[1791 was approved in December 15th

Today's news said, the four shootings American within 48 hours, a total of 11 people were killed, many injured. In the broadcast the news, also refers to a data America said, is the world's gun privatization of the highest level, the annual death toll caused by gun for thirty thousand people.

I think the starting point of this piece of news is probably good, try not to use the political vision at. But I think the News quoted statistics questionable.

First of all, the proliferation of firearms and the cause of the tragedy is inevitable; secondly, as has the absolute discourse power of media reports, in the news that, whether more could cause problems in news background.

In the beginning of the founding of the American, was a founding father of a country to the rights of the government not to harm the interests of ordinary people, make some laws to restrict the government behavior. At the same time also allows people to be in violation of their legitimate rights to protect themselves when. It introduced the second amendment to the constitution. Citizens are allowed to have weapons to protect their legitimate rights and interests.

In this context, America citizens can hold firearms within the law, is the news lay a social foundation.

However, whether such a law should be responsible for the purpose of social problems? I think that should be worth discussing. After all, the knife can cut vegetables can also attack. The gun is only a means instead of motivation. In drawing up the rules but also to the person who violates the rule with great interest.

Unfair reports and one-sided view, it should not appear more in life.

Social problems should be very complex. The report should also try to neutral. When we blame, who is to think of the innocent dead, their soul should be how to transcend? Their family members should be how to accept this fact?