The Li Tianyi case tomorrow court LAN and a netizen asked

Haidian court will8Month28Day shall not open trial Li Tianyi and five alleged rape case. It is understood, victims Yang severe depression, not to appear in person. Li Tian hope Yang improved court testimony. For tomorrow's trial, Li Lan and lawyers in legal adviser27Day10:00-11:00Users answer questionsThe following is a question:


                     The evidenceIn fact, judging andLegal judgment


 Ask:The blue bar,If Li Tianyi is convicted of rape charges, you will think that this is an unjust?

   Blue and lawyers: Hope is the legal judgment, facts and evidence to judge, but not convicted and sentenced the public opinion. As long as it is in the normal orbit strict judicial judgment, Lee home can accept; but if the deviation from the normal judicial track perverting the law, Li Jia will pick up the legal weapons to defend the dignity of the law, and the relevant personnel of the responsibility to pervert the law. This is the right and obligation.

 

   Ask:LAN lawyer, Ms. Yang is also as excusable at this time fell ill, because the court is about the existing evidence. After all the truth if not people know it, and Ms. Yang in court when accidentally exposing that win the lawsuit, she was afraid to lose. And I think, if conversion thinks, who have a guilty conscience in the case will try various devices to avoid appearing in court.

     Blue and lawyers:As for whether to avoid to appear in court, I'm not. But in terms of in order to better identify the crime, protect their rights or to verify the facts, her appearance is necessary. We hope relevant parties to attach great importance to this issue, to protect Yang, avoid damage and tools.



 

   Ask:On the stage, Li will not break the law, police did arrest him? In the phase of the trial, lawyers can overthrow the public security investigation, evidence?

   Blue and lawyers: What you have said is just the problem of program, detained by police, procuratorate arrest and prosecution, does not mean that the guilty. Any person without the court verdicts, are blameless. This is the basic knowledge of jurisprudence. Notice, the iron is formed through the judicial process, the miscarriages of justice is formed by judicial procedure.


 

   Ask:Ask whether the victim was bullied? The victim did not appear in court to testify, if she had been relevant departments, restriction of personal freedom?

   Blue and lawyers:  We never frightened her, as it was intimidating facts of doubtful authenticity, after all, so far, only Mr. Tian master her personal circumstances, how others.She is being threatened or being threatened, she is being threatened by or by the fact that the threat? This is a problem.So far, she was very obvious signs of tools. We hope that relevant departments to pay attention to, and guarantee its security, don't be Dutch act, being hurt, mental illness and disease.

 

  

   Ask:Before you have emphasized the truth, the Li Tian case has occurred, the truth is not changed?

   Blue and lawyers: We are open and transparent, to find out the truth, justice, resolutely against all kinds of malpractice and perverting the law attitude is One principle runs through it all., never changes. Changing is the other party, including her lawyers say, including information about her, including the occurrence of a statement of fact, changing, let a person not know what course to take. But the truth is only one, that anyone avoidance and change.

 

   Ask: The victim did not appear in court, will affect not to the outcome of the trial? Do you think Li Tianyi's odds big?

   Blue and lawyers: The court of law, not explicitly prohibited, the lawyer also made clear requirements. This is to ascertain the facts accused of a crime. But she was in court to inform the first day the court early ill for treatment of mental illness, and had her lawyer has repeatedly declared that she have the determination, confidence saw the defendant restrain by law. This should be the case in one of the most dramatic scenes. No evaluation, no speculation, eventually there will be a natural view.


   Ask: LAN lawyer, what do you think of your evidence enough to prove that Lee is innocent of the crime?

   Blue and lawyers: I have repeatedly stressed, I'm Li Jia legal advisor, I was responsible for the outside of the exchange and communication, does not involve a specific case and the evidence material, nor make any comment on the case and the material. This is my bottom line. The crime with the non crime, hope that the Haidian court will strictly in accordance with the evidence, the facts and the law to be identified.

 

   Ask: LAN a good lawyer, as matter of celebrities, we are very concerned about this case, also the sun for a long time on the Internet, and finally to open a court session tomorrow, will certainly to look at the facts and evidence, the trial for tomorrow, what do you want with netizens said?

   Blue and lawyers: The court is not necessarily a bad thing, find out the court help evidence and fact publication, finally let everything to the sun. The case so far, many doubts have not been effective solutions and reply, we only want to return to a normal judicial track, avoid miscarriages of justice. Famous people are also citizens, should not be emotional and false opinion kidnapping distortion, shall enjoy the same civil rights. We hope and believe that, the court shall hear.


 

   Ask:The trial, the Yang is the key witness, the key is not to appear in person, if you think she is deliberately to avoid the permit matter? This in favor of the defendant or not?

   Blue and lawyers: The court, in its own, is conducive to the criminal facts, this is her lawyer stressed"Have the determination, confidence"See the defendant is restrain by law, but also she expected. Her appearance on the check core fact is particularly critical, and existing reports were mentioned her false statements, as she has no false reporting, perjury, all these need the court investigation. Otherwise, easy to become a muddled account.


 

    Ask: Whether Li Tianyi was finally convicted or not, at least, his in the mind of the public"Charges have set up". So to him, the morality of the trial has concluded, then you think justice can save moral defeat?

   Blue and lawyers: Moral judgment can not replace the judicial trial. This is the basic common sense. Moral judgment is largely dependent on the hearsay information, emotion and personal aspirations will, fragments of the subjective, and is easy to manipulate and induction. China history never lack of bloody moral judgment, but judicial go short and hard. Therefore, the fact that pull into the court, making scientific decision, this is a great progress.