The case of Li Tianyi court interpretation

 

                      The truth, never surrender 

 

   Yesterday afternoon 4 when, the lawyer was invited to the Tencent micro-blog online users answer questions, for the application for the two session, logic paradox problems appearing in court, in the case of the one one answer, summarized below, please you generous with your criticism.

 

   Q: Blue and lawyers, hello! Forgive my ignorance, the first time I heard "Qing court again". Excuse me, lawyers, in what circumstances can be presented to the court "the Qing court again"? Li Jia is what reason "Qing court again"? "The Qing court again" was rejected, also can ask?

    

  Blue and lawyers: As expected, the reason. So far, all for Meng Ge were for various reasons to reject, afford much food for thought. The application was in court again12Experts through the understanding of the trial and files materials5Fully demonstrated an hour after the. Think, the facts of the case is not yet known, qualitative evidence does not have. According to the lawyer Li Zaike's words, "victim" misrepresentation of facts and forty or fifty inconsistent, it is necessary to transfer the victim, to restore the court investigation. 

 

   

   Q:Blue and lawyers Hello, seem to ignore some defense, court selective evidence and witnesses, if this kind of circumstance continues, how should do?

 

   Blue and lawyers: The court declined to comment. Meng Ge has so far always adhere to the normal channels to reflect the situation, she largely to defend and shows a mother and military dignity. She doesn't need any special treatment, only requires the judicial justice, to eliminate all human disturbance, let the real return to the normal judicial track, with facts, evidence and law to judge. I believe, the court and the judges will respect the facts and law, uphold the occupation conscience, make the independence and impartiality of judgment.

 

 

   Q:Why the so-called female victims do not appear in court?

 

   Blue and lawyers: 12Experts think, the victim as a key witness to testify in the court, because the report and statement of doubt:1The drunken state, doubt, ten minutes before be dead drunk, after ten minutes walk as if on wings;2Direct evidence that the defendant, no Yang stated drag, pull hair, beaten and behavior;3, white-collar identity, virgin, is five rape and other details are direct evidence to overthrow;4The so-called facial injury, forensic experts strongly questioned by the authority, is suspected to be a new injury, three days old wounds may not appear this kind of state;5As for the closed space, such as the car, the room was beaten and raped statement, multiple fraud, logical paradox, difficult to make out a good case;6, in severe violence cases, the5ManNever abandon, spent nearly 8 hours, there is enough time to escape, to call for help, the report of space, but it is not self - protection, instead morning from Hubei Hotel out walking, look relaxed posture normal;7First, as a sexual assault of women, the retained material evidence of skilled, after the infringement chose not to go to the police, but the bar staff and a driver to Li Jia, parents, Li I call, send text messages, for two days;8The proof, psychiatric treatment, documents and in private hospitals to prove the diagnosis of doubtful authenticity;9Do not rule out the suspicion perjury, false accusation. Existence of Yang problem statement list nine points, This is not the only one. In view of this, the court is necessary to testify, otherwise it is difficult to ascertain.

 

   Q:Light offence defense do in the other defendants, why do you insist on doing innocence, is based on Meng Ge's contract and move or do you think exactly sure win pleaded not guilty?

 

   Blue and lawyers: Innocence is the prudent choice of counsel of objective facts, evidence and law based on the direction of defense. On this issue, MS Meng Ge has never made any emphasis on lawyers and rigid requirements. Defense lawyers are fully play space. After the demonstration, the existence of facts unclear, insufficient evidence and reasonable doubt prostitution and do the Bureau cannot be excluded. The victim's identity, hair pulling, tugging, beatings, being5People rape no direct evidence to support the statement.

 

 

   Q:Zhao Yunheng questioned, you dare to deal with? The twelve experts really qualified to see first-hand information? 

   Blue and lawyers:For this problem, Chen Shu lawyers have made sufficient answer, this does not repeat. I respect the Zhao defence, but please respect the facts, legal Zhao and his party. As for the reality of his client Zhang, he should be very clear. A father in the court said lawyers are recorded. Witness Lee's court statement, Chen Shu's lawyer has been clearly explained. He did not need to deliberately emphasize has been witness court denied the testimony of witnesses, and the so-called details not decided to strengthen, to mislead the public. As for the victim has been withdrawn no premise of civil compensation request, each take initiative15Million for claims, that is his choice, Public opinion is the best judge., declined to comment.

 

   Q:The other four defendants pleaded guilty and what do you see??

 

   Blue and lawyers: The feedback law and guardian, the so-called four defendants guilty is man-made myth. In this case, the defendants have expressed to participate in prostitution apologizes, but no one admits to rape. There are really four lawyers in court for the confession of the defendant, do light offence and defense, defense counsel in court to take one hundred thousand alleged victims compensation. These things are. Special emphasis is, adult Wang Mou of the accused person, from first to last pleaded not guilty, but his lawyer has said in court that he has to do a lot of ideological work, let he confessed to reduce the penalty, and the mobilization of his father wrote expostulated with her confession, but Wang Dangting hit back, his father did not write to him. The court amidst the winds of change, all sorts of strange things, ridiculous.

 

 

   Q:Now who is Li to be fair, will be the support at the siege, and even clamored to network violence and Meng Ge and so on, outsider Chen Youxi lawyer in the personal point of view of the published views, but also to recruit supporters at the siege of Chen Youxi, the lawyer was forced to shut down micro-blog comments. Excuse me blue and lawyers, what do you think of violence on the network?

 

   Blue and lawyers: The enemy officer, Chou name, people's social psychology of objective existence, but someone in the use and incitement to this mentality, kidnapping social sympathy, to achieve discourse hegemony. In such an environment, Lee is the absolute disadvantage, the so-called strong weak and vulnerable to power. Lee case obviously exist network control human. So far, Chen Youxi has not yet received any delegate lawyer Li, Li also without payment of any fee to the lawyer chen. Chen Youxi Li Tian to a case of vocalization and intervention, is full of knowledge, for the public morality, speak boldly in defense of justice. In his words, in the face of fact and truth, someone must speak out. But Chen Youxi still suffer from network violence hit. Don't worry, the truth will never yield to any forces.

 

   

  Q:The terms of your own, with the pressure of public opinion? Do you think the public opinion will not affect the final judgment?

 

   Blue and lawyers: No one case will be like in this case, is entirely one-sided handahansha voice. This case does exist extremely bad public opinion control. The Li Tian case is the most strange is, the nodes in each key will have a variety of seemingly professional simulation high degree of rumors and the article came out, Meng Ge and Li Jia malicious attacks, to mislead the public, inciting social antagonism and hatred, then Lee and Li into the eighteen layers of hell, let everything the illusion is logical to become the truth and facts. So far, the sound becomes relatively rational, debating, this is the normal state of the public opinion. I hope the relationship between public opinion and judicial is the main road into the air, each take half, do not want to intervene in the judicial public opinion, but also against judicial use of public opinion. I hope this trial could become a model for judicial justice.

 

   Q: The bar has been supporting Ms. Yang, but the bar but never appear, how do you look?

 

   Blue and lawyers: All the witnesses to testify in court, especially the victim to appear in court is the key. The facts of the case to find out is not complicated, notify all the witnesses to appear in court, to fully and the true meaning of the cross examination, cross examination, it is easy to let the truth surfaced. Emphasis should be put on, the victim as a key witness in the case, the investigation organ has to do multiple false statement, the court is necessary. Unfortunately, she promptly fell ill, to let the case whirling.

 

    

  Q:At present, there seems to be no complete evidence chain, even there is no direct evidence that Li Moumou crime, the court will not know how sentences. Public intervention of judicial independence era, how do we avoid regulation? Worth thinking about. Ms. Meng Ge is not a good mother, but also a good mother.

 

   Blue and lawyers: Expert appraisal meeting, around the facts, evidence, procedures etc.12A problem of5The full certification, an hour final thought, the direct evidence can not prove that the defendant the facts of the crime, indirect evidence also can not form a closed type complete chain of evidence, many statements and direct evidence of the victim does not agree, the face scar by the forensic expert analysis, not three days before the old wound. In addition, this case does not exclude prostitution and blackmail and impose exactions on suspicion. These need the court carefully treated, judicial justice.

 

 

   Q: A key figure in the case of Zhang's hotel. He should have foreseen as adults, few people have sex the consequences. If the case is the gang rape, whether he will be recognized as an accomplice? If prostitution, whether he will be identified as the instigator?

 

   Blue and lawyers: According to the trial lawyers feedback, the defendant in court, witnesses are suggested a prostitution and blackmail and impose exactions on paper50Million facts, including the desire to take out one hundred thousand to compensate victims for a lawyer active light offence defense in media interview process is pointed out in the introduction Zhang Youyi prostitution plot. Prior to this, Ms. Zhang introduced the dream of prostitution and blackmail and impose exactions on behavior of the report, evidence material including SMS, telephone and the testimony of witnesses, very full. So, is crucial to the investigation to find out the facts of the case to a.

 

   Q:Whether Beijing Olympic Hotel surveillance video, video can accurately demonstrate Yang all of a person a long time in the car? This is very important, is that Yang Shixiang go direct evidence or want to stay. If you have five minutes, enough to play110And give us a call or send a message. Please, the lawyer answered

 

  Blue and lawyers: There is a logical paradox. Yang statement on the way to the Beijing Olympic Lee was beaten in the car. But the car for half an hour in the hotel door, the day has gradually bright, the road has a pedestrian walk, Yang a person stay in the car, the door has been opened, in accordance with its stated earlier in the car were beaten, she has100Remedies, including shouted for help, from the car ran, the phone in the car, but it is fantastic, Yang on their excellent timing there in the car without any movement, and are not satisfied with the case of the room, and the boy on the train to the Hubei Hotel, in the Hubei Hotel in the video, Yang Wan Li's arm, like lovers, with vigorous strides into the. If the rape in the Hubei Hotel, room, in the security situation closely Hubei Hotel, she didn't have any help, and at 8 in the morning around with this group of men together easily leave, nor do any help to the waiter and security. "Victims" often take the initiative to give up the chance of serious injury of self-help, statements and suffered, two hard logic self consistent.

 

 

   Q: Why did the lawyer for the defendant guilty? If without the permission, the lawyer for the defendant pleaded guilty to have legal effect?

 

   Blue and lawyers: To be clear, the difference and pleaded guilty to admit. In addition, the compensation is based on what kind of consideration, the lawyer to what role plays, all this needs comprehensive consideration. Clearly not conducive to Lee's allegations, the existence of human induced, the power of its certification, there is no other evidence to support? Don't isolate emphasizes representation and some evidence points to reach his guilty defense objective. This is not a responsible attitude. The Defense Department, is a new issue for the whole law circle.