Several reasons # had outstanding # case introduction and should not be sentenced to death -- Ceng Chengjie's lawyer, Wang Shaoguang

Ceng Chengjie case introduction

  2003Years. Once outstanding through bidding Xiangxi government transformation of the old city works, but because Xiangxi is the side of the poor area, the lack of bank loans, so the local government to encourage private financing.Local90%Old people are involved in.

But to2008Years, has outstanding government after the project completed, the new leadership took office, the overthrow of the former leader's policy decisions, that this financing behavior as the illegal fund-raising, will Ceng Chengjie and other more than twenty private entrepreneurs arrested,Ceng Chengjie was detained shortly, the Xiangxi state government has not made the assets assessment will be in Hall three, company value23.8Billion in assets to3.3Million sale, and in2012Years Ceng Chengjie was sentenced to death.

 

Attached: "folk financing crime and Punishment -- to have outstanding case" seminar

(experts: Huang Jingping, Wang Xinxin, Xu Xin, Li Zhuang, Yang Zaiming, Yi Yanyou...)

Http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_a7d040880101cizu.html

List of evidence and reports

Http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_a7d040880101ci1w.html

 

Why have outstanding should not be sentenced to death

 

(a)        The second instance judgment that has outstanding constitute fraud qualitative error:

First.Ceng Chengjie did not spend in financing, but financing for all legitimate by

Camp, and is used for legitimate business financing amount is greater than the principal (see table).

Whether Ceng Chengjie fraud-Let the figures speak

Financing funds whereabouts:Financing of principal7.1Billion yuan, direct investment cost7.7Billion yuan, direct investment is greater than capital financing0.6Billion yuan.

According to the two judgment digital

Project name

The amount (yuan)

Source

Project expenditure

55657.10

The second instance verdict24Article2That's ok25Page No.3That's ok

Including: World Trade in a period and the two period, the dry state city of culture, cultural entertainment, city lights, fixed assets and lease costs, expenses.

All Property Management Company

50

The second instance verdict26Page 55That's ok-The penultimate4That's ok

The seedlings are folk culture Co. Ltd.

278.42

The second instance verdict27Page No.9That's ok-Article10That's ok

Three Museum Art Troupe

100

The second instance verdict14That's ok-Article15That's ok

The new Le Grand Large Hotel

9093

The second instance verdict11That's ok-Article14That's ok

Tongren City, Hunan Guizhou Zinc Industry Co. Ltd.

2890

The second instance verdict29That's ok

Dandong Xiangdong Mining Co. Ltd.

564.01

The second instance verdict penultimate7That's ok-The penultimate8That's ok

The three Hall Hongfa happy amusement park entertainment city

22.8

The second instance verdict31Page No.3That's ok-Article4That's ok

Changsha Vitoria supermarket overlay project

6509.65

The second instance verdict31Page No.6That's ok-Article7That's ok

Xiangxi Real Estate Trading Center brother

30

The second instance verdict23Page of the last row-Article24Page No.1That's ok

Xiangxi state land acquisition demolition firm

100Million

The second instance verdict24First row

 Jishou Tenglong demolition equipment compensation

65

Huaxin accounting identification No.28Page No.8That's ok-Article9That's ok

Compensation Hongfa Entertainment City

46

Huaxin accounting identification No.28Page No.10That's ok-Article11That's ok

Bank loan expenses

114.47

Huaxin accounting identification No.28Page of the last paragraph

Publicity expenses

982.44

Huaxin accounting identification No.2Page No.12That's ok-16That's ok

Secondly, the second instance judgment that Ceng Chengjie Ceng Chengjie "in the name of others and investment company, project or a direct transfer of funds26484.878Million error(see "Ceng Chengjie the death penalty review of defense" article8Page3The three Hall, company investment Associate Company, which belongs to the legitimate production and operating activities, does not belong to the transfer of assets -- Part12Page No.5That's OK.

 

Two.        Three the company not to give people cause financing financing loss of principal, and as

If not the local government the goose that lays the golden eggs, three the company was worth23.8Billion yuan, is now worth more than40Billion yuan fine assets low-cost treatment to their wholly-owned enterprises, fully able to pay off the financing loan interestThe following chart (see "three Hall of assets and deducted from the payment of interest and customer bonus balance", and "Ceng Chengjie's work and accessories? Let the figures speak! Detailed description.

Three the assets and deducted from the payment of interest and customer bonus balance

Asset basis

Amount

Deduct interest paid after the principal amount

Balance

Before the assets value

23.8Billion yuan

2.02004555Billion yuan

21.78Billion yuan

The value of assets after the murder

13.77Billion yuan

2.02004555Billion yuan

11.75Billion yuan

The government auction price (a)

10.08365187Billion yuan

2.02004555Billion yuan

8.6Billion yuan

The government auction price (two)

7.878836094Billion yuan

2.02004555Billion yuan

5.858Billion yuan

Watson characterization

7.72464Billion yuan

2.02004555Billion yuan

5.7Billion yuan

Now the market value

Exceed40Billion yuan

 

2.02004555Billion yuan

38Billion yuan

 

Three.In the case of lack of assets evaluation caused by the fact that is not clear (see the expert and the second and the death penalty review of Defense), especially the concealment of assets evaluation report and asset and capital verification report, and hide5.18Billion yuan of outstanding principal balance of the great error, should be reversed back to the court of first instance for retrial"(see AnnexA public prosecutor Ceng Chengjie found hidden assets in death penalty casesAssessment report reflects the situation and the written opinions "," a "Sindh Kaiyuan accounting firm Hunan branch of the "Sindh Kaiyuan special trial word (Hunan Branch2008) article138"The assets of the special audit report for" and "About Ceng Chengjie the death penalty review cases5.1759The great error billion request back to the original court of first instance for retrial or defense opinions by the Supreme Court to entrust the accounting identification", and"Ceng Chengjie the death penalty review of defense" article17Page"The second trial procedures, serious illegal" .)


Four.This case has the local government participation in the background, is the early stage10Years of folk financing public support,2008Years after the leadership change cruel blow(see Annex "Xiangxi folk financing group events who? ").

Five.Ten thousand steps back, even without considering all the above, in accordance with the provisions of the criminal law should not be sentenced to death Ceng Chengjie.

"Criminal law" the provisions of article one hundred and ninety-nine, make this section 192nd, one hundred and ninety-four, one hundred and ninety-five provisions of the crime. If the amount involved is especially huge and especially heavy losses are caused to the interests of the state and the people, shall be sentenced to life imprisonment or the death penalty, also be sentenced to confiscation of property.

Visible, sentenced to life imprisonment or criminal punishment, shall not require a huge amount of,And must have "especially heavy losses are caused to the interests of the state and the people". The court of second instance that is this:

1,            To finance the masses caused6.2Billion yuan of economic losses. In this regard, the preceding article (two)"Three the company not to give people cause loss of the principal financing financing,......." Have said very clearly.

2,            Caused the financing group events and the Wu Anying self immolation. In this regard, "NetEaseSeminar "deliberately misrepresent" part "and it has reference to evidence that the two trial that is wrong.

 

In the lawsuit. Have outstanding case in the two processes exist serious facts are not clear evidence, erroneous application of the law, illegal trial procedures, according to China's current judicial system for immediate execution of death penalty sentencing by "less killing" "kill carefully" principle, in accordance with the "life principle, irreversible" I request the supreme people's court for judgment so many problems can legally carefully this trial, the real implementation of the "judicial principle of taking facts as the basis and the law as criterion". Truly the highest courtyard dean Zhou Qiang said, "the court 1/10000 mistakes on the party's one hundred percent injustice, the courts at all levels should get rid of the bad influence and interference to a fair trial principle of fair trial". The law should be to support Undo (2011Hunan) high punishment two with the word no.60Number of criminal judgment of first "Ceng Chengjie sentenced to death penalty, criminal verdict deprived of political rights for life".