The association of Jing Ji words (2011) No. 020-1 complaint case

Arguments

Beijing city bar association:

    Beijing Lvxie Ji words (2011) No. 020-1 complaints filed notice "and" attached "complaint" in March 23, 2011 received. I due to practice in accordance with the law safeguard legitimate rights and interests of the principal trigger each other complaints and bring you the trouble, very sorry and regret.

   Complaints from the other party of Hebei Jin Kun commerce Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Hebei Jin Kun"), which is the standard of practice and conduct I recognized, the focus of complaints that I criticize it in favor of the judge Cheng Jianling "improper", which indicates that Cao Cheng's "relationship" unusual -- the judge about his head, the other party need not draw a sword and render help. The complaints I discipline illegal transaction, is Hebei Jin Kun has not happened based on a false "facts" in the Shijiazhuang intermediate people's court prosecution of two Hebei zhongchu, two case trial length and the undertaker, are three Court of the vice president of the National Academy of Cheng Jianling. Among them, the first case of two wins 23000000 has been performed, the Supreme Court of Hebei to apply for a retrial, the retrial procedure and second case I undertake. Second case of first instance of Hebei Jin Kun already successful, as long as the appeal to maintain to win 29090000, but the ruling was ruled revocation rehearing -- believe that this result is related with all the heart with me. Frankly speaking, at the moment I am still in the "with" Hebei in promoting the discipline inspection and supervision department shall be investigated for criminal responsibility in this process, because of her deliberately misrepresent let the public credibility of the judiciary in Hebei all gone, the thousands of people in trouble! Not fire bag paper, I believe that Cheng Jianling will be unable to escape, the truth is emerging.

   My overall argument is: "the book" complaints in fact and reason are not established, I called breaches of discipline is inconsistent with the facts and legal. Now to the "filed notice" requirements, submit arguments as follows, please review.

   A summary of key points, complaints

   Hebei Jin Kun complaints: I'm agent second case two of the collegial panel and the complainant "baseless" slander, accusations and threats, in the Tianya improperly issued "disturbed" by the court "normal" trial order; call me "court" shouting and the committee secretary Zhang Tie force is the "villagers" "tell him the plaintiff, will not, do not meddle in this matter, don't show up"; that my petition terms far -- identified process "has become illegal unscrupulous merchant hand judicial procedure blackmail huge state-owned assets." said I; "slander Chinese courts and some judges in the post, not more than profiteers as a trusted", that the "white hair and beard" calls upon the top posts; I said "overall planning" Hebei Zhao Liang "the witness perjury". Complaints people thought I was a brimming with "Underworld gangster style" "rogue", requirements for me this "rogue" lawyer "severely punish".

   The two, the minor problems are briefly described

   Some details of complaints listed in the book, first gave a brief clarification:

   I slammed on the complainant at the Cao Lianying couple "fraud", this is the truth of the call a spade a spade; court investigation and debate on Cheng Jianling's criticism is part of burden of proof, cross examination and debate, this is behavior of duty fulfill their obligations, was directed at before and after the two case involved four judges the collegiate bench free, but not for the collegial panel. Secretary of the Shijiazhuang Municipal Public Security Bureau Director and Legal Committee Zhang Tieli, Cao Lianying's husband, Li Yongping and I are Hebei Luanxian people, but I never met with them. It is reported, Li Yongping famous, the ninety's of the last century was sentenced to life imprisonment (unspecified charges), there may still be in the execution of sentence outside prison. Multiple sources said, after 11 July 2008, Mr. and Mrs. Cao Li by serving in the stone City Hall reception department of Luanxian nationals Wang, looking for Zhang Tieli to "help"; she said Secretary Zhang "instructions" in different occasions, nobody dare "crest not do". The officials for assistance, she not afraid but indulge in elaborating on, quanliquanwai almost be known to all, her background is a piece of iron. On the other, Shijiazhuang Court Executive Board Lvxing judge had rushed executive brook no delay, suggesting "life on the sent".

   I said I'm looking for a tie to expose the truth, but not as "complaint" is said in court. "". In August 16, 2010, second of the first trial adjourned sign the record on the occasion, Cheng Jianling and I had a brief conversation, tell her I will not believe the truth and fraud intention Cao Zhang told the Tieli, impression in my idea is: "the truth will prevail, you know the truth, how can two trial case look not to come out? You help Cao Lianying can understand, but have a principle, need not be in such a help method! If this day is over, you can not stand! I heard that Cao Lianying found Zhang Tieli, but I don't believe she told the secretary told the truth, I don't believe a tie if you know the truth, will help her intervention case. Zhang Tieli and I are all Luanxian people, I don't know him but when necessary to tell him the truth, this thing, unlike what he heard, he must let Cao Lianying to cheat, meddling too much he will have an accident." Cheng Jianling listened carefully, but she remained silent silent. The provisions of the criminal law perverting the law, the specific subject of crime, abuse the law and practise favouritism, I don't want her farther. Cheng Jianling advice because she and I are from large -- enrollment in 1988, she was my undergraduate graduate, when students have shared experiences, blood is thicker than water.

   Tianya online criticism of the Shijiazhuang intermediate people's Court of shady net article, the view is consistent with my intention, speech used in my point of view, has not changed; with remarks I uploaded, but this is the comment and appeal, is calling on public attention to pervert the law and corruption -- of course I hope users care about our grievances so the law, how many some scruples. When the whole world is that Chinese judicial corruption has become endemic, called "reform consensus basic rupture" when Professor Sun Liping, unfortunately the judicial corruption into a highly social consensus: one is Du Peiwu, She Xianglin, Nie Shubin, Zhao Zuohai case, one side is Huang Songyou, Zhang Tao and other dozens of two or three judges with broken halberds defeat, the corruption of judges, judges were killed, the judge, the judge. Dutch act are on the table, but feel that every day should not be driven into a corner of the former, but the latter addition to turn one or two of sleaze, if who can let me sincerely feel Chinese judiciary is indeed "clean water", then I can turn over a new leaf, take back all the "slander lies". I think, the judicial process needs to accept supervision, the supreme court ban really want to implement, especially not reject the supervision from the lawyer, who can not more than a lawyer qualification perception of judicial corruption and the judges perverting the course of justice or not. Lawyer state one's views frankly and court fight for every inch of land, are not violations of discipline. It is in this case, I have no possible intervention and interference with the "normal" trial court! Cheng Jianling's four session automatics, two case referee had "come to a successful issue"! Hebei Jin Kun want, in a certain range of the court is obtained. I also want to say, "caution and judicial review" is not a comment on justice, respect the judicial authority is not allowed to judge, not equal to occur in the eyes of the evil allow someone to continue, no one can make me for anything with one eye closed! I diligently strive after justice, court of speech is protected by the law of freedom of expression, speech is: even if mistakenly believe that Chinese judicial confuse right and wrong heavy fog, just because I have poor eyesight achromatopsia anomalous trichromatism accidentally upside down in black and white, to express their views Straight From The Heart is still I cannot be deprived of the right to.

   Hebei Jin Kun said I lied "white hair and beard" is installed, said my black hair, suggesting that Cao Lianying and his agent to observe my not fine. My junior high school, "Shao Baitou", but the temples and the head is black. Sideburns appear white hair and head hair white, directly contributing two perverting the law, family friends and colleagues to be crystal clear: first, the Supreme Court two court judge Wu Jianhua in November 18, 2009 to dismiss me a retrial application, cause my heart damage blood pressure suddenly increased, the evening is forced to Chaoyang Hospital, then to the Fuwai Hospital cardiovascular college to do a detailed inspection, but the next day found the head appeared a little white hair, "Wu Guo Zhaoguan" night bald, I now really believe; second, is Cheng Jianling after two even three perverting the law -- as China materials storage and Transportation Corporation counsel, though I've never been to the first case of first-line agent, but from July 11, 2008 was so far, I Hebei and the fate, the same struggle every day in Hebei judicial vortex suffering -- chin three five root the beard is white, the cluster head white hair, is since July last year. Please colleagues believe, time flies would always get old, I am not one to worry about the old age, I don't play a card with the likes of Cao Lianying playing magic.

   Finally, the term "appeal" fire "in my complaint complaint", this puzzling is not true -- "burned" language, is called "the appeal process has become illegal unscrupulous merchant hand judicial procedure blackmail huge state-owned assets". In view of the appeal is submitted to the court documents, stamped with the seal is the expression of the position for Hebei, be borne by the latter. Besides, the appeals by the Hebei High Court ruled that revocation remand, that appeal was supported, regardless of whether the tone "ham", the text has been court confirmed.

   Three, the key point of Defense

   The three key points of Hebei Jin Kun complaint, arguments are as follows:

   1Criticism and criticism, a complainant Hebei Jin Kun problem

   I had criticized Cao Lianying couples and Hebei Jin Kun knows no delivery facts, but for illegal possession of property of the objective, concoctive fact filed two lawsuits constitutes a crime. According to the Supreme Court opinions of experts, which belongs to the matter worse more serious social harm of crime (see the Supreme Court "on criminal justice reference" seventy-third series). Hold the It stands to reason., I was as a lawyer's duty. Hebei zhongchu in response to malicious litigation at the same time, may also with the exhaustion of all, to the media disclosure, report to the leadership of Cao of fraud, and even to the Hebei Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection Report Cheng Jianling perverting the law, the purpose is to promote the public security organs to punish crimes, looking forward to the discipline inspection and supervision and court systems pure team of judges, as soon as possible to clear an evil member of the herd like Cheng Jianling. (see the attached Hebei roll in Hebei Province Commission letter report entitled "report, Shijiazhuang City Intermediate People's court three Court vice president").

   The complainant two fictional facts with the same "fact" against the Hebei reservoir, is to seek illegal interests judicial kidnapping. Reportedly, Cao Lianying in Hebei when the subway flour trade circle, is due to the "two war two wins" and won the "Cao won" "reputation", because she "successful experience" can always be reproduced locally, the concoctive fact "bind" the individual judge's tricks can Dengfeng made extremely. The first case of "bill payment request right dispute", by Cheng Jianling perverting the law Cao fraud has succeeded, in Hebei more than 2300 yuan in cash has been performed, I have entrusted the retrial petitions to the Supreme court. My agent in this case is Cao Lianying make in second case, the prosecution case is the "contract dispute" -- the only way to with the former case "echo" for the right of instruments attached to two "real transaction relationship", because of "insufficient evidence" of the road was lost to me, Cao Lianying's exercise of the right to release tomorrow in addition to Cheng Jianling after a change to "return the original dispute". Later, because of they dare not go "goods" status and whereabouts, does not prove that Hebei the "illegal possession" in the air, Cheng Jianling had to sacrifice "law making", coined the Supreme Court civil action does not exist "provisions" in the "return of property disputes," in that does not constitute a "sale contract" and "suspended" the first case referee foundation under contract law, the error quoted the wrong person, final decree CMST Hebei "return" nineteen thousand tons of goods or compensation for 29090000 yuan. As a result of the decision Its loopholes appeared one after another., in addition we presented new evidence and evidence, the court of second instance in December 29, 2010 to "that the facts were not clear" on the grounds, the judgment and remanded to revoke. At present, the Hebei reservoir 2300 million receivables is Cheng Jianling seized in Chengde steel mill.

   File evidence, Cao Lianying and his wife of Hebei reservoir operation is "financing trade" -- Cao inserted into Hebei reservoir in his two between buying and selling, which have no actual meaning unless he figure, the cargo supervision, is according to the agreement made by nature of ownership and tenure contract of sale of goods enjoy long-term rental; and control the yard is Cao Lianying couples. Cao Lianying and Hebei in the sixth round of the "business" in the end did not sign a new contract, Hebei Jin Kun "delivery" six wheel "goods" by Cao controlled Hebei strange stone Lin Trading Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "stone Lin company") "collect", this also is Hebei reservoir in the latter "delivery", not "pass through" Hebei intermediate goods, will not bear the risks and costs; Cao Qi Shi Lin to even the English company does not have a sixth round of 20600000 yuan loan principal and interest to coerce, forced to leave the next day Hebei zhongchu hypocrisy due to recover the loan funds to check, in violation of the provisions to the bank bill management industry. Hebei Jin Kun concoctive fact brought two pieces of malicious litigation, the actual achieved 23000000 yuan "accomplished", and another 29000000 yuan has not yet "accomplished", apparently has committed the crime of swindling.

   Hebei Jin Kun creditors offering will provide another Du dossier confirmed, Cao Lianying from May 29, 2008 onwards has been unable to repay, only a monthly 200000 yuan to "high interest" and into the 20000000 yuan each to take a day; July 11th Hebei zhongchu check "short", such as Du offer creditors cannot "recover" borrowing, according to Mr. and Mrs. Cao Li arrangements for the trip to the Handan yard "control the goods". After two months, Zhao Liang, et al. Du offer will arrange stone Pengbin left field supervision odd stone Lin for steel shipments, Shi Wang in mill supervision checkout, stone Lin company from the factory and other "home" and "payment" to 12940000 yuan for the Hebei Jin Kun Du offer less part principal will et al., the remaining 7000000 yuan respectively into litigation. At present, Shi Wang Jin Kun, Cao Lianying v. Hebei decision has taken effect; Du Xian v. Hebei Jin Kun, Cao Lianying was still in the city of Shijiazhuang in Yuhua court.

   Du Xian, stone, Zhao Liang, Wang has yard control, and after July 12th "pipe dream" foreign goods yard, check out clues to accept our investigation, "records" and Zhao Liang's calligraphy yard import cargo record, have been submitted to the Hebei High Court and Supreme Court, at the same time, we also have to apply to the court for some after taking stone Lin company in July 11th steel supply evidence and billing records, flow trajectories and to obtain the funds of financial institutions. The high court of Hebei case key facts not known, in December 29, 2010, the decision to withdraw the case back to the trial, I believe that this so-called "facts are not clear," should be refers to whether the two sides "delivery" facts "that are not clear".

   2About the criticism of Cheng Jianling, perverting the law

   In this case the two-tier trial transcripts submitted, I address the court did not harm national security malicious slander others, without disrupting the Cheng Jianling "normal" trial -- she put two false cases are "normal" concluded! My words and deeds are performing their duties in accordance with the behavior, not to judge the "defamation" and "slander", also did not interfere with judicial activities of disrupting the order of the court may. The lawyer law the thirty-seventh regulation, the lawyer in court: agent defense opinions will not be investigated by law, unless "publication of endangering national security, malicious slander others, seriously disrupting the order of the court, it should not include the words" lawyer on trial published. The Constitution stipulates that citizens of any state organs and staff illegal acts have impeach appeals against the right, subject of right here of course include lawyers, legal actions including the lawyer to the public opinions on the case aroused public attention. I think lawyers the right to comment on the happening of perverting the course of justice, pretend to be ignorant of sth. about safeguarding legitimate rights and interests of the parties, is not fit to defend the authority of the judiciary's mission. As the name suggests, the said method the thirty-seventh article of the law violations should occur in the court, if the complainant is intended to Beijing Lvxie deprive me of my right to judge the judge's duty behavior, or even required for the association behavior "severely punish", that not all contractors appeals lawyer with the line, are suspected of "slander" and "slander" a trial judge, or "interference" and "disturb" the order of the court trial?! This "shock" idea, apparently too absurd.

   I had the attack process of a violation of procedural perverting the law, but the opinion words and have according to, all is according to the needs expressed. Lawyers call a spade a spade with another judge evidence evaluation, neither nor slander slander. In the second case, we use a set of evidence to prove that the first case of first instance in violation of the collegiate system, the verdict is the presiding judge Cheng Jianling while the members of the collegial panel judge Zhang Guoshun travel to Shanghai alone to make, our purpose is to prove that the verdicts of the "facts" of the case directly accepted cannot be. As we pointed out, second case of first instance of the error in the second appeal court trial, according to a file in the presiding judge Cheng Jianling in September 14, 2010 to the Hebei Jin Kun agent Fan Haonan lawyers "interpretation" record, pointed out that she was in a collegial panel identified Hebei Jin Kun claims "evidence", in accordance with the law shall be rejected the plaintiff requests, even misinterpretation of evidence rule thirty-fifth, to inform its "can change the claim", which belongs to the "interpretation" abuse in jurisprudence, constitute the plaintiff side. We also pointed out, second the court of first instance, damage to Hebei the litigation rights, a judgment of my party to prove that the first case undertaker Cheng Jianling violated the collegiate system of evidence to the "evaporation" off (my first list of evidence and a trial comparison can be found). I think on this issue, the parties should first reach consensus, that is Times have changed., at this time when the case is not the case, Cheng Jianling is not Cheng Jianling: in the second case the court of first instance Cheng Jianling court, pointed out that the first case of first instance Cheng Jianling violation of procedural perverting the law, or in the second appeal court cut the responsibility second case of first instance Cheng Jianling perverting the law, not what is wrong! Since Hebei Jin Kun be blinded by lust for money to have insatiable desires, since the two presiding judge Cheng Jianling errors or perverted the law in the trial process, it must withstand the challenge from the Hebei reservoir and the public! In other words, I'm a lawyer entrusted by the people, be loyalty affairs must be bold initiative, shouldering the great trust of thousands of cadres and the masses, to deal with this series, "not" false case court investigation, I should not be and due diligence!

   The complaint said I was in court accused "the plaintiff around work, treat or gift, the collegial bench play favouritism and commit irregularities", this is not the case: not perverting the law It is without rhyme or reason. world, my intuition in the case of corruption behind the black hole could stretch his hand not to see the five fingers, I doubt some not to be divulged dirty in Cheng Jianling Cao Lianying, but do not get Cao the couple is "gift giving" and asked "dot" evidence in court, so I talk only to perverting the law violates the procedure of Cheng Jianling's "secret", never relates to whether she and others are offering bribes.

   Hebei zhongchu regarded Cheng Jianling as illegal profiteers looted assets accomplice, not wronged her from that experience, I can see clearly. August 16, 2010 the first session, my evidence includes the first case of the trial transcript, Zhang Guoshun flight record, Cheng Jian Ling send express voucher, her decision alone to make the first decision, this group of "evidence" that the first case of violation of the legal process Jian Ling collegiate system, decision is her at Zhang Guoshun during a business trip to Hebei and served in the! I want to prove that the decision to deny the effect of evidence shall be revoked. In order to determine the persuasiveness of evidence, I flew from Shijiazhuang to Shanghai, the plane ride to the intermediate people's court, the conclusion is even fewer cars on the road or over the weekend, nearly an hour out of the door to the door of the court. Check Zhang Guoshun's plane landed in Zhengding airport at two forty in the afternoon, Cheng Jianling four in the afternoon mail out the verdict, only an hour and twenty minutes, Zhang Guoshun back to the hospital if only thirty minutes! In the trial, I asked her whether Zhang Guoshun from the airport to the intermediate people's court in the "collegiate", asked the several thousand word sentences facts legal complex, even if the other man "as a mere formality" signature can, can you half an hour to walk after the draft, proofreading, typing, sign, seal, send out all the process? I also told her, I actually know a Zhang Guoshun aircraft rental home, after a few days he didn't come back to work! I said Hebei zhongchu think impassability, you open the judge if there is no ghosts, why are you so, you how this?

   But second case Hebei Jin Kun may fall into a passive, Cheng Jianling that only became more and more obvious, the final act undisguisedly. She saw the complainant "insufficient evidence" to be the first hearing, go through all procedures, should notice I in September 6th in court again "check the quantity of goods", and the hearing is not just the fact situation, she is just "make a gesture of attacking", as the Hebei Jin Kun over for a permit for oral application change lawsuit case a request to provide opportunities, but this request because the ultra time limit for adducing evidence and the lawyer did not specifically authorized by the collegial panel, the oral rejected, and in the trial transcript. But somehow, process after the adjournment to Hebei Jin Kun agent active "interpretation" -- the record records, inform the Hebei Jin Kun collegiate bench has identified its claim to the contract payment payment for "lack of evidence", but according to the law, "you may change the litigation request", Hebei Jin Kun agent and Shunganerpa up said he was "clear", the next day submitted oral application with the court rejected the agreement a written application. So Cheng Jianling disregard my objection, forced arranged in September 27th third session, in view of the "summons" still writing "contract dispute", and "case" after the change is Hebei Jin Kun agent court "interpretation" to "return the original dispute", I refuse to be a separate arrangement and apply for court. The afternoon of October 8th, Cheng Jianling finally in Hebei Jin Kun still can't say "original state" and reserve in Hebei how to "illegal possession" of the "original" case declared closed court. Finally, she once again "hit" in the verdict, will not be able to set up a "return the original dispute", not "Shi Ming", helped to "the return of property disputes," the case only in accordance with the provisions of judicial interpretation, does not exist. Cheng Jianling's key "Oolong", in the first case "that the sale" was established, in second case changed to identify "contracts of sale" is not established, which resulted in the first case "real deal" is not established, conclusion is Jin Kun advocated "bill rights" can not be established, because the the bill before and after "bill of rights" advocates, it is difficult to "unauthorized possession" based on.

   According to the Supreme Court of criminal trial concluded "reference", as a new type of malicious litigation fraud, the main difference with common fraud, is the victim that they had been deceived the player know cheating, but the judge did not know anyone in his deception. Liar with perjury form a chain of evidence to mislead the court made the wrong decision, and then through the enforcement procedures. In this kind of normal "malicious prosecution in court" is a neutral, once the malicious litigation and judicial corruption together, the judge a fraud suspects "sixth man", became the "black whistle", because the judge what all know, she is determined not to "study" the truth, so I always can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep. I think in this case, it resembles the hook of malicious litigation and judicial corruption: Cao and Hebei reservoir are very clear without real transactions, evidence of defective hiding from senior judge Cheng Jianling, but she ignored our numerous indicate doubt, two case entirely reliable Hebei Jin Kun evidence not admissible in evidence in Hebei, diameter according to Jin Kun appeal judge. Said she "clean water", who believe that?!

   Dear colleagues: I am not withdrawing didn't "spoiler", I was forced to "fit" the four trial of Cheng Jianling, all of our applications, including additional stone Lin third people to participate in the litigation, asked not to accept change of litigious claim and the application of Cheng Jianling "avoidance", by Cheng Jian Ling judges and the so-called "Dean" one by one to reject the. In Hebei Jin Kun is the best of both worlds to all: want to tell how to, need real transaction relationship, Cheng Jianling is sentenced to have no business relation establishment; need to reserve in Hebei "unauthorized possession", Cheng Jianling is sentenced to the buyer seller relationship does not hold. Even in a case, Hebei Jin Kun can continue to "calculate" "trial and error", after a period of someone to help her "interpretation", more wrong judges can help her quietly correct -- by the way, every time a notification session, Cheng Jianling can not arrived in time, she at least one or two hours late, once simply from morning to afternoon, trial activities without serious at all, it is not up to me to "disrupt" her court order.

   3Hebei zhongchu, about planning and to witness Zhao Liang "perjury"

   Charges of the bitterest complaints I, said I in violation of the provisions of civil procedure law and the lawyers law, "overall planning" Hebei Zhao Liang "the witness perjury". There are three levels to understand, one is Zhao Liang accept we investigate the formation of "records" is "false", two is the complainant to prove Hebei store bought Zhao Liang "perjury", the three is how to prove to Zhao Liang "perjury" behavior - "comprehensive planning".

   Second appeal against "reversal" is not changed, but the remand the suspension of Cao Lianying "won" the momentum. This is because the new evidence and evidence, the witness to testify in court. Volume income will Shi Jinwang, Shi Binpeng, Du Xian, Zhao Liang's "records", and in July 10, 2008 the supervisor "withdrawal", Zhao Liang from handwritten records in July 12th to import the goods yard, opened a freight yard controller and cargo import and details, the so-called "real deal" to support the two case of a trial it and "chain of evidence in unauthorized possession" collapse, CMST Hebei committed to representations of the Cao Lianying couple fraud can gradually restore the truth. Du Xian will et al "emerge in its totality" of Cao, is declared ended the game. Cao Lianying on the new evidence fulminate with anger and my complaint, just to prove she is cornered. The problem is, out of a "Zhao Liang" also cannot deny the goods to, can not hide the steel supply and settlement records, more can't obliterate strange stone Lin company offering and repayment records to du!

   In fact, offering will et al. Willing to accept "investigation" informed people, including Zhao Liang, to tell the truth, to thank Mr. and Mrs. Cao Lianying "spare none", they bring out his conscience will et du. It is reported, Cao Lianying had promised to win Hebei "ticket" after the debt principal and interest repayment of these people, but the succeed blackmail 23000000 yuan hand, but I refuse to perform the "promise", and offer a variety of insults will to Du, has repeatedly claimed that since the ability will be put to death in Hebei, more can't put them in eyes. This forces Du offer will sue and Shi Jinwang separate, but Cao Lianying unexpectedly to Du offer will raise the objection to the jurisdiction of the application, the objection was rejected and refused to accept delivery. Du, it was forced to fight in the Hebei intermediate court asking the time, purpose is to inform the Yuhua judge summons. Du Xian, Shi Wang and Zhao Liang learned that Cao Lianying and his wife to the false fact two prosecution in Hebei after the fact, voluntary testimony, and voluntarily accept our investigation. Zhao Liang himself at the time of investigation not only to submit to his site goods out Autographed records and hand-painted yard plane diagram, also introduces his personal experience in the three months to the freight yard and understand the situation to us.

   For Zhao Liang and other witnesses, as well as the investigation notes on the same day, and the Supreme Court in January 21st this year the bill payment request a hearing, I have not met with, not to mention the "overall planning" in Hebei "buy" Zhao Liang "perjury". The testimony of Zhao Liang not only has its own handwriting records to prove, but also with the other witness testimony is confirmed, we also believe that with the court unit Wenfeng steel and other evidences obtained is confirmed, Zhao Liang statement is true, "said the complaints were not perjury".

   Hebei zhongchu as a large state-owned enterprises, the pursuit of seek truth from facts, no need to "buy" witness "perjury". It is Hebei Jin Kun, see their illegal acts gradually exposed, to adopt various means to disguise. Cao Lianying Li Yongping couple had in my direction of the high court of Hebei submits new evidence sent to their hometown to find my brother, older brother advised me to consider fellow feelings don't go with the ball. In addition, Cao Lianying also threatened, tracking the witness, to witness to the pressure.

   A true witness is Hebei Jin kun. In January 21st the supreme court hearings, Hebei Jin Kun had arranged for Kong Hui to commit perjury, that Kong Hui was the yard of a master. While Kong Hui is in fact the demobilized to Handan after an ordinary clerk Unicom, is Cao Lianying nephew Liu Jianyong's "children" and his comrades, he could not also not yard field.

   "Complaint" encouraged me to remember "gentleman to love money, in a proper way", I appreciate it, is also willing to take this sentence the true saying give Cao Lianying a line. At the same time, I want to thank each other for my "complaint", because as a career in the episode, a complaint experience, may be more valuable to me.

   To sum up, complaints complaints reasons are inconsistent with the facts, it is nothing but want to give me pressure, influence of the upcoming second case for retrial. I am in Hebei Jin Kun v. Hebei reservoir in the case of the behavior are lawyers legal agency to fulfill the authority behavior, not illegal law laws and regulations.

   The above views, please check.

                                Defense: Beijing Huayi law firm lawyers Pu Zhiqiang

                                        In April 1, 2011 submitted

The original link:Http://lawyerpuzhiqiang.blog.sohu.com/170143756.html