Li Huizhi will this repeatedly read carefully, feel this may indeed come from the mouth of the supreme leader, not only because of the style is like Mao Zedong unique speech style, more important is to reveal the speech in the style of thought and said "I am the monk umbrella, Mao Zedong's thought style and characteristics of thinking defy laws human and divine" too well. Remember, set in 1954, when the first constitution, Mao Zedong had solemnly stressed: "an organization must have a constitution, a country must have a constitution, the constitution is a set of general rules, it is the fundamental law." He also pointed out: "the people of the whole country, everyone should be carried out, especially the staff of state organs to take the lead in the introduction, first you must implement the. Do not implement is a violation of the constitution." However, soon after, the supreme leader of the Constitution also "remember", said: "the constitution is me to make, I also remember. We basically do not rely on those, mainly depends on the resolution, a meeting, do four times a year, can not rely on the civil law, criminal law to maintain the order." In the "Cultural Revolution" on the eve of Mao Zedong "what's so great about you Liu Shaoji? I put a little finger can get you down "speech is more evident. A leader of the group, as long as the "out of a little finger", will be the highest organ of state power elected president down, where the dignity of the constitution?!

In fact, since 1954 the "anti rightist" and the "Cultural Revolution" and other cruel class struggle, it is also difficult to see: originally supreme "constitution", Mao Zedong and party in front of, indeed as useless "A Dou"; and Mao Zedong is more like "the emperor and the nobility of" Cao Cao, and even "defy laws human and divine" "monk". More sad, sad, helpless is, in twenty-first Century, the Chinese, the dignity of the constitution, the Constitution in the ruling party's prestige, not much higher than "fools". This, is the Chinese people sad place!

"Mao Zedong on constitutional" on the Internet are popular, some people criticized this not from Mao Zedong's mouth, but some "harbour evil designs" "rightists fabricated". In view of this, Li Huizhi suggestions, the relevant departments have the necessary to make a clarification; if the article is from the 1961 Mao Zedong at a forum held in Qinhuangdao on the meeting record, it is simple, check the meeting records, then Mao Zedong at that meeting speech text published problem is solved; from 1961 to now 48 years, I have long had the confidential files specified time. If Mao Zedong never said these words, it should be released to the public, this is to safeguard the party and Mao Zedong's image is very necessary.

However, the author is concerned with the problem put forward by Li Huizhi, Chinese constitution why not respect, and even the constitution drafting and formulation of the host "remember"?! Mao Zedong to death on the basis of the Constitution and the birth of the cultural revolution in the president Liu Shaoji, from Mao Zedong has higher than the authority of the constitution. Mao Zedong's authority, power and prestige from the long war age formation. In the end, the constitution, lack the authority basis.

The famous scholar Yang Xiaokai said, the constitution must have authority to be respected, and the constitutional authority from the consent of the governed. So all the successful good constitution had stipulated the most stringent approval procedures of the governed, generally require a referendum, by more than 2/3 citizens, legal status and authority of constitution. For example, the constitution of Japan during the American occupation of Japan after World War II to help Japan drafted constitution, the parliament in opposition parties and the public through the freedom of media long-term full debate, again by more than 2/3 citizens voted and legitimacy. However, the people's Republic of China Constitution does not have this authority.

The constitution must have authority, there must also be changes in procedures strictly. Without sufficient free debate can easily modify the constitution, there can be no authority. Some countries in order to make the constitution amendment provisions not hasty, constitution, shall not be subject to referendum proposal to amend the constitution of the government in office, or implementing constitution and the implementation of the plebiscite administration. Therefore, the revision of the constitution needs at least three administration time.

The constitution of the PRC has no authority, firstly because it does not require any program in the Constitution by the governed to complete the approval process to a certain program constitution. Because there is no the citizens recognized the most basic program, so the validity, the constitution of the PRC has no authority. For this has not been governed by a constitution, if Chinese should respect it, it would mean that the Chinese people lack the most fundamental constitutional education "". Secondly, the second conditions of constitutional authority exists is in the making and the adoption of the constitution, must be in opposition to. The state constitution as the most fundamental laws, not only represents the executive opinion, must be through the non ruling representative, especially opposition and minority agree, constitution can have the legitimacy and the condition can be implemented. Therefore, in the process of the constitution must let the opposition parties in particular, are willing to participate, constitution can real legitimacy.

After the two World War, China appeared two constitution. The first part is the constitution of the Republic of china. The constitution of the Republic of China is1946In December 25 National Congress through the,1947January 1, released by the national government, in December 25th the same year implementation. Approval procedures for the constitution of the Republic of China was too hasty, but also one of the causes of the civil war. But the constitution of the Republic of China in the formulation process, was presided over by non Kuomintang, Communist Party and participate in the process of China; that the constitution of the Republic of China established constitutional making program. But the constitution of the Republic of China shall, without consent and support of the then Chinese's largest opposition party, the Communist Party of Chinese. Therefore, the legitimacy of the constitution of the Republic of China's problems. However, the Communist Party of Chinese enacted in the establishment of power after the people's Republic of China Constitution, is a ratio of the constitution of the Republic of China more legitimacy of law. First of all, people's Republic of China Constitution does not provide any citizen approved the constitution procedure. Secondly, the Communist Party of China in revolution, and even the elimination against various political forces of the Communist Party of China, let all the anti Communist forces disappear, only the Communist Party and Chinese friendly parties. Therefore, compared with the constitution of the Republic of China, formulate the constitution of the PRC and no opposition forces in. To date, the people's Republic of China Constitution did not obtain the opposition, the government is still recognized, still continue to destroy the opposition. In addition, if will also implement the constitution of the Republic of China in the Taiwan area of the people's Republic of China's territory, so the constitution of the PRC, has not been the major political parties in Taiwan a few, such as Chinese Kuomintang, Democratic Progressive Party and people first party agree and support. So, the people's Republic of China Constitution in obtaining opponents agree the legitimacy is not exist.

To American as an example, America after the civil war the first congressional elections, which shows respect for minorities, respect the spirit of opposition. American constitution is not after the referendum, but it was after the war of independence was elected members of Congress repeatedly, fully free debate; although the northern victory in the civil war, but still invited parties to participate in the election defeat of the south, fair competition Council seats. Americans paid a great price for the civil war between the north and the south, but because of mutual tolerance, mutual avoid Losers are always in the wrong mentality, will respect each other in respect of the constitution under the rules of the game, thus creating a strong American today. The inclusion of minorities, inclusive of the opposition constitutional tradition, is the basis of the authority of the constitution, it created the prosperity and development of American. The Chinese, especially has the enlightenment significance.

The constitution to allow all parties competitive power, have fair competition power of the rules of the game. As the fundamental law of the state constitution, should not guarantee some party or group has better than other political groups to obtain the power. Constitutional human development history, is a limited monarchy and against dictatorship in history. The constitutional development process, reflected in the reality of political development, is to allow the opposition exists, must let the opposition and the ruling party is given a fair opportunity to strive for power. Unfortunately, people's Republic of China Constitution was the constitution way, the one party dictatorship system. That is to say, the constitution of the PRC, the one party dictatorship expressly written in the Constitution. This kind of "innovation", from the Soviet Union, it is to emphasize the universal suffrage, the minority is subordinate to the majority of the forms of democracy, freedom, denied the separation of powers and checks and balances, and the constitutional private property based, while the one party dictatorship system. The constitution is no longer limited the power of the government, protecting the rights of the people are not affected by the tools of government system and the constitutional violations, will become the unlimited government and one party dictatorship system tool. In Eastern Europe, the Russian people have abandoned the constitution, will be unlimited government and one party dictatorship system constitution, how can there be the authority?!

The constitutional development, is also a history of the limitation of government power. The constitution must be stated limit government power terms, for example in the earliest prototype -- constitution of Britain's big charter, it provides no representative place would not have to pay taxes, if the king wanted to tax it must go through the consent of the tax. The great charter also limit the government to free people only according to the law of arrest, detention, drive such punishment, in addition shall not be any reason to punish. That is to say, the exercise of government power must be restricted to a certain range. Most of the provisions USA constitution are expressly limits the power of government, such as government not legislation restricting freedom of speech. However, the constitution of the PRC is a realization of the unlimited government programme. The Constitution does not explicitly regulate the scope of government power. Countries can according to their need, for national security reasons restrict people's speech, communication freedom and personal freedom for example. Countries can also according to their need to violate people's private property. The assembly of the people, the freedom of speech is given by the government, so it can also be the government back.

The constitutional government should carry out the separation of powers and checks and balances on the power of the government. The government's highest authority, with parallel each other, not subordinate power. Distrust of authority, so to the separation of powers. The development of a sound countries such as American in European and American constitutional system, they are the executive power, legislative power and judicial separation of powers, mutual supervision, mutual non membership. However, the people's Republic of China Constitution stipulates that the National People's Congress is the highest authority for the. The people's Republic of China Constitution, except for seventy-seventh shows that the unit can remove the original elect deputies to the people's deputies to the people's power without any restrictions, the design of the people's congress. The people's Congress also has the administrative power(article ninety-second),The legislative power(article fifty-eighth)And judicial power(article 128th, article 129th and article 133rd)Etc.. That is to say, the three power collection in a body; as a result, people's Congress had no constitutional institutions can limit or restriction of its operation. This lack of unified design of separation of powers in the constitution, constitutional development history of government system design is extremely dangerous, and its essence is a populist anti constitutional development, commonly referred to as the constitutional monster. It originated in the French Revolution of the national assembly, resulting in arbitrary slaughter in the French Revolution Historical tragedy. This tragedy was later repeated in russia.

This lack of design balances decentralization will lead to government authority and responsibility of the executive can not distinguish between, cannot the success or failure of the ruling party's supervision. The former Soviet Union and the China since 1949, various political movements, ongoing government launched a social movement, resulting in tens of millions of lives is the result. China if not change this no system of separation of powers, still will China people as well as the constitutional development China bomb buried very unstable.

Many countries constitution, allow people and the government is fierce and violent means to prevent the theocracy. America 1960 Presidents were Protestants, Protestant general most against tyranny, American Protestant president the separation of church and state law in the Protestant countries, banned public schools to teach theology. The first Roman Catholic president Kennedy came to power, ruling and opposition parties asked him to ensure the separation of church and state, his religious ideology and administrative separation. But the people's Republic of China Constitution of Marxism Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought as the national ideology, the theocratic system. This is absolutely not acceptable in all constitutional state. This system, not to other religious ideology of justice, and the Theocracy of the constitution, can not be widely agreed to be for their,So it can not get the authority.

The constitution of the PRC without private property is sacred and inviolate clause, no local autonomous system design necessary for a country. For example, the people's Republic of China Constitution does not guarantee the interests of similar American Senate can get equal representation system. America each state in the Senate with two seats is equal, so you can become a small number of States to deal with the state to protect their own interests tool. Because of regulations of people's Republic of China Constitution adopted one party dictatorship, local government appointed by the central government, rather than the people around the election, so there is no local autonomous real, so the people and all provinces are not from the heart to respect the constitution.

In general, Chinese also constitution does not have authority and respect, which is why both the government and the folk don't respect the constitution. So, regardless of Mao Zedong "constitution" the truth, all reflect the situation and status of the China -- the fundamental law of the state constitution.

(of Mao Zedong "constitution" full text is as follows:

There are no things, foreigners disturbance. No constitutional society, is the best society. Five thousand years of Chinese constitution, never, never see what loss! The Han and Tang Dynasties prosperity, has the Constitution? The prepared to play the constitution, the results fall faster. The lesson is profound! We have quite a few comrades, is a superstition that constitution is the constitution, safeguard a country of a ready-made panacea, attempted to take party in under the constitution. I never believe in the law, do not believe that the constitution, is to get rid of this Constitution Science I. The Kuomintang has the constitution, also very seriously, but not by us to Taiwan? Our party has no constitution, defy laws human and divine, the result is not the victory? So, superstition constitution thought is very wrong, is to the survival of the party. Our great glory correct party is always not in favor of the constitution, however, after the founding of the PRC, taking into account the foreigner countries have formulated the constitution, and Chinese intellectuals have not fully become tame tools party situation, the masses of the people but also by the miserable situation the idea of rule of law poison, in order to gain time, transformation and education of the masses of the people, strengthen the leadership of the party, or to the constitution. The constitution, essence is the negation of the leadership of the party, in politics is extremely harmful, in not to be the case, we must turn harm into good, narrow constitutional constraints to maximize, adhere to the leadership of the party. Of course, if in the future one day, the conditions are ripe, it was proposed to abolish the Constitution Constitution, never, I would be the first to raise their hands, do not raise their hands is certainly the kuomintang. The public security organ is not reported that the KMT is difficult to grasp? I think, at some point, they will jump out, this is not move with the person's volition!

Of course, the constitution is made, do not execute, execution and to what degree, but also to the direction of the party shall prevail. Only a fool and anti party elements will be from the leadership of the party, implementation of the constitution. Without the leadership of our party, who will perform the Constitution? It was not, hostile forces the most respect for the Constitution? Hostile forces if the party out, the first thing is definitely the abolition of the constitution, which you can deny? If the party does not lead the party constitution, the party will go; under the constitution, has finished. Comrades, you say Party leadership, not the Constitution do? If the person even not to understand such a simple truth, then we also have to say: the people than the masses of workers and peasants also ignorance, the vast masses of workers and peasants need to accept re education, transformation!

Our party, like Zhu Geliang, the "constitution" the fools, is an extremely complex emotions! Not openly acknowledged leader of fools is not good, is unable to account for the people; if not fools as decoration, is not good, is unable to let the party freely to the masses of the people issue orders left and right, is waiting to be snatched Sima Yi beheaded. So, I consider repeatedly, decided to cancel the class in all schools in the country, politics is taught, let the people understand that, first, the fools or some, Zhu Geliang under his leadership, will not play the gangster, that's all right; second, Zhu Geliang is the most powerful, can summon wind and call for rain, worked miracles; don't listen to him, the consequences will be very serious, serious than Earth explosion also terrible!)

Chinese constitution why not respect?

2009-12-24 21:07:15

Browse 33329 times|Article 73 comments

Sina.com.cn well-known blogger Li Huizhi recently post Mao Zedong "" constitution "is a forgery?" To arouse the reader's attention. Li Huizhi said, recently, a netizen to an article entitled "Mao Zedong constitution" article mailed to him, this paper is the speech recording Mao Zedong 1961 in a forum held in Qinhuangdao meeting. Read can not help but wonder: why doesn't this conversation in official documents? With doubt, so in the "Baidu" and "Google" search, find this article very wide spread in the network of the upper class. Many people believe that this is true, it was also noted that this is another fake. He finally decided to be reproduced, the purpose is to let people make reflection: even though the "counterfeit", why "forged" so realistic? At the same time, why will sixty years reality so well? Today China, individual organizations will remain above the constitution, and this has been the Constitution when Mao Zedong "fools" whether to have the thought origin of deep?!

Li Huizhi will this repeatedly read carefully, feel this may indeed come from the mouth of the supreme leader, not only because of the style is like Mao Zedong unique speech style, more important is to reveal the speech in the style of thought and said "I am the monk umbrella, Mao Zedong's thought style and characteristics of thinking defy laws human and divine" too well. Remember, set in 1954, when the first constitution, Mao Zedong had solemnly stressed: "an organization must have a constitution, a country must have a constitution, the constitution is a set of general rules, it is the fundamental law." He also pointed out: "the people of the whole country, everyone should be carried out, especially the staff of state organs to take the lead in the introduction, first you must implement the. Do not implement is a violation of the constitution." However, soon after, the supreme leader of the Constitution also "remember", said: "the constitution is me to make, I also remember. We basically do not rely on those, mainly depends on the resolution, a meeting, do four times a year, can not rely on the civil law, criminal law to maintain the order." In the "Cultural Revolution" on the eve of Mao Zedong "what's so great about you Liu Shaoji? I put a little finger can get you down "speech is more evident. A leader of the group, as long as the "out of a little finger", will be the highest organ of state power elected president down, where the dignity of the constitution?!

In fact, since 1954 the "anti rightist" and the "Cultural Revolution" and other cruel class struggle, it is also difficult to see: originally supreme "constitution", Mao Zedong and party in front of, indeed as useless "A Dou"; and Mao Zedong is more like "the emperor and the nobility of" Cao Cao, and even "defy laws human and divine" "monk". More sad, sad, helpless is, in twenty-first Century, the Chinese, the dignity of the constitution, the Constitution in the ruling party's prestige, not much higher than "fools". This, is the Chinese people sad place!

"Mao Zedong on constitutional" on the Internet are popular, some people criticized this not from Mao Zedong's mouth, but some "harbour evil designs" "rightists fabricated". In view of this, Li Huizhi suggestions, the relevant departments have the necessary to make a clarification; if the article is from the 1961 Mao Zedong at a forum held in Qinhuangdao on the meeting record, it is simple, check the meeting records, then Mao Zedong at that meeting speech text published problem is solved; from 1961 to now 48 years, I have long had the confidential files specified time. If Mao Zedong never said these words, it should be released to the public, this is to safeguard the party and Mao Zedong's image is very necessary.

However, the author is concerned with the problem put forward by Li Huizhi, Chinese constitution why not respect, and even the constitution drafting and formulation of the host "remember"?! Mao Zedong to death on the basis of the Constitution and the birth of the cultural revolution in the president Liu Shaoji, from Mao Zedong has higher than the authority of the constitution. Mao Zedong's authority, power and prestige from the long war age formation. In the end, the constitution, lack the authority basis.

The famous scholar Yang Xiaokai said, the constitution must have authority to be respected, and the constitutional authority from the consent of the governed. So all the successful good constitution had stipulated the most stringent approval procedures of the governed, generally require a referendum, by more than 2/3 citizens, legal status and authority of constitution. For example, the constitution of Japan during the American occupation of Japan after World War II to help Japan drafted constitution, the parliament in opposition parties and the public through the freedom of media long-term full debate, again by more than 2/3 citizens voted and legitimacy. However, the people's Republic of China Constitution does not have this authority.

The constitution must have authority, there must also be changes in procedures strictly. Without sufficient free debate can easily modify the constitution, there can be no authority. Some countries in order to make the constitution amendment provisions not hasty, constitution, shall not be subject to referendum proposal to amend the constitution of the government in office, or implementing constitution and the implementation of the plebiscite administration. Therefore, the revision of the constitution needs at least three administration time.

The constitution of the PRC has no authority, firstly because it does not require any program in the Constitution by the governed to complete the approval process to a certain program constitution. Because there is no the citizens recognized the most basic program, so the validity, the constitution of the PRC has no authority. For this has not been governed by a constitution, if Chinese should respect it, it would mean that the Chinese people lack the most fundamental constitutional education "". Secondly, the second conditions of constitutional authority exists is in the making and the adoption of the constitution, must be in opposition to. The state constitution as the most fundamental laws, not only represents the executive opinion, must be through the non ruling representative, especially opposition and minority agree, constitution can have the legitimacy and the condition can be implemented. Therefore, in the process of the constitution must let the opposition parties in particular, are willing to participate, constitution can real legitimacy.

After the two World War, China appeared two constitution. The first part is the constitution of the Republic of china. The constitution of the Republic of China is1946In December 25 National Congress through the,1947January 1, released by the national government, in December 25th the same year implementation. Approval procedures for the constitution of the Republic of China was too hasty, but also one of the causes of the civil war. But the constitution of the Republic of China in the formulation process, was presided over by non Kuomintang, Communist Party and participate in the process of China; that the constitution of the Republic of China established constitutional making program. But the constitution of the Republic of China shall, without consent and support of the then Chinese's largest opposition party, the Communist Party of Chinese. Therefore, the legitimacy of the constitution of the Republic of China's problems. However, the Communist Party of Chinese enacted in the establishment of power after the people's Republic of China Constitution, is a ratio of the constitution of the Republic of China more legitimacy of law. First of all, people's Republic of China Constitution does not provide any citizen approved the constitution procedure. Secondly, the Communist Party of China in revolution, and even the elimination against various political forces of the Communist Party of China, let all the anti Communist forces disappear, only the Communist Party and Chinese friendly parties. Therefore, compared with the constitution of the Republic of China, formulate the constitution of the PRC and no opposition forces in. To date, the people's Republic of China Constitution did not obtain the opposition, the government is still recognized, still continue to destroy the opposition. In addition, if will also implement the constitution of the Republic of China in the Taiwan area of the people's Republic of China's territory, so the constitution of the PRC, has not been the major political parties in Taiwan a few, such as Chinese Kuomintang, Democratic Progressive Party and people first party agree and support. So, the people's Republic of China Constitution in obtaining opponents agree the legitimacy is not exist.

To American as an example, America after the civil war the first congressional elections, which shows respect for minorities, respect the spirit of opposition. American constitution is not after the referendum, but it was after the war of independence was elected members of Congress repeatedly, fully free debate; although the northern victory in the civil war, but still invited parties to participate in the election defeat of the south, fair competition Council seats. Americans paid a great price for the civil war between the north and the south, but because of mutual tolerance, mutual avoid Losers are always in the wrong mentality, will respect each other in respect of the constitution under the rules of the game, thus creating a strong American today. The inclusion of minorities, inclusive of the opposition constitutional tradition, is the basis of the authority of the constitution, it created the prosperity and development of American. The Chinese, especially has the enlightenment significance.

The constitution to allow all parties competitive power, have fair competition power of the rules of the game. As the fundamental law of the state constitution, should not guarantee some party or group has better than other political groups to obtain the power. Constitutional human development history, is a limited monarchy and against dictatorship in history. The constitutional development process, reflected in the reality of political development, is to allow the opposition exists, must let the opposition and the ruling party is given a fair opportunity to strive for power. Unfortunately, people's Republic of China Constitution was the constitution way, the one party dictatorship system. That is to say, the constitution of the PRC, the one party dictatorship expressly written in the Constitution. This kind of "innovation", from the Soviet Union, it is to emphasize the universal suffrage, the minority is subordinate to the majority of the forms of democracy, freedom, denied the separation of powers and checks and balances, and the constitutional private property based, while the one party dictatorship system. The constitution is no longer limited the power of the government, protecting the rights of the people are not affected by the tools of government system and the constitutional violations, will become the unlimited government and one party dictatorship system tool. In Eastern Europe, the Russian people have abandoned the constitution, will be unlimited government and one party dictatorship system constitution, how can there be the authority?!

The constitutional development, is also a history of the limitation of government power. The constitution must be stated limit government power terms, for example in the earliest prototype -- constitution of Britain's big charter, it provides no representative place would not have to pay taxes, if the king wanted to tax it must go through the consent of the tax. The great charter also limit the government to free people only according to the law of arrest, detention, drive such punishment, in addition shall not be any reason to punish. That is to say, the exercise of government power must be restricted to a certain range. Most of the provisions USA constitution are expressly limits the power of government, such as government not legislation restricting freedom of speech. However, the constitution of the PRC is a realization of the unlimited government programme. The Constitution does not explicitly regulate the scope of government power. Countries can according to their need, for national security reasons restrict people's speech, communication freedom and personal freedom for example. Countries can also according to their need to violate people's private property. The assembly of the people, the freedom of speech is given by the government, so it can also be the government back.

The constitutional government should carry out the separation of powers and checks and balances on the power of the government. The government's highest authority, with parallel each other, not subordinate power. Distrust of authority, so to the separation of powers. The development of a sound countries such as American in European and American constitutional system, they are the executive power, legislative power and judicial separation of powers, mutual supervision, mutual non membership. However, the people's Republic of China Constitution stipulates that the National People's Congress is the highest authority for the. The people's Republic of China Constitution, except for seventy-seventh shows that the unit can remove the original elect deputies to the people's deputies to the people's power without any restrictions, the design of the people's congress. The people's Congress also has the administrative power(article ninety-second),The legislative power(article fifty-eighth)And judicial power(article 128th, article 129th and article 133rd)Etc.. That is to say, the three power collection in a body; as a result, people's Congress had no constitutional institutions can limit or restriction of its operation. This lack of unified design of separation of powers in the constitution, constitutional development history of government system design is extremely dangerous, and its essence is a populist anti constitutional development, commonly referred to as the constitutional monster. It originated in the French Revolution of the national assembly, resulting in arbitrary slaughter in the French Revolution Historical tragedy. This tragedy was later repeated in russia.

This lack of design balances decentralization will lead to government authority and responsibility of the executive can not distinguish between, cannot the success or failure of the ruling party's supervision. The former Soviet Union and the China since 1949, various political movements, ongoing government launched a social movement, resulting in tens of millions of lives is the result. China if not change this no system of separation of powers, still will China people as well as the constitutional development China bomb buried very unstable.

Many countries constitution, allow people and the government is fierce and violent means to prevent the theocracy. America 1960 Presidents were Protestants, Protestant general most against tyranny, American Protestant president the separation of church and state law in the Protestant countries, banned public schools to teach theology. The first Roman Catholic president Kennedy came to power, ruling and opposition parties asked him to ensure the separation of church and state, his religious ideology and administrative separation. But the people's Republic of China Constitution of Marxism Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought as the national ideology, the theocratic system. This is absolutely not acceptable in all constitutional state. This system, not to other religious ideology of justice, and the Theocracy of the constitution, can not be widely agreed to be for their,So it can not get the authority.

The constitution of the PRC without private property is sacred and inviolate clause, no local autonomous system design necessary for a country. For example, the people's Republic of China Constitution does not guarantee the interests of similar American Senate can get equal representation system. America each state in the Senate with two seats is equal, so you can become a small number of States to deal with the state to protect their own interests tool. Because of regulations of people's Republic of China Constitution adopted one party dictatorship, local government appointed by the central government, rather than the people around the election, so there is no local autonomous real, so the people and all provinces are not from the heart to respect the constitution.

In general, Chinese also constitution does not have authority and respect, which is why both the government and the folk don't respect the constitution. So, regardless of Mao Zedong "constitution" the truth, all reflect the situation and status of the China -- the fundamental law of the state constitution.

(of Mao Zedong "constitution" full text is as follows:

There are no things, foreigners disturbance. No constitutional society, is the best society. Five thousand years of Chinese constitution, never, never see what loss! The Han and Tang Dynasties prosperity, has the Constitution? The prepared to play the constitution, the results fall faster. The lesson is profound! We have quite a few comrades, is a superstition that constitution is the constitution, safeguard a country of a ready-made panacea, attempted to take party in under the constitution. I never believe in the law, do not believe that the constitution, is to get rid of this Constitution Science I. The Kuomintang has the constitution, also very seriously, but not by us to Taiwan? Our party has no constitution, defy laws human and divine, the result is not the victory? So, superstition constitution thought is very wrong, is to the survival of the party. Our great glory correct party is always not in favor of the constitution, however, after the founding of the PRC, taking into account the foreigner countries have formulated the constitution, and Chinese intellectuals have not fully become tame tools party situation, the masses of the people but also by the miserable situation the idea of rule of law poison, in order to gain time, transformation and education of the masses of the people, strengthen the leadership of the party, or to the constitution. The constitution, essence is the negation of the leadership of the party, in politics is extremely harmful, in not to be the case, we must turn harm into good, narrow constitutional constraints to maximize, adhere to the leadership of the party. Of course, if in the future one day, the conditions are ripe, it was proposed to abolish the Constitution Constitution, never, I would be the first to raise their hands, do not raise their hands is certainly the kuomintang. The public security organ is not reported that the KMT is difficult to grasp? I think, at some point, they will jump out, this is not move with the person's volition!

Of course, the constitution is made, do not execute, execution and to what degree, but also to the direction of the party shall prevail. Only a fool and anti party elements will be from the leadership of the party, implementation of the constitution. Without the leadership of our party, who will perform the Constitution? It was not, hostile forces the most respect for the Constitution? Hostile forces if the party out, the first thing is definitely the abolition of the constitution, which you can deny? If the party does not lead the party constitution, the party will go; under the constitution, has finished. Comrades, you say Party leadership, not the Constitution do? If the person even not to understand such a simple truth, then we also have to say: the people than the masses of workers and peasants also ignorance, the vast masses of workers and peasants need to accept re education, transformation!

Our party, like Zhu Geliang, the "constitution" the fools, is an extremely complex emotions! Not openly acknowledged leader of fools is not good, is unable to account for the people; if not fools as decoration, is not good, is unable to let the party freely to the masses of the people issue orders left and right, is waiting to be snatched Sima Yi beheaded. So, I consider repeatedly, decided to cancel the class in all schools in the country, politics is taught, let the people understand that, first, the fools or some, Zhu Geliang under his leadership, will not play the gangster, that's all right; second, Zhu Geliang is the most powerful, can summon wind and call for rain, worked miracles; don't listen to him, the consequences will be very serious, serious than Earth explosion also terrible!)