The Supreme People's Court Reply

                       (2009) the people He Zi No. forty-second

    The Anhui Provincial Higher People's court:

    You two OO nine years in May nineteen please (2008) Wan min Shen Zi No. 440th "about how to understand and apply the" motor vehicle traffic accident liability compulsory insurance regulations > twenty-second instructions "received. Through research, the following reply:

    Agrees that the Committee judges you Institute of minority views.

    This complex.

The Anhui Provincial Higher People's court

Anhui high method [2009] No. 371

About how to understand and apply the "Notice of motor vehicle traffic accident liability compulsory insurance regulations" article twenty-second

 The intermediate people's court, county (District, city) the basic people's court:

The review of the petitioner and respondent Dong Jialing Chinese Ping An Property Insurance Limited by Share Ltd Fuyang branch of property insurance contract dispute case, how to understand and apply the "motor vehicle traffic accident liability compulsory insurance regulations" (hereinafter referred to as "Regulations") twenty-second different opinions. Case by the judicial committee for discussion and decision to form two kinds of opinions from the Supreme People's court. In October 20, 2009 the Supreme Court to [2009] the people He Zi No. forty-second letter in reply to my school.

According to the spirit of the "Regulations" answer, the twenty-second in the "loss to the property of the victim" should be understood in a broad sense, namely the "property damage" should include personal casualty losses, such as disability compensation, death compensation etc..

Hope in the future similar case processing in implementing the spirit of the province court reply, ensure uniform law applicable.

                           The Anhui Provincial Higher People's court

             Two hundred nine years in December 10th