The original American court did

   Small high school recently invited lectures, Yi American lawyer Xu Xiaobing. From first to last, is the interactive mode, and the simulation of six man jury. In order to let everyone can have more communication opportunities, I put the questions to be asked to stay to the end of the lecture, privately with Mr. Xu exchange.

   China court execution is very serious problem. American is how to do? Mr. Xu said, America court no execution mechanism, the court verdicts were handed to the police to perform. I asked Is it right? Bailiff? Mr. Xu said not, is the ordinary police. As long as the judgment of the court to the regular police to enforce it.

   The court heard Chinese, witnesses rarely appear in court, America court do? Mr. Xu said American witness must appear in court. I then ask, then the court witness to appear in court, witness not appearing in court Is it right? To be convicted of contempt of court? The next answer surprised me: the witness is not in court, is the party or his lawyer pass. The parties so long as the lawyers in accordance with the legal form of a written summons, in accordance with legal procedures, the witness received the go, otherwise it is contempt of court.

   From these two problems to my feeling, USA court judges do, is the main control in the court of the program, magistrates, judges many things not the courts to do. It may be more beneficial to justice. If the decision of the court the court to execute, the inside of the interest will be large! Favorable, drive is big, not what the water was not performed. To the ordinary police law enforcement so that to carry out, this is the police get paid to do this, you can according to the judgment of the court to enforce. Resist the seizure, seizure; the arrests arrests, get to court sentenced a contempt of court. There are difficult to execute? The witness is a lawyer before the trial, you will do something, summons you to prepare, you hair, witness to inform you know what to achieve what purpose of lawsuit. He doesn't come? It is the judge punished.

   In short, all in accordance with the conducive to fair, fair principle to handle, share very fine. As far as possible the rights given to the parties. What is democracy? Democracy is reflected in all aspects of. All may lead to doubt the fairness of the thing, the judge will not do, can give you the right to do it for you, give you both, so fair?