Letter: Peking University Law School Dean Zhu Suli embezzlement and fraud

    We are teachers, School of law on the basis of this, our "constitution" provisions of the organizational principle and the "Teacher Law", "higher education law" gives teachers the democratic rights of party, government leading bodies to the Peking University law school dean Zhu Suli reflects the serious problem, hope to be able to pay attention to and to immediately address.

   We think, School of law at the national education fundamental policy under the guidance of "establishing a world class university and Peking University" target strategy under the guidance of the party and government leadership, the school leaders, with some achievement in discipline construction, legal education, personnel training and academic research, which also included Zhu Suli's personal contribution. However, objectively speaking, the law school achievements and progress is a conscious effort to most teachers law school results, as professor Zhu Suli is relatively good, but as president and not properly perform their duties, resulting in law school and overall academic development greatly hindered, failed to get greater achievements, but also in the reality of the situation the continued in office has directly into a major obstacle the development of Education College, have even become unstable factors that influence teachers' College of unity, harmony. We think, Zhu Suli did not immediately leave, law school management team will basically paralysed, law school is to be without hope, law school will have no peace, is the minimum requirements even the situation of stability and unity cannot be guaranteed.

    A, Zhu Suli in office ten years, bad record Scabbers, masses foundation lost, and recently a new round of staff dissatisfaction

   In 2000 nine, October, due to the former president Wu Zhipan was transferred to the Beijing leadership positions, Zhu Suli began to take the law school work. In the spring of 2001, Zhu was appointed dean of the law school. Although at the time the teacher against the post, but his bad performance has not been sustained, substantial exposure, so the majority of teachers or to listen to their words, he accepted the fact that when the president zhu. In his head, his mediocre performance, work style of rough simple, addicted to establish their own What I say goes. status, and the development of the school of law offer very little, even to the discredit of Peking University Law School, to many. Zhu's first time to maturity is the spring of 2004, but his request was for Zhu school two years behind. By the spring of 2006, the law school's start, Zhu to seek re-election action encountered firmly opposed to many professors. If a success, quality as teachers may take the initiative to give up for re-election, ease teaching and academic research (law school, former leaders are consciously not to seek re-election); but Zhu Suli has tried to hide its bureaucratic habits, down to the teachers take the initiative to greet, a benign countenance, on the other hand to you against his re-election, try to spoil him, send smoke wine, the opposition has been covered, the final one. But it is precisely because of the law school there are so many voices of opposition, so was not complex transition has lasted more than nine months, even in the school Party committee decided to Zhu Suli for a second term as president, was a week of "publicity" is also extended to six months. This is hitherto unknown phenomenon in the Law School of Peking University and other colleges in the history of.

   Zhu Suli won re-election in the midst of opposition, the Institute of public law should be cause for the heavy, review the mistakes, mistakes of their own, the unity of all teachers struggle to revitalize the law school. But he failed to live up to the school party trust, return to one's old habits, narcissistic pride, difficult pain, no longer care about other teachers style arbitrary, remove those who disagree with sb., a set of all appoint people by favouritism, the courtyard wind down the law school, The atmosphere was foul. The conflicts between teachers and he caused annual constantly, as of 2008 August, vice president for the patch as a matter of law school in charge of foreign affairs, there was a serious confrontation law school professor and Zhu Suli. This time, the comprehensive conflicts caused by the performance salary arrangement is a fresh burst over the years.

   The afternoon of January 18, 2010, law school held the conference announced the performance salary allocation scheme. According to this scheme, school administrative personnel according to the position is divided into five thousand yuan, four thousand yuan and three thousand yuan three grades; teachers' salaries are assigned to work in accordance with the quantity, such as "core journal" published papers, teaching hours and social work. The scheme was not solicit any teachers' opinion, proposal announced immediately after the intense reaction. Law school, many teachers in the hospital teachers comment email groups, expressed strong dissatisfaction with this plan.

   Professor Gong Renren issued a document in January 19th, with a measure of the number of academic is absurd, for academic blasphemy and for scholars to insult, is the work of Professor diminished to piece rate workers. He also thinks that according to the announcement, if a professor last year failed to publish articles in "core journals", teaching hours and not much, performance pay to might as well a just participated in the work of the administrative staff income, while the teacher performance pay may vary between several times. He thinks, the academic level of the true and the number of published papers and is published in the so-called "core journals" no relationship. Nearly twenty professors Wang Jiancheng, He Weifang, Fu Yulin, Li Hongyun, Liang Genlin, Zhao Guoling, Liu Yan, Bai Guimei, Ge Yunsong, Chen, Ma Yinan, Liu Dongjin, and as associate professor have issued publicly endorsed the views of Professor Gong Renren. Among them, Professor Wang Jiancheng thinks, tell from the program, which involves the vital interests of teachers is not something that can be completely determined by the hospital leadership research, but should seek the views of the majority of the staff. Law school still has a lot of young teachers because of fear of Zhu Suli take revenge on said privately to the teachers support views. Published in the mail group opinions are mainly concentrated in the criticism of academic policy and management mode, the work piece to determine how the so-called performance salary is absurd. "The decision to wage" and "the title is China decided", "characteristics", it is the result of academic thesis plagiarism, crudely made and academic journals seek nothing but profits, "the paper industry" deformity expansion, the academic spirit become destitute and homeless.

    This triggered by the performance salary allocation scheme, quickly lead to the fierce criticism for the dean's leadership to Zhu Suli. Professor Gan Peizhong put forward in January 20th of a mass email, "because the discussion initiated by piecework distribution model in the leadership decision has caused our family's new deeply uneasy and tense atmosphere, was enough to prove that in the main leadership personal credibility further facing crisis, I really felt worried. Because Zhu Suli's arbitrary style of work and mediocre way of doing things, and running his own academic interests and young students in a certain charm and lost to team building law school bullying, today's School of law with lacking spirit of cooperation described has been far less than in the description of real situation ", and disclose the facts and reasons of law school teacher collective no student events. Gan Peizhong publicly called for the resignation of Zhu Suli to give the school a chance. In Beijing University Law School Professor Qu Sanqiang work 30 years wrote in the letter: "teacher since 30 years of reform and opening up, the main leaders of the law school after the change (Chen Shouyi, Ma Zhenming, Zhang Guohua, Zhao Zhenjiang, Wu Zhipan, Zhu Suli, Wei Zhenying), like the leadership incurred so sharp" dry, group "contradictions have never happened....... The fundamental problem of law school is, as of a strong Party leadership is serious lack of humanity. Leadership seriously divorced from the masses, not heart aspirations of the masses, the masses do not care about the life, is not of concern to the masses, there are serious bureaucracy. The hospital leadership for the vast majority of faculty and staff of the ideological status, family life, health, they know nothing at all the passions!"

    The law school teachers to Dean Zhu Suli fierce criticism is not accidental, but profoundly reflects the serious problem that has long existed in the law school's internal. It is because of these serious problems, the law school in the past 10 years, divided in public opinion, mood float, Voices of discontent. In this context, once violated the "public opinion" event, it may cause a great disturbance. Therefore, under the same roof of Beijing University Hospital, the other performance of the wage distribution for the case of relative calm, but caused such a stir in law school, caused many teachers opposed to the collective, the whole story is not surprising. Since Zhu Suli re elected president, due to its simple, rude, remove those who disagree with sb. bureaucratic indifference by teacher criticism, in direct conflict with positive including open confrontation in the conference have occurred, this is just a new round.

Two, President of the power of arbitrary, teachers lack of humanity care, resulting in "cadres" antagonism sharp

    In the past nearly 10 years, Zhu Suli's bureaucracy and absolute arbitrary style causing serious harm to the development of the law school and the "masses" relationship. In the party and government leadership, Zhu Suli is almost a person said to calculate, the opportunity to major development related matters of law school, he also never with the staff to discuss, important personnel arrangements are never in accordance with democratic procedures to solicit the opinions of the masses. In discipline construction, recruitment, retention of teachers and management team members and other issues, Zhu Suli also can not adhere to the principles of justice, even against the party's organizational principles, remove those who disagree with sb. The current law school teachers, divided in public opinion, decreased academic team cohesion and competitiveness.In a review of the Ministry of education, Beijing University law school had slipped to three stream position,School efforts to fight the first-class university construction goal in law school is losing heart foundation. We feel heartache.

   Because Zhu Suli be a law onto oneself, cause the law school is most young teachers dare anger but dare not say, this is never Peking University School of law, history of the abnormal phenomenon.

    In the past few years, there have both ability and political integrity, excellent in character and learning more than assistant professors, extraordinary potential was forced to leave. These young people including: professional colleagues think it is the most outstanding young scholar Wang Yi associate professor, associate professor Zhang Gu, who first received a doctorate of law and the Max Planck Germany is the most solid intellectual foundation associate professor Wei Zhi. They both at home and abroad have very high academic reputation. There are some rigorous scholarship and academic potential young scholars also oppressed.

   Recently, a young teacher to Professor Gong Renren wrote: "I have never seen a law school or unit, as the current University School of law, in the academic field, so arbitrary, so What I say goes., so depressed, so wantonly independent spirit, such as this intolerance." Associate Professor Wei in Peking University law school taught for thirteen years in Peking University when he was forced to leave, Zhu Suli went to the office to say goodbye, Zhu Feichang flatly only said two sentences: "you can go, but low-key". Not to stay, no relief, no normal leaders even should express the colleagues of strong feeling and sympathy. The reason for low profile, is the negative impact of Zhu Suli afraid of Wei left for his personal leadership prestige resulting in more depth.

    There is another who retired last year old teacher very sad to say, "in the law school work a lifetime, retired to by him to hold a small ceremony, like dogs are being thrown out. Really chill which!" Many retired teacher life difficult, law school in addition to group Party committee organized activities to mark the year care, without any real humanistic care action in actual utility. Tian Ruxuan teacher home, a single person, the body is sick, Li Hualan teacher is the reference room retired, has been lying in bed for years, Zhu Suli never personally or by other team members to visit. In the day before yesterday in March 1, 2010, Mr. Wang Tieya, famous professor in our hospital (served as the International Court of Justice) widow (according to the age and the family is our most teachers such mother) died in Babaoshan due to the body, the Tsinghua University law school to send its party secretary Che Peizhao professors attended Peking University Law School, but without any party responsible people go to law school, that several international law professional teachers present feel chill and shame. In Zhu Suli there, the attention of the people basically is three kinds of circumstances: one is to support the re-election of president he was dean and people; two is the individual professors have a strong voice in the three team members: his interests. Any in the weak position of the teacher whether retirement are removed from the list of his interests. Zhu Suli is a trouble to law school ethos is not maker.

    Zhu Suli serious bureaucracy and rough management style makes many teachers feel humiliated. For example, a few years ago, Professor Zhang Jianguo once spoke stood in a faculty meeting, proposed law school professor system that attempts to set up the school demonstration. However, sit in the front row of Zhu Suli professor Zhang Jianguo's speech just ignored, even one word responses are not. When Congress to silence for a few minutes. In fact, the professor will system in Tsinghua law school, Central University of Finance and Economics School of law, economic and Trade University School of law has been established, and running very well. Our next door neighbours in the school management system reform has exceeded Peking University Law School, formed the academic team cohesion, and the slogan is to build a world-class Law School of Peking University Law School, but the breeding and has Zhu Suli's individual be a law onto oneself mode.

    Zhu Suli serious personal arbitrary and extreme narcissism which divided in public opinion, the situation of disunity law school. The specific affairs many teachers hold an attitude no longer concerned law school, but look coldly from the sidelines at. In law school, very difficult to organize the whole staff meeting, each semester only reluctantly summoned two times the conference, each attendee is often inadequate teaching staff of 1/3. The important ceremony activity law school student organizations such as the new Congress and the graduation ceremony, where Zhu Suli attended the occasion, most teachers are not willing to participate in the. Whenever the occasion, teachers heart very entanglements: originally by the enthusiasm of the students invited should go to the ceremony, but, unwilling to see Zhu Suli hypocritical whitewash show performances, only reluctantly not to participate, so these should be solemn occasions become cold and dreary, student teacher disappointed, sad. Many teachers are older often take Wu Zhipan and Zhu Suli compare, moral and human evaluation one mile.

    Many teachers believe that the teacher, in aspects of competition is reasonable, the problem is that we have lost a good environment can make every teacher can comfortable work. The leader must have the humanity accomplishment, law school is expected to harmonious and powerful.

Abuse of power three, teacher team construction, seriously affecting the balance structure of discipline development

    Zhu Suli as the president of this should be widely listened to all the teachers especially professors advice, a comprehensive assessment of construction law school subjects, allocation of teaching resources appropriately. However, he put the post personal preferences of relation and the dean of the re guarantee inclusion which leading to a serious imbalance in development of law school subjects.

   Under the direct control of Zhu Suli's abuse of power, which he was one of the discipline development judgment will and into the plan completely messed up the subject of normal demand, resulting in some major because he deliberately selective arrangement appears overcrowded, the age of teachers echelon structure is extremely unreasonable, teaching arrangement is difficult to implement the normal situation, but some professionals such as environmental law, social security law, Chinese legal history teacher long or be a one-man show.

   Zhu Suli is a flagrant violation of the 2004 "Peking University faculty recruitment and promotion (Provisional) Regulations" article fifth of the inbreeding coefficient of the prohibited the teachers team construction, to employ its just graduation soon joined the school teachers disciple.

Four, President of the title as individuals seek fame and fortune tool

    As the dean of the law school for nearly 10 years, Zhu Suli almost nothing to the overall development of the law school to make any substantial contribution. His lack of collective to the law school's dedication and sincerity to all the teachers, love feelings, but rather keen on his own "career", taking advantage of his position to publish articles in magazines, or shuttle in other units of speech opportunists. He used the power of the Ministry of education, School of law, the qualification of Yangtze River scholars only national excellent course "jurisprudence", Beijing Municipal Quality Course "jurisprudence" and other benefits all your fame. In Peking University School of law in history, there had never been any administration leadership so naked fish for fame.

   Zhu Suli in undergraduate teaching in the past rarely speak "jurisprudence" this course, also had not written or edited a jurisprudence textbooks, his major interest is focused on the sociology of law, comparative law, the lecture is that arrangements are. In fact, for an undergraduate "jurisprudence" is Professor Zhou Wangsheng, Professor Zhang Qi undertake the task of teaching, the professor and Zhao Xiaoli lecturer some bear. But, Professor Zhou Wangsheng is chaired the school appointed teacher of this course. But shamefully, the "jurisprudence" Declaration of Beijing high-quality course, Zhu Suli used his powers of the president is contrary to fact arrangements for hosting teachers to declare the project award, Zhou Wangsheng and he participated as the main people together to declare, rejection Qiangshi professor Zhang Qi and the more and will serve as the course teaching for a long time. Professor Zhao Xiaoli, lecturer at work. Application materials in addition to the "teaching" (1-2), "research" (1-3) (Note: see the "National Excellent Courses Online Declaration System -- > < public course jurisprudence") content, a large number of other materials and written by Professor Zhou Wangsheng led his PhD, Zhu Suli except the last reviewed there is no substantive text contribution. Reporting completed after at least six months, Zhou Wangsheng and He Weifang did not get any message, until one day the school educational administration inform professor Zhou Wangsheng to do the teaching video (to get the required courses reward after), learned six months ago reward approval. So is the National Excellent Course award to declare the course. Perhaps, only released a list of awards host name is this reward program itself caused by the defective, but bonuses in any case should not be the exclusive host a name. Is precisely the most disgusting thing happened to Zhu Suli. The two prize bonus total nearly 150000 yuan (Beijing municipal for 50000 yuan, the national level is 100000 yuan) net by one possession, even should be to participate in the organization of the material Zhou Wangsheng teacher doctor service fee are not. This blatant exclusive cooperation group, greedy sell, buried his manual operation performance and dirty ugly things, Zhu Suli had done. Recently, we repeatedly asked, was confirmed to join professor He Weifang professor Zhou Wangsheng, declaration of course never share a penny from the hands of Zhu Suli prize, Professor Zhou Wangsheng is that his students would doubt him put Qian Quanmi away, even the service fees are not. As for the legal professional Professor Gong Xiantian, Professor Zhang Qi and other teachers themselves are not in the courses of lectures, is done by you, honor, bonuses and you have what relation? One size fits all, is their own, and also to particles to the others, it is difficult to make people believe is the dean of the law school for. This level of work behavior, can afford the law school team leader role?

    This thing, in fact implies a kind of unprecedented scandal risk, it is a academic bomb: Peking University law school 2004 year to declare for the city of Beijing and the national quality curriculum "jurisprudence" reward in the presence of academic fraud seriously. Generally speaking, the number of times and the number of classes is only problems of calculation workload, most will involve many hours fee amount, but in the declaration of course national awards, and its significance is extraordinary. Because the declaration is the curriculum reward, not a large number of continuous teaching times and large class teaching is not winning, by Zhu Suli as the host for the "jurisprudence" excellent course project has serious fraud cover derived from this. 04 years when the awards, asked to fill in 1999 to 2003 a total of 5 years during the course of lectures. "Jurisprudence" is my college undergraduate basic courses, Zhu Suli, Zhou Wangsheng, He Weifang three people reporting awards of the teaching object is students, each year will open a semester, I fill out from 1999 to 2003 Zhu Suli to declare material in 5 years a total of about 5 times, and the studies on jurisprudence professional students do not open in this course, master of law is the creation of this course, Zhu Suli once to the 00 level and the master of laws about the course, but never in 5 years have swept by him, Zhu Suli to speak this course has not heard Shu Ren of Hongkong college, Macao University of science and technology cooperation in class, in the summer of 1999 to 2000 the summer Zhu Suli was American visit in a year.

   According to our preliminary investigation, 1998 September, Zhu Suli once told the jurisprudence course for undergraduates, 5 and a half years before September to 2004 since 1999 February, Zhu Suli has never been to Peking University law school undergraduate taught "jurisprudence" course. 01 years in September to 02 years in January, Zhu Suli gave 01 undergraduates on "law principle" course, but course content and its contents and Courses "jurisprudence" has significant difference. Therefore, Zhu Suli in the declaration of the awards form to fill in 5 years 5 times to teach this course has no basis in fact. Even if the actual teaching 4 times, only 1 times is not established, nor can the statistical negligence to shirk the responsibility of fraud. We think, this is a kind of academic fraud, in order to obtain high-quality curriculum honor and fabricated data. In law school, continuous, lots of teaching this course teachers are professors Zhou Wangsheng and Zhang Qi. Professor He Weifang in 1997 for undergraduates "jurisprudence", to 2003 September, did not give the undergraduate teaching this course. We asked the school to take extreme serious and cautious attitude on the matter, in order to safeguard the reputation, dignity and social image, we strictly control the suspect matters, at present there is not any diffusion. Because it is highly sensitive, we did not dare to make thorough investigation. In 2005, Seoul University Hwang Woo-suk stem cell fraud case of tragic scenes we still be visible before the eyes, earlier in the history department professor Wang Mingming of Peking University Beijing University events happened to trauma healed up, we really do not want to let the north get so hurt, don't want to let the education system in Beijing, the national Ministry of Education issued the revocation of the two awards events. Moreover, the declaration of the excellent course award of Peking University and other projects also exist the lecturer is excluded, the false personnel relationship leaders or leaders not lecture courses reward declaration! This shows that, in the whole school level, official standard culture teaching and research situation of corrosion of purity is widespread, academic fraud courses on May in the north there are many dead. We request the school leadership attaches great importance to. At least, schools should be required to declare the excellent course award in the best teachers lecture number by academic staff responsible for verifying signature properly, so as to avoid regeneration flaws, perhaps which day will fire.

   The Chinese situation, national and university is not for all the teachers to provide office and other facilities, the various departments to solve the problem of financing the teacher office conditions etc.. Therefore, as the faculty leaders are responsible to raise money, efforts to improve teachers' working and living conditions. However, Zhu Suli has served as the dean of the law school for nearly 10 years, from disdain for law school collective services, to raise money to improve the conditions of the office work is not as. He not only lack of foreign exchange ability, lack of law school collective dedication. By is, so be richly endowed by nature with brand of Peking University School of law, the scientific research building was construction by the school loans, but the office is by Professor Luo Haocai mobilization of entrepreneurs in Hongkong sponsored construction, law school teachers earn far less than other Beijing University Law School Teachers' income. Stop welfare housing distribution in the school under the situation of young teachers, unable to purchase, which failed to become the Zhu Suli as Dean to concern. Some teachers think that the law school, Zhu Suli is weaker, spoil everything. In the Law School of Peking University history never any administrative leaders like Zhu Suli the complete lack of service as a collective dedication.

    Because of public responsibility Zhu Suli fail to comply with the Dean shall bear, lost several after law school long-term development opportunity has important significance.

   In 2007, education authorities preferred to EU cooperation with Peking University School of law construction of China EU School of law, to be donated 30000000 euros, was Zhu Suli alone received EU representatives. In the party and government leaders not to report, nor consultations and all teachers, even leading the other members of the team are not solicit opinion circumstances, he curtly refused the other cooperative business please, said Beijing University law school are not interested in. However, after Wang Jiancheng professor in the school heard after this matter, how can be asked in the meeting such a big thing with the professor to discuss ways of reckless refused to attend the meeting, teachers learned it and mounting public indignation, Zhu Suli found his earlier position totally inappropriate, then through the office system to every teacher outgoing message, I college or to get the ecsl project, so we do not to talk. Then I do not know Zhu Suli has done much efforts, but the opportunity loss, mistake is cast, Zhu Suli to escape the teacher scolded, but in another law school faculty meeting cheats of all teachers, that the relevant application construction CESL thing has been entrusted to the executive vice president Li Ming professor of management, and after Li Ming had no know the "principal"! The ultimate Peking University law school will be the opportunity to someone else, cause people's University, Tsinghua University, University of political science and law three competition. Reportedly, China University of Political Science and Law President Xu Xianming specifically for this three times to Europe lobbying, finally won the project.

    In 2006 my courtyard collective declaration of major project of Ministry of education, but as a host of he in the declaration of the project when the respondent does not attend the defense (he was in Beijing), to vote the first round brush is out, start-up capital 800000 yuan project, by Renmin University of China law school for leave.

   And Hongkong Shue Yan University cooperation, was more than 20 years ago when Hongkong has not yet returned very not easy to set up, the former leader Zhang Guohua, Jin Ruilin, Zhao Zhenjiang, Wei Zhenying, Zhang Wen, Zhu Qichao, Wu Zhipan and other law school for accomplishing this project and the healthy development of a lot of effort, the project for the development of Chinese law education and promote the legal communication between Hongkong and the mainland has made great contributions in Hongkong. At that time, the college has not recognized the government of Hongkong, but after the Hongkong government officially recognized as the University, just be Zhu Suli arbitrary termination of the project. Tian Ju president position, but extremely arrogant, self-willed, overall development of the law school suffered from all kinds of contusion. Now the law school, cooperation projects and unprecedented atrophy, fewer and fewer friends, the road gets narrower, it is no wonder that some teachers say, Peking University School of law is the "Wu Zhipan house, Zhu Suli destroyed the foundation"; some teachers think that Zhu Suli's Peking University Law School in ten years is "ten years of catastrophe".

   To report to the "superior leadership achievement" and get more money for personal, Zhu Suli has stubbornly emphasizes "core journal" the quantity of published papers, to measure the absurd management mode of academic and scholar with digital, causing college style increasingly impetuous. With the mode of industrialization management of academic and education, is bound to create a "sow dragon seeds, which is the flea" tragedy. Now Beijing University law school has been very difficult to say is a good place to do science, and is moving towards a production lot of mediocrity and academic garbage plant and officialdom.

Five, the words and deeds of Zhu Suli repeated damage to Peking University and law school reputation

   The influence caused by as early as 2004, "Gant with Cobb" event (nicknamed Zhu Gan events), Zhu Suli because of violation of recruitment rules (forced admission courses or foreign language students who failed the exam subjects, refused admission exam students) has widely blamed online nationwide and paper news media, forcing the main school leaders have to deal with the consequences. Although as a tutor of doctoral students has some discretion to choose candidates, but also must be conditioned to strictly abide by the rules, especially as the Peking University law school if not comply with public recognition of the equal opportunity of education system is bound to impact worse. In fact, Zhu Suli in this event's behavior has on the school of Peking University and law reputation caused long-term damage. The occurrence of such event in any part of the world first-class university, not resign as Dean will be immediately dismissed.

    Zhu Suli in 2008 in the central law given the "Dean of the Peking University law school" as the "socialist concept of the rule of law and the rule of law thoughts of capitalism" lecture. Zhu Suli regardless of academic integrity and historical facts, the lecture about numerous, widely criticised by law. For example, Zhu Suli because of the lack of basic knowledge of history, but the modern concept of human rights is attributed to the European countries are too small; Zhu Suli nineteenth Century to soak nationalism, racism, anti Semitism, Germany "national spirit" touted as "an important contribution to the rule of law offer". Again, Zhu Suli thought that "socialist concept of the rule of law" and "rule of law idea of capitalism" the big difference between "not entirely because of different social system or ideology", which is actually equal to deny Marx about basic principle of scientific socialism. This politician, not only damage the reputation of the University School of law, but also to the Central Committee and other departments to carry out the law education program in the National University law school undertaking serious discredit.

   For example, "Southern Weekend" November 11, 2009 published "" socialist rule of law "into teaching materials, classroom, head" reports also mentioned the Zhu Suli lecture, was caused by a large number of netizen criticism and satire, that "Southern Weekend" official website unusual to remove users comments. To law students teaching the rule of law is the proper meaning of legal education, but those who saw Zhu Suli the well-known "famous", each university law school students, generally produced a resentment and hostility on the rule of law education in the Central Committee and the Ministry of education for the implementation of the.

   Because of Zhu Suli's lack of basic literacy, often make a variety of objects expose oneself to ridicule the Peking University law school to shame. For example, a few years ago, Zhu Suli was invited to the Haidian District court speech, was sitting on the podium of the digital court president and vice president, Taiwan has nearly 200 court officers. After nearly 3 hours of lecture, he spent more than half of the time talking "yellow disc" case. The most embarrassing thing is, he should ask the presence of judges who have not seen Huang dishes at home, he even admitted that he had seen the Yellow dish at home. Even more ridiculous, he asked all of Zhu Jiang president and a vice president, "did Zhu Jiang Dean two not at home saw yellow dish?" Get two court flush with shame, be at a loss what to do.

   November 15, 2008, Academy of Social Sciences Institute held the 50 anniversary conference, Zhu Suli was invited to his speech, his opening remarks which was built 50 years, what is there to celebrate the centennial celebration, and is not, is not a 50 years of the house needs repairing that has meaning, and the American Posner view showing a proof, rationality against people 50 years celebration, the speech in the final two minutes to learn a little bit of contribution of the argument. The presence of hundreds of people are amazed that leaders from all walks of life, sob unceasingly, said after the retired director asked incumbent leadership "how to get such a jerk, delivered a speech?" The answer is, "he represents the north, North sent a pig, I have to arrange the speech". Recently, the teacher and the law of the institute party committee secretary Chen Su together at the meeting about this, Chen Su secretary said "Zhu Suli to the law the celebration speech is to play a son". Our teacher had to say "sin, sin."

   Last year, the Supreme Court ready in the national court system arrangement of several important problems of legal education seminars, invited Beijing several University Dean of the law school to participate in the forum to discuss, the Supreme Court President Wang Shengjun attended, deployed during the study period, because Zhu Suli in his speech very irresponsible and deny the Supreme Court ordered the lecture value, is the Supreme Court leadership on the spot position abolished the participation of Peking University Law school. No matter what the occasion, Zhu Suli ignored the Peking University law school image and dignity, as Dean is withdrawn pride, strange words strange language casually wounding, not respect from colleagues, Peking University law school all enemies. Even in an encounter in the dinner party, a primary understanding of the law school dean Zhu Suli field to our teacher, and Zhu dinner never thought has been plagued by a Zhu shame. Due to Zhu Suli's personal social speech and deportment and Dean's identity together, therefore to Peking University law school has brought many negative publicity, school colleagues respect North laughed at and even retaliation law school.

   We are not the land of idyllic beauty, we need to get the project resources, external relationship we have to teachers' personal social contact and repairing Zhu Suli's injury, we have to pay more than others to get academic resources. In other universities, harmonious affairs these external relations are made by the president to do, Zhu Suli is see the temple and temple, in the destruction of the bridge bridge, did not help the teachers of our school have a social science project, without the help of the teachers of our school published academic papers, he's the worst school of management.

Six, requirements and recommendations

    The school Party committee and Secretary of President Zhou Min, and the Standing Committee members, we love the love, School of law, School of law, to flourish, hoping to restore the leading position in the China legal education and research in the field of. On the basis of teacher team poor performance and law school Zhu Suli past now opposed Zhu Suli's intense group emotions, we think, because the Zhu Suli administration and the serious situation of delaying the law school one day cannot continue. In improving the party's ruling ability, pure the party's ruling team body and strengthen and improve Party leadership of University, law school administrative leadership to replace the selfish, incompetent, the masses still have a poor reputation is to meet the needs of the development of the cause of the party. Zhu Suli continued to serve as the dean of the law school, not only the means of idling management team, but also may lead to unexpected events other. If the school does not take immediate measures to revoke Zhu Suli's president or removed from his position, any reason to delay will likely this event spread to the society and the media and the evolution of another "the event", we are most reluctant to North hurt again.

   If the school Party committee thinks immediately have difficulty Zhu Suli president, from other roles also have a lot of inconvenience, we recommend starting law school immediately change a job. Because according to the regulations of the school, tenure, before three years, it is now four years, and Zhu Suli has been the dean of the law school this position for spent nearly 10 years, far more than the two term limit. Zhu Suli's first term expires 2004 spring, but Zhu deliberately delayed for two years until the 2006 election two years since arrangement, delays are possible, that we require immediate change also has legitimacy. The North cannot in the middle-level leadership term completely no rules and composition. Peking University School of law, the vast majority of teachers: Zhu Suli didn't fit the position, Dean of the law school. Immediately start the general selection, at the end of Zhu Suli's tenure, the popular sentiment, represent the general trend, already is imminent. We request the school Party committee and administrative leadership decision, immediately on the law school take the appropriate decisions and actions. We also hope that the school Party committee to selection based on full respect for law school teachers intend a new dean.

   Time will not wait for me. dear min, weeks the principal Secretary and standing committee members,, stay behind. Recently, Premier Wen emphasized in its call Education Forum, education reform "to teaching as the center, to play the leading role of teachers, the tendency to change the administration of education". The construction of University established the goal of a world-class university, we should first establish the dominant position of academic and education itself, the university autonomy, academic democracy and try to establish the leadership of the Party committee of school by professors (school) system. Our North from the beginning was a democratic, scientific, progressive tradition, should walk in the forefront of the country in this reform; we hope that administrative leadership school Party committee and the school, to reform college leadership system and academic evaluation system from law school, dare to Peking University First, gain experience, advanced management pattern which conforms to our country national condition for the creation of first-class university grope and practice with the management system of University College in the world. However, Zhu Suli's past as draw further apart and objectives of this reform, the current in the teacher troop adverse authority and its ability in particular affinity is not enough to bear such a heavy responsibility. The report cited the fact, is the proof. We look forward to the school Party Committee decision as soon as possible.

I would like to

CPC PKU Committee and min Weifang secretary, President Zhou Qifeng, the Standing Committee members


Some teachers university law school
(the signature page and main contacts because of security considerations, only to the Party committee office to submit a)

July 1, 2010