At the beginning of 2011 8, Liu received a building development company developmentCommercial housingSelling short message, then in August 6th to the property sales offices to view projects, after the real estate sales staff introduction will sign a housing subscription agreement with the defendant, for one of the houses, and on the spot to pay the housing subscription fee is 5000 yuan, the payment second days Liu go to the sales offices to enter into a commodity housing sales contracts, but in the course of the discussion the two sides did not reach an agreement, Xiao Liu immediately proposed to modify the terms of the contract, but the defendant insisted that the contract is a contract format cannot be modified, because the two sides of the details of the contract and the terms are too divided, the contract did not sign, after Liu had repeatedly asked the defendant to return the paid subscription payment of 5000 yuan for a variety of reasons, but the defendant refuses to refund, refund of their helpless, pay 5000 yuan subscription payment requests the defendant Liu went to court.

    Lao Li said: agreed the "subscription payment" non deposit, do not have to confiscate the deposit standard. From the protection of the weak point of view, is generally tend to buy a house, but also can promote the relevant aspects of the housing sales contracts to further improve and standardize. The support of the court the plaintiff litigation request, order the defendant to repay to subscription of 5000 yuan.