Weifang University School of law

 

2008The law undergraduate graduate thesis defense

 

 

 

Rank

Sequence

Book

 

Two hundred eight years in May

 

One, the Defense Committee

Chairman.

Miao Jinchun, associate professor of Jurisprudence

Vice chairman:

Zhao Baohua, constitutional and administrative law, associate professor

Li Daxin, associate professor of criminal law;

Committee member.

Wang Mei, economic law, associate professor

Wang Shuhua, associate professor of constitutional law

Zhu Wenying, associate professor of civil and Commercial Law

Han Xuezhi, associate professor of international law

Yang Weihua, the science of criminal law, lecturer

 

Under the defense team defense committee:

Group	Members	Defense Secretary
1	Wang Shuhua, Li Lin, Zhang ji,	Qian Jianing
2	Sang Yiru, Wang Shuyi, Xue Yuan	Zhao Yunfeng
3	Liu Yingxin, Dai Yongzhi, Wang Xiuxia	Sun Changwei
4	Zhang Caiyun, Zhang Weiling, Liu Guodong	Zhou Zhongsheng
5	Zhu Wenying, Wang Fang, Wang Zhao	Liu Fujin
6	Zhao Min, Xu Xiaohong, Ni Zhijuan	Qi Yujuan
7	Yang Weihua, Du Licong, Chen Zhiying	Zhang Yuesong
8	Wang Mei, Zhao Qingying, Feng Xiyan	Song Rui
9	Wang Yi, Zhang Shanxiu, Li Guiping	Sha Dongli
10	Han Xuezhi, Tan Zhen, Xu Li	Hu Tianliang
11	Wang Chunyan, Sun Junlei, Song Wei	Miu Tingting

Note: each group first teacher as a group leader.

 

 

Two, the respondent schedule

This year's graduates a total of 266 people, a total of one day, as follows:

531 MarchSaturday.

 

Three,Graduation design (paper) the standard of grading

Graduation design (Thesis) achievements scored by five grades: excellent (90 - 100), good (80 - 89), moderate (70 - 79), pass (60 - 69), fail (below 60). The graduation design (paper) performance evaluation focuses on the following five aspects:

1, the students in the graduation design (paper) in the process of writing the learning attitude, work style performance etc..

2, the graduation design (paper) selection is reasonable.

3, the students in the graduation design (Thesis) of professionals in the basic theory of the master and work independently, the ability to analyze and solve problems.

4, the completion of the condition and quality of argument and logic, rationality, including the scheme, data access and usage, the words are scouring etc..

5, when the respondent to answer questions and issues.

 

The following specific criteria:

Outstanding:

(1) in the graduation design (paper), work actively, serious attitude, the successful completion of the task.

(2) the thesis is novel, the very strong practical significance, theoretical significance.

(3) to complete the graduation design (paper) task, flexible, correct, the integrated use of theoretical knowledge of the profession, the ability to analyze and solve problems, in some respects, original.

(4) the clear, well structured, logical, consider the issue fully; the conclusion is correct; the full and accurate data, the full argument; language is accurate, fluent.

(5) the respondent, can to answer, answer questions correctly, the thought is agile.

(6) the formal standard.

Good:

(1) the graduation design (Thesis) of hard work, can be better to complete the task.

(2) the thesis has certain practical significance, theoretical significance.

(3) to the graduation design (Thesis) tasks to perform better, can use the knowledge, analysis and problem solving ability.

(4) the paper clearer thinking, more rigorous structure, logic is strong, have certain persuasion; the conclusion is correct; the data is informative, argument is sufficient; language expression is accurate, fluent language.

(5) the respondent, can basically to answer, to answer the question correctly, clearer thinking.

(6) the formal specification.

Medium:

(1) the graduation design (paper), work conscientiously, to complete the task.

(2) the thesis clear.

(3) to complete the graduation design (paper) task, the basic use of the knowledge, has the certain ability to analyze and solve problems.

(4) the correct conclusion; argument is full; the statement fluent, typos, not shun a few words.

(5) reply to answer the main question correctly.

(6) the form of a specification.

Pass:

(1) the graduation design (paper), basically completed the graduation design (paper) task.

(2) the course is.

(3) the conclusion of the paper is basically correct, reliable and argument, Shang Tongshun.

(4) in the defense can answer the main question, no major mistakes.

(5) the form of a specification.

Fail.

(1) the graduation design (paper), attitude is not serious, serious absence, failed to complete the graduation design (paper) according to the requirements of the mission.

(2) have serious mistakes in the paper.

(3) in the process of writing this thesis, was found to have serious problem of plagiarism.

(4) the basic concept of fuzzy answer, mainly answered the question wrong, did not meet the minimum requirements.

Four,The respondent notes

(a) the respondent discipline

1, students should enter a specified place, to be present at the meeting in order to reply the provisions, in principle not to leave. If must leave, must to rejoin Committee (Group) to submit a written application, approval rear can replace reply order, otherwise as voluntarily giving up reply processing.

2, shall not exchange reply order, where to exchange, to cancel the qualification of the respondent.

3, to answer the Defense Committee (Group) questions. The problem, if there are different views can be debated, but the attitude to be sincere, this should be concise and to the point. When the Defense Committee (Group) make arbitration on the issues raised, the defense must automatically terminate.

4, in addition to rejoin Committee (Group) members, other staff, attendance personnel have no right to ask questions, comments.

5, the defense Score unified published by the defense committee, defense students who are not to ask anyone about themselves or others achievement.

6, students' grades, reply to the comments, if has the objection, may require the Defense Committee review.

7, the respondent venue must keep quiet, not noisy.

(two) a specific program

1, students should enter a specified location.

2, when the respondent shall arrange 1 people responsible for defense secretary, recording and other matters.

3, the host announced the names of the students and the reply order reply.

4, the respondent began, students first to rejoin Committee (Group) to report their topic, purpose and writing ideas, and introduces the main content and viewpoints, conclusion, time is 5 - 10 minutes.

5, the Defense Committee (Group) according to the knowledge of the content or related questions (4 questions).

6, the students answer the questions can consult carry information, such as hear nothing, may require the Defense Committee (Group) repeat.

7, the students answer the questions, the Defense Committee (Group) it should be pointed out that the student answer is correct, it is not clear.

8, student achievement by the Defense Committee (Group) evaluation, write reviews (according to the content of the thesis and comments on defense situation faithfully fill in).

   

 

 

                                         School of law

                                      In May two 00 eight years