The first session of the second

The new secretary Shen Zuoqing took office after need time to familiar with the situation, so the law school's annual meeting has been delayed2008Years6The month began preparations, and the actual meeting is2009Years1In August, dragged out3Years.

Each government has its own style, Chen is different with gold Shideng, Shen Qing and Chen is also different. But the Secretary style potential necessary in its branded. Shen Zuoqing likes meeting, issue orders left and right at the meeting. Therefore, the first term he to law school work, light on all the Teachers Congress opened8Second, the second semester opened again7Second, other meetings greatly small such as joint conference, the enlarged meeting, the dean of the Department of conference is too many to count, get some department director such as Jin Qizhou, the idea of resignation. The reason why we hate meetings, because from the city went to the sand, light road one-way will need more than one hour.

Related to this, there is one thing,2007At the end of the year, according to each school of law4000Element base a year-end award, buckle my2500Yuan, send me1500Yuan, I was absent from the meeting because of Xiasha5Time. Yang Lei told me that law school has the formal rules: absent without reason faculty Congress3More than once500Yuan, buckle2500Yuan is no basis. I say, did not notice me, not absent without reason. He thought I was right, encouraged me to speak out. I went to the dean and secretary sent an e-mail to explain the situation. Because their reply to my dissatisfaction, so my first faculty meeting in the beginning of the new semester after the raised objections, criticized several hospital leadership. After Shen Qing came to talk to me, "you speak in front of so many people at our nose to scold." I go to the teahouse he will talk4An hour. We talked about the conference. I told him truthfully the previous situation, he seemed very support, said it was wrong to leading card proposal "". I feel he is very open-minded in its issue. I put the law school also not to100People, engage in indirect democracy is not necessary, can engage in direct democracy, the Teachers Congress instead of Congress, he was not agreed, saying can try to expand the proportion of. He wants me to take part in its activities, I promised him.

2008Years6Month, the law school began preparations for the convening of the second session of the congress at the first meeting of the Secretary under the leadership of Shen Zuoqing. The branch led the establishment of a9One group, which6One is the administrative personnel, the meeting but also convenient, but3A teacher must Run away. So, the first preparatory meeting, Zhou Dagang leave of absence. The group had the election, accounted for the total number of staff regulations on behalf of40%. Shen Zuoqing and I used to represent proportion could be higher, but40%Is the law school faculty meeting the lowest ever percentage. The election also provides the president, secretary and chairman of the trade union as the representative of. According to the "implementation rules", only the dean and secretary is the representative of. The administrative group, actually more of a representative, because if the chairman of the trade union vote to be elected, will take a number of administrative. Then according to the election of elected representatives, again by the president on behalf of election meeting group. I was elected to the presidency. The first faculty meeting others pushed me into the presidency, I refuse, because do not want the presidium meeting. But this time I no longer refuse, because the situation in the past the presidium decides on many issues.

Then the Bureau meetings, open the total4,5Meeting. I went to two, found that are some routine chores, there is no need for a meeting. So after several meetings of the presidium, I learn to Zhou Dagang appearance. But I still heart, to call the director of general office Zhu Zhenhong asked what problems discussed before every meeting, feel do not need to leave. Other teachers who represent more honest, to some more.

In addition to the meeting of the presidium, also held the two meeting attended by all delegates formally (even before the meeting that a3Time), one is to decide whether to cancel the3A special committee, to set up an executive committee.[15]This is Yang Lei and Shen Zuoqing two people. The problem I and Yang Lei privately discussed many times, he never said to me reasonable clear this institutional reform, so I opposed. At that meeting, I and Yang Lei public debate. Shen Zuoqing actively solicit views of the old president Lu Jiexiong. But this time the old land of opinions and I agree completely, the modified "no legal basis". The final vote by show of hands:11Votes against,9Yes, the rest abstained, Yang Lei proposal abortion. Anyone notice: Yang Lei's opinions are administrative support, support my teachers are representative.

In its branch organization personnel preparation process compilation of some previous meeting file, there are our proposal to the Commission was drafting work rules, in the original2004Year to convene an interim meeting to discuss through, but because the hospital leaders opposed ran aground. I suggest that Yang Lei and Liu Jianmin at the meeting as the proposal out of Jiaotong University will vote. They all agreed to.

I also drafted two proposals. A conference of reality, this meeting is in both sides, staff Road Campus teachers on the staff meeting, living in the teacher in Xiasha meeting. Because the law school teachers have a small part in Xiasha, mostly in the staff here, every meeting should go on the road from the city went to the Xiasha, plus car to waste several hours, but increase of Hangzhou city traffic congestion, exhaust emissions and school transportation costs. On both sides of the meeting can serve multiple purposes. (the proposal see Annex seven). Another proposed the establishment of teachers' Congress spokesman, in order to promote the spirit of the meeting. (the proposal see Annex eight).

Liu Jianmin once in Xiasha canteen together with me and have lunch with the financial supervision. I agree, advised him to draft a proposal. He gladly. In the process of drafting him my advice: the scope of supervision of the Party branch of light will include. I consider: first, six months ago, Shen Qing talked to me heard before leading card proposal approach, seems to disdain, saying he should be pro democracy; second, from his usual performance, vanity is extremely strong, supervision and he may cause a rebound, but no supervision might be able to exchange for his support third, total spending; this is a piece of money a few years before5,6Million, and the president of this piece is big, because the property rights are in the hands of; fourth, estimation does not have what problem Kong Qingjiang Dean of economics, the financial supervision should not be too strong. Therefore, in order to reduce the resistance, to establish the system, temporary or not will branch included. Quicker than words can tell, these trade-offs in my mind only flash, I had advised Liu Jianmin don't include spending on Dean, this piece of supervision well, the next meeting will be re proposal, will include general financial. Liu Jianmin's financial supervision measures is downloaded from the Internet, there are provisions for total financial supervision, after his return will delete the relevant provisions.

He then took to the dean and secretary, they do not agree, Liu Jianming winced, not to mention, but to write their own proposals do not pay and some unwilling. I said to him, the law school democracy from first to last is from the bottom to the top drive, leadership is always drag rather than power, so the opposition is normal. If the leadership against us afraid, where "the detailed rules for the implementation of the revised"? Even to today's progress? He spoke of his concerns, such as the title of.[16]He said that my courage is big because of capital, but he didn't. I suggested that he and Zhou Dagang communication, make friends, because "the week just like you have no capital", also was a lecturer.[17]I also reminded him that2005Years12Month31On the evening of words, said that after he, according to the new "implementation rules". Ask him to remember. He said, "remember", but we are still hesitating, said "did not think things will become so complicated."

A formal meeting date2009Years1Month8Day. The two proposal I drafted and representatives, after more than half a month of exchange and communication, and finally collected8Joint signature, the proposal Committee4Ratio1By (Yang Lei vote against). I to the3Night to live season with floor to hospital do ceremony, will do according to the detailed rules for the implementation of "school" issued. Ji Liyu4Morning to hospital do, Shen Zuoqing looked at the bill, instruction office not issued, the reason is not a draft agenda proposal. This is I learned later.

Shen Qing incited the school office director Meng Wei drafted the agenda of the conference the draft, which is the key file preparation, opened so many meetings of the Presidium and the meeting have no opportunity to discuss it, now the two person a clapper, easy1Month4On the afternoon of mobile phone messages posted by.

Because I didn't have a mobile phone, not to see the draft agenda. When I was in1Month5Day heard, immediately asked to see, actually found on the proposal did not say a word, and Zhu Zhenhong contact. He said Meng Wei Nong, told him to change what you can. I called Meng Wei, he said he is according to the president of group means to write, can not be changed, advised me on the8Modify the preparatory meeting on the afternoon of the proposed.

In the evening, I'll call Liu Jianmin. He will continue his financial supervision bill submitted to hesitate, because Dean and secretary showed antagonistic attitude, he even against their will.

Then with Shen Qing contact, no one at home, call his mobile phone. He said the move, I told him to phone home, he refused to give. This is very unusual, because the home phone number within the school is open. I advised him to modify the draft agenda, add on behalf of the proposal are presented and discussed. Such proposals are completely out of kindness, because if the modification draft agenda in the preparatory meeting, whether it is equal to the Party branch of the proposal, let his face does not look good. But he took my kindness as ill intentions, to my request refused, also found the excuse that must be discussed at the meeting, he wouldn't do such modifications. But the draft is he inspired Meng Wei drafted, the specific content and without any discussions and decisions. Since he let the draft, he certainly can be modified. I still to understand him, if he had not seen the "rules", do not know the rules, I told him: "according to the" rules for the implementation of the proposal to the Commission proposal ", after the examination must be issued to the Congress, so the draft proposal, that should be discussed and voted on the agenda; moreover, drafting assembly the agenda is the general Party branch of things, so the Party branch has the right to modify, benefit of this modification is to avoid or put forward different views at the conference to reduce, improve work efficiency." He must think me in his file, so that said "he" tone "rules are seen, look very carefully," says one cannot decide, need to open a branch will be discussed. I see him so excuses, said "it is according to the procedure in the8Day will change." He said10Days of presidium meeting. I feel his bs,8On going through the agenda and formal meeting, how10Day to discuss? He also said Kong Qingjiang questioned the "implementation rules", think05Years no through. Also said that "not according to what the" implementation rules "". I say "implementation rules" is the constitution, organization method we Jiaodai Hui; he said on this point is not everyone agreed. He was his own speech, don't want to listen to me. By the time I was completely clear: Shen Qing previously expressed to us against the leading card proposal of sympathy and understanding are false, his be a law onto oneself than the previous card proposal leadership go beyond. Apparently, he has seen8Two representatives proposal jointly, but deliberately not included in the agenda of the general assembly, in a flagrant way to break the "implementation rules". It is impossible to negotiate, only struggle. According to Liu Jianming said, before on a number of occasions, the detailed rules for the implementation of our "he had tried to play down". Only then did I truly feel we05The importance of the detailed rules for the implementation of the "new". The basic law made Shen Zuoqing feel awkward, not condemn it, reject it, he would not be in its issue, be a law onto oneself do as one pleases. We should act in accordance with the law, criticized Shen Qing illegal.[18]

And then call Xu Zhu, because she is a member of the presidium. But she doesn't think much, obviously not the top leadership. But I know, without pressure, the secret ballot situation, she agree with me that.

1Month6Afternoon, I speak to Liu Jianmin, he said that Yang Lei's great change, touches on he felt isolated, no allies. I told him not to mind, because Yang Lei is not bad. But he still feels lonely, is now concerned about meeting people become less and less, Zhou Dagang withdrew into opposition, Yang Lei, Wu Dongxian is not active. I said: "although some people left, but not out of the people, the situation than2002Years and04Years are good, because we have a "implementation rules", leading card not our proposal." On this point he agreed. I said: "go your own way, let others say. The indifference of the majority is given fact, reformer's task is to do everything in one's power, then the success and failure of the results will be in a calm mood record, accumulate experience for future reforms." I also cited Wang Anshi's "art of conception": you have left to do and not do it, you will regret it in the future; do not succeed, then no what can regret. We talked for a long time. Finally, Liu Jianming decided he had already written the financial supervision bill. Because of the need to eat the dinner on New Year's Eve the evening of the second day, the hospital to collect signatures, easily. I said "you I came two, just collected3A can". He said "good". I also asked "program has no time level?" He said that does not matter ", I told Zhu Zhenhong about it."

Put down the phone, I am to have Liu Jianmin as a friend in a hard struggle and pleased, would like to point what said to him. So they spread out a blank sheet of paper, copy of Wang Anshi's "art of conception" full text, and put Liu Yuxi's poem "a side with a thousand sails, diseased trees ahead wanmuchun." Changed to "stop the side with a thousand sails, old trees ahead wanmuchun", ready to give him (then I invited gold Qizhou, Liu Jianmin dinner, hand copied page gave him).[19]

1Month7On the night of the dinner on New Year's Eve unit, I went too late. Liu Jianmin showed me his already collected11Representatives of the signature, also said "your signature without the". We are very worried about the delegates dare not signature,11The signature of the person is far beyond the requirements of the "rules"5The threshold, it is There is a way out. All of a sudden, the haze of the weather is sunny. I take care of Liu Jianmin "the key now is not on behalf of the proposal draft agenda for discussion and review procedures, must add" tomorrow, he said "I know".

2009Years1Month8On the afternoon of second law school Jiaodai Hui opened the first meeting. The first is the preparatory meeting of the Party branch draft agenda. I propose to amend the agenda, on behalf of the proposal to increase the discussion and voting procedures. As I began to speak, Shen Qing interrupted me, I pay attention to time, speak short. He clearly know what I have to say, intentional harassment. I refrain from gas, not to quarrel with him. The secret ballot vote for my suggestion:31Delegates2Votes against,3Abstentions,26Yes, by. But because these proposals were not previously issued, so the proposal did not according to the agenda of the proposal is described, only left to10Day meeting.

Party branch work highly irregular. Arguably,8The preparatory meeting, since has revised the draft agenda, it means that the original draft is invalid, should according to the resolution of the conference the draft of the revised and reissued. Should be increased to the proposal that, to discuss and vote on the amendment. But the job is not done.10On the morning of the meeting is still in draft agenda of. Program foul to such a degree, to the branch leadership without.

Morning, group discussion, more boring. My son (due to6In the college entrance examination is not assured) sick at home, in the11At first to leave. At noon the presidium meeting, call Liu Jianming called me to go. When I arrived they have been opened, discussed the proposal Committee candidates. The committee before the number in the presidium decided by5Reduced to3People. Morning3A group discussion is my nomination3Tickets, Fujian and Ying Zhenfang2Ticket, Liu Jianmin et al1Ticket. In fact, such nomination with random. But Shen Zuoqing was determined as a candidate3People, in an election. I to the presidium explanation: pure contribution, without interest, against the proposal committee leadership, less people are willing to do, Liu Jianmin was doing in there very well, and I talked to Jin Qizhou, persuaded him, so that the two of them put in, make difference election. But Shen Zhuqing insisted on an election, there are one or two people seconded him, no one publicly supported me, even if it is an election.

On the afternoon of the first three team in group discussions, LIMITED10Minute. Then I speak freely, I criticized the Party branch interception proposal things, also Shen Zuoqing's name with criticism, office, and then introduced the two proposals. (the speech text in Appendix nine). Two ½ pages speeches I speak18Minutes, half-way two times interrupted by Shen Zuoqing, said I timeout.[20]

After I went out to go to the bathroom, Shen Qing had come, sad to say I wronged him, he did not retain the proposal, the proposal issued or he agreed. I said "sorry" to be polite, did not think he could be insatiable, immediately changed a face to say: "you have to apologize to me openly at the meeting, or I did not finish with you. I have done so much work, you talk it all out. Later on I will speak first, and then you apologize." I said: "well, you arrange the time, I say." He probably heard me the wrong tone, said: "I do not arrange a time for you." I said: "you presided over the meeting, want me to apologize, and don't give me time, what did I tell you?" He saw no signs, turned into a conference room to.

After the meeting Shen Qing dragged up the topic, denied the interception proposal, I would ask him to explain8On the afternoon of why had not issued the proposal, Zhu Zhenhong helped to explain things, the delegates listened impatient, said privately to you afterwards, interrupted dispute. The meeting finally made anonymous voting. Leave the counting of the voids in the tellers, Shen Qing argue: "no wonder some people on SFRC not interested, I am not interested in." I then said: "especially when I criticize you a few." He habitually replied: "my pleasure?" The audience set the whole room roaring with laughter.

Soon, the tellers return meeting announced: both the meeting system,15Votes,8Votes against,3Abstentions, the spokesman system,13Votes,8Votes against,5Abstentions, not through the count. (if the number of votes "more than half", just through. But in the morning to attend the meeting on behalf of the number28Man, less than half the opening ceremony attended by31Man, even15The ticket has not reached the half. In order to avoid the complicated things, will give a little of it.) Financial supervision,23Votes,2Votes against,1Abstentions.

At the end of the conference of secretaries and very generous, said he "did a lot of things do not understand, Zhu teacher was right" etc.. I feel he is lazy, always like to use the work of others (in one year after the second meeting I criticized him, "style", it is certain to say); two is rough, the relevant documents to the meeting, he never really see. He does not know the nature of the Congress, always want to put it into administrative service tool; he does not like the proposal, you want to it.

Generally speaking, the meeting is still progress, because we are against the leadership will by the financial supervision and the two sides of the meeting of two in favor of teacher's proposal. In many barriers set by leaders and process these proposals in the,2005The "implementation rules" has played an important role, that our democratic politics began to accumulate results. If there is no "implementation rules" expressly, we cannot8On the afternoon of the meeting successfully modify the program, add on behalf of the proposal for discussion and deliberation, these proposals will once again be lost card; if there is no "implementation rules" expressly, strong criticism of violations and I cannot to Shen Zuoqing, make him not only wrong, but also law deficiency. Shen Zuoqing obviously very hate the "implementation rules", spreading propaganda to knock on it on several occasions, there will be a meeting in waste law and law enforcement struggle. But he ultimately can not at the meeting down the basic organization law.

A windfall of this conference is passed the proposal committee work rules. This rule in our03Years had tried to initiate the convening of Congress to pass, but it was led by abortion. This was no dispute through, a description of our democracy progress, the progress of political atmosphere, two is because the secretary work is coarse, he airs, people about love, this file is estimated that he has never seen, only authorized him to trust Yang Lei to do. Yang Lei will this work rules in other administrative regulations, administrative secretary led all the delegates voted for, so the rules unanimously, really some slip by. The rules have not only the content of financial supervision, and to evaluate the hospital leaders through the questionnaire survey, once implemented, there is a supervisory role. Although the questionnaire must be approved by Congress through, so I will do, but later will show power.

The staff after the meeting, the hospital leaders refused to carry out both sides meeting resolution, still persist in one's old ways. Which President Kong Qingjiang hold negative attitude, but Secretary Shen Zuoqing and director of the Department, in various meeting criticized the decision. These sounds are Everfount feedback to my ears. Listen to Yang Lei, he gave back to Shen Zuoqing to do legal education: "how to oppose you can at the meeting, now through the should be executed." But Shen Qing resolutely refused to. Yang Lei in turn said to me: "he won't do, you also do not have what way." I said some is "approach."

2009Years4Month17Japanese law school after the beginning of the faculty meeting issued a second notice:21Open all the Teachers Congress in Xiasha pm. I went with the proposal committee two other members of the Fang Fujian and vibration Fang to discuss countermeasures, offer criticism school leaders ignore the SFRC resolution approach. They were in favor of.

I think of this approach stems from two inspirations. The first is the2008Years2Month23Evening with Shen Zuoqing in the teahouse that conversation. He was talking happily, all along what I. But when I presented the law school unit is small, should engage in direct democracy, replaced by all the teachers congress Congress, he does not like, say "can expand the proportion of, for example50%In order to do so, ". At that time I feel he is afraid to expand the influence. And this Congress to represent the proportion as he40%, and strengthened my feeling. The second point is soon after talks with Shen Zuoqing, a family friend happened to hear a word on the Internet now: "the sun". I only know that in the countryside in the grain, hay, did not think of the people and things can also be the sun, because the sun means to keep exposure, is disclosed, the image is really extremely, too wonderful for words. If so, we also can be in the range of law school leadership within the sun. So from then on, I had in the leading idea, to2009Years4Months have finally put into practice.

We reported in the first paragraph with short3Line shows the character of5Points: first, the Congress passed two meetings and the financial supervision two proposals; second, the Congress elected our proposal and Democratic Management Committee; third, our responsibility is to oversee the proposal is implemented; fourth, we will not regularly published Bulletin (not regularly is to give his leave adequate leeway); fifth, bulletin the purpose is to strengthen the relationship between representatives and voters. The second section leaders on both sides of the criticism against a resolution. The third section explains not financial supervision implementation is the responsibility of leadership. The fourth section of the two proposals cannot implement made such comments: "FSA rules, leader of the Institute is led not to execute. Or rather, is to facilitate their implementation, light is convenient for teachers is not convenient self leadership is not performed, this is wrong." The fifth section points out the "implementation rules" provisions of the congress annual meeting, but has not held on time, it is the duty of the Party branch work. The last section called on everyone to actively exercise their democratic rights, "observe, led the doings of thinking, review." Since it is a "people be in power, then we should show a little master of the style. Law school leaders should and must represent the interests of the masses in the law school range, and can not only their own convenience, the majority of teachers facilitate regardless of." (the full text in Annex ten.).

In the process of drafting bulletin, our committee name caused a bit of confusion. According to the "rules for the implementation of the Congress", should be "proposal and democratic management committee", but Zhou Dagang was in the drafting of the negligence, the "management" word into "supervision", so the two meeting, the rule is "working rule proposals and democratic supervision committee". I still use the "management" in the drafting of the draft report, but Fang Fujian think or use the word "supervision", so the name is "the proposal and democratic supervision committee".

This bulletin is good, because the party in Fujian told me, he heard from the office secretary now dare not meeting. This shows that our pressure is useful. The term then never meet again, only to the final again in the regular meeting2009Years of6Month30On Tuesday afternoon, Shen Secretary chaired the meeting, he talked about the meeting meeting and on both sides of the resolution, said that the proposal is good, but unrealistic, not to do. I was present, casually inserted the sentence: "the conference resolution should be executed." He was harshly rebuke: "Congress has to obey the leadership of the party!" I said "you Secretary even basic concepts do not know, what is the leadership of the party?" On the spot to argue with him up. Yang Lei sat beside me push me a lot, I thought he had something to say to me, they stopped arguing, Shen Zuoqing continue to say, tone it down a lot, he probably afraid to embarrass you, then don't mention the faculty meeting. But Yang Lei did not utter a word, after coming home, I specially make a phone call to ask him what things, why push me. What he said no, because the time is tight, ask you not to say. This made me very angry. I say "time is tight, Shen Zuoqing should not put its thing, thing is he picked up, attitude is so bad, I haven't finished. You have to push to push him, let him shut up, let me finish. How can you push me?" Yang Lei could not say what. He became an assistant to the president at the time,[21]Probably more to consider from the hospital leadership perspective.

2009At the beginning of the fall semester, leading to inform the meeting, still in xiasha. I suggest that the committee met to discuss countermeasures. Prior to this, when we go to Inner Mongolia tourism have discussed the problem. The last agreement9Month11On Friday morning9At the meet in the procedure law office staff. We discuss the leadership in the execution of its internal disagreement resolution issues, focus on the analysis of the opposition to the strongest Shen Zuoqing Secretary of state of mind, agreed that his problem is mainly used to high handedness, desire for power expansion. Fang Fujian is still optimistic about the hospital leaders on both sides of the executive meeting resolution, that the leadership will certainly do a few times, at least they will show a gesture, but Ying Zhenfang and I believe that if we do not urge, even their attitude will not do. We also discuss the evaluation of democracy on the leadership of the problem. Finally decided to do3Thing. One is for school leadership messages on behalf of the Commission, remind them of the need to implement its resolutions, is indirectly; two was drafted second bulletin, focuses on the criticism against its decision to jump the highest, the loudest of general Party branch secretary Shen Zuoqing, his arrogance gas flame play; three is the leadership democratic evaluation by drafting table, if necessary to beg the organization department evaluation table reference ready-made, can also be downloaded from the Internet a similar table reference. The first thing to do on the spot, out by Fujian, Ying Zhenfang and I advice. We asked: "what's your name?" I said: "the hospital leadership". Then I say a few words, he played down, made some changes to a few words,3People are not the views, can send out.

Shen Zuoqing replied to our mail, questioned the mail is a personal opinion or commission the collective opinions, if it is the opinion of the committee will be meeting minutes out, also said the personal opinion can find their head. We feel very funny, the following dates clearly written "proposal and democratic supervision committee", you have no eyes? We would have finished, have no more to say, you want to talk, you about. We unanimously decided to ignore him. He probably suspected was a person I do; such doubts in fact contains no respect for the other two members of the.

2009Years11Month9Day, law school once again issued a notice of the meeting, to12On Thursday afternoon, a faculty meeting. In accordance with the Committee9In the resolution of the meeting, we began to draft second bulletin. This time has changed the previous bulletin will institute leader general, all practices, because that's too big, not to isolate the diehard. Now according to the3Institute leadership on the different attitudes of teachers' Congress, discriminating technique, the vice president Zhang Xuejun supported the resolution its attitude to be praised, to Dean Kong Qingjiang relatively liberal and progress to encourage, the stubborn attitude Secretary Shen Zuoqing opposed the resolution of teachers' Congress made severe criticism. In view of his6Month30Day said, "Congress has to obey the leadership of the party" that sentence, informed the draft pointed out: "the law school teachers will always not to move or retreat to adhere to the four cardinal principles; but at the same time, we will never allow anyone to meet the individual's desire for power and take the leadership of the party to scare people, to prevent the base democracy, to violate the SFRC resolution, contrary to the collective will of teachers. The conference adopted resolution in full compliance with the important thought of Three Represents, on behalf of the school of law, the interests of the broadest masses. The implementation of this resolution, is to improve the party's leadership, strengthen the flesh and blood ties between the party and the masses, embodied an important aspect of the advanced nature of the party leadership. It and the leadership of the Communist Party is harmonious and unified. Comrade Shen Zuoqing to the opposition, to artificially create discord, is a serious distortion of the leadership of the party, is completely wrong." Next to him on the draft Party, told him what the leadership of the party. However, the committee felt that it should face to the Secretary in the final discussion was finalized, the individual sharp point of words out, make some sentences as far as possible to ease some, but the basic content has not changed. (the second report full text in Annex eleven).

11Morning, second bulletin issued, our work temporarily come to an end. My eyes because of excessive use, a few days to very uncomfortable, just second days to go to a hospital of Zhejiang eyes, just can escape to Xiasha meeting. But the other members of the committee concerned that the reporting sharper, secretary will jump up attack, said "the best everyone to." I say "jump can be good-looking. You want to, when he get desperation, stamp with rage, we skip a Tui sitting in front of him, quietly looking at his face twitched every muscle, isn't that a great art to enjoy? Don't buy a ticket, white to see. But he can't jump." But his judgment is not consistent, I finally had to give up the eyes of plan, second days to the Xiasha attend the boring meeting. I have selected a and Shen for wearing the seat opposite to sit down, have a look whether he will jump. As I expected, he did not jump, but said "later in this issue will no longer comment." In this way, the Committee wanted his arrogance fight purpose is reached.

Will have a point New problems crop up unexpectedly. thing, is president Kong Qingjiang referred to "Zhu wrote a letter" to all the teachers in the speech, the Committee of the bulletin said to my personal behavior. I don't know he is confused or have an ulterior motive, night to call him asked the matter, he said he heard people say is, and promised to clear up at the next meeting. But wait until the next meeting, he would forget it.

Significance of two bulletin is not in the report itself, but that we found a staff and faculty, communication, timely notification of information in a way, resulting in a hitherto unknown pressure on leadership. We can already within the hospital informed criticism of any non-compliance with resolution Congress leadership; and what time reporting initiative criticism, criticism, or to what extent of the criticism in our hands, do not need to consult with anyone. These rights are of our own to fight, not who gift. The formation of such a pattern in a state-owned units, I'm afraid all Chinese was our family, other units is very difficult to do.

 

The second session of the second meeting

2009At the end of the year, the law school leaders decided to held the second congress. From the time point of view, from the previous Congress just for one year, the Annual Congress seems to be normal again. In our first report criticized the Party branch did not timely held meeting, this criticism seems to occur. My first reaction was to normalize should praise, encourage and promote the annual congress. But think again: No, the school rules at the end of each school allocation scheme must go through two levels of school by the Congress, held a meeting to cope with year-end distribution last ditch, and not in accordance with the Teachers Congress system too observant of conventional standards. itself, so at most only conditional praise. But the later development I soon give up the idea of praise.

The establishment of the Congress spokesman system proposal before the first did not pass, I decided this again. Because the teachers live scattered, to collect signatures are very troublesome, I decided to use text still proposal last year. (see Appendix eight).

12Month4On Friday, the law school office informed me that9The Party branch meeting on Wednesday, including the members of the presidium, held in Xiasha, discussion meeting held. I asked the director of General Office of Zhu Zhenhong Party branch have to draw up a draft agenda. He said no, this will not make a decision, is preliminary. I said "don't open this conference. By the branch first draft a draft program, ask for everybody's opinion, if have opinions and not dispute another meeting to discuss the proposal; if there is no objection notice board collected proposal, then held a meeting. So many people get to Xiasha to go to the meeting, what all can't decide, harass the people and waste money, inefficient." But Shen Qing like meeting, no one can stop. So I ask for leave. Later I heard that at that meeting Shen Qing trying to keep my proposal to the agenda to go, Liu Jianmin and Yang Lei told him no, must be listed in, do not let it pass can only be taken in other ways. "This is legal representation, because" implementation rules "provisions of the columns must be included in the agenda, the presidium had no right to decided not to include. He accustomed not to rule, use to make decisions, and the meeting is his call. Law school faculty meeting experience for him is a very necessary democracy and the rule of law training. Zhang Xuejun put forward the SFRC resolution should be performed, different opinions may be open to debate. This view is correct. But because the relationship between Yang Lei and Liu Jianmin and he is not good, did not support him, is actually wrong, should be on the wrong things, he spoke on should support. Liu Jianming said he made the peacemaker.

12Month10The day Liu Jianmin and I talked for more than an hour. He said he didn't want to mention the proposal this year, last year because of the proposal, against the leadership, the leadership of the individual in on the conference on his attitude makes him feel very uncomfortable. Especially he is chilling masses of indifference and snobbish teachers: "more than half of the school of law is unworthy of our interests as they go. Interests you for them, they do not support, in turn, also on the theme to discuss the leadership of the great leader, to criticize you." And he is about to go abroad for further study, so I just want to learn English, "do not want to do those things." I understand him, sympathize with him, also no longer forced him, just tell him to just talk about the week, because Zhou Dagang was detached in the professional titles, and two of them participate in the same age, title, its experience is similar to the common language, there should be more.

2010Years1Month12Japan also held a meeting of the presidium, discussing the draft agenda. At the time of my school2007The annual year-end bonuses were ruling just down, newspaper interview me, I said to his opinions down and give it to them. But I know this to make the program, is very important, so I rushed to the Xiasha to open this conference.[22]I'm going to serve two purposes: first, to the proposal that sponsors the agenda; second, on behalf of freedom of speech has become a law school faculty meeting agenda should be retained the traditional. Because of my strive, these two have done it, but free speech time was limited in5Minute. In addition, I have put forward the specialized committee shall report to the Congress, which have been recognized. As for the way of reporting, I tend to oral presentations, but in the end in order to save time, we decided to use written form issued, do not speak, I'll agree. The time for the meeting1Month22On the morning of9P.m.3At half time, you can then push, and then open the faculty meeting.

At night, I put the meeting made to inform the Party of Fujian and Ying Zhenfang, and took counsel with the report on the work of the committee. The report by the drafting, the collective discussion draft. With particular reference to "the second report to Secretary Shen Zuoqing errors are mainly criticism and help in the investigation on the basis of." The report also pointed out: "the end of someone secretly spread the news said, the Committee of second members of the Committee informed Zhu Jinqing individuals' proposal to name and democratic supervision committee 'to all the teachers to write, this is irresponsible. The Committee affirms to 'name, all proposals and democratic supervision committee' to the teacher's letter, is composed of all the members of the committee to discuss the decision, the so-called Zhu Jinqing on behalf of the personal authorization to 'nominal proposals and democratic supervision committee to the teachers' personal email, is groundless statement." This paragraph of word meaning is not only to clarify the facts, but also to the hospital leaders show the proposal committee is a unity and fighting collective. (the full report, see Appendix twelve).

1Month19Daily office issued a notice:1Month22A day's agenda is: Congress8Point to11Half; then law firm meeting;3All the Teachers Congress began at half; then the annual dinner. The faculty meeting agenda just listed4A: (1) deliberation report (Dean2Consider the special committee report (written) ()3Review ") School of law compliance incentives ("4Consideration of the proposal on behalf of). The back is inscribed1Month13Day, a day after the meeting of the presidium, but the presidium meeting open many matters are not included. I20On the morning after seeing immediately contacted Zhu Zhenhong, asked how one day meeting became3And a half hours, he said no so much content. I asked the Bureau discussed procedures do not, he said that4Is the content, the actual program was discussed according to the president of the presidium: report, sponsors, group discussion, team leader to report, on behalf of freedom of speech, assembly voted. Say a no miss. I said yes, but the draft agenda of the preparatory meeting must be adopted by all the representatives, it is invalid. He said that the bureau is not passed? I say yes. But the presidium conference agenda cannot be replaced, must be approved by the congress. He said he was going to ask the secretary.20On the afternoon I called again and asked, he said that the Secretary had something in the way teachers, waiting for him to come back after contact with him.21On the afternoon I called several times to ask, there is no one in the office. Evening playing Zhu Zhenhong's mobile phone, said he had, has been printed. I said "good."

1Month22On the morning of8At the meeting, I arrive, read the draft agenda, no problem, just as the presidium the discussion, the report on the work of the committee shall be in writing, not to write clearly, secretary explained in a meeting, shall be in writing. Because some representatives not to, etc.20Minutes,8Point20So, the assembly adopted the draft agenda. Then according to the agenda of the report, and then I introduce spokesman system proposal, said3Minutes, Secretary interrupted me, think what I say has nothing to do with the subject, I say is relevant, ask him why every time I speak he'll break me, had a few words. At last he said hole Dean, Kong Qingjiang hit a circle, I continued, until the end. (the speech, see Appendix thirteen). Because I read jointly sponsor name before a speech, including Zhu Jiannong, he in my speech ended immediately said it was his last year's signature, this does not count, I did not ask for his advice, so my approach is wrong.[23]I said "OK, crossed out the name of Zhu Jiannong." After the meeting, Gao Ying also asked her name removed from the sponsor list, but it is in private, not when the leadership of the surface.

Then discuss in groups. We prepared a to the leadership of the democratic evaluation form, the need to seek representative signature. From the procedure that it was too late, but we still want to have a try. We in the panel discussion on the collection to the17The signature of the person, and then show it to Shen Zuoqing look. He looked after his support, so the table by later became very smoothly.

In the discussion of our group meeting for clarification, individuals should not be building Bokun proposed Committee work report, should only report what to do, said Yang Lei seconded the motion. Zhu Jiannong said in the report "criticism", formulation. Shen Zuoqing pointed out that our report mention a person does not accord with the facts. I've done rebutted speech interpretation.

Group discussion before the meeting, the team reports. Zhu Zhenhong group put forward our committee work report that the meeting times reduces is because we informed the committee criticized the leadership, this is the lack of factual basis. Yang Lei's report is more neutral, telling the group disagreement about the Committee report. Wu Gaoqing's report about Dean's work report, did not involve the establishment of spokesman system proposal, but the week just added a personal opinion, said spokesman rights should be limited, if what you want to say, "it is terrible."

The original is just meeting one of the most active promoter system, but after a three meeting he always feel these people in the proposal is not interesting, not to mention is the next. He especially for most men feel disappointed, and too much of their energy input, so later decided to quit exit. From the2005To this end2010At the beginning of the year for4Years did not care for the Congress, he has been completely out of touch with reality struggle pulse, do not understand the objective truth. His words almost absurd: School Leadership control all units within the discourse right, he doesn't feel terrible, a non-governmental Congress spokesman, he felt terrible. What kind of logic is this? I guess he was some false information to mislead.

After the report is free speech. Zheng Wanqing and I asked to speak two hands. Zheng Wanqing was the first to speak, no one interrupts him. My speech is mainly criticized Shen Zuoqing's work style: style, ostentation and extravagance, efficiency is low, its outstanding performance is a conference. He only their own convenience, never caring people of the time, more do not consider the teaching and the scientific research efficiency. My speech is pre read, half page,5Minute. But Yang Lei sat beside me and I only read once again unusual5Words, he took the watch to me that the time has come, I ignored him; in short5Minutes he constantly let me look at his watch, I almost called out, but in order not to affect the speech, I refrained from attack. When I had finished, he told me I was10Minutes later, I knew he was nonsense, ignored him. (my speech text in Appendix fourteen).

We finished, Shen Qing into the free speech, for I refute. The first faculty meeting delay is not his reason, this be wide of the mark. I told him I was criticizing you too many meetings, sooner or later, but not the time of the meeting. He began to deny the interception proposal thing, that did not receive the proposal. I say it does not accord with the facts, you the draft agenda is2009Years1Month4On the afternoon of two proposals, we are4Morning service institute to do, how to say no received? Fight a few, settle a matter by leaving it unsettled.

The final vote. Don't vote, report and the report of the committee. Only the evaluation form and spokesperson system vote.29Vote, vote invalid,28Ticket valid votes. Evaluation form (Secretary I openly declare their support)235The spokesman system17:11Through.But the leadership that should be modified to vote, I say I understand has passed on the first according to the proposal, several people have attached leadership said, think that we should revise, also someone says "we have". Later in the week just privately say I am right.

Noon and just have lunch together, he said he was surprised by the result of a secret ballot, because he thought the spokesperson system. However, he also voted against. This shows that he has been completely out of touch with reality.

The dinner table, Zhu Jiannong and carrying a hospital leaders said to me: he just thought I approach is wrong, the vote is in favor of spokesman system. Whether it is true, have publicly criticized me to curry favor with the leadership of my people and support in the secret ballot when there are definitely. This is the last interesting phenomenon. On three non official documents -- spokesman system proposal, work report, our committee's democratic evaluation form, except the secretary expressed support for the evaluation form, on the report of the Commission and the spokesman system proposal, only criticism, not a praise, even praise even the stereotype properties are not, for example, the committee do a lot of work ah, on behalf of the work of the Commission says yes ah, and so on, are not. But when the secret ballot votes, is more than vote,17Ratio11, not in favor and praise, but dare not speak, or it may not speak. But criticism words from the perspective of course spokesman self-interest benefit is more than fraud -- as well as their responsible exercise of rights, but also to please the leadership (this should be the most important), not offend me. The only exception is Zheng Wanqing, he told some both praise and I praise the leadership, is praiseworthy for one's excellent conduct.

In a sense, leadership is also being fooled. Hear their ears are support and agree with them, but they do not see a place, people against them in the vote. And even those who criticize our words, also not necessarily led to favorable, because from the psychological point of view, the more people criticize, more is to deepen the people to the file or the text impression. Many of the delegates did not attach importance to the democracy at the grassroots level, to come to the meeting is because the leadership informed, by now the network popular words, is "be". Send their documents they had not carefully to see. You pick, debate, he interested in, look to see. See, I remember. So prick who seem to help lead busy, actually gets in the way. This effect is probably the leaders unexpected.

2010Year in the spring semester3Month1The day before school. Notice to law school3Month16Held a faculty meeting. The proposal and democratic supervision committee according to the assessment has just passed the table on three hospital leaders for the first democratic assessment. During the test, we issued a total of80Table, but only to the recovery49Zhang. Many people are not willing to participate in the vote clearly. In this49Zhang Piaozhong, more than 1/3 to three leaders have played100Divided. Fang Fujian in the count when sighed: "it is to power is not exercise!" To do away with a maximum score and a minimum after the weighted average, the president, vice president, Secretary of the fraction respectively92,89,84. In accordance with our commitments to the teacher announced the fraction.

2011Years1Month6On the afternoon, because Zhang Xuejun has resigned as vice president positions, we again to two hospital leaders remaining, Kong Qingjiang and Shen Zuoqing of the democratic appraisal, still only received49Copy of the valid votes46Copy. Two scores were 90.09,91.58. Score is not important, the key is the system has been established.

From the2011Annual spring semester began, the leading law school. Former Secretary Shen Zuoqing out, the new coming secretary Zheng Sufa and Secretary Zhao Heng, Kong Qingjiang will stay on as president, also add Lou Bokun and Chen party two vice president. Because its working and classify the branch, so I take the initiative to find two new secretary to reflect the situation, hope that they will be able to correct the previous law school refused to implement the resolution its mistakes, implement the decisions on both sides. Their attitude is very clear: all its resolution should be implemented, because the school faculty meeting resolution, school leaders are to be executed.

Moreover, and Shen Qing made frequent meeting is different, we are just the beginning in the staff Road Campus opened once, after no more than two months had a meeting.5Mid month because of the need to elect new representatives of teachers met again. Reflect on the new leadership is a new style of teachers.4In early January, director of general office Zhu Zhenhong told me: you voted for union activists (there6Of people), because you have contributed in its issue. I think, its contribution I made fast10For years, has never been awarded advanced, now how I activist? Ask: who assessment, leadership or the people? His answer: a combination of both, the trade union members review. Perhaps this is a virtuous cycle of the mark, means that our activities are gradually accepted by the Law School of leadership. If so, then its working will be successful.

 

Summary of experience

9YearsPracticeLong and hard, butDemocracy at the grass-roots level for the city's accumulated useful experience. Now try these experiences may be summarized as follows,For aspiring to promote grassroots democracy construction of our country people reference.

 

One or two basic conditions.

To carry out the two basic conditions of unit grass-roots democratic construction is bravery and science. Anyone who wants to make the democracy at the grassroots level, must first do this to judge the situation, ask you whether to have the two basic conditions. Have, you can do it; not, don't do it, because it is white.

First is a common. There must be people dare to face the unit's leadership, public and Leadership (including in the General Assembly debate, two at) to lead the eye, keep a straight face the heart does not jump, full confidence to say "no" to. This is the most difficult, because our country widespread fear of officer. Whether it is afraid to take revenge, or want to please to seek the benefit, the officer of the attachment is our nation's greatest weakness at the present stage, is also the largest resistance of democracy at the grassroots level. In turn, face the leadership courage may come from the sense of social responsibility -- patriotic passion for the future and destiny of the nation's deep concern and care for, or because of some unreasonable phenomenon or institutional units within the discontent, hope to achieve a reasonable demand, and may even look down on the low level for leadership. No matter what the reason, bile is necessary and important, is the driving force. No gall, dare not face the leadership, grassroots democracy is impossible.

The second is rational, which has reasonable cause. Democracy is the system construction, not to not go with any led, not intentional. Therefore, request must be reasonable. If the request is not reasonable, it becomes make trouble out of nothing, will certainly have to be messed it up.[24]

If you put a reasonable demand, leading immediately adopted, it would be too good; if leaders can always do so, called good advice, then democracy at the grassroots level is not required. The problem is that leaders rarely. In most cases, the reasonable demands are not met, and the resistance is often from the leadership, so the democracy at the grassroots level is necessary.

 

Two, the basic method.

So, how to do from the leadership of the resistance? This involves the basic method of democracy at the grassroots level. The basic method is to use your bravery to say, say to more people listen to (the meeting said than will say because of more efficient, to hear people); use your reason to convince them, make them aware of your right and leadership. The key here is a "tough" word, is Mr. Lu Xun's tenacity, the kind that unremittingly. As long as you have the patience, perseverance, constantly said, long said, there must be more and more people agree with your point of view, the final in the secret ballot to win more votes. The spirit can change material, theory are powerful. The enlightenment in Europe's Renaissance and the consequent broke the feudal building. Lenin said: "Marx's victory in the theory of forced the enemy has to dress up as the Marx doctrine." As long as you have, and am constantly said, eventually your final victory and obstructionists failures are inevitable.

China grass-roots leaders, for all its flaws, look not bad in nature; they have to face, will speak the truth. They are reluctant to adopt the right advice to you is because accustomed accustomed to persist in one's old ways, tyranny, no one dare say a "not" word in front of him. In other words, they are spoiled by the masses. Therefore, when you first came out and said "no", they are not used to, not to, so the conflict, or even misunderstood you, doubt what you have personal purpose, or is to make life difficult for them, not to give them face, etc.. All kinds of misunderstanding, suspicion, even a rumor, will produce. To have faith, to withstand the attack and pressure. As long as we stand our ground, we will win. Chinese people only know "s rafter first rotten", "qiangdachutoudiao", but little thought when the root exposed rafters not rotten, or bird have not been killed, it is destructive to the existing order and promote the reform of the role will be enormous. When you unremittingly to say a simple truth, when more and more people realize that the time error you right and leadership, the situation will change gradually in the invisible, will gradually increase to the leadership of the pressure, it will break through the resistance, the reform towards pushing further. As an individual would pay a lot, but think about the significance of this reform is large, it is worth to pay. What is love the motherland, love the people? This is the.

It must be clear: democracy is legitimate, open, on the ground activities, not the underground struggle, no cabal. In fact, this also involves an important aspect of the reform of the national character. In a democratic system, legal expression of the channel is not smooth, people can talk in private, so they formed a "did not say face to face, back blather; will not speak, will grumble" situation. So, an autocratic units look everybody is very obedient, in fact divided in public opinion, lacking spirit of cooperation. This phenomenon has become a China characteristics. Democracy provides an effective channel to solve various contradictions among the people in the legal system, training all through a legal procedure, the issue of public discussion, a democratic vote, then everyone consciously implement, unit cohesion will greatly increase.

 

Three, policy and strategy.

Be careful not to touch the high-voltage wire, don't criticize the political system. Democracy at the grassroots level is something to stand on solid ground, system construction, in small units within the masses, training and leadership, its political system is compatible. Some people are very radical, like an alarmist, curry favour by claptrap. This is not good, avoid by all means. Leaders sometimes underhand, see you not pleasing to the eye, will give you a hat, the political integration you. Democracy is sensitive, easy to be him from the party, bourgeois liberalization. Never in his sleeve. Democracy at the grassroots level fully in line with the strategic plan of the Party Central Committee, in accordance with the four principles. While individual leadership so buckle hat, is not really loyal to the Communist Party, but to maintain his authority, to satisfy his desire for power. To have an ulterior motive of people and things, should expose the truth, to fight back. Therefore, do not touch the high-voltage wire political caution is necessary, if the words are not careful, easy to be caught braids, fall into a passive.

Even the low-pressure line is also not to touch. Low pressure line here refers to the higher-level units (in our case is the school). Democracy at the grassroots level will encounter great resistance, need to mobilize all can mobilize, to unite the people, to concentrate on, key breakthrough, to succeed. Therefore, do not make too many enemies, as far as possible with the higher leadership relationship. If not for the support of superiors, will cause them not against, don't stop, at least not strong opposition. As long as you have no political braid catch in the unit leaders, he is also not good to report above, please above him out, because that would make it his incompetence in the face of a higher level. Do not touch the low-voltage truth in sweeping the floor to analogy, is his room is not clean, do not sweep hall, more don't dump to sweep in front of the house. Of course, you make the room (the unit) thoroughly cleaned, it should consider the hall and soil field, will touch the low voltage. But there is something in the future, do not need to consider.

The initial stage should pay attention to narrow the range of appeal. In physics, the size of the pressure and stress area is inversely proportional to. The force area is small, the pressure increases. Therefore, when the resistance is large and its own strength and limited circumstances, should try to narrow the scope of claims, often make a request to the effect of a two well. The proposed requirements should be carefully selected, careful consideration, can trigger a virtuous cycle. Once proposed, to basic method using said above, make full use of the two basic conditions, pegged tightly, not up until the goal. When we break through the leading card proposal, spent the whole3Years of time. Wait until the first step to achieve the objectives, then second steps. Forward so step by step, grassroots democracy will accumulate results.

 

Four, theoretical study -- the leadership of the party and the democracy at the grassroots level relationship.

Uphold the party's leadership is the political premise, must not violate. How to promote grassroots democracy in this major premise, is a former did not solve the problem. The key here is to deal with the relationship between the leaders of the unit. The unit leadership is the object of supervision of grassroots democracy. Uphold the party's leadership means that the unit leadership decisions must be approved and supported not against? If so, then the supervision can not be, at most only a decoration. But we don't think. Because of the party's leadership is the leadership of the CPC Central Committee, the central conference resolution earnestly study and implement, comply with the national laws and regulations. In this context, a lot of practice base unit, there is room for discussion. For the spirit of the instructions of the Party Central Committee leadership against, only personal interests, regardless of the interests of the masses and global interests, should be serious criticism. This criticism and struggle, not only will not weaken the party's leadership, and will strengthen and consolidate the leadership of the party. This is what we do in the two report work.