Yi Zhongtian likes American beware of too

   Happened to see Mr. Yi Zhongtian wrote a book "the cloud", the content is about American "constitution" formulation process. Did not think of China rather study history of Mr. Yi Zhongtian also has a keen interest in USA history, then bought a book, a day spent watching. From the author of "postscript", the author wrote this book the time is in 2004. Mr. Yi Zhongtian said, because he saw Mr. Yin Xuan translation of "debate: American constitutional conference record" one book, very like, "can't keep this story retell", then use a more popular way, the brief but important history reappearance out. My overall impression after reading that, Mr. Yi Zhongtian was like USA, at least is like USA "constitution". In this love mood, Mr Yi Zhongtian feelings more than reason, in some places, too, lost the objective judgment on something.
   For example, in the last book, "wrote Author: principle and compromise" section,: "we even can say, it is a constitution created a nation". I think this is not appropriate. The so-called state, territory and sovereignty, including people, a constitution could not create these things all. Therefore, more appropriate to say is: a constitution created a national government. Also in this chapter, Mr. Yi Zhongtian wrote, "USA constitution" the world's first written constitution, "developed later can last more than 200 years unchanged, it is really a miracle". Mr. Yi Zhongtian called "the same", mean there is no text modification. I think, this is also belongs to the excitement of exaggeration. American "constitution" and later had the amendment, that Mr. Yi Zhongtian is know. Since there are a lot of amendment to the constitution, the constitution is flawed, it is modified, how can it be said that 200 years of "change"? Different forms of the whole constitutional or increase the amendment is to change the constitution, should not in order to create a myth and ignore the fact that.
   The myth making phenomenon America constitution, expressed not only in Yi Zhongtian where, in American there too. In the book "Introduction", Mr Yi Zhongtian wrote: "be of noble character and high prestige Benjamin - Dr. Franklin's gaze over the chairman of the meeting chair, staring at a piece of art from the opposite wall. That is an oil painting. In the painting, the sun is gushing out". There are a section of text, that is Franklin of 81 years old at the time of the others said, do not know the painter is a sunrise or sunset, "I finally have the chance to know now, it is on the rise, but not in the fall". This period of literary flavor description, the purpose is to America portrayed as the rising sun, writing and standard habitual description revolution after the success of the like. However, this text into a big trouble.
   In the following text, Mr Yi Zhongtian has a comment, means that the first edition of this book, the reader is this text points out, Yi Zhongtian "tampering America constitutional history", because the site did not have such a painting. Mr. Yi Zhongtian said, when he was in his visit in 2007, made a special trip to Philadelphia, visited the site of the convention. In this historical site, he did see a sunrise painting. However, America commentator said, when the constitutional convention met in 1787, it is not a sunrise, oil is added later. So, Franklin is full of philosophical words is It is sheer fiction. Mr Yi Zhongtian admits to being wrong in the comments, but also explained that, his statement from the previously mentioned Yin Xuan's translation of "debate" in a book. He said he didn't know America original author is wrong, wrong or translator. In my opinion, no matter who is wrong, a lot of people are willing to "sunrise" myth is true, otherwise the Americans will not be like the paintings of Jinggangshan, on the site of the constitutional convention, after hanging a sunrise painting. Normal practice this act and the protection of historical relics is inconsistent, adds beautifies the false.
   Mr. Yi Zhongtian mentioned a saying repeatedly in this book, making USA constitution, there is a psychological is "defense officials such as thieves, anti right such as fire, preventing the abuse of power such as flood control", this should be an important experience for Mr. Yi Zhongtian to revel in the USA constitution. The power of prevention is necessary, however, Mr Yi Zhongtian ignored initially formulated USA constitution, why the power so "defend". In fact, the guard has a very simple, that is in the American Constitution, mostly is the identity, status, there is a huge amount of property of the social elite, they prevent the subconscious mind is the power to prevent power on their personal property. Because, power to infringe on personal property, often appear in the American European brothers. It is because of this reason, such as the mythical great American Constitution did not make a conclusion on the issue of slavery, even didn't mention the word "slaves", just very hypocritical "other people described" instead of. This shows that they all know that slavery existed, many people also slave owners, including later USA president. But some of them also know that slaves are disgraceful,And they pretty words do not match. However, because of the slave is their property, they have to protect their property, defense officials such as thieves, one purpose is to prevent the supreme power to deprive them of their property, including slaves.
   American constitution makers, to maintain their own property did not slack, this is their "anti officer as the real reason thieves". The point of these elite to maintain them incapable of further increase of personal property, be absorbed in to in 100 days or so, is dedicated to this, so this fabulous great constitution, no "civil rights", so thatSouthern slaveryAndThe childAccompanied by a great America constitution also exist in large quantities. Mr. Yi Zhongtian can take the "regret" as an oversight, also can be seen as a compromise choice, however, we can also see it as the result of these elite for their own interests at the expense of the public interest. Although America constitution finally used the "citizens of the United States" such words, but, in the process of the formation of the constitution, for the name of the people, from the legal, are solely those of the framers of the constitution embezzlement. They took the name of the people made to safeguard their own interests constitution. No people authorized to them, nor people approve of the constitution. People in where? Who are the people? This is an old problem, from 200 years ago American can start questioning.
   Mr. Yi Zhongtian cited a number of features and benefits USA constitution, that is, should be acknowledged. However USA constitution tilted to the rich, capitalist characteristics, also cause it to form the future America society a long-term fixed phenomenon, defense officials do not prevent profiteer, anti right not anti corruption, anti abuse of power does not prevent capital defy laws human and divine. An example. American had a Super Company named the United Fruit Company, now because the name was too notorious repute and changed to "odd quetta". United Fruit Company peak, control all the world banana trade, and control of the cargo of a lot of countries American industry, postal industry and financial industry. In twentieth Century 50, a small country in Central America Guatemala is the United Fruit Company control of the world, leading many Guatemalan farmers lost their land. Guatemala elected president Guzman proposed to the United Fruit Company, paid for by the government of Guatemala, the purchase of a part of the United Fruit Company of idle land, to their landless farmers. The results, the proposal angered the United Fruit company. United Fruit Company holds a lot of Guatemala's land, the name is to give the Guatemalan government tax. In order to pay less taxes, the United Fruit Company land prices are very low, now, Guatemala elected president requires the purchase of land in accordance with the United Fruit Company. The price of the United Fruit Company, how to do?

   At that time USA politics has an influential man named John - Dulles, Truman and the Eisenhower administration in powerful positions, who served as secretary of state American, while he was a United Fruit Company Law officials. United Fruit Company immediately by Dulles's relationship to the American government revealed that, Guatemala's president elect Guzman has the tendency of communism. In 1954, USA CIA support to launch the invasion of Guatemala, Guatemala and plunged into 40 years of the war, about 200000 people were killed. CIA agents searched countless archives Guatemala also found no evidence of "altogether" guzman. However, it doesn't matter, United Fruit Company land, not by the government of Guatemala "low price" buy go, this is enough, and it American profiteers will succeed. In other words, this is USA government pay for profiteers service, American profiteers interest is USA national interests.
   Then again, if American constitution is not the "official" anti so close, I believe that when people USA government, there must be some conscience, people have a sense of justice, with the power to stop the United Fruit Company rogue move, at least not the associate oneself with undesirable elements. The Constitution and USA results, which took the United Fruit Company benefits as long as it doesn't harm the interests of Dulles American, can mind frankly accept red envelopes, common loot, the use of power to power a profiteer profiteers services, tools. America constitution makes capital become the boss, power is only for capital services. As the capital of servants, power of course to restrict large capital. "Defense officials such as thieves", just big capital if stolen his housekeeper their money only, say from this meaning, America capital goal is reached. American fight Iraq spent hundreds of billions of dollars, is the people's money, the constitution of it? Behind the war president, vice president of the family's oil interests constitutional constraints? The financial crisis triggered by the subprime mortgage crisis happened recently is a typical example, the government lost the ability to monitor the financial traders get out of hand, caused the consequences. Now American government should strengthen supervision, just turn: anti government before the profiteers, now the government anti profiteers, really anti false anti do not know, really false tube tube who know, wait and see what the results.
   Therefore, understanding and interpretation of the constitution American, should not only understand it literally, also should see its essence. Chinese there are a lot of people very worship of American, a number of people in the constitutional government is even more so. I saw the first president American, known as the "father of the nation" America Washington said a words, here with these people together. In 1796, George Washington when he left a farewell speech, in which a saying: "a country will produce a variety of another country enthusiasm in sin....... This will make those who be overweeningly ambitious, corrupt, deluded citizens devote their favorite country,But betrayal or sacrifice the interests of their own countryHowever, no hatred, sometimes even proud of;......" Why don't we earnestly listen to the opinions American founding fathers?