This afternoon, in the Zhuhai campus held a lecture, a young teacher of Beijing Normal University, but also my friend told me to listen to. The lecture is dean of the Peking University law school Zhu Suli, entitled "law and public opinion -- from the perspective of Xu Ting case". I had the privilege of being friends is arranged in the middle of the first row of the classroom, the classroom All seats are occupied., probably hundreds of people. In the face of Chinese famous jurists a Liangbinbanbai, my sleepiness slightly overcome lived.

The beginning of the lecture, Zhu Suli stresses the Xu Ting case how. Abnormal boring. His core idea is: for Xu Ting's first trial, sentenced to life imprisonment, the judge is the correct choice. The second commuted to a prison term of five years, Zhu Suli's inconsistent points out, is very wrong choice, but in the back said this is the opinion of the. He presumptuously think, all the people in the case of Xu Ting,, including judges and the masses, focuses on the substantive justice, procedural justice and do not care. He indulged in for example, such as Yang / better, he killed so many police, so he had to die. Zhu Suli think, this is Chinese judicial system characteristic, is the mainland legal system thought, it is better than the analysis type the Anglo American mode of thinking. This be opinionated crazy, crazy jurists, advocates the substantive justice "". He don't understand: the procedural justice and substantive justice and mutual basis, they can not give up? Strictly speaking, the procedural justice is the real justice.

Zhu Suli on the "public opinion" explanation ", is the people's feeling". In fact, he this is parrot. Zhu Suli tells us, in April 10th this year, the Supreme People's court for a president to Zhuhai court inspection. He pointed out that with the Zhuhai City Intermediate People's court judge talks, treat not sentenced to death, there should be three basis: "one is to the law as the basis; two is to the overall status of public security as the basis; three is to society and people's feelings as the basis." He explained to the special: "some people may not understand why the society and people 'feel' as the basis. Because the only way, to achieve the unity of legal effect and social effect."

When I laughed at, the ear is Professor Zhu Suli vague, contradictory. I almost fell asleep. He also make impromptu comic gestures and ramarks a. I heard him speak in excitement emotion which improve the tone said: "I firmly oppose the abolition of the death penalty!" His explanation is: if your parents, children, relatives were deliberately murdered, you will not agree with the death penalty for murder? (this is the Peking University law school level? Treat the criminal, to revenge to answer blows with blows an eye for an eye?) Then, he again arbitrarily say: 99% of the people are not there to judge said. Rely on! He is too underestimate "the masses" civilized quality.

Until the end of my speech, I have not heard that, this guy is in favor of law or for public opinion, or the middle of the road. He in addition to approve of the death penalty, I don't know whether he agree with what. But one thing is for sure, he and Zhang Wuchang are the same, that China system is the best in the world, and he is never wrong, this is like old Zhang Wuchang the braggart. He has faced legal peer criticisms, I never read the law works. Dick old ghost as well, he said he had read enough, so do not need to look at the others.

The long two hours passed, to the question of time. The first is a Beijing Normal University Female Teachers trembling with fear to say a eulogy, also do not know whether he asked what problems. Zhu Suli is a fool, smiling. Then, a parade of the Northeast accent student asked: high salary can do. Zhu Suli won the people's "consciousness" to do this, he cited the Supreme Court recently arrested former vice president Huang Songyou as an example, said that although the then vice president as high pay much, but Huang Songyou loves underage girls. Finally, a student very well, in fact, is the question Zhu Suli. He said, the death penalty is not revenge, justice. He quoted Rawls: some legal system, no matter how they are efficient and orderly, as long as they are not justice, must be reformed or abolished. Unexpectedly, Zhu Suli rudely interrupted him, stern voice asked: "do you really want to ask what is the problem? What is your problem?" The students stammered sat down. Zhu Suli stood up, said in an angry voice: "I didn't like famous quotes. What is Rawls? What is Dworkin? Maybe one day, I even more famous than Rawls." Below is a burst of laughter. In laughter, Zhu Suli continue to use his sophistry logic said: if your XXX was killed, you will pity? Is also in the laughter, I also know that, even in the most remote corners, there are a lot of people appeals for justice. Sadly, elite still persist in one's old ways, in the final analysis, public opinion is a fart?!

This is the first time I saw Zhu Suli. I promise, the future even if he is in front of me, I will also to pay no heed.

Today, a waste of time, this diary is a waste of time. My friends, this is now China social elite. It is they, let our society upside, complete darkness.

-- -- -- -- ---

I have some criticism of Zhu Suli:

Who is in compliance with the Chinese legal?

Naked chat code is tantamount to "thought crime"

President of Peking University Law School why often bullshit?

Elite, is becoming an idiotic specimens

-- -- -- -- --

Other anti false elite article:

"Mei Lanfang" do all the dirty

Old Zhang Wuchang why often fart?

Sima Nan finally to universal values out

"Counter revolutionary" event to witness Chinese serious idiotic

President Wang Shi America answer five questions about God