The law represented by who?

          

 

 

 

China Agricultural University rural newborn below three

(2011.8.22)

 

Moderator: we continue to look at the network news. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage:

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshmen in the proportion of rural household registration students fell below 30%, only 28.26%. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple.

Want to know how the teacher viewed back hole Rural students now reduces the.

Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, there has been a steady decrease. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (Moderator: or can't afford.) it causes more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (Moderator: here some people said, "poor never come on son", there is a saying.) it is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (Host: I think they are killing each other?) not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth.

China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that youNetizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape.

Kong Qingdong: you can have a look a lot of Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly the description of "the vicissitudes of life and man" in society -- you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation of wealth? Very few. (The host: "the rich but three".) well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate.

Netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children cannot afford the high tuition fees.

Kong Qingdong: there's also a relationship with our exam content, you get those are going to classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children adversely. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (The host: I'm sure not to climb.You can not add). (Moderator: I 0.) but you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (Moderator: rural children also will not climb the tree.Don't climb trees) that you fall, do not climb trees -- do you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration."

 

China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that you

 

Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death

(2011.8.23)

 

Man without morals laws never fair! Moral should always be the first. The law is the bottom line. Kong Qingdong: I found that our first video netizens are very understanding, so that the legal key. (host: it is the law school?) It is not a law school; many law students, just to be traitors to teach bad law professor. When some traitors and professor of law school, so to speak: "if you are a lawyer, you give the criminal defense, you find another of his sin, you can't go to expose him, this is called the occupation moral." If you like to an economic crime person as a lawyer, he also found out his son, you have to keep his secrets, this is called "occupation moral". This is our famous traitors jurist, his logic, his ethics -- finally to make money for the first. netizen: case got. But I don't want to see every time the media, public opinion influence of judicial decisions. The court in under the pressure of public opinion to return the justice of law. It was a real country under the rule of law? Kong Qingdong: now China question is not the real rule of law. We now, is this law to a great extent, the powers that be usurped by a traitor. I don't want to see the Communist Party led the people in revolution up like, not revolution not ah, because the government is the reactionary government, so the Communist Party must be the leadership of the people's revolution. Moderator: what if all these things, must by the public to take part in it, that we are not tired, every day do not have something else. Kong Qingdong: not . As long as people adhere to the cry for justice, then the court after it, it knows what is right. (host: they no longer --) on, if it is always such a mess, let them go down well, Is it right?? netizen: this thing I worry about is, every case if all through the mass dispute in order to obtain a fair judgment, how can do Where there are people so many ways to master many unfair decision? The people which have so much energy and constant attention to these things? A protracted war, a delaying tactic, which may be of interest group expected. So the key is to have the power to the population problems. Kong Qingdong: Here I will give you the experience of advanced America, is America the judicial decision, it is a relatively strong jury -- jury system -- the jury of ordinary group is from people from all walks of life, they don't. The jury voted, this person is sentenced to death or not sentenced to death. (host: "public review" category.) For public review, "". We are not going to learn American, why not learn the advanced experience of this? That is to say, judges, lawyers, these people are occupation, are professional, special law. (host: but the hole teacher, I think "public review" we dare not believe, who knows who it is it?) Why can't you believe it? No, but first the system, you have to ensure that, all should be transparent. Is a random sample of fifty individuals, can be pumped into your head today, you don't know, but you can with your conscience, you heard the two sides in the defense, lawsuit, after you listen, you with your conscience, you said that the people should not damn it, or that the judge three years or five years. I think this is a very effective, the judicial sector balance, is also an effective supervision. So as not to our laws, operating in a few traitors.

Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape, in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the Supreme People's court for approval. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what.

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be!

Netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law? I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow!

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :

Kong Qingdong: a tribute to the hometown of Suihua, also paid tribute to the Imam to your name. (Moderator: imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when.

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :

The host: and we also heard, it is said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant's family.

Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (Moderator: know the law but break it.Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision.

China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that youNetizen: it seems that the crowd is very effect. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers.

Kong Qingdong: the "onlookers", is actually a common concern.

Man without morals laws never fair! Moral should always be the first. The law is the bottom line. Kong Qingdong: I found that our first video netizens are very understanding, so that the legal key. (host: it is the law school?) It is not a law school; many law students, just to be traitors to teach bad law professor. When some traitors and professor of law school, so to speak: "if you are a lawyer, you give the criminal defense, you find another of his sin, you can't go to expose him, this is called the occupation moral." If you like to an economic crime person as a lawyer, he also found out his son, you have to keep his secrets, this is called "occupation moral". This is our famous traitors jurist, his logic, his ethics -- finally to make money for the first. netizen: case got. But I don't want to see every time the media, public opinion influence of judicial decisions. The court in under the pressure of public opinion to return the justice of law. It was a real country under the rule of law? Kong Qingdong: now China question is not the real rule of law. We now, is this law to a great extent, the powers that be usurped by a traitor. I don't want to see the Communist Party led the people in revolution up like, not revolution not ah, because the government is the reactionary government, so the Communist Party must be the leadership of the people's revolution. Moderator: what if all these things, must by the public to take part in it, that we are not tired, every day do not have something else. Kong Qingdong: not . As long as people adhere to the cry for justice, then the court after it, it knows what is right. (host: they no longer --) on, if it is always such a mess, let them go down well, Is it right?? netizen: this thing I worry about is, every case if all through the mass dispute in order to obtain a fair judgment, how can do Where there are people so many ways to master many unfair decision? The people which have so much energy and constant attention to these things? A protracted war, a delaying tactic, which may be of interest group expected. So the key is to have the power to the population problems. Kong Qingdong: Here I will give you the experience of advanced America, is America the judicial decision, it is a relatively strong jury -- jury system -- the jury of ordinary group is from people from all walks of life, they don't. The jury voted, this person is sentenced to death or not sentenced to death. (host: "public review" category.) For public review, "". We are not going to learn American, why not learn the advanced experience of this? That is to say, judges, lawyers, these people are occupation, are professional, special law. (host: but the hole teacher, I think "public review" we dare not believe, who knows who it is it?) Why can't you believe it? No, but first the system, you have to ensure that, all should be transparent. Is a random sample of fifty individuals, can be pumped into your head today, you don't know, but you can with your conscience, you heard the two sides in the defense, lawsuit, after you listen, you with your conscience, you said that the people should not damn it, or that the judge three years or five years. I think this is a very effective, the judicial sector balance, is also an effective supervision. So as not to our laws, operating in a few traitors.

Netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent reprisal breeds reprisal. Root.

Kong Qingdong said: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law.

Netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, so take it easy.

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :

Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness work. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage.

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :Netizen: no moral man made law never fair! Moral should always be the first. The law is the bottom line.

Kong Qingdong: I found our first video netizens are very understanding, the key word when it comes to the legal. (China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that youModerator: it is the law school?) is not law school; many law students, just to be traitors to teach bad law professor. When some traitors and professor of law school, so to speak: "if you are a lawyer, you give the criminal defense, you find another of his sin, you can't go to expose him, this is called the occupation moral." If you like to an economic crime person as a lawyer, he also found out his son, you have to keep his secrets, this is called "occupation moral". This is our famous traitors jurist, his logic, his ethics -- finally to make money for the first.

Netizen: the wrong has been righted. But I don't want to see every time the media, public opinion influence of judicial decisions. The court in under the pressure of public opinion to return the justice of law. It was a real country under the rule of law?

Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :

Kong Qingdong: now Chinese problem is not a real country under the rule of law. We now, is this law to a great extent, the powers that be usurped by a traitor. I don't want to see the Communist Party led the people in revolution up like, not revolution not ah, because the government is the reactionary government, so the Communist Party must be the leadership of the people's revolution.

China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that youHost: that if any such thing, must by the public to take part in it, that we are not tired, every day do not have something else.

Kong Qingdong: No. As long as people adhere to the cry for justice, then the court after it, it knows what is right. (Fall, climb trees -- don't you think you have a rural household, even if you rural children? Don't climb the tree is what the children of farmers! Don't climb the tree line, down to fish in the river, but to have a skill that you are rural people. Otherwise, if we only according to the account, that many officials have their own account into the rural household, immediately "non agriculture". All good things let them take, No. So that the news that the people responsible for this sentence is right: "not only the household registration." Li Changkui case retrial, was sentenced to death (2011.8.23) Moderator: 22, the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's court in Zhaotong city on the court, Li Changkui intentional homicide, rape in accordance with the procedure for trial supervision of a case for retrial and RJC: cancel the original trial suspended sentences, sentence to death Li Changkui, deprived of political rights for life, and shall be submitted to the the highest. Our teacher talked about so many holes in Li Changkui's case, just in the micro video which I really see him grow into what. Kong Qingdong: this case is finally restored justice. Very has the relations with the US on a comment on news of the sentence is: what law who represent? Laws are made by the court to represent, law is judge to represent? Are not. Judicial workers do not represent the law, like the Bank of people does not mean money, like our professor does not represent the knowledge -- as professor does not represent the truth. Just you this work, engaged in is associated with this thing, but you are right, the whole society to measure, to the whole society to judgment. The law we usually give the judicial staff, as we entrust the government -- government does not represent the truth, the government may make mistakes, mistakes we modify your. We state this final authority, is in the hands of the people. If the court's decision unfair, that the people have the duty, also have the right to request you to act in accordance with the law. But we have some traitors jurist, oppose laws and public opinion. They think: all people, it is illegal; he asked, legal. And you don't is one of old people? This cannot be established in logic. We now people must polish eyes, justice in where? Justice in our hearts, we here in the. However, not every person that represents justice. If the court made an unfair decision, we have to make their voices heard, urging it to back to the law of. Like the previous trial error correction, this does not mean that public opinion is against the law, it is the law itself victory -- this is legitimate, this is the legal right. If committed heinous crimes, such as the cruel murder rape, not sentenced to capital punishment in this country, the laws of this country, its institutions, collapsed. So for those with the law as a child's play, with the law to achieve their despicable political purpose, we must be vigilant, to these people, to clear out the judicial team. Our laws, now very unpopular, why? Is this law into a large number of traitors, imperialist lackeys, traitors, mean and having no sense of shame. Legal master in their hands, breaking the law, damage the social. However, we are part of the ordinary people the law completely disappointed, or go on "anarchism" road, this is wrong. We must believe in the law. However, the law does not hold the hands of those people. To believe that even if we did not go to law school, we didn't read the legal profession, however, everyone is aware of the. You will not be fooled by those legal programs on TV, think they know, they just do not understand law; is the people's understanding, people will always be! netizen: I think the traitors and the Legalists wail opinion rape law I want to put a thousand banger to celebrate! Another: I was the Hui, the name is a play by the name of Imam to. Suihua city in Heilongjiang Province -- the hole game regards two fellow! Kong Qingdong: fellow homage to Suihua, Imam also this to give you a name. (host: Imam.) -- "Imam", this is a personal religious like "priest" like, Islamic inside, the "priest", the equivalent of the "Abbot" us, people called "Imam" -- then we say that the netizen says so on. If say, oppose the will of the people and the law, it would become a minority they interpret the law -- that is his meaning, the legal representative. They were legal under the banner of "rule of man", in fact, is to return to the track, they actually want to "rule of man" -- is what he said, is the truth: "because I'm a jurist, Professor of law at me, so I will represent the law." So if we look at this step, we will not be on him when. host: and we also heard, said that the Li Changkui case (RE) the second time, did not inform the defendant. Kong Qingdong: Yeah, if it is in accordance with the law to do so, you at least "procedural justice" has nothing to do. So these people always sneaking, "cheat", the lack of respect for the law, say repeatedly repeatedly said "law" is that these people. (host: know the law but break it.) Yes. The law seems to be a very mysterious things falling from the sky, they have, we can't do -- this is wrong! Hole and tell everyone: any law, are based in heaven, the heart of the. In the absence of the law before, we human beings are living for many years. We human beings first by heaven, the heart to maintain, in order to facilitate later -- as we build the country, established government -- we established law. But the law, it is necessary to constantly modify, constantly, constantly perfect the supervision. netizen: it seems that the crowd is very useful. The high court's decision was fair, we should continue to onlookers. Kong Qingdong: this "onlookers", it is common to. netizen: why people to eat the leek by the rulers of oppression, just hope in being bullied, the ruler can make decisions for them, in order to prevent. Root. Kong Qingdong: "root". "Root" say, is the vernacular, but is completely in line with the spirit of law. netizen: as ordinary people, now we can only be a concern, a change, slowly. Kong Qingdong: This is a very requires patience, need toughness. But we know, our socialist building, also is the collaborators and traitors are one point one points to dig down -- "the Bank of a thousand li, collapse in Yixue", so we are now to the one point one point leakage, repair seepage. :Moderator: they no longer --) to, if it's always such a mess, let them go down well, Is it right??

Netizen: this thing I worry about is, every case if all through the mass dispute in order to obtain a fair judgment, how can do? Where there are people so many ways to master many unfair decision? The people which have so much energy and constant attention to these things? A protracted war, a delaying tactic, which may be of interest group expected. So the key is to have the power to the population problems.

China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three into (2011.8.22) Moderator: we continue to look at the. China Agricultural University rural freshmen below three, look at the Webpage: China Agricultural University manages director Zhou Xufeng said, this year the school freshman students in the rural household registration ratio below 30%, only. But from 2002 to 2010, the rural household registration students proportion has been stable at more than 30%. But he also said, this is only statistics new information on the rural household registration students, simply to the household register to determine the rural students reduce, too simple. back want to hear hole teachers how to treat rural students now reduces. Kong Qingdong: not now reduced, from the reform and opening up, has been steadily. Reduced to a very serious, very alarming proportions, is twenty years of things, especially in recent ten years. This is not only the China Agricultural University, you have a look, you have a look of Tsinghua University, the students, how many are the children of farmers, how much is the ordinary citizens' children? Less and less. I was in 1983 the University, at that time in my university, Peking University provided children proportion accounted for 40%, and now, even less than 10%. The China Agricultural University is also the case, the harm is very great. First, it causes severe social injustice. The workers and peasants of our population is huge, most people are peasants, most people are ordinary peasants, ordinary citizens, however, their children to university, but reversed -- population occupies a large proportion of the population, their children the opportunity to go to university is the least. This is not a fair. Second, to the whole society, the social development is very unfavorable. Because the workers and peasants the smartest and most children, children have the ability to let the workers and peasants, children can be as much as possible to the University, the country will have hope. You have so many shoulder can't pick, hand not to mention, not a little social practice ability, these people have no the way one gets along with people ability of the University, is a loss to the whole society, is detrimental to the whole country. Whether it is now the world's other advanced countries, and we Chinese ancient, is to let everyone equal opportunity. Our ancient imperial examination system, is about "towards Da Saro, Mu Tang Emperor Tang", is in the test of equality before the. We now you look at the examination system, if do not have what problem, but because we are now the exam oriented education, rural children had no contact condition to more can guarantee him to the University, the test questions, the coach, he is not. The children in the city, especially the rich kids, rely on money -- rely on money to get more mentoring opportunities, rely on money to focus on high school. So, from education perspective, this is an unfair. This is not fair to serious stage, will enable rural people completely exterminated the University of hope; many children even admitted to university, his parents wouldn't let him read. (host: or can't afford.) This has caused more and more sharp opposition between urban and rural areas. Finally, rural person he had no chance, no chance? If you can't turn in education, he can only take the means of revolution. Is turning over only two means: one is education, is a revolution. In order to ensure social stability, long period of stability, it should be in the front so that everyone has a chance of education. If not completely equal opportunity, also be similar, not proportional difference too poor. If the difference is too large, the majority of people are in despair, the only revolution. No revolution how to turn? Who would like to have as a slave? Is our Chinese culture stresses: "military and political leaders, rather a kind of peace?" We Chinese unlike Indians, when the slave generations when. Chinese thinking: I when the slave does not matter, my son as a county magistrate, my grandson to when the emperor. This is Chinese culture, so you have to give him such an opportunity. So I think, this issue now, to a very serious stage. Our educational departments must take special means, must have such a policy vigorously to the rural students inclined. Included in the content of examination, to take an examination of those with practical, labor content, less about pointless, test after what use are not those questions -- to tilt and vigorously to rural students. (host: here some people said, "poor never come on son", and this argument.) It is impossible, in fact, was always a son. Another sentence is the truth -- the rich but three generations -- this sentence is the truth; but a rich family, most of his children must die. You have a look a thousand years of history, the children of the rich finally? Are killed. (host: I think they are killing each other?) Not kill each other. The farmers will revolt, workers will revolt, the proletarian revolution, how many princes head, not all rolling landing? So don't believe what "nobles can world continues," never in that kind of thing! A history, or a "conservation law" of the universe -- people will always stand up, you don't let him use education to turn over, he used the revolutionary turning. You want to let oneself family keep better, last longer, it would have to take the chance for others -- this is the truth. netizen: rural children hope not less. Only the pursuit of material desires, not from the heart of the culture revolution, the country will be more and more bitter, money or no money, have the right to have no power can not escape. Kong Qingdong: you can have a look large Chinese and Western literary works -- literature is mainly described the vicissitudes of the "people" in society -- and you have a look how many people, the first generation is rich, the second generation is also rich, until the four or five generation wealth Very few. (host: "the rich but three".) Well, "the rich but three". If only "not rich", there may be the original situation; the problem is be rich and cruel, must be accompanied by a miserable miserable fate. netizen: economic status seriously restricted the student education, poor children can not afford the high. Kong Qingdong: content and exam, you test those who are on remedial classes to learn how to make the question, of course for rural children disadvantage. For example, I presided over the college entrance examination, to add a interview questions -- to climb, climb to 100 points, up to half 50 points. (host: I sure can't climb up.) That you do not to. (host: I'm 0.) But you can through other aspects, increase your points. That is to say, this problem have to add some tend to rural students. (host: rural children also will not climb ah.) Don't climb a tree that you

Kong Qingdong: Here I will introduce advanced experience USA, is American the judicial decision, it is a relatively strong jury -- jury system -- the jury is ordinary people from all walks of life, they don't know. The jury voted, this person is sentenced to death or not sentenced to death. (The host: "public review".For public review), "". We are not going to learn American, why not learn the advanced experience of this? That is to say, judges, lawyers, these people are occupation, are professional, special law.Man without morals laws never fair! Moral should always be the first. The law is the bottom line. Kong Qingdong: I found that our first video netizens are very understanding, so that the legal key. (host: it is the law school?) It is not a law school; many law students, just to be traitors to teach bad law professor. When some traitors and professor of law school, so to speak: "if you are a lawyer, you give the criminal defense, you find another of his sin, you can't go to expose him, this is called the occupation moral." If you like to an economic crime person as a lawyer, he also found out his son, you have to keep his secrets, this is called "occupation moral". This is our famous traitors jurist, his logic, his ethics -- finally to make money for the first. netizen: case got. But I don't want to see every time the media, public opinion influence of judicial decisions. The court in under the pressure of public opinion to return the justice of law. It was a real country under the rule of law? Kong Qingdong: now China question is not the real rule of law. We now, is this law to a great extent, the powers that be usurped by a traitor. I don't want to see the Communist Party led the people in revolution up like, not revolution not ah, because the government is the reactionary government, so the Communist Party must be the leadership of the people's revolution. Moderator: what if all these things, must by the public to take part in it, that we are not tired, every day do not have something else. Kong Qingdong: not . As long as people adhere to the cry for justice, then the court after it, it knows what is right. (host: they no longer --) on, if it is always such a mess, let them go down well, Is it right?? netizen: this thing I worry about is, every case if all through the mass dispute in order to obtain a fair judgment, how can do Where there are people so many ways to master many unfair decision? The people which have so much energy and constant attention to these things? A protracted war, a delaying tactic, which may be of interest group expected. So the key is to have the power to the population problems. Kong Qingdong: Here I will give you the experience of advanced America, is America the judicial decision, it is a relatively strong jury -- jury system -- the jury of ordinary group is from people from all walks of life, they don't. The jury voted, this person is sentenced to death or not sentenced to death. (host: "public review" category.) For public review, "". We are not going to learn American, why not learn the advanced experience of this? That is to say, judges, lawyers, these people are occupation, are professional, special law. (host: but the hole teacher, I think "public review" we dare not believe, who knows who it is it?) Why can't you believe it? No, but first the system, you have to ensure that, all should be transparent. Is a random sample of fifty individuals, can be pumped into your head today, you don't know, but you can with your conscience, you heard the two sides in the defense, lawsuit, after you listen, you with your conscience, you said that the people should not damn it, or that the judge three years or five years. I think this is a very effective, the judicial sector balance, is also an effective supervision. So as not to our laws, operating in a few traitors.(Host: but the hole teacher, I think "public review" we dare not believe, who knows who it is it?) why can't you believe it? No, but first the system, you have to ensure that, all should be transparent. Is a random sample of fifty individuals, can be pumped into your head today, you don't know, but you can with your conscience, you heard the two sides in the defense, lawsuit, after you listen, you with your conscience, you said that the people should not damn it, or that the judge three years or five years. I think this is a very effective, the judicial sector balance, is also an effective supervision. So as not to our laws, operating in a few traitors.

 

Man without morals laws never fair! Moral should always be the first. The law is the bottom line. Kong Qingdong: I found that our first video netizens are very understanding, so that the legal key. (host: it is the law school?) It is not a law school; many law students, just to be traitors to teach bad law professor. When some traitors and professor of law school, so to speak: "if you are a lawyer, you give the criminal defense, you find another of his sin, you can't go to expose him, this is called the occupation moral." If you like to an economic crime person as a lawyer, he also found out his son, you have to keep his secrets, this is called "occupation moral". This is our famous traitors jurist, his logic, his ethics -- finally to make money for the first. netizen: case got. But I don't want to see every time the media, public opinion influence of judicial decisions. The court in under the pressure of public opinion to return the justice of law. It was a real country under the rule of law? Kong Qingdong: now China question is not the real rule of law. We now, is this law to a great extent, the powers that be usurped by a traitor. I don't want to see the Communist Party led the people in revolution up like, not revolution not ah, because the government is the reactionary government, so the Communist Party must be the leadership of the people's revolution. Moderator: what if all these things, must by the public to take part in it, that we are not tired, every day do not have something else. Kong Qingdong: not . As long as people adhere to the cry for justice, then the court after it, it knows what is right. (host: they no longer --) on, if it is always such a mess, let them go down well, Is it right?? netizen: this thing I worry about is, every case if all through the mass dispute in order to obtain a fair judgment, how can do Where there are people so many ways to master many unfair decision? The people which have so much energy and constant attention to these things? A protracted war, a delaying tactic, which may be of interest group expected. So the key is to have the power to the population problems. Kong Qingdong: Here I will give you the experience of advanced America, is America the judicial decision, it is a relatively strong jury -- jury system -- the jury of ordinary group is from people from all walks of life, they don't. The jury voted, this person is sentenced to death or not sentenced to death. (host: "public review" category.) For public review, "". We are not going to learn American, why not learn the advanced experience of this? That is to say, judges, lawyers, these people are occupation, are professional, special law. (host: but the hole teacher, I think "public review" we dare not believe, who knows who it is it?) Why can't you believe it? No, but first the system, you have to ensure that, all should be transparent. Is a random sample of fifty individuals, can be pumped into your head today, you don't know, but you can with your conscience, you heard the two sides in the defense, lawsuit, after you listen, you with your conscience, you said that the people should not damn it, or that the judge three years or five years. I think this is a very effective, the judicial sector balance, is also an effective supervision. So as not to our laws, operating in a few traitors.

 

Source: (Http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_476da3610102dr8c.html) - law represented by who? _ Kong Qingdong _ Sina blog