Pull the Japanese Ambassador car flag law analysis

 

   The Japanese ambassador Tanba Yuichiro recently in Beijing car was forced to stop and pull out the flag. The Japanese Foreign Minister Xuanba Hikaruichiro said Tuesday that Japan has to China's solemn protest, and asked the Chinese side in accordance with the law to carry out criminal investigation.

 

   

          The Japanese ambassador to China Tanba Yuichiro

 

   I think no matter what, for what reason intercepting vehicles removed the Japanese flag practices are not rational, not worth recommending. If you want to express patriotic emotion, should be through legal rational channels. We provide legal services to more than a dozen countries Embassy in Beijing, also dealt with a European country Counsellor's son was Beijing police arrested case, also had not seen or even not heard of a similar situation. But from the media situation, the parties did not talk to people in the car of any language or physical contact, not any threat, the Embassy Attack or harm, also did not open the door to enter or attempt to enter the video as Japanese territory in car, nor to the embassy transportation through violence attack (is hit or hit the car), so from the international convention of any diplomatic point of view are not what a violation of diplomatic personnel to liberty and security of person. At present, it should be the citizen individual behavior, there is no evidence that this is the Chinese government official, so also does not exist China in violation of the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations problem.

 

    In simple terms, whether by people do not steal or open to take Japanese flags, all should be illegal if the circumstances are obviously minor, did not reach the breaking Chinese criminal law degree, certainly without what criminal investigation. So what legal consequences? Specifically, the violation of the "Public Security Management Punishment Law" of the people's Republic of China belongs to the violation of public security administration acts disturbing public order, concrete is suspected to affect the normal traffic take strong force or any damage to, occupation of public or private property. This kind of behavior if the parties reach a mediation, can not be punished. If you can not reach a mediation, should be given a warning, or a fine of 1000 yuan or 15 days detention. Considering the legal nature of the case is not serious, but the ambassador Niwa was magnanimous says this is the case do not want to affect the Sino Japanese relations, an understanding attitude, so I think if you find too difficult, considering the attitude of understanding the ambassador Niwa, considering the efficiency and economy of the law, there is no need to put up a pageantry the police to investigate the case. Even if cannot find the perpetrators, the public security organ can be carried out by a public warning to them. But public warnings can also warn others not to make similar mistakes.

 

  This matter has its legal nature is a civil violation of public security management Chinese,The so-called foreign non trivial is just the lack of spirit of equality before the law and national self-confidence and weak thinking. We should not be because of a case involving foreign elements will not handle cases according to law, I have seen many foreign customers are proudly described to us they are super national treatment to not always in their own countries in China, a American friends and I definitely would not return to the USA, in China criminal police is not generally large, because they are afraid of making mistakes in foreign affairs. There is a American friends before the old ride a hanging USA California license plate motorcycle full run Beijing, others and the car did not China licence but never police. If because of diplomatic protests as a waste of taxpayers' money with someone, some quite Big deal, if on the parties to act contrary to heavy penalties, the fundamental principle of equality before the law. In fact we should be investigated for criminal responsibility is the result of public statement preparation group ascends Diaoyu Island and violated the China criminal law, constitute the organization people to secretly cross the national boundary (border) environmental crime of Shintaro Ishihara. (of the Ishihara criminal case I have been to the Ministry of public security report, please clickThe Hao Junbo report for capturing wanted Shintaro Ishihara to the Ministry of public security; about my v. Shintaro Ishihara and the Japanese government Diaoyu Island four the accused infringement, please clickBeijing court accepted Hao Junbo v. Shintaro Ishihara and the Japanese government Diaoyu infringement litigation materials   China legislation should declare the Ryukyu Islands Sovereignty)

 

   I personally think that this matter from the diplomatic game for China pour is also a good opportunity to use. Japan called for an investigation of the matter, China should be investigated, but according to the principle of reciprocity, the Japanese police legal responsibility Chinese should also urged the Japanese government first held a few days ago illegal landing on the Diaoyu Islands to sacrifice those Japanese and Diaoyu Islands illegally seizing China citizens, and launched a criminal investigation of the situation and the progress promptly notify the China requirements the government of japan. Japan since the request China processing Chinese civil law, Japanese citizens themselves should punish illegal.

 

Hao Junbo lawyers introduction and contact way:

   China first transnational litigation claim expert lawyer. China first cross-border securities claims, the first international air crash injury claims, the first claim cross-border, transnational anti first antitrust lawsuit.

   Hao Junbo graduated from Canada first but also for many years ranked first master's Osgoode Hall School of law. Agent a number of internationally and the impact of domestic cases. Lawyer Hao Junbo is an international legal experts with rich experience, is the first agency Chinese victims of transnational crash and injury, the first agent Chinese shareholders of securities class action claims in the Chinese America lawyer. Is the first collection of Chinese enterprise China antitrust class action lawyers to the price monopoly of the Multi-National Corporation in the European Union and the America.

  Hao Junbo lawyers and international lawyers agent all costs China customers and investors for claims and litigation in USA and internationally by the lawyer team advance, litigation risk is borne entirely by the law, if not found, all fees shall be borne by the team of lawyers. China customers and stock shareholders to participate in the USA securities litigation or multinational crash and other international claims litigation, not only without cost, no risk, no need to spend time, fill out the form to participate in, also does not need to go abroad to participate in the trial.


     Hao Junbo lawyerFor Chinese consulate in Beijing world (including Holland, Norway, USA, Poland, Singapore, South Africa, Nigeria and so on), America Olympic Committee, Air France, Royal Air Holland, American Renault tobacco companies, Gibson guitars, Hi-Vac and other world famous enterprises and organizations China served as legal adviser, in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games during the former American Olympic delegation as China legal adviser.


    Lawyer Hao Junbo changed China court does not accept the crash case history. He was also the first in the Chinese is open to foreign products for victims of transnational collective action China lawyer. Agents have dozens of families Chinese crash, and China consumers to America, Russia, France and other countries, Chinese Airlines / air driver training school and Bausch & Lomb, Medtronic Inc and other multinational manufacturer of personal injury or death claim. He has repeatedly successfully for the purchase of the NASDAQ and other America stock losses money China investors in the America involved in securities class action. Once for the losses arising from the Multi-National Corporation monopoly pricing or price collusion Chinese enterprises, agency of anti-monopoly in the European Union and the America collective action, relates to a liquid crystal panel, air freight and sea hose industry.

 

 Hao Junbo lawyers had illegally trading in the Diaoyu Islands tort case against Shintaro Ishihara and the Japanese government. Hao Junbo lawyers publicly stressed that the Diaoyu Islands and the Ryukyu Islands is a territory of the Chinese.

 

 Mr. Hao Junbo is the first also included Marquez Asian celebrities and celebrities in the world record China lawyer. Was China procuratorial daily as Chinese legal guardian.

 

Electronic mail (MSN):Lawyerofchina@hotmail.comTelephone (consultation please send text messages): 13718052888


   We are now recruiting buy stocks such as (Nu Skin) of the Chinese investors, who buy or acquire new USA shares in the period from October 25, 2011 to August 7, 2012, regardless of whether they have selling the shares can entrust a lawyer to participate in the litigation claims, and no need for any expenses. Please clickAmerican law for U.S. stocks such as (Nu Skin) investors in USA securities litigation claims

We are currently collecting bought Rui group American stock investors to participate in the proceedings Chinese securities claims USA, if you in the period from February 24, 2010 to May 3, 2010 purchase of Rui group common stock, welcome to contact us before the deadline of October 31, 2012 for claim. Please clickCollection of Rui group stocks investors in American securities collective claim v.Litigation