Case analysis summary

 

Investigation and supervision department Cai Shaoyong

For more than two months the comment has entered the review stage. As a freshman in the arrest of the contractor, in more than two months in the past, the2006Since the facts unclear, insufficient evidence not to approve arrest cases self-examination, inspection, especially through by the Procuratorial Committee of some of the key case analysis, make me very touched. Listen to the board of review questions and ask questions, especially van examination questions and criticism, I found myself in the process of handling cases of different degrees exist many problems and deficiencies, and even wrong understanding, such as the case of censorship is not fine, not strict, learning is not enough, can not seriously marking on the investigation organ; problems in the interrogation of criminal suspects review found without interrogation, interrogation is not fine, sitEnjoy it to the public security organsNo interrogation to the problem, thinking is the case itself problems, can not find, ask out, cause should not arrest cases and recommend approval of arrest, serious consequences may exist even wrong arrest; the simple investigation is able to identify, understand, ask through cases, but the facts are not clear the lack of evidence, not to approve arrest suggestions, etc.. The lesson is profound. Through the leadership of criticism and education, I summarize and reflect seriously on the reasons of their own problems and problems, mainly in the following areas:

First of all, on the understanding of the significance of the arrest is not enough.

As a police investigation and supervision department, usually the arrest only as a kind of coercive measures, without taking into account the arrest is an important part of the procuratorial organs to fulfill the responsibility of legal supervision, is an important part of maintaining the judicial justice, but also an important embodiment of the level of law enforcement of procuratorial organs. The review is not careful, not serious, responsibility heart is not strong, not only affects the quality of case by case, not smooth action, it damages the procuratorial organ's image, damage the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, the lossy state organs prestige among the masses.

Secondly, the work manner is not earnest.

Specific performance in the following three aspects:

1Review the files, not careful, not to grasp the case. As in a review of Qin Jianwei in the case of theft, as a contractor for Qin Jianwei theft case, because of my review is not fine, not strict, not to see through all the volume of materials, see the facts of the case, the basic evidence, the suspect first also made a confession of guilt, although the suspect has argued, but feel it excuse not reliable, that is the criminal suspect is the case, arrest him wrong, while ignoring some evidence at the time of the deviation and some details, in case of critical details appear inconsistent, and does not put forward a sound investigation, after a successful lawsuit buried the hidden trouble for cases of trap, resulting in the case now can not be a smooth action outcome, and even the serious consequences of the case may have the wrong arrest. In addition, in a review of Song Xiaohui on suspicion of theft case, that Song Xiaohui was the traffic policeFound that car, I also made a confession of guilt, on why the traffic police to check his car, how to know the car is the missing car, how the suspect's whereabouts, etc. do not have a clear review, the car is in what place, who changed the frame number and engine number not found out, the argument the suspect's innocence no investigation, blindly forward approved the arrest of advice. ThereforeResult two facts unclear, insufficient evidence cases make arrest.

2To fulfill the duties of supervision is not in place. That fact, evidence examined the suspect suspected of a crime on the line, do not consider found from the case and held other cases of illegal crime, mechanical handling. Sometimes found cases there is not a normal phenomenon, but used to call and ask, did not find out the default, dereliction of duty, the supervision of a mere formality. As also found some abnormal phenomena in the review of Qin Jianwei when the theft, but due to a lack of sensitivity, did not cause enough attention, just call to ask why the case handling personnel, for ten days after a written records, the public security organ to Qin Jian Wei communications is what time to let these people go, their communications. Why no written records and other problems, no supervision units handling written opinions for reference, and to capture the forensic opinion, supervising, urging the public security organs without further collect relevant evidence.

3There are high, complacent phenomena work, service learning is not enough, lead to grasp of the evidence is not in place. Always think they are engaged in procuratorial work for decades, with many cases, since that case confidence is more accurate, and be big with pride emotions, experience, feel the, relaxed on the study of knowledge, so that the deviation in the processing of cases. As in a review of Song Hongxun on suspicion of theft case, only pay attention to the suspect's excuse, no analysis is true, reasonable the excuse, justify the blind adoption unreasonable, not to the public security organ for investigation and collection of evidence on the testimony of witnesses, raises it with facts unclear, insufficient evidence to suggest, make the not approved the arrest of ideas for this should be approved the arrest of the suspect cases, indulgence. After the case is closed, the existence of the case in question is not timely and the public security organs shall timely exchange of views, supplementary investigation, the contempt of the key details in the case can not be a smooth action. As for Huang Qingye, Huang Shilong, Wang Jiansheng on suspicion of theft case, the Yellow Dragon King built the qualitative behavior of student two people is not accurate. These are my usual study is not enough, weak legal knowledge caused by. As for Li Xiangyang suspected of concealing concealing the proceeds of crime, criminal case (the case has to start the program in the self-examination), because of my experience, feel that Li Xiangyang was to buy other people buy from the hands of a person in addition to the other stolen motorcycle, the middle of the theft suspect not recorded, not convicted, also the facts are not clear, the evidence is insufficient suggestions. Without considering the I have a confession, the victim has the statement, and there is evidence, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility, this is I'm not learning the new interpretation, on the basis of past examples of case, in the other comrades to handle similar cases approved the arrest, I think that the case should be investigated for criminal responsibility of criminal suspects, offered start the program.

Third, knowledge is not in place.

In the report on the Qin Jianwei case, the members of Procuratorial Committee and van inspection has been criticized, they also considered the case in accordance with the two basic down, put forward to the van. It is hard to accept criticism, knowledge is not in place, at that time from the crime of approved the arrest of Qin Jianwei is not wrong, just did not exist in the materials problems and details out, did not make a record. After the section chief and chief procurator common analysis, after careful reflection on their own, to recognize the existence of contradictions on key details, facts unclear, insufficient evidence of the case made the decision of arrest, likelyCause miscarriage of justice, forSerious consequences. Later in the examination, I do recognize problems and their own shortcomings in handling cases in the. Especially8Month25Afternoon and26Day morning, listening to the provincial director Jiang Hansheng personally for the corruption case of Zhao Shuxiang, Meng Baolin case, Xu Jinqiang case, Yunnan Wang Shuhong homicide, Guangxi Lan Yongkui, Hechi Tan Junhu, Hubei Macheng Teng Xingshan robbery homicide argument, especially listening to Xu Jinqiang and Lan Yongkui, Tan Junhu for the robbery after, realize it in two cases there is a common problem in the prosecution phase of examination and approval of arrest is not strict, the examination is not fine, only pay attention to evidence of guilt, do not pay attention to evidence of innocence, the criminal suspect to justify torture to extract confessions of investigators are not implemented, on the hastily made the approval of arrest. According to Jiang Hansheng, said the case against her, for Qin Jianwei, high meet and Song Xiaohui theft has many of the same place, in the interrogation of Qin Jianwei, Qin Jianwei also defended the investigators torture to extract confessions problem, I also did not implement the investigation, only pay attention to the confession, excuse on the suspect's innocence no investigations for example, Qin Jianwei argued that in the day it was handed to police station until second day before it was put back, no time to throw money at the depot door. The excuse that I no investigation, only pay attention to the confession of Qin Jianwei, on the hastily approved the arrest made suggestions, these are my usual study is not enough, the service quality is low, the level of case handling ability is not strong, the law enforcement idea errors, not strictly in accordance with the provisions of the criminal procedure law caused by.

Now think of it, I review the style and the thought the case was terrible, these are not only the problems and causes of Qin Jian Wei, Song Hongxun, Song Xiaohui and other case can not be normal procedure, if long before, is likely to cause damage to the case review, and even lead to miscarriage of justice. Through deep reflection, self inspection of some cases in the past, I have a deep understanding of their own problems, also learned from. In future work, I will further improve the work style, overcome selfFull ofEmotion, strengthen study, timely grasp of the relevant legal interpretation, consult with an open mind, be careful, don't miss the details, dare to supervise, do the examination work.

 

 

TwoOOIn August 14th eight

Case analysis summary

 

The public prosecution department Du Zhenyi

According to the school work arrangements, this year6Month so far, in our hospital2006Years to2008Review of arrest, prosecution, public security since the withdrawal, built from the case to the public security organ repair check no longer transferred case, self-examination for more than two months on the job. Through self-examination on, make yourself aware of this activity from first to last the hospital party concerned about the two business department investigators and love; the hospital Party attaches great importance to the work; the hospital Party of procuratorial work into a piece of work, it is absolutely necessary, but also very timely.

    A, I feel

Two months of work on the case, two business departments to carry out the examination of arrest, prosecution, the work of a targeted to combat training, which runs through the concept of socialist law enforcement idea, also reveals the rule of law, law enforcement for the dialectical relationship between people, Gong Pingzheng Yi, Service Development Bureau, Party leadership, also solved for law enforcement, who is thought to understand a problem who case; at the same time, from how to do the review of arrest, prosecution work, how to accurately grasp the two work standard of evidence, how to judge the legitimacy to evidence of authenticity, how to adopt, use the volume, volume of evidence in the evidence review collection, how to identify and dispose of the volume of evidence collected materials and so on, give us a very vivid, targeted professional course. All the members of the particular case statement, reflects the members responsibility, points out that in the case of review of arrest, prosecution, contractor personnel problems. In the case of the meeting, check analysis on cases, fan of induction and the handling of the case, all reflect his love and dedication to the cause, it is because of the fan. The cause of love and dedication spirit and its political, professional quality, to bring out "to make progress, unity harmonious" leadership. From the analysis of the work, makes me think of why the people's Procuratorate of Yuzhou city into the national advanced ranks of a Procuratorate, ranking in the national procuratorial system, there is only one answer, we have a civil and military leaders, a strong leadership team.

Two, my question

Based on the2006Years to2008Years,15Analysis of a case, I clearly see their own problems, summed up in one sentence: not awarded not to know, on a jump. By thinking about the near section, to find their own shortcomings.

(a) The concept, the socialist law enforcement law enforcement idea, learning is not enough,

Understanding is not deep, more not flexibility. Nearly two years of work in the party, under the arrangement while also learning the socialist legal theory, also writing experience, experience, but its real significance understanding not only emphasizes the efforts, work busy, as business department, as long as to do business, case not problem, the study of political theory is not learning is the administrative department of political theory, the results did not learn, work didn't do.

Two. Don't pay attention to the legal knowledge, learn the essence of business. After the case is accepted by the public security organs, just according to the confirmation of charges, go over some of the law, because they do not pay attention to study and understand the meaning of them, to turn to the terms, but also an understanding of the mechanical, mechanical applied.

Three. The prosecution case, not serious, meticulous, not by the feeling, experience. The prosecution as simple to understand as four steps, namely, after accepting the case: scoring. - the production of legal instruments - report. It is because of usually pay no attention to business theory study, report the cases only the past experience in handling cases of qualitative case, to the section chief, chief procurator do not provide a legal basis for more, resulting in treatment in some cases is not so accurate.

Four. Awareness of legal supervision is not strong. Investigation supervision for the public security investigation personnel is not comprehensive, also not good supervision, in reviewing the case is not very deep and detailed, find the problems in the investigation of less, supervision is not in place, at the same time as the legal knowledge is not comprehensive, supervised back is not so hard, there is no legal basis for supervision they are listening to,, will have many concerns, dare not boldly to supervise, cause back investigators wait time after repair phenomenon.

Five. In the prosecution work, not strictly in accordance with the rules of business integration. Reflected in the insufficient learning on the integration requirements, not deep understanding, execution is beneficial to their work on the implementation, no profit is not performed, there is time, time is not performed, optional sex is big. In the case of tracking supervision activities, there is no strong carrier, always with the supervisor bootstrap, call for police investigators supplementary investigation, complement of unclear business center inadmissible notice. Not the case into the program as a case, no awareness of the overall situation, resulting in some cases is difficult.

(six) as a public prosecution department old procuratorial officers, in how to prepare the transfer, help, with regard to science, reasonable suggestions are still not in place. Work at ordinary times, always think oneself is not paid chief, chief, cases are divided in the person's head, every man has his case, that the more afraid of his shadow to handle the case, but also afraid of leadership. Without the public prosecution department as a whole, this is a collective concept is not strong, no awareness of the overall performance.

Three, my plan

    By working up the case, make oneself is a great shock and education, see the problems themselves in the case of the process, find the root of problems. I am determined to the analysis of the case for power, profound reflection of their own problems, conscientiously sum up experiences and lessons. Do the following work in the future:

(a) In political theory and business theory study and work hard, strive to raise their political and professional qualities. The socialist legal concept of thought through to their actual work to further rectify the law enforcement idea, own, solve for whom the law enforcement, standing in the position to law enforcement. Seriously study the law, criminal procedure law and related to the business of legal knowledge, understand the intention of the legislation, lay the foundation for a solid political theory and business theory for future prosecution work.

Two. In handling cases, to be careful, to prevent rough and yeh. After the case is accepted, good marking, questioned, the production of legal instruments, each link, encountered problems, to put down the shelf, learn modestly from others, consult, discuss and solve the existing problem in the cases, be able to self-examination of solution, and never let the investigation personnel to fill in check, the time limit for examination and prosecution. Complementary check solution, never check back, bring the case as his case, set up the public prosecutor, was the idea of a dish of chess.

Three. In the prosecution of legal supervision, to highlight the consciousness. The legal supervision of the prosecution is an important duty in review. Make good use of this duty, is an important part of a good case. Therefore, we must dare to supervise, it is to break the sensibilities, said that, for slow, waiting for the time of the investigators, the criticism of criticism, the report to the leadership of the report, written correction written corrective; secondly, should be good at supervision, but also to supervision according to law, be reasonable. To solve the existing investigation authorities in the investigation activities in the case not to initiate, The fight against the added no supplement, blow, the fixation is not fixed, the exploration not exploration, the interrogation, interrogation, the identification is not identified problems.

Four. Strict implementation of the procuratorial business integration rules of procedure law and the Institute to develop. The procedure law and the integration rules, is an important part of the substantive right treatment. No legal procedures, the correct treatment is very difficult to ensure that the entity, in the case of activities can be seen in many cases, the understanding of the problem, resulting in cases not smooth action, one of the important reasons is not act according to the regulations and the procedures of the procuratorial business integration rule, is a profound lesson. So in the future in the handling of cases in the process, to enhance the procedure consciousness, rule consciousness.

   (five) play the key role in the old comrades, to prepare for transfer, take action. Actively propose reasonable suggestions to Cory, for the prosecution of science to a new level and make due contribution; in handling the cases, often and new comrades together, study together, to learn from each other, complement each other, mutual improvement, an exemplary role to play good old comrades.

 

Case analysis summary

                                 

The public prosecution department Wang Hongfu

This year6Since September, according to the school party deployed, two departments, public prosecution for investigation and supervision2006Analysed deeply personal, collective self verification and the years can not be a smooth litigation cases. Analysis of the case verification, so that I have been warning and profound education. This activity to me, for I thought I bring order out of chaos, law enforcement of quality inspection and enforcement style combat on my test evaluation.

The case verification analysis for a long time, the strict request, high specifications is the first ten years of experience in my work, a special activity also is my biggest harvest. This activity, not only to our intuitive feel their presence in the thought of law enforcement, law enforcement style and service quality of the problems and shortcomings, but the event like a lighthouse, guide the right direction for our future work.

In the assessment of the case verification, for their own problems, I feel very ashamed and sad, although there are ten years of public prosecution work experience, although handled thousands of cases, but to handle cases still there should not be problems, therefore, I think the public prosecution department contractors, we should first of all reflection, shall be submitted to the party and the first to check that I. And the reason I did not lead to check, because I realized that only through the whole process of case analysis to check on their own problems in a more profound understanding, more comprehensive. Through this case verification of activities, I think its mainly exist in the following four aspects:

A thought, law enforcement

The first is the purpose of law enforcement is not clear, the concept of self. Do not understand the real meaning of "no punishment in doubt case", the case of minor problems as conviction doubts to treat, the case handling can not correctly grasp. The new criminal policy and socialist legal concept learning, understand not deep, on the "for whom the law enforcement" this problem is not clear, so not a correct concept of law enforcement, the one-sided emphasis on the suspect excuse but ignore the rights of the victim protection mainly work. It made me realize that no law enforcement objective correct is not the correct enforcement of law enforcement, if the purpose is not clear, can only cause to suspect to combat ineffective and inadequate protection of the rights of the victims of the consequences.

Second law enforcement responsibility is not clear, supervision and consciousness is not strong. Work in the desalination of procuratorial supervision duties, mainly do not pay attention to the investigation and judicial activities are legal to carry on Supervision in reviewing the case, the heavy entity light procedure, on the case.

Third law enforcement principle is not clear. There is no good adherence to the "take the fact as the basis, the principle of law enforcement to the law as the criterion", "take the fact as the basis, to the court as the criterion" thought. Handle cases not tightly around the case facts and evidence to judge according to law, but the court opinions and views as a measure of the standard case, understanding of blind obedience to the court. Now, this idea is not only influenced by supervision on court, also affect the effectiveness of supervision.

Two, law enforcement style

Law enforcement in the style of work, my main problem is working responsibility heart is not strong, mainly in the following aspects:

First, marking not serious. For details of cases do not pay attention, the correct procedure and case details may sometimes affect the cases. "Detail decides success or failure", this sentence also has guiding significance for the correct handling of the case.

Second, the interrogation of criminal suspects are not serious. With no marking problems found detailed interrogation outline, the interrogation record format, existence of interrogation is not in place, such as the harm is not in the interrogation to find leaks the crime committed, leakage; two is not timely found violations of the investigation organ; three is not able to find the suspect of crime, surrender circumstances, thus can not correctly, fully implement the prosecution duties.

Third, Duotuishaobu outline making is not serious. Supplementary check problem without reasoning and pertinence, always think that as long as the problem to ask, investigators shall understand the intention of supplementary check, should know what evidence investigation supplement, no empathy investigators correctly understand Duotuishaobu intention, can check to bit. This problem, if the young comrades concerned could be forgiven, but for ten years the experience for me, should not happen, because they are not do not have the ability and experience to the need to fill up problems listed, listed the fine and reasoning in place, the main reason is not steadfast, covet province jin. The reasons are because of the working responsibility heart is not strong.

Three, service quality

Quality in business, mainly due to the presence of subjective emotions be big with pride and not pay attention to professional knowledge learning and improving the quality of the business. Especially in recent years, just engaged in the prosecution work studying business knowledge tenacity all gone, always think oneself for many major, complicated cases, did not have errors and deviations, and their professional quality has also been recognized leaders and colleagues praise, therefore, began to blind self satisfaction, extremely arrogant once, confident and aggressive become conceited and obsolete, work nature also lost the initiative and the feeling of pressure, lose the motivation of learning and enthusiasm, not aware of improving the quality of the business such as the sail against the current, or. Work on the case, the lack of deep thinking, the case study. It is precisely because of these reasons, in recent years due to their own professional quality not only greatly, even retrogress phenomenon. In the case of the verification process, all the members of the sharp questions, case objectively comments made me impressed, but also make me feel a lack of business knowledge, and van inspection for each case finally analysis, summarize the station height, makes me to feel, how to grasp the case. How to handle the case in order to achieve the unity of political, legal and social effects. Business knowledge can self study, case responsibility heart is not strong can improve myself, but not the correct law enforcement idea is short of self correction, therefore, I feel the case check my biggest harvest is a fan of inspection and members of the case inspiration to me to help me to correct its own concept of law enforcement. I participate in assessment review cases, causes the case no smooth action is mainly embodied in three aspects:

A study on the general principles of criminal law is not transparent, the subjective aspect of crime can not correctly grasp, to judge, to measure the subjective intentional standards did not grasp, resulting in handling the case, the subjective intention cannot accurately judge the crime and crime, confuse the antecedents of excuses, thus affecting the smooth case.

The two is the study of a case of public prosecution evidence lack of standard system, for the case has reached "indeed, fully" without clear aims in what circumstances, what is the "two basic" knowledge is not in place, resulting in reviewing the case, to demand too much of the evidence, buckle is too strict, meticulous, affected the cases of fast smooth action.

Three from the05The Department of public prosecution of the country appeared in the "She Xianglin case" misjudged case of thorough analysis, summary, make me in handling cases in the "once bitten, twice shy ten year" fear, start thinking of law enforcement can't help right, this kind of thought influence the correct judgment on the case, too in some cases, treatment is one of the reasons for the improper. So I said the case verification, my biggest harvest is a fan of inspection and members of the case inspiration to me to help me to correct its own concept of law enforcement, make me realize right cannot prevent misjudged cases, and enhance the sense of responsibility, and continuously improve their professional quality and strict compliance with the system, it is the fundamental guarantee for preventing wrong case.

Four, abide by the system

Review06For years the case, mainly exists in compliance with the institutional aspects of the problem is not strictly comply with the implementation of "procuratorial business integration rules". Is not strictly followed, one is not aware of "integration" is the procuratorial business rules to regulate law enforcement behavior, improve quality, strengthen the supervision function ensures the; two is that the "procuratorial business integration rules" increased processing case workload, thus the "procuratorial business integration rules" understanding is not in place, the implementation is not in place. Now, the public security investigation supervision is not in place, to investigate the guidance is not in place is not the "procuratorial business integration rules" implemented, do not use the system to stop the case of vulnerability, to strengthen supervision.

Five, the next step of the reform measures

The case check in is like a mirror, reflect the existence in the handling of cases of the problems and deficiencies, and the existence question and the insufficiency of the summary and Reflection on their own, so I found the root causes of these problems and realize its harm. Therefore, in the future I should try to do the following:

1, to strengthen the socialist concept of the rule of law and the current criminal justice policy learning experience, to change the idea of law enforcement, firmly establish a correct concept of law enforcement, has always been to "justice" as law enforcement behavior criterion.

2, to study business knowledge, continuous self pressurized, self charging, and formulate feasible learning plans, in a month, a comprehensive system will be "two laws", the current judicial interpretation and the proof standard learning again, make their own professional quality has been improved obviously.

3, to enhance the sense of responsibility and mission in the work, to firmly establish the "quality consciousness" in the case, completely overcome not serious, not a strict style of work, and with fine quality to measure the case entity, procedure and carrier.

4The provisions of the business integration, "rules" to remember in heart, practice in line, with the legal process to ensure that the substantive justice.

                              

2008Years9Month11Day

Case analysis summary

 

Investigation and supervision department  Zhang Baoping

By not arrest, cannot be lawsuits self-examination, assessment, the procuratorial committee focused on some key cases case by case analysis, especially for the "holistic" case of the examination, I deeply understand the importance of this case, verifying the necessity, timeliness. The verification activities are a powerful corrective deviation of law enforcement, law enforcement behavior previously thought, unified thought understanding, clear, clear direction.

Through this inspection, which makes the procurators, especially me, found many problems and defects, and some are quite serious, it makes me feelDeep.Jiang Hansheng senior prosecutors to teach us, makes me feel for him on the case of the rigorous attitude, the pursuit of fairness and justice, persistent; he is to uphold the people's interests first, the supremacy of law and make unremitting efforts to do, is also a strong shock to me, gave me encouragement, to motivate, get a baptism from the thought to the spirit. By comparing with the advanced character, more highlights many problems itself, are at work to live up to the leadership and Comrades hopes.

A review of the case, not careful, not deep, not comprehensive, resulting in improper handling of some of the cases

Because of the case review is not careful, not fully understand, only to see the partial, and not grasp the case from the whole, the case is separated, the wrong advice, resulting in some cases did not receive timely treatment, affecting the procuratorial organ's image. For example robbery case in last year for the Kang self-improvement, paying too much attention to the suspect in the details, too much of the cause, too much about the cases, cases will be separated, see different criminal intent, but did not grasp the case from the whole, intentional content determine the case; ignore social harmfulness case, did not put forward the arrest of opinion. Although the case has been listed as the self-examination after the restart of the case, but because of their own work at the time of not careful, not comprehensive, to the public security organs and the masses caused combat ineffective phenomenon, the procuratorial organs of the image is a kind of damage.

Two, the style of work is not serious, a muddle with one's duty, have experience handling of the problem

On the admissibility of the case, sometimes rough over file material, see the confession, went to the interrogation of criminal suspects, but not seriously review files, filing, investigation and found case, criminal suspects arrested after, by asking the investigators have learned, see for license agreement, by before the experience that arrested the wrong no, we suggest make arrest. Resulting in some cases in the trap, because some details and the influence of the successful cases, such as in the Chen Zhengjun robbery case. The incidence, case after is not clearly stated, this muddle with one's duty performance and ultimately affect the handling of the case, add unnecessary trouble to the leadership, the leadership of waste precious time.

Three, attach too much importance to the suspect excuse, to explain the poor response

The suspect in custody after light offence or defense of innocence, this is normal psychological reaction of criminal suspects. But in reviewing the case, especially for some certain antecedents, difficult, complex or controversial cases, once the suspects in defense of innocence, is considered "excuse" such as "tiger", poor response to the "excuse", at a distance, to avoid mistake cases and prevent reason lawsuit cannot capture after, put bad advice. The robbery case was more obvious in the Kang self-improvement, now in retrospect, this approach is wrong and dangerous, and the procuratorial personnel to combat crime, to fulfill the responsibility of legal supervision status does not match, this shows that I am learning efforts not enough, deviation exists the idea of law enforcement.

Four, work to fulfill the supervision is not in place,Supervision of the sense of responsibility is not strong, supervision capacity needs to be strengthened

For the problems found, not actively try to solve the problem, but to avoid problems, put it away unheeded, allowing the supervision responsibility, so as to cause the passive. For example robbery case in the review of Chen Zhengjun and others, found that after the incident and arrested a suspect, but released shortly after the problem, cause I don't have deep search problem, to put it away unheeded, it seems, is likely to miss important crime with the crime of malfeasance cues, suggesting that I supervision sense of responsibility is not strong, the overall situation awareness is not strong, find clues, clues of transfer capability is not strong.

There is a deviation to grasp five, criminal policy and law enforcement idea, understanding, that affect the correct handling of the case

In the "no punishment in doubt case" concept, mistakenly believe that as long as there is doubt cases, suspects excuse verification can not, can not be ruled out, some problems have not been identified, is doubtful, it cannot handle. In this incorrect ideas instigation, and in some cases, especially the antecedents of robbery and theft cases have not been timely treatment. On the "Leniency" of the criminal policy, wrongly understood as "a liberal" and neglected for some cases shall be strictly, do not have a correct understanding of "wide and Yan", which used some of the severe cases of "wide". For example, in the verification of Liu strong two robbery case, Kang Ziqiang two robbery case, this is the case.

Six, don't study hard, not deep, business knowledge is not in place, the business capacity needs to be strengthened

This is mainly manifested in the case, to have some antecedents of robbery, blackmail and impose exactions on, trouble is not inaccurate, awareness bias, not a very good from the crime to define their difference, to confuse the concept and behavior, only to see the intentional content confessions in, ignoring what intentional content from the objective behavior, cause case handling. This is mainly reflected in the verification of the Kang and robbery, robbery in the Xu Jianhua case, Liu Jieshi. This shows that I have tasted in business knowledge, floating on the surface of the problem, which affects the business ability, not very good for qualitative case, cannot get accurate advice, or even the wrong advice. I remembered the year before lastFor the illegal disposal of seized property case, because there is no around the crime to review the case, mistakenly give not catching proposal, the leaders point out that, after the re-examine the case of arrest, the court accepted the court's decision, that I was proposed not catching advice is wrong, the quality of the case is not high, business knowledge is not comprehensive, there is a deviation, also shows that the business ability, need to continue to improve.

Seven, there is no serious work, not careful, do not take the initiative to phenomenon

In the production of not catching reason manual and supplementary examination outline and reasoning is not strong, the pertinence is not strong, not specific, either proposed is unable to fill check items, or it is too general and not specific matters, or some minor problems, but did not hold the key links, key problems the supplement check items. This reflects the robbery, in does not catch Kang and ran Chaofeng injury cases, shows that the work is not serious, not careful, work responsibility consciousness not strong question.

In addition, is not active, there isAnd so, by thought. For not catching the case, without a good basis for our hospital integration rules do supervision in place, meet on the phone, ask, a supervisor who, without the initiative to the case handling units to implement the investigation situation, supervise the handling unit active investigation, nor will the relevant supervision and recorded for future reference.

Through this case verification activities, made me fully aware of the existence of their work in the problems and deficiency, deviation exists in the concept of law enforcement and law enforcement idea. Compared with Jiang Hansheng's own case of persistent and the law of equity, justice, more show deficiencies in my business ability, law enforcement behavior. In the future, I will rob, to check out Chen Zhengjun Kang self-renewal as typical cases to warn myself, to remind ourselves to the advanced character of the story, trying to improve law enforcement style, grasp from the depths, small office, further correct ideas, enhance learning, strengthen the sense of responsibility, to overcome the existing in the workNot serious, not detailed question,To guide their enforcement actions with the correct concept, prevent law enforcement idea deviation, well supervision in accordance with the procuratorial business integration rules, procedures, with legal, justice idea of law enforcement, law enforcement behavior deviation correction possible, ensure that the quality of case, re tree the new image, reflect fairness, justice demands.