Suzhou science and Technology City / high tech Zone Dongzhu / Enteromorpha town / Tongan town / week lawyer
Created:
/Author:
Aaron Lewis
Zhou Zhongsheng Lawyer Chen Hanziqiye sues the treatment of inductrial injury insurance
Suzhou lawyer Zhou Zhongsheng Tel: 6210
4280 189
QQ:80 4941115
[case introduction] Chen Moumou Department of Shuyang County in Jiangsu Province, in the South Korean enterprises in Suzhou, in the industrial accident at work in November 9, 2011, January 29, 2012 in Suzhou city human resources and Social Security Bureau shall recognize the hurt accident injury, June 13, 2012 Suzhou City Committee of labor ability identification identification of disability rating of nine.In August 14, 2012 the two sides to terminate the labor relationship.Chen Moumou injured when the company pay social security for the.
Because Chen Moumou injured when the company to pay for the social security, a one-time grants for the disabled and disposable injuries Medicaid by the social security institutions pay, only need to pay a one-time grants for the disabled in employment.That is to say, most paid by social insurance agencies, companies need only take a small part of.Logically speaking, the company should get the related compensation paid to employees.But unfortunately, in many employees to negotiate with the company, companies are refusing to pay a penny.Chen Moumou helpless, had to entrust the lawyer Zhou Zhongsheng processing.
Lawyer Zhou Zhongsheng to the city of Suzhou, Wuzhong District labor dispute arbitration committee arbitration court, after the company that procrastination can not solve the problem, and agreed to pay for their treatment of inductrial injury insurance, "Mr. Chen today to get treatment of inductrial injury insurance.
[lawyer] company pay social security viewpoint for the employees, mostly paid by the social insurance agency.However, the company still needs to take a one-time grants for the disabled in employment.Many companies have paid social insurance company cannot pay the heart, this is damaging the lawful rights and interests of employees, of course, is not conducive to effectively solve the problem of.