Tian Wenchang: the rule of the spring will come early

Thirty years ago, the law can be said to be rising rapidly warming. In recent years, the legal department is all over the country, even to the extent of flooding. When the early to enter the legal circle of people, including Wei party, everyone is enthusiastic, the holding part legal career aspirations. Then suddenly cooling, legal person first generation after the Cultural Revolution was poured a pot of cold water, hopes are fading. That is to say, the law is not to rise, rise to half cold. Now there is a phenomenon, quickly, and I see the hope. Why? Those big thanks to Wei Fang said, I think the king*Li*The army made a head, thin*Hee*To a great. This Zhang lawyers have the right to speak. After the cultural revolution, legal and how? Because tens of thousands of old cadres devastated to have no way, as a warning for the future, decided to take legal way. So after the cultural revolution, the legal system is a heavy price, no cultural revolution, legal system does not produce. The construction of legal system until now30Years, a little better, the old man is not in the specific system, specific phenomenon is inevitable, must engage in authoritarian, negative method.

I used to think, also have to back, has not done what, I have a feeling now, advance and retreat in the end, after a storm, I say who is this meaning. They put this back level speed up in advance to the bottom, I don't think back, back to the event, so that is a wake-up call, give us a hint. That is not the scholars, is not the ordinary people, also is not our lawyers, even top leaders are be placed in jeopardy, not good, so do, Jiangshan, power, life is in danger, so we must come back to practice the rule of law. The rule of law is how out of, have a look the history is clear. When a ruler has the ability to maintain their rule, he doesn't need the rule of law, constitutional monarchy that is forced to. Only the ruler incapable of action, only need to rely on the rule of law to maintain the order of politics. So I think that the rule of law is not a certain person's subjective will, but social development objective demand a certain degree of. China is no rule of law, is that demand is not there, and later found the problem, turn back, through repeated several times, let all people from top to bottom, from the bottom of Shangdi recognized the rule of law, the society can't live without.

In short, when a ruler that rule of law is not only bound hand and foot problems, when the law is to protect the right, law can be accepted. So I think in this case, may lead to a rebound in the new. I have mentioned before, the rule of the new spring will come early, I think this possibility exists. If you say that to prepare, we should start from the thought or theory do some preparation. Zhang did not say, I will not certainly catch up, Wei Fang no problem, who should be confident and look forward to. (Zhang Sizhi: I have to hurry.)

Say a few words in Guizhou creek. The case entity does not say, the program is certainly a problem. He has a central command group, major cases is so run. According to my understanding, the command group is simply the lawyers and the parties as hostile forces, completely is the class struggle of the frame, not from the basic position it as a case to treat, but how to prevent these people trouble sabotage. This can have good? The case in the first round, the lawyer was not in court expel them, high, high, the Ministry of justice to watch video, high attitude is very fierce, that is make the court of law. Later I went to the Justice Department lawyer asked to see what our video, they say look16Minutes of video, five day trial,16Minutes of video, this thing is not saying ah, to the exclusion of the illegal evidence trick is the same, interpret out of context, break off both ends. I made all these years of lawyer, too clear, everything has a cause, the lawyer then asshole, don't know, thirty lawyers will not It is without rhyme or reason. to a court. Do not say first make no trouble, why do lawyers make, find out the reason. And then I put this five days of video to find, picked from30Minutes to the Supreme Court to have a look, I say to you, this16Min lawyers at court, what is that half of the rest of the time, I personally and commentary, and the comments. Don't let the lawyers to speak, or that is irrelevant to the case, or rather re speaking, raise your hand to ignore you, ask to speak was rejected, forced to say they were expelled from. Have a chance in the future, don't say the whole five days, in this thirty minute video can be released. Not only the case, the case of Beihai too, clearly has a problem, is not clear, it is difficult to have a break.

(arrange according to recording, without the spokesman review)

* Tian Wenchang: Director of Beijing Kyoto firm, director of the National Committee member of the criminal law business.

    (the above transfer from "abstract" micro-blog lawyer)