For a long time, Chinese media or the so-called elite, has been promoting and advocating the western democracy, especially advocating American president election system, think people each one vote, you can elect for the country, for the people, good leaders.

   China official has said China is not suitable for the western democracy, but not suitable for the western direct presidential election ballot leaders, however, the official did not put cannot explain the reasons for the more common, more fully. This is also I want to write this blog reason.

   To understand this, we must first understand the nature of USA election, and China what unlike American place, have what not good problem.

   The essence of election, American

   USA essence, is capitalism, is whether the constitution, or other legal system, as well as the electoral law itself are as capitalists services, services for the capitalist pursuit of profit.

   The two major political parties America, namely: the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, also is the capitalist under the control of the parties, all their claims, are not beyond the capitalist legal system and service requirements, the two party of the presidential race, in the long run, but is a kind of wheel flow play tricks, the execution ruling policy, also won't deviate as capitalists service of the big box.

   America presidential candidate, is to go through two party nominated (other small parties, although also can nominate, but basically is the supporting role), if the two party's nomination, did not meet the USA most of the will of the people, but according to the election law, also have to choose a person from to when the president. This also explains from another point of view, the importance America president is not too high, all of its behavior, but also restricted by law.

   So, can only say that, in USA whoever is elected president, have to according to the legal system to protect the interests of the capitalists to operate. Legal system for capital services, is the core problem. In this sense, USA presidential election is just a political show, is the capital of household countless rope control puppet (USA also unwilling to be controlled, but also inevitably lead to step down or be assassinated fate), but a good president, but is now better legal system as the capitalist services, create more benefits for the capitalists.

   Some people may ask, if elected president, cannot maintain the capitalist interests do, or, to overthrow the existing legal system to make a new set of legal system, only for American national citizen service? According to the present legal system, the possibility of this basic impossible, this is because:

   First, American the president's power is restrained, most bills are subject to both the house and the Senate is effective;

   Second, American Senate election in the house or in the Senate, is also carried out by independent electoral system, the president is unable to control the congressman's election;

   Third, USA capitalists controlled media, such as television, radio, such as: network, through publicity, publicity can ensure to the benefit of the agent was elected, both presidential election, or in the house and the Senate election are;

   Fourth, American election, in addition to the election by the electoral law outside the normal, its presidential candidate or other candidates, establishment and legal or policy, participate in the figure are private or secret organization. Such as "skull and bones", "America Council on foreign relations", "the Carnegie endowment for international peace", "Rockefeller foundation" and "Rand Co", to USA legal, policy and the election produces major effect. Interested users can access the Internet, introduces the organization. According to China parlance, a lot of things American, are private secret communication, arrange diving rule results the capitalists under control, America no elite advocate of democracy, democracy is just a front.       

   Two, why China not suitable for direct leadership of the country

   First, Chinese does not have the perfect legal system for directly elected leaders

   Any country if a directly elected state leaders, the national legal system should be relatively perfect and complete, the ultimate goal is for the capitalists America legal services, but in this goal, the system construction of the legal system is relatively complete, both law making a paper, or the implementation of supervision, and the separation of three powers restraint mechanism, are relatively complete, this also to American in capitalist mode of operation are 200 years, and Chinese general socialist construction. Only 60 years, 30 years ago from the struggle, do a lot of exercise or movement of expansion, after 30 years there route to, at least not adhere to public ownership in many aspects, there is no one to one direction of efforts and improvement.

   That is to say, American can manage the state in accordance with the existing law, not what's the problem.

   With an example of the image, it seems, to build a house, you will have a perfect, accurate design drawings, and the construction of legal system USA, like the perfect design drawings, and all kinds of elections or daily management state, as if looking for a construction unit to build a house, as long as the design drawings. No problem, process monitoring is in place, which is a specific one of the construction unit to build a house, not too big effect. And China is not suitable for direct elections, mainly is the system of law China, still did not achieve design drawings qualified stage, especially the supervision and restriction of power of many, there are many legal terms are mutually contradictory, operability is poor, can say, Chinese existing rules almost no law is the 100% full execution.

   In the absence of legal constraints, elected leaders, he can do what I want, that the management of the state will be more chaos, the house will become east west slanting not covered?? The present leaders also exist such problems. This phenomenon, in China many counties of the city planning and construction, because the leadership changes city planning, more most incisive.

   So, Chinese if elected leaders, there must be a perfect, complete, fair and equitable, power constraints, and fully representative of the interests of the people of the legal system, without this premise, elected leaders can only be to state more tube to the chaos.

    Second, China too particular about human relationship, should not be used for direct presidential election system

   China culture characteristic, is not too like according to the regulations, pay more attention to human relations, open the back door, engage in unspoken rule, if the election after the presidential nomination system to operate and manage the country, so, the state power will become a gang or private power, serious when, feudal emperor restoration are possible produce, state governance or corporate governance a long system, showed a tendency of many public private;

   Third, Chinese generally lack the overall interests, lack of fairness and justice consciousness, rationality does not protect the election results

   Because of China development is relatively backward, education degree of national acceptance is relatively low, coupled with the impact, Chinese under feudal is strong, as well as the influence of Confucianism be worldly-wise and play safe, many people lack the interests of the state, the overall interests, lack the horse fair, consciousness, no more devoted to maintain fair the brave spirit, and attention is paid to the interests of small groups, old fellow, old school, old men, kinship, and ethnic relations and other interests, it can not guarantee to just to participate in elections, sacred to use the right to vote, to avoid the occurrence of bribery, would be less likely to choose good leaders.

   Not only the national leader election, the election of other levels also have similar results.

   Slavish education in China not eradicated, the sanctity of independence, impartiality, brave spirit, votes not generally popular among the citizens, Chinese cannot be directly state leaders.

   In summary, the basic conditions Chinese does not have elected leaders, although do not have direct elections, but with a rate supported by opinion polls and other testing way, unqualified political leaders ahead of laid-off conditions, if the country does not have this kind of exit mechanism, meet incompetent leaders in power, to wait until the expiration of office only, not to in China, Yu Min, has been harmful? This is not consistent with any power requirement constraint.