Sichuan University School of law third balance cup

Sichuan University School of Law Third Session of "balance Cup" essay contest sponsored by the Law School of Law Committee of the Communist Youth League, the club, Wangjiang method research branch, students will be jointly hosted by the Sichuan, balance law book Co. Ltd CO is offering prizes. This event since 2012 October, received strong support from our college teachers and students, receive all kinds of articles about 100 articles.

After the deadline, the organizing committee has organized the review. Wangjiang method for heads of departments, law school student editorial department and some young teachers to participate in the preliminary examination, reexamination and the final link, review in strict accordance with the "principles of fairness, justice, openness," the anonymous review. We will review results publicity:

 

Graduate group

The first prize (1)

Dong Lei (2010 undergraduates): "criminal possession of backwash and consult on -- Based on the" civil law transplantation

 

Two prize (2)

Jiang Xia (Wu Yuzhang college class of 2010): "compare cross-strait funeral expenses calculation methods and standards"

Guo Xin (2011 undergraduates): "understanding and application of Marxism" commercial appearance

 

Three prize (4)

He hoped (2010 undergraduates): "analysis of totalitarian nightmare kernel -- starting from the 'crooked spine' meeting"

The horse Sushuang (2011 undergraduates): "the woman those beautiful," stand up "into poetry -- on the legal status of women in ancient Chinese"

Li Hongji (2011 undergraduates): "free three" and its limits

Wang Zixu (2011 undergraduates): "look -- Reading Cardoso 'law' growth development of law from a pragmatic perspective"

 

Excellence Award (6)

Shu LAN (2010 undergraduates): "to explain the crime of illegal business operation system" Miscellaneous Provisions

Liang Yong Wei Wei (2010 undergraduates): "the social responsibility of the enterprise of" beyond law ""

Beam Chen (2011 undergraduates): "legal response of a new round of" backdoor listing "boom -- the actual operation in the market hot observation and thinking"

Liu Qingquan (2011 undergraduates): "and discover the truth -- Comment on 'why'" case occurred

Zhou Xueqing (2011 undergraduates): "contradictory Logos -- read Marco Aurelius' Meditations? '"

 

Graduate group

The first prize (1)

Chen Bangda (PhD 2010 procedural law student): "program of indwelling identification"

 

Two prize (2)

Wei Yongrui (PhD 2012 procedural law student): "the sentencing suggestion: integrated quality control and information"

Hong Lingxiao (Research Master level 2012 procedural law student): "criminal judgments reasoning mechanism -- An Empirical Study on the six guiding case perspective"

 

Three prize (3)

Lee Xin (research doctorate level 2012 law students): "price monopoly: adjustment of Chinese samples and anti monopoly law"

Wu Qiuni (2012 level of graduate student of science of criminal law): "study of transformation crime subjective mentality"

Lee Min (Research Master level 2012 procedural law student): "the relationship between supervision of public opinion and the judicial trial"

 

Excellence Award (7)

Chen Weilu (2011 level of graduate student of science of criminal law): "the special one Dutch act of qualitative behavior -- to meet QQ Dutch act case"

Deng Xu (Research Master level 2011 procedural law students "cognitive dissonance): from the perspective of judicial interpretation of the marriage law of three"

Week Xu (Research Master level 2012 civil and commercial law student): "motor vehicle traffic accident liability compulsory insurance partial compensation of legitimacy"

Fang Xiaomin (2011 level master of law): "cross analysis of civil and criminal reward reward to Lu Ruigeng v. Donggang Municipal Public Security Bureau of the reward advertisement dispute case"

Zhou Xiangshan (Research Master of 2012 grade in civil and commercial law student): "anatomy from the standard path: improvement. Foreign guaranty system of company of our country"

Xie Jingling (2012 level master of law): "and improve the reform of the civil adjudication supervision procedure"

Liu Shuai (Research Master level 2011 procedural law student): "the" public interest "and the protection to the administrative public welfare lawsuit -- from the perspective of"

 

 

 


Law School: Wangjiang method for

Research branch

Student union

 

June 21, 2013


 

Sichuan University School of Law Third Session of "balance Cup" essay contest rules of law


One, general

1In order to regulate the Law School of Sichuan University, Third Session of the "balance Cup" essay contest (hereinafter referred to as the competition law) selection, promote open, transparent, fair competition, serious awards, guiding students to participate in the competition to meet requirements, the specially formulated rules.

2, competition is set up in order to promote the Sichuan University law school, all the students to learn and exchange.

3Participate in the competition, the subject of study for students of Sichuan University School of law and Wu Yuzhang's law of professional full-time undergraduate, postgraduate, doctor of all.

4Competition, including the form of the following three categories:

(1"One world"), is the current social hot discussion paper;

(2Legal review);

(3Legal professional papers).

Among them, students can participate in all categories of essay contest; all graduate students, doctoral students (limited to the2(,)3The two articles).

Participating students beyond the above-mentioned scope of submission, regarded as invalid.

 

Two, "one world" selection rules

5"One world", namely the hot social issues and current affairs discussion paper (hereinafter referred to as "the eyes to see the world") only for full-time undergraduate students participated in the. The current discussion is restricted to occur in2012Years8Month31Hot issues of major international, domestic, relevant laws of. Can refer to Wangjiang method for "social focus on Legal Issues" in the discussion topic to determine the content.

6"One world", words should not be less than3000Word, no limit, but in order to fully discuss the required the content is appropriate. The title and the structure of self.

7"One world", must comply with the general specification. Writing norms can be found in "Southern Weekend" current standards.

8"One world", must be with the department law or theory of law. That must be analyzed using law or law and other interdisciplinary approach the topic.

9"One world" award, mainly explores the following aspects:

(1Ability to select typical cases);

(2The analysis of the case of route selection capability);

(3Comprehensive analysis ability,) on his own views;

(4) perspective, the idea and content of novelty and creativity; and on the basis of convincing.

 

Three, the selection rules of Law Review

10, legal review can be attended by the third rules for all students.

11, the law review of the book should be in the China or other countries and regions of regular published books, paper, or other written material. Review of published or unpublished author statement not review books, paper or other written materials shall not be. Can refer to Wangjiang method for reading books to determine the comments object.

The book, paper, or other written material to be associated with the law or legal discipline. Not participating in illegal science books, review papers or other written material.

12, legal review words undergraduate no less than 3000 words, the other students shall not be less than 4000 characters, no limit, but to complete the expression viewpoint is appropriate. Since the topic. The article should contain the comment books, paper, or other written material.

13, legal review must comply with the general specification, writing norms may refer to "legal review" magazine standard.

14, legal review selection mainly explores the following aspects:

(1) understanding, analysis the author's original meaning;

(2) put forward his own opinion and study their views;

(3) innovative demonstration and the tightness of analysis, comment and opinion.

 

The selection rule four, law professional papers

15Legal professional papers, by the rules3All the students participated in the.

16Legal professional papers, should be the law and law of cross discipline as the main body of the professional academic papers. In addition to academic norms must comply with the general law professional paper specifications, in accordance with the specific writing norms "Wangjiang law" submission specification.

17Legal professional papers, words should not be less than5000Words, but this should be to complete.

18In accordance with the law, the rules in various disciplines with different specific selection based on the actual, determined by the professional review teacher.

 

Five, the selection procedure

19"Eye, see the world", legal review by the participating students in time before the second chapter, the third chapter presented in conformity with the provisions of article, by review group after the first amendment opinions; players revision by the review group gives the final score, score from high to low to determine the award.

20Legal professional papers, by the participating students to submit within the prescribed time before the fourth chapter stipulated by articles, review group after the first instance, will enter reexamine articles held "Academic Salon"; Academic Salon will invite professional teachers and the related comments and modifying opinions. Players will be revised papers submitted to the review, review group gives the final score to score from high to low to determine the award.

21Legal professional papers, grade proportion to consists of "Academic Salon" (for professional teachers60%Review group () and to account for40%).

Six, the component of the evaluation group

22The review group, consisting of Zhang Bin teacher, teacher Wang Zhu, Liu Xinjie, Liu Ning, Wang Tianyu teacher teacher teacher, miss Wang Junjie, miss Li Cheng.

23Legal professional papers, by professional teachers to participate in the review, the jury notice.

 

Seven, prohibits and appeal

24Participation in the contest, the articles prohibited under any of the following circumstances:

(1) in violation of national laws, regulations and the four cardinal principles, public order and good customs;

(2) plagiarism, or excessive cited literature;

(3) to published article entries;

(4The competition to co authored);

(5) the three or four chapter second in violation of the rules, norms.

Violates the above (1(,)2) two, punished in accordance with the norms of the relevant laws, regulations, schools and colleges, and to inform the relevant responsible teacher, counselor. Violates the above (3)~(5The violation of article), cancel the selection criteria.

Violates the above (1(,)2) two, cancel the responsibility person game qualification; in violation of the above (3)~(5The violation of article), cancel the race, but the responsibility I can still meet the requirements of the other in the.

25Review group reserves, according to the actual situation to24One can not cover other obviously contrary to the spirit of the game and the principle of fairness and impartiality of irregularities punishment right.

26The review group in accordance with24,25The punishment decision, they may appeal to the review group; the reasonable, cancel the punishment; the unreasonable, to maintain the original punishment.

27For complaints, there are indeed justified punishment wrong, to contest the working group responsible person Jiang Hua teacher review. The results for the final processing results.

 

Eight, the award is set

Award Item

Name The amount of

Award Goods

The first prize.2Name)

Undergraduate and graduate each1Name, vacant.

500Yuan purchase vouchers and certificates of honor

Two prize (4Name)

Undergraduate and graduate each2Name.

200Yuan purchase vouchers and certificates of honor

Three prize (7Name)

Undergraduate4Name, Graduate Students3Name.

100Yuan purchase vouchers and certificates of honor

 

Nine, annex

28Players participate in the competition, submission, deemed to have read, understand, know, recognize and obey the rules.

29The rules, the right to interpret the Law School of Sichuan University "balance Cup" essay contest enjoy legal working group.

30This rule, effective as of the date of promulgation.

 

 

 

Sichuan University Law School Law "balance Cup" essay contest Working Group

2012Years10Month12Day