USA lawyer lawyers orientation can open letter

     American lawyer lawyer directed energy and neurogenic weapon abuse to members of the open letter (No translation)

 

ATTORNEY'S LETTER TO SENATOR LEAHY

Per my request, our attorney has sent the following request for a congressional hearing and an inquiry on our behalf to Senator Patrick Leahy's office. Senator Leahy is the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee

 

WILSON LAW CENTER LLC
Jonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at LawP.O. Box 1102
Morrison, Colorado 80465
(720) 219-8366
Fax: (303) 697-1189
Jon.wilson.law@hotmail.com
Www.WilsonLawCenter.com

March 31, 2008
Sen. Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate,
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator

I represent Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance, an organization with several hundred members around the country and internationally who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons. These targeted individuals suffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation. We seek your office's assistance in initiating hearings and a fact-finding congressional inquiry into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens. Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressive targeting

Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals, based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings, public releases by agencies, and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication. The weapons are believed to be based on electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy, and were characterized as "psychotronic" in Rep. Dennis Kucinich's draft of House Resolution 2977, the Space Preservation Act of 2001 Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past; for example, the CIA's human experimentation discussed inOrlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988)Secretly administered, lysergic acid diethylamide discussed inUnited States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987) and military, chemical experimentation as discussed inCongressional Committee Report 103-97, 103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994)Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted, including people with post-graduate degrees and a lifetime of achievements, and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a dismissive response based on charges of anecdotal evidence or group paranoia

Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similar charges of directed weaponry, but, to my knowledge, all have been dismissed due to immunity and state secret defenses, and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agencies or companies. It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons when the perpetrators operate from remote, unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional. Given the wide scope of alleged targeting, there is a certain risk of sounding too conspiratorial, however, common denominators such as physical symptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and more can be readily established

Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance will gladly provide your office, and any legislator and investigator, reports from targeted individuals documenting instances of targeting, medical documentation, and recordings. This firm will provide research and investigation results upon request as well. We will diligently work with anyone willing to help. Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry and collaborating with other legislators in an effort to uncover and stop this inhumane practice

Very truly yours,
Jonathan Wilson
Attorney for Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance

The Senate Judiciary office has informed us that we just need a letter from at least one senator requesting a congressional hearing to begin this process. What I would recommend now is that we follow-up this letter from our lawyer with in-person visits to our local Senate offices with requests for a hearing. We should carry this letter with us, along with Rep. Jim Guest's letter and other documentation. And follow-up further after this with phone calls

I will also write a letter to which I'd like to attach the signatures of as many TI's as possible grouped by state, so each senator can easily see who are his/her constituents. All this will also be a topic for the Saturday night Podcast