The case of Xiamen:           

   The company will not pay the provident fund employee lawsuitsProvident fund management center

        Focus Xiamen real estate network Xm.focus.cnIn 2009 04 months 29 daysXiamen Commercial Daily Ni Lijing

　　The company did not pay the provident fund management center of the Xiamen

　The staff think its not as to urge the management obligations

The company did not pay the housing accumulation fund for employees, last year, a staff that the provident fund management center on the company failed to supervise, management obligation, the prosecution to the court.

Our history first "mingaoguan" Law -- "administrative procedure law" is born 20 years. Yesterday morning, Xiamen City Intermediate People's Court Administrative Tribunal announced 20 "mingaoguan" typical cases, of which there are many little-known.

Lin is a Xiamen design company. In 2007 April, he complained to the provident fund management center, from the beginning of 2004 October, the company is not for him to pay the housing accumulation fund, violations of the legitimate rights and interests of his.

He filled out a complaint registration form, the provident fund management center received the complaint, and recognized the design companies do pay the Lin provident fund 3350 yuan.

In the management of the staff of the center's urging, design company in 2007 July for the payment of housing provident fund.

Lin began to other company employees "welfare". In 2007 August, Lin once again to the center report, design requirements for company is not sufficient for other employees pay housing provident fund to make processing.

Later, Lin to management center fails to perform his duty, bring a lawsuit to the Siming District court.

The court held that, Lin sue the provident fund management center is not as untenable, the claim shall not be supported.

Lin refuses to accept the decision, appeal to the court, but the court from the program directly to the court rejected the prosecution.

The reason is: design, whether for other employees and payment of housing provident fund deposit in full, on Lin does not have a real impact, and he does not have a legal interest, therefore, Lin does not have to prosecute the subject qualification.