly reply Chen is two criticism to convey. For the first point, I used the "great determination and courage" stories to illustrate the correctness of grassroots democracy; the second opinions, I explain the necessity of grassroots democracy from the lessons of failure Xin Hai revolution. (speech text in Appendix six). Because I am full reasoning, who chaired the meeting, Secretary Chen is praised, said I "can run for president."

Then, the proposal committee members Zhou Dagang, Liu Jianming, Yang Lei briefly spoke a few words. Everyone has expressed support for the proposal, but the words very place. Everyone, cooperate tacit understanding, one-sided public opinion, make full potential.

My speech caused widespread resonance assembly, the way to dinner at noon, several people came up and greeted me. Yu Shaoyuan said, "you are good", Ma Guixiang suddenly found I "politician", suggested that I "to today's speech on net", Xie Zhidong and others say "follow the teacher Zhu democracy", etc.. This and the02The speech was so as to hide hide my situation in stark contrast. As can be seen, most of the representatives agree on "implementation rules" modification.

At lunch, you There were many discussions., mostly on the proposal favorable voice. PM first division5A representative group discussion, during the period of Chen is with Liu Jianming to each series, fan the flames, say we comment on the proposal of the big problem, clause. Although Liu Jianming supported the proposal, but did not dare tell Chen is top cow. Chen is even to the fourth groups suggest that the don't vote. Zhou Dagang immediately objected, saying the vote or vote. Chen is said to "get a trial". Zhou Dagang said to have voted on trial. Chen is a walk, Ma Guixiang remind everybody said: "you see, they have become aware of the seriousness of this problem. So we must be put to the vote."

Fan Chen is played a certain role, but failed to reverse the one-sided situation caused by the morning session. The discussion was very warm, many times to be indifferent to the Congress on behalf of the very seriously, a review of the revised "Regulations", and proposed own opinion.

After the discussion meeting summary. Our second group and Liu Jianming headed the third group did not make any amendments to the proposal. The first group, fourth group and fifth group proposed some amendments. Some of them good, such as the fourth group Ma Guixiang proposed to increase the provisions: "to discuss and vote on the proposal of the meeting agenda is of course." But my heart but don't want to have this many modifications, New problems crop up unexpectedly. things as little as possible, otherwise likely to pass. Because more than half of according to the rules needed to reach all the representatives, absent and waiver of representatives are counted as votes. The total number of35People, have three representatives in the study abroad, considered to be against this, the remaining32People must have at least18People voted to pass. Can achieve this figure, who had no heart bottom, because all sorts of unexpected things may appear, I feel very ill. It is best to propose any amendment right proposal, the psychological impact on the success of the morning show, estimated by the problem. Or Xie Zhidong at once said: "not pertinent provisions no room for improvement, but the important thing is to pass it." This is in place. If today's proposal to pass, then good amendment can only wait until the next meeting again, all our efforts will be cast to waste. And the next time the meeting because of the change of leadership change, circumstances, and may be a completely different scene. [11] Once the bill, the agenda of the meeting and the voting rules were changed after modification, it will be much easier.

From the above amendments also can be seen its point in the program and the technology is not mature, which changes to the bill must be determined character, rather than verbal advice, even if this advice very specific. Such as the fifth group scheme modifications to the presidium, they not only need to put forward a concrete alternative, but should write specific text, written these words instead of what the text in the proposal, as well as alternative after the context requires some what adjustment. So it can be put to the vote. Even as the words of Ma Guixiang, written very clearly, but also to further indicate in what place, and go after the context need to do what adjustments. This work can only be done in the meeting, it is difficult to do at the meeting. In addition, Ma Guixiang believes the amendments should be separated one by one vote, and the right. Opinions vary, and some may even contradict each other. But the actual practice is all together to vote, also asked the sponsors according to the suggestions to amend the proposal. Will certainly not change, only after the modification, the modified text should be the confirmation. Without the General Assembly vote confirmation text how could a General Assembly resolution? When the meeting is over, they could not vote. Thus, the voting can only vote against the proposal, not to vote on the text of uncertain. In addition, the proposal has a program, amendments to the proposal, should go program, put forward after watching the proposal in the meeting, and in consultation with the sponsor, consensus to directly modify the proposal, not to mention the opinion at the meeting; if they fail to reach an agreement as the proposal again. [12] Visible, even though it is a very good, very warm meeting, is still not mature technology. The spirit of responsible representatives also is not enough, because we have not had to spend time on the contents of the proposal and written for voting on amendments, but only in a meeting when the mood to speak at length, and then pat the buttock.

After the report by the end of each group meeting to discuss proposed amendments. Big differences, unable to agree on which is right, finally had to vote. How to vote? Raise your hands or bearer? Zhu Jiannong said put your hands up, Yang Lei said that this type of program of things up to. I asked the program is where hands on. Zhou Dagang think we should bearer. Finally we decided by secret ballot vote. The result of the vote is17Vote for the amendment,11Votes against,1Abstentions. Because the votes did not reach half of total number of Representatives, modification is effective on a problem. President Kong Qingjiang said the proposed changes to the bill should be a simple majority can, don't like Congress passed the bill, Zhou Dagang immediately expressed their support, without opposition. The amendments were identified as effective. The next step is to vote on the proposal itself. Results by secret ballot is20Votes,5Votes against,4Abstentions. Originally, attend the meeting have32The meeting was scheduled for the afternoon5At the end, but because of fierce debate, continued to7O'clock years until the end. Both group discussion earlier is now the conference delegates argued, participation is unprecedented, a change from the previous two meetings most people lazy, as a mere formality. Shen Yiping, Zhu Caihua, Xie Zhidong three people to go to the kindergarten children, some have something to go first, they came back after finishing things, want to participate in the vote, but to6O'clock did not vote, still debate, they shall not, had to go again. If you do not go, the3All in favor; because walk, will become a vote. But because of18More than half of the total votes on behalf of,20More than half of the votes2.5The ticket, or. I am a little relieved.

When he came out, I saw Liu Jianming very excited, he said: "in the future regardless of him, according to the rules." Indeed, this is a substantive progress, is a milepost construction of grass-roots democratic law school. We passed a protect us as the most basic rights on behalf of the proposal right -- -- the fundamental law, since then, leaders can't card of our proposal. The ice has been broken, ships can sail. In large part, this is probably a new China for the first time in history, because the other units, either Congress or the National People's Congress, it is impracticable.

Out of the meeting place8Executive floor, Yang Lei pulled on me, to celebrate the victory. In fact, this is not my personal victory, because the work is all done. But since the Yang Lei years, Zhou Dagang often picked up the bill, I always eat idly without work, so I feel it should pay for it, they agreed to Yang Lei's proposal. Yang Lei called Zhou Dagang, Wang Jianlin, Li Xingchun et al., we go to a new orchid dining room upstairs restaurant dinner.

School leadership to the outcome of this meeting is also the identity. If they lose, it also lost be sincerely convinced. [13] This is the embodiment of good democratic quality. [14] Chen is secretary repeatedly praised me after different occasions, said I should run for president. Until2006Years2Late last month, the new semester the first teachers of the general assembly routine, he also so that I (I did not go to the meeting, his praise is after the others told me). This phenomenon, this the conference leaves very well, like when I spoke at the meeting, said, "a virtuous cycle be lively and vivid, interactive, the political situation is formed" law school. The emergence of this situation, and the two leaders to abide by the rules of the game are inseparable.

A year later, that is2007In the spring, Chen is planned to reopen its, in order to make the annual meeting to normal. But that year I met middle-level cadre school change. The two department level leadership and school all functional departments of the office, provincial leadership belongs to middle-level cadre. Middle level cadres3Years. From the2004Years7Month, to2007Years7Month is full3Years, so the need for change. When the student director seat vacant, so the school leadership decided to transfer old humanness to serve as student director. But according to the Convention, Secretary of general Party branch to two term, when the College of Business Administration of the Party General Secretary Shen Zuoqing's term is over two, can go to when the director, Chen is may be to re-election in law school2010Years, he also had the desire. But school officials insist on doing this arrangement, always have their reasons.