"The Fuqing Commission for Discipline Inspection, explosion" occurred in June 24, 2001, exactly seven years since the.

  In this case, there have been many media reported, interested friends can search the Internet, I don't want to talk about the case, just want to say that the trial procedural issues.

 In July 22, 2002, Fujian Provincial People's Procuratorate of Fuzhou city Chen Keyun, Wu Changlong explosion case, the prosecution to the Fuzhou City Intermediate People's court.

  In November 29, 2002, Fuzhou City Intermediate People's Court of the first trial, lawyers for the innocent plead for them. The first trial, the evidence too many loopholes to judge, but the defendant family around Hanyuan and Sue, provincial leaders have made instructions, then the case had to be shelved.

   The case dragged on for two years, until November 29, 2004 only to trial. The second day, November 30, 2004, the Fuzhou City Intermediate People's court made the first instance judgment, with the explosion Keyun Chen, sentenced to death Wu Changlong, suspended for two years, deprived of political rights for life.

  Use two years as a trial, the trial court seriously exceeding the time limits. Violations of the law on court, relevant departments have to pay no heed "".

  Chen Keyun, Wu Changlong, the verdict of the first trial, appeal to the Fujian Provincial Higher People's court in 2004 December.

  High court in this case, for instance again a year, only in December 31, 2005 to "original facts unclear, insufficient evidence. Production, transport and so on in the case of the explosive source types and explosive devices, before and after the defendant's confession is not one, there are also many contradictions between the defendant and between the evidence of confession, confession and seized, need further investigation and verification "on the grounds, revocation of a judgment, the Fuzhou city intermediate court remanded for retrial.

  A common criminal case, the court of first instance trial even for two years, so "serious" case, is extremely rare. Unexpected is, not only the court of first instance does not perform the "law of criminal procedure", even the court of second instance and so.

  Remand the case for a new trial, the Fuzhou intermediate court in April 5, 2006 will be the case back to the procuratorate. During the period, procuratorate requires supplementary investigation, therefore the two extension. Because of the incidental civil action, to extend the time limit of two months. In case of complicated reasons, and one month extension. Until October 10, 2006 to make a trial, Chen Keyun was sentenced to death with reprieve, Wu Changlong. Two people still refuses to accept the second suspended death sentence, the statutory appeal within the time limit, the appeal to the Fujian Provincial Higher People's court. Since then, the cases are no more.

  In accordance with the provisions of "Criminal Procedure Law" article 168th, the people's court shall accept the case of public prosecution, within one month after the sentence, not later than one month and a half. Where this law the 126th regulation of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the central government, the higher people's court approval or decision, may be extended by one month.

  In accordance with the provisions of this article, the Fuzhou City Intermediate Court and the Fujian Higher People's court in the trial of Chen Keyun, Wu Changlong, in the bombing, a serious violation of the "law of criminal procedure" in the trial.

  The case has dragged on, has difficult decision, not because the case is complex, but because of the doubts too much. Because there are a lot of flaws evidence, the trial court according to "Spare him!" sentenced them a reprieve, judicial organs have forgotten "presumable innocence" principle.

   According to Wu Changlong's sister said, the explosion is not Chen Keyun and Wu Changlong crime by the public security organs, they wronged. That year, the investigators to obtain confessions, implementation of torture for Wu Changlong, since he was also scarred.

  "Fuqing Discipline Inspection Commission explosion" case, has attracted media attention. "China Youth Daily", "Oriental Outlook Weekly", "the Strait Metropolis Daily", "Fujian daily", "Hongkong - Asia Weekly" are reported. However, case of judicial organs, such as "dead", not "hot boiling water".

  Some of the media reports, the case if overturned, many people will have to be investigated. Learned that from Wu Changlong's sister's material, for a police officer to also won two cases.

  In order to brother wash unrighted wrong, over the years, Ms. Wu has always insisted on the petition, once stopped the leadership of the Party committee of the car, but also by the public security organs of the detention order.

  Ms Wu asked me, second times after the appeal case, has been a year and zero eight months, the Fujian Provincial Higher People's court is not the court was, what to do?

  I said, you go to the Supreme People's court reflect. She said, I have been to many times, the reception staff always reply, Supreme People's court shall be responsible for the supervision, and the case is still pending.

  I told her, that the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the National People's Congress Standing Committee to reflect on it, they have the right to supervise the court. She answered, also visited, no action.

   Yes, the petition is basically no what effect, but the people in addition to petition the road, have what way?

   In ancient times, the feudal officials, as long as there are people to the Yamen "Mingyuan tambourines", he had to personally check the grievances. Now the times are different, people be in power, officials became a servant. But the master to see public servant, is so difficult, stopped the car and servants, the servant dare detention master, this world is what?

   The death penalty for seven years pending, created the history of justice "miracle". Appeal, dragged on for a year and zero eight months without trial, but also a serious violation of the "law of criminal procedure".

  The higher people's Court of illegal acts, the Supreme People's court, responsible for the supervision of the Supreme People's Procuratorate, office of the Standing Committee of National People's Congress is "to pay no heed," who will maintain the judicial justice and what to rely on?

 (attached: "petition beggar" Ms Wei's life more arduous and tortuous, because the land battle she was wounded, due to the lack of fair treatment, and embarked on the road to appeal. As the petition also repeated several times arrested, detained by public security. Later, the judicial organs for "obstructing official business" will she was sentenced to 2 years in prison. She said, from the beginning of 1991 to Beijing to petition, except that two prison sentences, every time you want to come to Beijing to petition. Although the petition not see much hope, but not the petition and what method can solve the problem?)

   Attached:When I face to life to the dead woman......

       The long men Lu, when is the end?