The Vs property rights property "property law"

The Vs property rights property "property law"

"Private ownership and public ownership dispute", the key lies in"The legitimacy of property"Dispute. In western society, due to the "human rights and interests and rights of the inviolability of private property right" "Universal values", property rights and property rights, is one thing. In other words, anyone can sell the property, and at any time, can have their own property value-added income. In other words, is that people can have their own property, and can enjoy the derivative income as capital! This is Mr Hu's words: "let the people to own property income"!

The Queen's "Marx and Engels obscurantist Engineering"Theory of team, for the" privilege under the market economy "theory, got some should be the theory innovation bitch and made chastity memorial arch, simply to" property rights "and" property "out of. So, it is a synonym of "property rights" and "property", through "Chinese Sophists Xingyi misinterpretation", into two uncorrelated power; and the former, known as the" real "--, attention, this is Chinese unique. Have a look the official explanation of Marx theory guards, right left right right is right, is not the right exchange barter! "In other words, is Chinese has the right to own property, but can't exchange, otherwise the consequences, earnings confiscated!

Even so, the so-called "replacementUniversal values", as China privilege characteristics under the market economy foundation of" property law ", in the hands of China modify various interest groups, after a decade of the parade, or dystocia died on the vine! Laws are made by the interest group "The Democratic Party of the Ming Dynasty"Discussion and revision, is another kind of sense of the characteristics, the reference"Class interest group endorsements Democratic Party based"Final form"Privilege autonomous interest group unit"Two article. Even so, cannot guarantee the market exchange right of so-called property law or aborted! Which means that, in addition to guarantee "The erosion of interest groups within the system of national interests"I can't think of a privilege, the rationality of the other.

This is a logical ability is idiotic grade Ma taught anti party master, since the power of truth "capital does not belong to the human rights", and his privileged private production concept. In this manner the Marne idealism formatted idiotic people such as Zhang Hongliang and company, the production in the brain, is also the social havoc three years hair disaster type! Logic level the idiotic people high to such an extent: the author corrects the Marne idiotic expert "The Coase transaction theory of misunderstanding", can be the idiotic people called" group of Coase "; thus the Coase also economics and idiotic people, become idiotic special supplies, the Marxist doctrine cannot be formatted and so on, is not entitled to invoke the absolute number of idiotic enough level --, --!

The idiotic also said, "no he claimed that the hypothesis of economic man, economics is wrong, can not be used", so he is right; but if you accept his "economic man hypothesis", then he also said, "the market is not rational", so he is right. The simple meaning of logic, from "Scientific evidence and Popper theorem", know this kind of master, why always can make out a good case. This will make out a good case ability, we do not have. (smile). The idiotic people make themselves more than a little while. Like this idiotic level anti party master, almost every sentence is wrong, it is very rare! The post a lot of, or let you appreciate. Odd stick together! (smile).

The etiology is not difficult to find. When a person's brain is "The idealist doctrine of Marx and Engels"And"The horse Enjun right sense of superiority"Completely formatted, may also enjoy"Small privileged interests"Go to"The right to private ownership"Fish and drum cheer, generally is such symptoms. If he is conscience betrayed the soul to work overtime, but also how many claim to be "Human nature is private"Understanding, if he really is Zhang Hongliang claimed the so-called conscience, it really his mother sad. Although "Know the cause will know to solve his way", but, I softhearted, did not have the heart to tell his mother! For such serious idiotic patients, the author has not received interest, but would like to have a look, will have the same idiot being their own master. In this Bo infested Wuzuo, not necessarily so dominant idiotic, but the number is far more than one!

For the market economy "Monopoly law into the divine law against administrative monopolyAs the market economy ", the" property law "into the" privilege "! Nothing but is afraid to touch the "four emperor Party principles of public ownership" side! They have had to get the machine to avoid the theoretical innovation of private ownership; killed in their previous estimates, accept the human interest of the inviolability of universal values! Say to also cannot blame them, he said some rightists unconditional support for the universal values of human rights, to hear the nature of private ownership, feel uncomfortable, thought is to deal with the public ownership of the black power! What is the brain to public ownership eunuch education formatted idiotic!

I know a lot of people do not catch cold to Long Yongtu. But I absolutely agree with Mr. long sentence: what kind of people, there is what kind of government! "Maintenance of injustice are often victims of their own"! Have a look.The household registration system, the right"You know.

"Error antitrust is historical understanding"Anti monopoly law, but also can not be what the" constitution of market economy". politics is just the economy! Market economy is the Constitution Constitution of civil society:The human rights unit, and have the property owned, free power independent exchange, shall not be infringed! This is trillion martyrs advance wave upon wave for thousands of years, from the long and get dark state ownership in feudal society revolution: "The people finally can own property, and property income"! This is the so-called western free! This is the human rights! This is the so-called "Universal values"!

Now you know why, Ma to teach "Theoretical innovation team"To separate, non property and property rights; why China there will be" property law ", also can not stand? Why not to adhere to public ownership, but since that can do what the Ming Dynasty style democracy within the party? Why did the idiotic, heard the author exposed his inner-party democracy of Laodicea, will jump up, crying for his contribution to the "Godel's theorem", and put him and his Wuzuo similar Philosophy Master, not fat thin height were all swept into the dustbin of history?

"Rationality not management market and administration monopoly"
"Reform and optimization approaches of transaction cost theory"
"The transaction theory enlightened optimization route map"
"Private ownership and Mencius good desire"
"This is the selfless"
"A correct understanding of problems on the natural master solution"
"Three interest bodies democratic idea composing history of heaven and hell"
"Anti monopoly law is USA judicial history error"
"Monopoly is legitimate property rights of rationality"
""Monopoly" is the keyword consisting of four hundred years of modern world history"
"History of montage anti monopoly and socialist public ownership"
"Private ownership and public ownership dispute"
"Whether the economic limit market monopoly can reach the firm?"
"Limit the monopoly initial distribution will Grant Thornton"
"Excessive monopoly will reduce profits"
"International trade does not improve the domestic monopoly profits"
"Monopoly and income into the relevant local illusion"
"Public ownership of planned economy is one of the causes of the gap between rich and poor"
"The national tax strength to count the administrative monopoly"
"Profane mother "development is the hard truth""
"Social development is the private ownership of the green to allow people to get rich!"
"The Vs property rights property" property law ""
"A historical contribution strength and Coase Theorem of property"
"Kos theorem of Chinese economic phenomenon"
"The development of science and theorem China law and scientific view"
"Defect and abuse of Kos theorem"