ZhuJin Qing is our school expert, super personality, this is the case, Mr. Zhu sued the school of law of the classic ah, turn(to) seeTo this message, I remember last year in the school when the securities law teacher Zhu already in the classroom with us to discuss his year-end bonus thing, it has not yet subsided

Ladies and gentlemen, hello

The school of my application for a ruling located in Xiasha campus library report hall of the two floor, time is Thursday12Month17DayAfternoon1:30. It is said that this information has been published on the campus network. Looks like the school very much, should have a certain appreciation, welcome free interested to attend.

You good

This year, our school launched a "campus dispute adjudication procedures (Trial)". Then I saw, in the11Month6Presented the awards for the book to school, to the school of law to recover early last year they unprovoked docked my year-end bonus. This morning, I received official school on my application for acceptance notice, the date of the award. In accordance with the provisions of the program, the law school now must submit written materials to reply. So, unless the leadership of surrender, as soon as possible, they stood in the dock will sooner or later. Application form is attached to the exchange of information.

Zhu Jinqing

Zhejiang Gongshang University campus dispute application form

Induced:                The Dispute Adjudication Board
Applicant.        Teacher Zhu Jinqing Law School
The respondent:        School of law
Requests:       1 Will in2007I buckled year law school at the end of the year award evaluation2500Yuan plus interest bank deposits back to me;
                       2 This event directly responsible leaders in the public review teacher conference.

The facts and reasons
Last year1Month9Day, law school4000Yuan capitation benchmark evaluation on all the teachers2007The annual year-end bonuses, divided into the grand prize6000Yuan, the first prize5000Yuan, the two prize4000Yuan, the three prize is not specific figures. No prior in the published criteria, the vast majority of teachers are not known. In fact, it has no standard from first to last, only by the leadership of the subjective impression and personal preferences to decide. From the results, about70-80%People with4000The average number of yuan. Because some hospital leadership I see not pleasing to the eye, so I want my deduction2500Yuan, only to me1500Element.
1Month17On the evening ofOur department director Zhu Jiannong, commissioned by the hospital leadership, informed me home buckle my money decision, reason3Points: one is that I go to a small meeting; two is that I invigilate to less; three is that I asked the others binding test. These claims are not justified, because the meeting is not going to be in did not inform me, I don't know, responsibility in their not in me; those who notice my meeting and I are on time. The work I entirely on school leadership decided to do, and the arrangement of the school office, how can deduct money? The papers please binding is there, the Yang Lei just have something to Xiasha, because I live in staff Road, the trip Xiasha very troublesome, please Yang Lei help me put a course examination paper bookbinding. It is between friends help each other things, how can as deduct money reason? I realized something new to hospital leaders, do not understand the situation, I think there's a misunderstanding., so with twelve points of goodwill, in accordance with the provisions of the objection procedure leadership, sent them an email, detailed description of these circumstances, hope that they can make the wrong button back my money. At the same time, I also very friendly attitude on the development and construction of law school asked some institutional suggestions. See annex.
After the Spring Festival, I received Kong Qingjiang president on behalf of school leadership email. Because the bonus for me is chaired by Zhang Xuejun's secretary general Shen Zuoqing and vice president of the Institute, long was not there, so he is for the other two institute leader views to me:

ZhuTeacher.
About the contribution award assessment is discussed and decided by the director of the whole system in the meeting.
Through the discussion of project is one teacher with the College Council, the procedure is: by the relevant participants pointed out that the teacher has no contribution, or inadequate, in determining the grade.

Because of the meeting to half, I was called to the graduate department prepare a material, not involved in most teachers including your comments. However, upon receipt of your advice, I do understand. Presumably such comments: (to you1) long rarely participate in the college Conference (2) as a tutor, but does not participate in the student reply (Report3This year, no other special contribution).

The meeting is to make your contribution award grade based on the reasons mentioned above. It is understood, not the participants at the meeting on the level of your objection.

Kong Qingjiang

The answer is more irrational than the contents of the notice Zhu Jiannong director. First of all it is arbitrarily switched to deduct money reason. Zhu Jiannong was commissioned by the hospital leadership to notice me, so the content of the notice has the binding force of the hospital leadership. Now the three reason given for leadership and three had not the same, but don't do any explanation for such a change, so I immediately felt a bonus evaluation of chaos and arbitrary. Because all the objective and fair evaluation, must have a clear standard. Especially when the buckle money punishment, reason should be very clear. Since the very clear, could not freely switch. Switch the reason, that they had no reason, no standard. Of course, they also didn't think anyone would dare question, while questioned found wrong, they act with confusion, everywhere looking for a reason to prove his right, to protect their own authority. The argument was refuted, and to search for other reasons. Strictly speaking, leadership is not looking for a reason, but to find an excuse. Since it is make excuses afterwards, it will not have the sincerity, not objective and fair.
        Secondly, from the new reason for content, than the old reason more far fetched. The old reason somehow still is all about this year, new reasons pulled to the previous year. The teacher's job is to annual examination, the previous year's work in the past year early treated. Now I can't find a reason, just turn up a historical debt to. The history of I also made a contribution, how about? As for no"Special contribution"That is, unwarranted charges. This year my scientific research workload exceeded, quality will be better than others, not worse than others. Teaching evaluation of my research into the first, the undergraduate teaching assessment also come out in front. Based on these, although I do not expect what reward, but with an average total. The hospital70-80%People have4000Yuan mean, do they have"Special contribution"? Graduate thesis report meeting is true absence, but the law school environment on these issues have been relaxed, sometimes they are absent from the meeting or tardiness is. Self leadership do worse--Students formal answer is more than an hour late, directly affect the reply process, cause undesirable consequence. All of these things are never punished. Today, but to me this will not affect the progress of the meeting does not affect the overall work of an absence to hold, it is framed., is never wanting!
I decided to refute.2Month19On the afternoon ofAll the Teachers Congress in law school, I made the following statement:

Everybody is good. Let me introduce myself first, because some teachers is new, may not know. I am chamber method research and teacher, named Zhu Jinqing, was last semester year-end bonuses were the most. I want to say is this thing today, ask a few questions, because the system construction of these problems with our school of law is closely connected with the.
Last year, the school according to the hair to every teacher4000Yuan capitation fees, also called contribution award. I know quite late, is in this year1Month17In the evening, our department director Zhu Jiannong told me: because you're meeting doesn't come, so decided to buckle your college2500Yuan, only for you1500Yuan, if there are objections please contact the dean and secretary as soon as possible. So, I'll explain to the president and secretary, don't go to the meeting because I don't know, because we meet before is a college from door to door to call, then a lot of teacher bought a mobile phone, and the Internet, using a mobile phone and network notice, but those of us who have no mobile phone without Internet still call. Last semester7Meeting, the two call, I have to.5Without notice, not to. No, money will be docked. The question now is: our teacher Is it right? Must buy a mobile phone, must use the Internet? Because there is no expense to buy mobile phone fee or not online and don't get law school in notifying the mobile phone and Internet is not to blame? Your leadership is the communications subsidies, enough to pay for mobile phone fee and the annual1000Multiple Internet; and what we teachers are not. The school also has never stated we teachers must be online to buy mobile phone, also did not say if you don't buy not to bear all the consequences. If so, I do not buy the mobile phone access to the Internet will not have no fault. And you didn't notice my leadership meeting is at fault, belonging to the work of the oversights and mistakes, should buckle to buckle your money. You do not review their own shortcomings, which in turn will buckle my money, this is what reason? This is the first question I ask.
Step back and say, even if the school regulations, all my fault--Don't notice you deserve it, money is buckled on. It should also have a standard. Since it is a contribution award, it is nothing more than the teaching and scientific research. The most plus teaching accident and meeting. Then four aspects. I fulfilled the workload of teaching the school rules in the assessment year, exceeded the amount of scientific research, teaching quality and scientific quality is not better than any of you leading difference Teaching, no accident, I have completed three of four aspects, only one meeting, and not a not to. I buckle2500Element, based on what criteria? If there is no standard, then I have to wonder: are some of the leadership have prejudice against me, deliberately looking for an excuse to hit me. You don't see the teaching effect, do not look at the quality of scientific research, just look at how much the meeting. Excuse me, teacher's main job is to teach or meeting? This is your contribution prize or a prize? This is the second question I want to ask.