The article is a bit long, but I hope you can read patiently

To tell you the truth, before a lot of people ask me, you have to read the master of law in the United Kingdom, why should we continue to America, no sense. To tell you the truth, I have been to no good reason, just said, hope the young can learn about, much more experience. Until a few days ago, after the father of the Internet, has been concerned about Zhejiang Hanlong group and America electronics giant and federal agency case reports, heart that was strong but gradually being forgotten national feelings, blood law, to burst out

Some details about the report, the following was quoted as saying by the Zhejiang daily:

If the child will not be socket finger into the charged will be how? Earth leakage circuit breaker device called a GFCI, let people from similar tremble with fear in one's boots. GFCI, leakage circuit breaker failure protection,,, four English word acronym.

    In order to intellectual property disputes such a small device, a private enterprise of Zhejiang spent $about ten million, and American giants, federal agencies, played a full 6 years.

    In September 15th, Wenzhou private enterprises -- China LED technology group, in Beijing held a press conference announced: the American Federal Circuit Court judge, "general Protecht sued the federal" America International Trade Commission (ITC) on the lawsuit, won at the end of.

    Six years four lawsuit

  In accepting the CCTV channels connected after the interview, "general Protecht" Chairman Chen Wusheng in an interview with reporters, the mood is not calm, because he had just suffered a series of lengthy and time-consuming and money.

    In August 27th, the Federal Circuit Court USA America Federal Trade Commission (ITC) 337 survey error decision.

    6 years ago, "general Protecht" (formerly known as the orthodox electrical) production of GFCI began to America market. A sudden Chinese opponent, encountered strong resistance USA counterparts. American 500 Qianglaifudun company successively in 2004, 2005 to 558, 766 from infringement of its patent prosecution, respectively "Tongling technology" and USA dealers.

    During the 3 years of the contest, in July 10, 2007, USA court partition New Mexico federal judge issued a verdict, "Tong company made USA GFCI products, does not infringe on 558 and 766 America levinton company patent." In this case, known as the Sino US intellectual property lawsuit China enterprise wins the first case.

    "General Protecht" in just 36 days time, company industry alliance Paxiximu America levinton, on grounds of patent infringement, the "general Protecht" 4 China enterprises v. American Federal International Trade Commission, requirements for patent infringement of the "337" survey from China GFCI products, at the same time bring the patent infringement litigation to USA New York court federal North division.

    In March 30, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission ruled that "American Tongling technology" violation of Paxiximu company 340 , 398 patents, and to USA Customs issued a limited ban, banning the production Chinese manufacturers through leading group in GFCI products by USA customs import. This decision led directly to the "general Protecht" products sales dropped 4/5.

    "Leading technology" in September 17, 2009, the Federal Trade Commission to America American federal circuit court.

    To win in the "truth is excellent"

    Today, in Beijing, Chen Wusheng in an interview with reporters, said: "this is a small is big contest, despite spending a lot of time and energy, I feel that the value of!"

    Six years ago, Chen Wusheng has spent $10800000 on intellectual property lawsuits, especially the lawsuit, in America Atlanta hired Sheng delen international lawyers, consisting of 10 people luxury lineup.

    The huge cost, often let China enterprises and step back in intellectual property lawsuit with foreign giant. For a fledgling private enterprises, "general Protecht" to win it today. Chen Wusheng is fresh, a Shanghai enterprises at the beginning and "general Protecht responding" together, because can not afford the time and money and quit, "fell on the way to the court."

    "However, if there is no independent intellectual property rights, even with the best of the best lawyers, judges, also can't win." Chen Wusheng said with deep feeling, victory between intellectual property rights, has the core technology, with independent intellectual property rights is the key in the key. He introduced, Usa Inc's GFCI is based on the mechanical and electrical integration of technology, and the "general Protecht" to zero power permanent electromagnetic tripping and electromagnetic reduction principle of magnetic type, a new way of leakage protection, are higher than those of the electromechanical integration technology and safety reliability and sensitivity of detection.

    "Tongling technology. Science and technology", and set aside space for automation, intelligent, remote control, is in line with the upgrading direction. It is this, that USA peer envy. "The fundamental purpose of Usa Inc, is the destruction of our patent, make every attempt to make invalid." Chen Wusheng said.

    Zhejiang University International Economic Research Institute Professor Zhao Wei think, "general Protecht" victory is an independent intellectual property rights of the victory, this reminder of the Zhejiang private enterprises should pay attention to improving the internal management system of intellectual property rights, to maintain the core competitiveness. Competition in the market environment, "the right to travel the world".

    Professor Zhang Ping of Peking University School of law, points out that the,American large enterprises one after another to litigation, real purpose is to contain Chinese enterprises to enter the American market. So the lawsuit is a surface phenomenon, fighting for market share is the essence.

    The latest news is, in September 3rd, just before the "general Protecht" win over a period of 7 days, Lifton and 558 of the patent "Sun patent" and "patent of" 124 and 151 patent appeals USA ITC, requires a permanent ban all infringing products into the American market.

    "We will resolutely respond to!" After the four lawsuit, Chen Wusheng is still full of heroic spirit.

 Content quoted here, I think a lot of people do not understand this and I must go to USA what to study law. And Zhejiang Hanlong group in the same America have similar situations Chinese business too much, is worth us thinking deeply! In this case, we assume that, if a large number of legal aid law is best know American hold USA lawyer qualification certificate of the conscience of the Chinese born lawyer, then American so-called using Chinese enterprise cost less the high cost of litigation and lawyer can not maintain a wagon wheel turns initiated action, let our national enterprises exit USA market trick will not play. I can't say this is a fundamental solution, because it is more efficient to our government should also take a series of similar to the trade barriers against and government involved in the protection of negotiations on measures and so on, but at least, as we these laws, we can also in such a way as to our country, do a little contribution to our national enterprise!

Beat someone by playing his games only better. I never forget yourself as a Chinese national mission. Now, USA in attitude, especially the trade between the two sides, the inequalities of sanctions, they can be said to be the protection of the market, is of its protection, the market everywhere, but they could not in most of our Chinese with a computer chip Microsoft drank 100 things Coca-Cola with Unilever daily products but also for those of us who are in American market share has a minimal amount of the national independent brand enterprises to suppress exclusion! Don't you want Chinese become a waste with their own resources, pollution of their environment as the primary processing market you produce lower product?! Does our self-developed products you really do that don't fit?! As a legal person, more as a Chinese, I, we, you must try your best to make our motherland more powerful!