On the development of "suggestions

On the development of a "Standing Committee of National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" bill

In the partyIn the country Hence peoplePublic spiritQq623309161

Note: in urgent need of the National People's Congress, CPPCC researchBill or proposal

 

Following the National People's Congress to prevent and correct the judicial organs, the relationship between the case of money, favors means (work hard and be practical, do not tell lies, cliches, officialdom. To prevent the judicial organ meeting meeting, just say no, just say no to implement, harm, harm, harm people's party. Lying is not implemented, forget forget, as long as the country party) to implement the following measures, is to prevent and punish corruptionists, is correct, the relationship between the case of money most powerful measures, otherwise, over the past fifty years is unable to solve the case of money, the relationship between the corrected. Why? Money, the relationship between the case to case,The case of money, relationships, etc. can be found 1/1000 good. Implement the following measures, judicial corruption to occur, can be quickly corrected. The prevention and correction of judicial organs, the relationship between the case of money, favors by National People's Congress law and suggestions to improve the regulation is effective and supervise the handling of complaint (organization review is valid), by the judicial organs of self-discipline.

If the proposal be accepted, not to increase fiscal expenditure, litigants with money, collusion judicial personnel is very difficult, according toCase "Standing Committee of National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law"Program to walk case ends, the National People's Congress, the judicial organs at all levels shall not accept the petition review, not, not. To tell the truth, the current three big procedural law procedure party with money, collusion judicial personnel easy money, the current case, relationships, etc. can be verified 1/1000 good.

How to solve a case litigation civil litigants with money, collusion Secretary of Provincial Committee procurator (contain deputy attorney general, member of the procuratorial committee, internal organization person in charge), Dean (including the president, vice president, a full-time member of the judicial committee), cases and on the Supreme People's court filing through the presiding judge and in charge of. Method the complaint letters and visits, error correction (assuming how to do)? How to solve a case litigation civil litigants with money to the Supreme People's Court (including the president, vice president of full-time member of the judicial committee), Attorney General of Supreme People's Procuratorate? (contain deputy attorney general, member of the procuratorial committee, internal institutions responsible person) cases error correction (assuming the how to do? The case with money, collusion of second instance court, vice president, Dean of the verified correct difficult, difficult, in collusion with the provincial committee secretary of correcting more difficult?) The rapid development of "the National People's Congress Standing Committee on judicial case supervision procedure law", law and petition the judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" finish the program can quickly correct correct. How to solve the case no wrong petition problem --- the judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" finish the program termination. The following measures, the case of money, relationships, can quickly correct and end cases execute one as a warning to others, play the role of. To tell the truth, the current three big procedural law procedure party with money, collusion judicial personnel easy money, the current case, relationships, etc. can be verified 1/1000 good. Search - a "Civil Procedure Law" to accelerate the revised proposals in the Baidu (long-term measures. See will understand why? What problems could be solved? If the adoption of the proposal, the litigants and judicial personnel walk "Civil Procedure Law" program case ends, law and petition will not be accepted (why? Injustice and misjudged cases and difficult cases).

The rapid development of "the National People's Congress Standing Committee on judicial case supervision procedure" or "Standing Committee of National People's Congress individual case supervision procedure", scientific, orderly, effective judicial supervision, let the wrong case not correct history and no wrong cases quick end, rapid solution supporting the complainant and the judicial organ, promoting social harmony and suggestions. To tell the truth, the current three big procedural law procedure party with money, collusion judicial personnel easy money, the current case, relationships, etc. can be verified 1/1000 good, error correction is difficult. As long as there is "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law", the judiciary as long as the "case of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure" program to walk, the case ended, law and petition will not be accepted (why? Have misjudged cases can quickly correct the difficult).

Too much content, in order to save costs,In Baidu search -- about the Supreme People's court to suggest to the NPC formulated "the law" suggestions (measures) , see will understand why What problems can be solved? "Law" is the formulation of long-term measures. If the adoption of the proposal, the litigants and judicial personnel walk"The law"End of procedure cases, law and petition will not be accepted (why? Injustice and misjudged cases and difficult cases).
   How to solve a case litigation civil litigants with money, collusion Secretary of Provincial Committee procurator (contain deputy attorney general, member of the procuratorial committee, internal organization person in charge), Dean (including the president, vice president, a full-time member of the judicial committee), cases and on the Supreme People's court filing through the presiding judge and in charge of. Method the complaint letters and visits, error correction (assuming how to do)? How to solve a case litigation civil litigants with money to the Supreme People's Court (including the president, vice president of full-time member of the judicial committee), Attorney General of Supreme People's Procuratorate? (contain deputy attorney general, member of the procuratorial committee, internal institutions responsible person) cases error correction (assuming the how to do? The case with money, collusion of second instance court, vice president, Dean of the verified correct difficult, difficult, in collusion with the provincial committee secretary of correcting more difficult?)The rapid development of "the National People's Congress Standing Committee on judicial case supervision procedure law", law and petition the judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" finish the program can quickly correct correct. How to solve the case no wrong petition problem --- the judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" finish the program termination. The following measures, the case of money, relationships, can quickly correct and end cases execute one as a warning to others, play the role of. To tell the truth, the current three big procedural law procedure party with money, collusion judicial personnel easy money, the current case, relationships, etc. can be verified 1/1000 good.Search - a "Civil Procedure Law" to accelerate the revised proposals in the Baidu (long-term measures. See will understand why? What problems could be solved?. If the adoption of the proposal, the litigants and judicial personnel walk "Civil Procedure Law" program case ends, law and petition will not be accepted (why? Injustice and misjudged cases and difficult cases).

Summary: the current case of money, relationships, etc. can be verified 1/1000 good. With the specified case, money, relationships, etc. can be quickly corrected and end cases; the reason is: the staff the judicial organ law and petition only in accordance with the provisions of laws and the highest judicial procedures to walk, we should recognize the case is fair, but the current law and petition without law and the supreme judicial organs no provisions, entirely by the judicial organ conscience, money, relationship between the parties colluded judicial personnel, law and petition the difficulty one can imagine the difficulty of correct. Good law and petition law, judicial personnel walk program should determine the case is fair, this legal case is "Standing Committee of National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" and "the law", the rapid improvement of three procedural laws. The present case needs to develop the "Standing Committee of National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law", law and petition the judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" walk the end end procedure cases, cases, judicial organs and people's Congress not to accept the. Law and petition accepting end and involves the vital interests of units and individuals, there may be a lifetime of pain, make the rules by the National People's Congress, otherwise the judicial enforcement of it, money, relationships, case to verify correct, difficult.

Assuming that the current civil procedure law, the litigants to judicial personnel too easy, law and petition is numerous, some appeal and petition for years without a written reply, some written after the against the law and petition letters and visits, disorder, confusion, error correction is difficult. What is law and petition unit and individual irrationality or case is not correct, what law and petition units and individuals go through what procedure cases should be recognized as fair, to the judicial organ to the law and petition units and individuals go through what procedures should be recognized as case justice, so far without the law. As for the law and petition cases is wrong, from the provisions of the three big procedural law and the supreme judicial organ, get involved law anti whether or not to accept the letter, whether the evidence, whether written reply, if supervision, what time to reply without any rules and does not perform the consequences, case identification of fault by the judicial the internal organs of recognition and decision, the provisions of rule by man, the cognizance of fault identification by the judicial organ interior difficult to convince the people, causing many problems cannot be solved. In this case, the cases that involve significant interests of units and individuals for the wrong program, there may be a lifetime of pain, make the rules by the National People's Congress, the judicial enforcement.

According to the case: at present, people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ performs three major procedure law of the lack of scientific, orderly, effective legal supervision. Provisions of the current three big procedural law and the supreme judicial organ, recognized the case too simple for the wrong program, resulting in the wrong case cannot be corrected, especially the law and petition has no law, law and petition the state judicial organs disorder, want what to do, law and petition to reply in writing have a written reply, do not want to reply in writing is not a written reply, want to say to say, want to say is wrong. Large law and petition does not set the scientific, orderly, effective legal termination and error correction, go down for a long time especially serious consequences, both are detrimental to the complainant and the judiciary, to the party and society is bad. The judiciary is the last barrier of justice, if this barrier problem, society will be in disorder, in this case, must increase the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ performs three major procedural law scientifically, orderly, effective supervision, scientific, orderly, effective supervision approach is to develop a "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure", let the Standing Committee at all levels of scientific, orderly, effective supervision, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs or pressure in a "case by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure" cognizance cases of right and wrong and end and error correction. The judicial organs in accordance with the case of "Standing Committee of National People's Congress supervision procedure" to determine the case of wrong, should recognize the case is fair. The people's Congress, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ is not registered, not, not, not assigned by the investigation, no assessment review.

Law and petition is numerous, some appeal and petition for years without a written reply, some written after the against the law and petition letters and visits, disorder, confusion, error correction is difficult. From Zhang Hui's nephew was acquitted case; four judges of Shanghai high court Zhao Minghua violation; Hu Meiji (Wu Limin's mother), Wu Limin and other similar cases can prove (the tip of the iceberg). Zhang Gaoping, Zhang Hui and nephew to the court and the procuratorate anti Yang too, but for many years not received a written reply, the law and petition for retrial, and end system is in chaos; law and petition and protest, retrial, suggested that the court system is in chaos. What is law and petition unit and individual irrationality or case is not correct, what law and petition units and individuals go through what procedure cases should be recognized as fair, "the constitution", and (2007) No. 5 document, do hair (2009) No. 22, "the Central Political Committee on the perfection of law and petition mechanism of opinions" provisions of the end to answer (these documents are particularly good, the key is the Supreme People's Court issued the operational rules) - public hearing to determine the fault, let the petitioner, litigants, have nothing to say. However, the highest judicial authority has not issued executive "constitution", and (2007) No. 5 document, do hair (2009) No. 22, "the Central Political Committee on perfecting the law and petition mechanism of views" end the provisions of the detailed operation rules, especially the parties to the highest judicial organ for hearing how to do, the highest judicial organ has no operation regulations, these problems need the highest judicial authority stipulates, solving the prominent problems. The National People's Congress and representatives of parties to apply for a certificate to listen to the highest judicial organ, the supreme judicial organs do has no clear provisions. To solve the above major problem, need the highest judicial idea innovation, system to accelerate the improvement of it, or simply can not solve the problem for many years.

1"The case for judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure" is the top priority of the National People's congress. Reason.

One is nowProvisions for three big procedural law and the supreme judicial organ, recognized the case on the wrong program too simple (procedure and the procedure of second instance trial should be simple), want to say to say, want to say is wrong, want to reply in writing letters written reply, do not want to reply in writing is not a written reply. Especially the law and petition has no legal provisions, judicial organs to want what to do, law and petition to a written reply on the written reply, do not want to reply in writing is not a written reply, want to say to say, want to say is wrong;

Two is tooGo to the judicial cognizance of case is not good for the wrong reasons: internal identification, lack of supervision, wrong is wrong, say to, want to reply in writing, do not want to reply not reply, especially the law and petition chaos, possible correction pressure or selfish or no known cause;

ThreeThe last review "National People's Congress Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on individual case supervision procedures", very few judicial authorities and very few legal experts think people should strengthen the supervision of judicial personnel, supervision should not be afraid of the supervision on a case case, the emergence of new injustice and letters. From 2007 Zhang Gaoping, Wu Limin, Hu Meiji appeal (petition case) and many other cases, this view is unreliable, leave the case supervision is not supervised, leave the supervision on a case analysis of amending the law or laws without operation. "Before the supervision law" not issued relevant judicial case, local supervision regulations to supervise the judicial case, no supervision cases. The relevant judicial cases supervision procedures complicated, the internal division committee review, make judicial organs to correct, the judicial organ is not correct, the NPC Standing Committee made a decision. The Standing Committee of the NPC is numerous, litigants want to influence each committee member to vote is rather difficult, voting fairness high. From the past relevant judicial case of local people's Congress supervision provisions of customs supervision of judicial case, a judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts strongly opposed to the National People's Congress promulgated the judicial supervision on a case decided and "supervision law" provisions of the judicial supervision on a case, the emergence of new judicial injustice untenable, instead, to correct a number of cases promoting the rule of law. Some legal experts idealization, leave the cases to the judicial organ staff supervision without supervision.

FourThe National People's Congress to stop to consider "Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on individual case supervision procedures" after ten years of experience that the staff the highest judicial supervision of the judicial authority and subordinate judiciary sometimes useless, the effective implementation of laws and regulations can not, a few cases can not be scientific, orderly, effective quick determination of right and wrong and scientific, orderly fast, effective corrective and end;

Five is the caseOn the wrong end of cognizance and case is the major provisions, relates to each unit and individual interests and justice orientation, is the last relief channels, the National People's Congress has no scientific, orderly, effective legal cases against the wrong and the end of science. The highest judicial organ to perfect the regulation can quickly find the wrong cases and correct the wrong case, however, the highest judicial organ, self limiting control resistance huge desires.

Six from theThe source to reduce unjust cases and wrong cases, improvements of three procedural law and the formulation of the law. However, perfect the three procedural law and the formulation of the law is a long process, decades or even ten time. If the provisions of the three procedural laws: procuratorate did not protest cases, the parties disagree appeal shall be approved by the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers in the enforcement hearing opinions), end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if the application for retrial, the court no longer the parties disagree should appeal to the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers in the enforcement hearing opinions), end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if you have more than 10 doctoral tutors according to the legal opinion, the Supreme Judicial organs shall entrust the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers participate) the enforcement hearing opinions, end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if the county (city, district) above the judicial administration department established administrative, civil law advisory committee, legal advisory committee by the judges, prosecutors, lawyers, Institute of political science and law experts and other components, the litigant request by the legal advisory committee member 5 people to 13 people to participate in the trial of the advisory opinion, and by the applicant to pay fee, the court shall . The judgment of the court to the Advisory Committee that result as the standard, to walk the litigation case ends, the public credibility of the judiciary to improve, not the referee appeals and complaints reduced by at least 80%, most of the judiciary staff welcome. The above provisions, the case is not much... The above provisions. There, the judiciary cognizance of case to say to say, want to say it was not the opportunities and conditions, to reply in writing letters written reply, do not want to reply in writing is not a written reply, however, perfect the three procedural law and the formulation of the law is a long process, decades or ten more time.

The seven is the nationalPeople have the ability to set strict scientific legislation, orderly, effective program review of law and petition cases that end of right and wrong and corrected quickly, will be the victim from the flames quickly rescued, fishing in the hot pan, solution supporting complainants and judicial organ staff, let justice is expected to, believe the party, let the hopeless a selfish. In addition to the National People's Congress quickly develop "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law", there is no other scientific, orderly, and effective way to solve the current problems of judicial organs.

There are eightThe wrong case not correct or not rapidly corrected cannot blame the prosecutor's Procuratorate director and long. The reason is: if there is a "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure", the president of the court and the procuratorate does not want to error correction and random case no chance of right and wrong, the complainant or the judiciary personnel when there is no chance of illegal profit.NowProvisions for the three procedural law and the supreme judicial organs of cognizance of case is the rule of man than the rule of law, the lack of supervision, wrong is wrong, say to, want to reply in writing, do not want to reply not reply, especially the law and petition chaos, possible correction pressure or selfish or no known cause;

TenDeng Xiaoping, Li Peng, the leadership of the Party Central Committee that "the supervision of National People's Congress quickly establishing case judicial decision" is right, just monitor method is not right, should be to organize a hearing, the hearing the case has the highest potency.

ElevenThe National People's Congress is not good for the judicial organ law and petition for the supervision effect. In the past, the National People's Congress for questioning, the judicial case asked, with sometimes the effect is not good, alarm Wu Bangguo chairman, President of the effect of Xiao Yang, Wang Shengjun Dean, sometimes is not good, and sometimes negative effect. The National People's Congress must make decisions "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure", scientific judicial supervision.

The National People's Congress on the law and petition supervision is based on the "constitution", "supervision law", "law" provisions on behalf of. The people's congresses at all levels received the law and petition (including representatives of the National People's Congress after forwarding), transferred to judicial organs to deal with and respond to people's Congress; "supervision law" provides for the establishment of the Committee of inquiry into specific questions for investigation, haven't heard of NPC investigation to set up a special committee to investigate the judicial case; "Representation" provisions represent has the right to propose the establishment of the Committee of inquiry into specific questions for investigation, but no specific operating rules, haven't heard of Representatives proposed to judicial case National People's Congress set up a commission of inquiry into specific questions for investigation. The above description of a problem, poor operation, the effect is not good, such as: one is Zhejiang grievance rehabilitate behind the prosecutor: hurt can not be forgiven (Zhang Gaoping, Zhang Hui will be acquitted) several times in 2007 to 2012, and did not receive a written reply, and prosecutors to help; two is Hu Meiji (Wu Limin's mother) the case, Wu Limin.

Twelve is the fullMember of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress is the legal responsibility of supervision of judicial organs in handling cases, the National People's Congress Standing Committee member of the House Judiciary Committee is the highest judicial authority of supervision units. Now to the focus of supervision is the highest judicial organ and the provincial judicial authorities, the reason is: the highest judicial supervision at the county level or above and their cases to the judicial organ case fault identification and correction, and enforce laws and regulations, supervision, the highest judicial responsibility; Provincial Judicial supervision organs at or above the county level and their cases to the judicial organ wrong identification and correction, and enforce laws and regulations, supervision, the provincial judicial authorities of major. However, from the past to the highest judicial organ to perform their duties, perform their duties by law is not the rule of law, not Hu Meiji (Wu Lee Ming mother), Wu Limin, the case(Zhejiang grievance rehabilitate behind the prosecutor: hurt can not be forgiven (Zhang Gaoping, Zhang Hui will be acquitted) several times in 2007 to 2012, and did not receive a written reply, and prosecutors to help).Description of a problem, not the power of supervision will be corruption, supervision, corruption of small space; supervision of small, large space of corruption; supervision, supervision procedures, corruption free space or error correction fast;The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision strength,The spirit of the Third Plenary Session of the eighteen (so that the people can feel the fairness and justice in each judicial cases) fast implementation will punish the petition, have reason. Of course.A member of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision should be scientific, orderly.

Thirteen is the mostPower source on the wrong identification and correction of high judicial supervision organs at or above the county level judicial cases and the cases: the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress for investigation, hearing the case, tasks, reply. The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on the investigation, assigned, hearing, reply to have legal basis.

The above situation decisionTo quickly develop "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure law".

2"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" (Draft) is a very important law, is the key to other laws, regulations and rules, can effective execution, is the key to laws, regulations and rules, the rapid changes, is the wrong case rapid corrective and preventive are only effective legal wrong cases, is the symbol of justice and the rule of law legal, scientific, effective supervision of the national people's Congress judicial organ law.

3The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure law draft "(Draft)" and "the pastThe Standing Committee of the people's Congress on individual case supervision procedures "(Draft) and the provincial people's Congress Supervision on a case, identified. The major cases of difference, the difference of the Standing Committee of people's congresses at various levels, is the chairman of the meeting or conference, director of the judicial Committee of uncertain cases to the wrong, set strict procedures for law judicial personnel, lawyers, and legal experts on that case by hearing, ask questions, investigation, see the file etc.. Over the past few experts, authorities worry not, "case judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" (Draft) AC-AC experts, the judicial organ staff to discuss will prove.If the case justice "Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" (Draft) to determine the case is not accurate, currentThe three main rules of procedural law and the supreme judicial organ, internal identification cases of insanity as, "not the rule of law, the lack of supervision, wrong is wrong, say to, want to reply in writing, do not want to reply not reply, especially the law and petition confusion, error correction of a pressure or desires may not error correction.

4"The people of the whole country settingThe cases of Judicial Committee Congress supervision procedure "policy is based on: (2007) in the 5 document, do hair (2009) No. 22," the Central Political Committee on perfecting the law and petition opinions "provisions of termination mechanism. In the (2007) in the document No. 5, (2009) No. 22 document of law and petition to find methods -- public hearing to determine fault. Eighteen the spirit of the Third Plenary Session - so people can feel the justice and law at the end of each judicial cases.

5"The people of the whole country nowThe cases of Judicial Committee Congress Supervision Procedure Law "(Draft), to solve the pastThe judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts strongly opposed to the National People's Congress promulgated the judicial supervision on a case decided to concern, concern is: one is in the pastIn the past the National People's Congress Standing Committee"The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on individual case supervision procedures" (Draft) provides: one is to supervise the judicial organ shall be affected by the NPC Standing Committee on the implementation of the supervision of the case, the opinions and suggestions of the NPC Standing Committee, shall be handled according to law. Two is the judicial organs and their staff do not perform NPC Standing Committee does not perform the administrative liabilities shall be investigated in accordance with the law or the legal liability of judicial decision case.Cause for concern is the problem of:Dreadful big qualitative case is wrong is not exactly new judicial injustice, afraid of the petitioner's case is not accurate qualitative effects appear new judicial injustice and petition, and the person not know what course to take. The judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts strongly opposed to the National People's Congress promulgated the judicial supervision on a case decisions and "supervision law" provisions of the judicial supervision on a case the reason is people's Congress should increase the supervision of the judicial personnel, improve the judicial personnel quality work. The National People's Congress on the judicial supervision on a case will appear new judicial injustice. "Before the supervision law" not issued relevant judicial case, local supervision regulations on judicial case supervision, no supervision cases. The relevant judicial cases supervision procedures complicated, the internal division committee review, make judicial organs to correct, the judicial organ is not correct, the NPC Standing Committee made a decision. The Standing Committee of the NPC is numerous, litigants want to influence each committee member to vote is rather difficult, voting fairness high. From the past relevant judicial case of local people's Congress supervision provisions of customs supervision of judicial case, a judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts strongly opposed to the National People's Congress promulgated the judicial supervision on a case decided and "supervision law" provisions of the judicial supervision on a case, the emergence of new judicial injustice untenable, instead, to correct a number of cases promoting the rule of law.Some legal experts idealization, leave the cases to the judicial organ staff supervision without supervision."The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" (Draft) to determine the case of wrong than to "the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on individual case supervision procedures" (Draft) complex procedures, hearing decide right and wrong, and listen to the staff by the public security, procuratorate Department expert genera, court, judicial, the National People's Congress, the CPPCC, Institute of political science and law experts, NPC deputies and CPPCC members, the parties to the case, lawyers, journalists, ordinary people.The judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts do not oppose the introduction"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure" reason is: one is that the National People's Congress Standing Committee member and past internal organization members are not familiar with the laws that many cases, rational and irrational inaccurate does not exist, the National People's Congress Standing Committee member and the internal mechanism of personnel not to make any conclusion in two cases; the influence of authority to worry about a party decided to create new injustice and new complaint does not exist, the National People's Congress Standing Committee and internal agency members of the case not to make any conclusion; three is to set strict procedure hearing, the rational or irrational conclusions accurate than judicial review cases, program review more, with money, beauty, honor, family interference and individual power illegally pressure disturbance difficulty, judicial review cases than their more inaccurate.

6"The introduction ofThe cases of judicial Standing Committee of the people's Congress supervision procedure ", let the wrong case not correct history.Do not put"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure law",The highest organ of the people's judicial supervision of the judicial authority and subordinate judiciary useless.Introduction"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure law",Is the effective supervision on the Supreme People's judicial organ, but also for the effective supervision of the best way to judicial organs and the judicial organs at lower levels.Do not put"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law"Without justice, human, practice has proved, without debate and discussion, even theThe Supreme People's court, judicial organs to manage all that.. Implementing the proposal, make the wrong case not correct history and past, wrong case not corrected will never happen, indicating learning general secretary (so that the people can feel the fairness and justice in each judicial cases) fast, fast implementation of the Third Plenary Session of the eighteen. Do not implement the recommendations, according to the current provisions wrong cases sometimes never correct, even if the highest judicial organ judicial organ, it manages all people, things, there is no debate and discussion of objective facts.

7"The introduction ofThe cases of judicial Standing Committee of the people's Congress supervision procedure ", the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law shall be cancelled for the retrial procedure, the reason is the provisions of the civil procedure law to apply for retrial procedure waste of judicial resources and the effect is not good. The verdict, ruling, decided to have legal effect through appeal or apply for a hearing to review, to ensure that the wrong case rapid correction.

8"The introduction ofThe cases of judicial Standing Committee of the people's Congress Supervision Procedure Law ", the judiciary force or pressure to work.

Suggestions

1. request the chairman of the National People's Congress meeting decision of the National People's Congress appointed within the division commissioned three research groups (each group 1000000 yuan of funds) or by Chinese law (trust funds 3000000 yuan. Divided into three group China law) on the law and petition investigation and Legislative Research (National People's Congress has the ability to pay the fee. The legislative work very hard, time-consuming and laborious, but also have many legal knowledge and legal knowledge, in addition to the many law and petition cases and collect many law and petition case analysis, but also in the online publication of mailboxes collected petition cases and recommendations, to start drafting laws, otherwise no operation, laws and enforcement. In this case, only the National People's Congress have the ability to entrust the three group of law and petition established research group of legislative research. The judicial organs of many problems, rooted in the National People's Congress without the law and petition law, do not have law and petition law, have the wrong case and the case never corrected) chairman of the National People's Congress meeting decision of the National People's Congress appointed within the division commissioned three research group, which is the National People's Congress to exercise the powers of one of the three major events. The National People's Congress exercise authority for three things: one is legislation; two is the appointment or election of cadres; the three is the supervision of cadres. Methods of cadre supervision is quality, listen to the special report, correct the bicameral violations. Violations corrected procuratorate from the start, leave the supervision and law can not grasp the key from the law, no operation.

2Chairman of the National People's Congress meeting decidedThe National People's Congress appointed within the division of law and petition set up a research group, published immediately mail online and in newspapers, collecting time of 2 months, extensive collection of law related suggestions of complaints handling procedures. Don't believe that no science to solve law and petition method.

3Research is focused on the collection received legal complaint lettersInterview process, review the petition cases procedures, public hearing procedure: public hearing procedure and participants(open committee hearings by the public security, procuratorate, court, judicial, NPC, CPPCC Department experts, University of political science and law experts, NPC deputies and CPPCC members, the parties to the case, lawyers, journalists, ordinary people and so on; hearing comments by the public hearing member signature); hearing opinions for the highest potency(hearing procedure is complex, the judiciary cognizance of case of wrong than high accuracy, to participate in the hearing without money,Beauty,Honor,The family interference and individual power illegally pressure disturbanceApplication of the parties); public hearing charges (also free) should be returned to the applicant, rational; if the parties apply for public hearing to hearing (Involving state secrets, commercial secrets, privacy by politics and Law Committee, National People's Congress appointed within the division, procuratorate, court, judicial organs, the public security department experts committee hearings); hearing comments after the execution shall be terminated; if the parties apply for public hearing, should entrust (like the court judicial identification as) the judicial administrative organ tissue, enhance the fairness and reduce the workload; above the county level people's Congress appointed within the division can organize public hearings or entrust the judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing; the judicial authorities may entrust the judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing, enhance the fairness and reduce the workload; major cases and important cases must be hearing; Standing Committee of National People's Congress on the wrong case cannot be determined (solve the past few judicial personnel strong opposition and some legal experts strongly opposed to the National People's Congress promulgated the judicial supervision on a case decided); people's Congress appointed within the division investigation cases wrong should be corrected, judicial organs to correct should end supervision; NPC division appoint preliminary investigation that case has the wrong should be correct, the judicial organ shall organize a hearing understanding inconsistency; judicial enforcement hearing opinions should end cases; not the implementation of detailed administrative punishment terms, to ensure that the executive decision; the hearing officer should be randomly; the hearing officer security responsibility and legal liability.

3"The cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress Supervision Procedure Law" (Draft)

Article 1In order to strengthen the judicial supervision, ensure the correct implementation of the constitution, law, protection of citizens, legal persons and other organizations of the legitimate rights and interests, according to "people's Republic of China Constitution", "the people's Republic of China on the National People's Congress and local people's congresses generation table method" and "the people's Republic of China People's congresses at various levels the NPC Standing Committee supervision law", this law is enacted.Note: the supervision is the only object of judicial organs, administrative organs of illegal cases resolve through litigation, judicial injustice by supervising and correcting people's Congress, is the rule of law marks.

Article secondThe said case, is refers to the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs have been completed (refers to judgment, ruling, decided to have legal effect) but may be wrong, or are not complete but may have suspected illegal procedure, as well as the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ shall handle the case according to law and not for.

Article thirdNPC Standing Committee shall adhere to the principle of collective exercise of powers and not directly handle cases in the case supervision. Specific cases handled by the people's court, procuratorate, public security organ, the state security organs shall, in accordance with legal procedures of judicial administration of the people's.

Article fourthThe Standing Committee at all levels to the people's court, procuratorate, public security organ of the organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative people for suspected illegal cases supervise. The NPC Standing Committee for the people's court at a lower level, which belongs to the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs for alleged illegal case, can be assigned by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs, investigation, hearing recovery; also can suggest the lower people's Congress supervision according to law. The lower of the NPC Standing Committee of the NPC's supervision scope of the case, or that need by the NPC Standing Committee for the supervision of the case, can be referred to a higher people's Congress supervision according to law.

The people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ at the county level or above, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs and has been in force but suspected of illegal case, the National People's Congress Standing Committee member of the House Judiciary Committee can make the people's courts, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial and administrative authorities are investigating the lower people's court, organ the procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative people suspected of illegal case, hearing, reply. To the people's court at or above the county level for alleged illegal cases, the National People's Congress Standing Committee member of the House Judiciary Committee can make the Supreme People's Procuratorate investigation, hearing, reply. To the people's court at or above the county level for alleged illegal cases, the NPC Standing Committee can make people's Procuratorate investigation, hearing, reply.Note: the 1 reason is the superior judicial authorities have the right to investigate, on the lower level of suspected illegal cases correct reply; 2, the judicial authority and the entry into force of the case without investigation, hearing, can only say suspected illegal cases, suspected of illegal cases shall be assigned by the judicial organs for investigation, corrective, reply; 3 is in the hearing hair (2007) the provisions in the document No. 5, No. 22 (2009) primary documents, people will rise to the legal policy, conducive to the operation of the judiciary and handled according to law; 4. superior judicial authorities have the right to investigate on the lower level of suspected illegal cases, to identify the wrong high authority, especially typical, complex case.

Fifth People's Congress supervision implementation source case:

(a) the people's complaints, charges, applied for a hearing the case to the people's Congress Standing committee;

(two) the Standing Committee of the NPC organizations of the inspection, law enforcement inspection and review found the suspected illegal cases;

(three) members of the NPC Standing Committee, NPC deputies suggested that the implementation of supervision of suspected illegal cases;

(four) the Standing Committee of the NPC Standing Committee of National People's Congress or subordinate to reflect the suspected illegal cases.

Article SixthThe Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committees to handle the relevant matters in the individual case supervision.

Article seventhThe column on the case materials, the Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committees that meet the provisions of article second, shall be entered in the register, and in the following manner:

(a) sent a letter to the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, or suggest lower NPC's supervision;

(two) to the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's understanding of the circumstances of the case, and exchange of views;

(three) the exchange of views unreconciled cases, entrusted by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs at or above the provincial level shall entrust the judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing or a written notice to the parties to apply for a hearing within 15 days; can also be submitted to the chairman of the meeting or the chairman of the meeting decided to set up an investigation group investigation, set up specific issues according to the Law Commission of inquiry.

(three) the exchange of views consistent case, the parties shall be no appeal to inform the parties to apply for a hearing.

The people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people received within 90 days from the date of the report and the letter. Due to special reasons need to extend the time limit, must explain the situation, but the extension shall not exceed 90 days, except as otherwise stipulated by law.

Suggested lower NPC's supervision, the lower the NPC Standing Committee informed supervision in 90 days. Due to special reasons need to extend the time limit, must explain the situation, but the extension shall not exceed 90 days, except as otherwise stipulated by law.

Note:The wrong case not correct or not rapidly corrected blame prosecutors Dean and procuratorate long?Can't blame. The president of the court and the procuratorate is not god. This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work. This article, prosecutors, and procuratorate long borrows or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel achieve the illegal profit no chance.

Article eighthThe Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committee received the applicant to the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ of hearing a case, may entrust the summary hearing, complex procedure hearing organization above the provincial judicial administrative organs within 60 days. The Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committee received the applicant to the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ of hearing a case, also can be in 15, assigned by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ of hearing, the people's Procuratorate, the people's court; the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs of the date of receipt of the review, in 60 days, and in 60 days written notice to the party concerned case is wrong or no wrong; inform the parties of cases no wrong without interest litigation, notify the party concerned in writing to the fee within 15 days from the date of hearing, fee at within 15 days of the judicial administrative organs entrusted organizations at the provincial level or above the simple procedure of hearing. The judicial administrative organs at or above the provincial level to receive client certificate, shall organize a hearing within 30 days, the hearing shall be on the spot to conclude, within 15 days, according to the written opinion and entrusted organ, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the State Security organs, judicial administrative organs receive hearing opinions shall be served on the party within 5 days.

The people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ or the parties believe that hearing views are wrong, should be 15 days from its receipt by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ or the parties to apply for judicial administrative organsComplex process hearing. The simple procedure of hearing views fails to apply forComplex hearing hearingOrComplex process hearingFor the final opinion.

The people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's mistake uncorrected cases, the costs borne by the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, no wrong by the applicants bear case. The wrong case involved a lot of people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, the people's court shall be borne by the final effect, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of state security organs, judicial administration of the people's.

The applicant has the right to choose the Justice Department organize the hearing.

Applicants to apply for a hearing fee by the applicant, the cost borne by the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, people's court, people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative machine received a hearing within 15 days will be zoned to the applicant fees provided by the applicant bank card. The date of.

The people's court, procuratorate received organs, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's Congress by the House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committees to date, in the examination within 60 days to apply for a hearing cases is wrong, should be corrected in 90 days.

The people's court, procuratorate received organs, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's Congress House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committee assigned date, shall return the results in 90.

Note: 1 above the provincial judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing workload is not big, you can specify the hearing committee personnel specific case. Above the provincial judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing is the procedural work; 2 hearing by the applicants bear the costs; 3. people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people undertake fault costs, is conducive to the promotion of the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ active correction. 4 wrong case not correct or not rapidly corrected blame prosecutors Dean and procuratorate long? Can't blame. The president of the court and the procuratorate is not god. This, prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long borrows or pressure to work; 5 is the wrong cases, as no wrong cases have no chance, no wrong cases identified as wrong cases have no chance.

Article ninthThe applicant to the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's request for hearing cases, shall be the date of receipt of the applicant according to the basis, examination within 60 days, and in 60 days written notice to the party concerned case is wrong or no wrong; inform the parties of cases no wrong without appeal the written notice to the parties to a hearing fee, within 15 days from the date of the hearing, for in 15 days the judicial administrative organ entrusted organizations at the provincial level or above the simple procedure of hearing. The judicial administrative organs at or above the provincial level to receive client certificate, shall organize a hearing within 30 days, the hearing shall be on the spot to conclude, within 15 days, according to the written opinion and entrusted organ, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the State Security organs, judicial administrative organs receive hearing opinions shall be served on the party within 5 days.

The people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ or the parties believe that hearing views are wrong, should be 15 days from its receipt by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ or the parties to apply for judicial administrative organsComplex process hearing. The simple procedure of hearing views fails to apply forComplex hearing hearingOrComplex process hearingFor the final opinion.

The people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's mistake uncorrected cases, the costs borne by the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, no wrong by the applicants bear case. The wrong case involved a lot of people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people, the people's court shall be borne by the final effect, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of state security organs, judicial administration of the people's.

The applicant has the right to choose the Justice Department organize the hearing.

Applicants to apply for a hearing fee by the applicant, the cost borne by the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the people, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative machine received 15 days will be designated to the applicant fees provided by the applicant bank hearing comments on.

The people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people in the examination within 60 days to apply for a hearing cases is wrong, should be corrected in 90 days. Note:The wrong case not correct or not rapidly corrected blame prosecutors Dean and procuratorate long?Can't blame. The president of the court and the procuratorate is not god. This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel to illegal profit no chance.

Article tenthThe hearing is divided into simple and complex hearing procedure of hearing procedure. The simple procedure of hearing by more than 3 people 5 people following the hearing procedure; complex composed of more than 13 people under 23 people, hearing procedure by complex master or above personnel hearing committee hearing. In particular by the applicant to determine the number of the hearing officer. Note: 1 complex hearing procedure for correcting wrong cases do not have no chance, no wrong cases identified as having misjudged case no chance; 2, this is very important, contrary to have serious consequences, in favor of law enforcement. The consequences to the legal provisions; the 3 method is the last relief channels, the requirements to be strict; 4 hearing is the doctor in doctor, host, the hearing officer to be fair, the conscience is 5The three major procedural law stipulates a trial procedure, trial procedure is simple; apply for retrial procedure, retrial procedure is simple (Procedure and the procedure of second instance trial should be simple), procuratorate supervision procedure is simple and the court of appeal procedure is simple, superior judicial authorities found wrong case corrective procedures simple, caused by money, beauty, honor, political future, family interference and individual power illegally pressure disturbance influence wrong case correction and the emergence of new judicial injustice the petition. If the provisions of the three procedural laws: procuratorate did not protest cases, the parties disagree appeal shall be approved by the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers in the enforcement hearing opinions), end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if the application for retrial, the court no longer the parties disagree should appeal to the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers in the enforcement hearing opinions), end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if you have more than 10 doctoral tutors according to the legal opinion, the Supreme Judicial organs shall entrust the hearing committee hearing (hearing should be experts, lawyers participate) the enforcement hearing opinions, end, the parties do not appeal hearing should pay, not to pay the case ends; if the county (city, district) above the judicial administration department established administrative, civil law advisory committee, legal advisory committee by the judges, prosecutors, lawyers, Institute of political science and law experts and other components, the litigant request by the legal advisory committee member 5 people to 13 people to participate in the trial of the advisory opinion, and by the applicant to pay fee, the court shall . The judgment of the court to the Advisory Committee that result as the standard, to walk the litigation case ends, the public credibility of the judiciary to improve, not the referee appeals and complaints reduced by at least 80%, most of the judiciary staff welcome. The above provisions, the case is not much... Three. Modify the procedural law is a long process, the National People's Congress must supervise the judicial decision, only the people's Congress should supervise the judicial decision making science, "the cases of judicial Standing Committee of the National People's Congress supervision procedure law". With the above provisions, the people's congresses at various levels, and the judicial organs do not receive the visit, except for the hearing. Do not receive the reason is correcting channels, visited the pressure without reason; 6The wrong case not correct or not rapidly corrected blame prosecutors Dean and procuratorate long?Can't blame. The president of the court and the procuratorate is not god. This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work, prosecutors, and procuratorate long borrows or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel to illegal profit no chance; 7 participate in the hearing person more, the applicant for more.

Article eleventhThe hearing committee judicial administrative organs by the public security, procuratorate Department expert genera, court, judicial, NPC, CPPCC, Institute of political science and law experts, NPC deputies and CPPCC members, the parties to the case, lawyers, journalists, ordinary people and so on; hearing opinions shall be open signature hearing committee members. Involving state secrets, commercial secrets, privacy by politics and Law Committee, National People's Congress appointed within the division, procuratorate, court, judicial organs, the public security department experts committee hearings. Note: 1, this is very important, contrary to have serious consequences, in favor of law enforcement. The consequences to the legal provisions; the 2 method is the last relief channels, the requirements to be strict; 3 hearing is the doctor in doctor, host, hearing officer must be justice, conscience Caixing; 4 hearing to determine fault is made (2007) No. 5 document, do hair (2009) No. 22, "the Central Political Committee on perfecting the law and petition mechanism of views" and other end requirements. Hearing in the case of red say white, white to yellow, to say the wrong, wrong said to no chance and condition, the reason is to participate in the hearing personnel have legal experts, the law of the NPC deputies and CPPCC National Committee members, lawyers, hearing procedure strictly, the case of the wrong program is much more complicated than the judicial organ internal identification can not be said, red black, to say the wrong, also do not have the opportunity and conditions will be red as black, to say the wrong. 5 hearing personnel should be high, especially the hearing personnel. 6 this provision, can promote the judicial organ correction and prevention have the wrong case, but cannot correct the injustice cases. 6This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel to illegal profit no chance.

Article twelfth hearing expenses associated with hearing case costs. The cost in the case hearing officer grant, poor travelling expenses ratio shall not be less than ninety-five per cent. Note: the legislation hearing should cost to participate in the hearing officer grant, poor travelling expenses ratio, improve the enthusiasm to participate in the hearing of cases, prevent the abuse of judicial administrative organs of hearing fee.

Article thirteenthThe people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ believes that the legal, regulations for hearing opinions are not accurate, should according to "the National People's Congress Standing Committee Resolution on enhancing the legal interpretation work", "legislative law" provisions for the authorities to explain, received a request unit shall, within 3 months in a written reply, and shall make a public announcement. Note: This article, the law never backward trial required, speeding up the pace of legislation. Let the complex case study by the supreme judicial organs, or explain to the legislation of the unified national law, letThe complainant and the judiciary personnel achieve the illegal profit no chance.

Article fourteenthThe hearing committee of the judicial administrative organ for classification, establish hearing library. Division of administrative cases, civil cases, criminal cases and so on several professional committee hearings. The judicial administrative organ shall organize the hearing of a random drawing. Not to participate in the hearing, the judicial administrative organs shall not participate in the hearing officer told the case handling units, the parties, agents etc.. Note: 1Why the judicial administrative organ of hearing: a library to host and participate in the hearing officer and political skills; two to host and participate in the hearing officer familiar with policy; three to host and participate in the hearing officer understanding of society and public opinion; four to host and participate in the hearing officer justice decent; five is recommended for the person or organization, employment of the judicial administrative organs; six to host and participate in the hearing person love the party and country, people; seven to host and participate in the hearing person clean; eight host and participate in the hearing officer recognized in most people; 2The method is the last relief channels, the requirements to be strict; 3 hearing is the doctor in doctor, host, hearing officer must be justice, conscience.

Article fifteenthTo participate in the hearing committee may not contact the parties, agents, contact the parties, agents should be avoided. Don't belong to the hearing committee staff, not inquire, understand the case and to understand the hearing committee members. Note: 1, this is very important, contrary to have serious consequences, in favor of law enforcement. The consequences to the legal provisions; the 2 method is the last relief channels, the requirements to be strict; 3 hearing is the doctor in doctor, host, hearing officer must be justice, conscience. 4This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel to illegal profit no chance.

Article sixteenthThe staff, the judicial administrative organ the hearing officer personnel, relevant personnel to keep secrets, shall not leak case. Note: 1, this is very important, contrary to have serious consequences, in favor of law enforcement. The consequences to the legal provisions; the 2 method is the last relief channels, the requirements to be strict; 3 hearing is the doctor in doctor, host, hearing officer must be justice, conscience. 4This provision,Prosecutors and the president of the procuratorate long force or pressure to work, do not want to correct no chance, the complainant and the judiciary personnel to illegal profit no chance.

Article seventeenthThe chairperson of the hearing, the hearing officer is directly interested in the case or other may affect the fair, should be avoided. Avoid hearing officer is decided by the chairperson of the hearing, the hearing is decided by the avoidance department.

Article eighteenth under any of the following cases, cases should be terminated after the end, by the judicial organ or the NPC Standing Committee issued notice at the top end, andThe people's court,HighestThe people's Procuratorate, the Ministry of public security, Ministry of JusticeOnline bulletin. End casesThe NPC Standing Committee, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs at all levels, no registration, no, no, not assigned by the investigation, no assessment review.

(a) the implementation of hearing the views of petition cases;

(two) conciliation and cash handling cases;

(three) the parties a written commitment to appeal petition cases;

(four) notify the party concerned in writing within 15 days to a hearing fee disjoint petition cases;

(five) inform the parties to apply for a hearing is not a hearing on the petition cases in 15 days.

But,After the end of the case, there is new evidence or the Justice Department experts more than 15 people proposal review except for cases, can be re investigation, review, hearing. Note: must have such provisions for special circumstances, there is remedy channels.

Note: 1 the dear is the major provisions, by the National People's Congress, not by the law, the highest judicial organ otherwise, social chaos; 2 perform this way, the majority of cases the parties will not give hearing fees, can quickly end, do not pay the fee is the reason: to participate in the hearing personnel without self-interest, the conclusion is accurate, the petition illegal purpose can not be achieved; 3 real hearing cases is one of the few; 4 hearing does not increase the cost of justice. Such as medical event identification, the hospital said no responsibility, the parties to apply for judicial authentication, identification of experts, not by self-interest, identification accuracy; 5 hearing than the judiciary found on the wrong program, to say the wrong no chance, said pairs of basic no chance; 6 the implementation of the hearing, the wrong case should the responsibility of judicial organs, can promote the active correction and prevention of wrong cases. The judicial authorities should reduce the active correction of the responsible person penalty, encourage correction, let people believe the party, Mistakes must be corrected whenever discovered; 7 this is supporting the complainant and the solutionsThe people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's effective way.

Article nineteenthThe people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administrative people should be in receipt of the enforcement hearing opinions hearing opinions within three months, and the results will be reported to the NPC Standing Committee.Due to special reasons need to extend the time limit, must explain the situation, but the extension shall not exceed 90 days, except as otherwise stipulated by law.

Article twentiethThe Standing Committee of the NPC Committee established case accountability, accountability committee is appointed director of the division, the judicial authorities, legal experts, staff of 9 people to 17 people. Accountability Committee recognized the case is wrong, shall be investigated for responsibility and accountability are reported to the Council of chairmen or decision of conference of director of Standing Committee submitted for consideration, standing committee of responsibility assigned by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administration, supervision and other organs in 3 months, and report the results. The people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ active correction, accountability committee did not study responsibility, be investigated for responsibility by the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, administrative organs, judicial supervision organs according to law. Note:

Article twenty-firstThe Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committee sent a letter to consult the relevant materials and borrow the case file, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ shall immediately relevant materials and borrowing relevant case file to the Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committees of the NPC Standing Committee, the House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committees shall be handled by the volume of procedures according to the provisions of.

Article twenty-secondThe Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committees that the evidence should be judicial identification, inform the parties to apply for accreditation. The Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committee received the application, the people's court, procuratorate, Department sent a letter to the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's material identification according to the requirements, appraisal charge by the parties to the people's court, procuratorate, public security organs, organs of the state security organs, judicial administration of the people's court, the authorities; the procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative people received within 15 days from the date of the entrusted authentication identification fee.

Note: 1 this is the key to ensuring the judicial organ active correction; 2. accountability committee is appointed director of the division, the judicial authorities, legal experts, responsible for that responsibility accurately.

Article twenty-thirdThe method of the case by the people's Congress Standing Committee, the House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committee chairman of the report or chief meeting shall supervise, in the following manner:

(a) the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs involving illegal facts need further investigation and verification, can set up an investigation group investigation;

(two) the judicial authority not to perform the hearing views, can be submitted to the NPC Standing committee;

(three) on the major or the illegal if the circumstances are serious, be submitted to the NPC Standing Committee, the establishment of the Committee of inquiry into specific questions for investigation.

Article twenty-fourthNPC Standing Committee Commission of inquiry into specific questions is established, the commission members by members of the NPC Standing Committee, NPC deputies and legal experts, lawyers, judicial departments and other relevant professionals.

The chairman or director meeting decided to set up an investigation group or the NPC Standing Committee to consider specific issues the establishment Survey Committee, member Commission of inquiry into specific questions or investigation group investigation shall be not less than five persons, and shall make records of investigation; in the investigating personnel shall comply with the provisions of the discipline and secrecy.

Interested members of the investigation group and the investigation of the case, should be avoided.

Investigation team to consult the relevant materials and borrow the case file, shall go through the formalities by volume; the relevant authorities shall immediately.

Member of commission of inquiry into specific questions or investigation group, can listen to people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative agencies report, ask.

The people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs should actively cooperate with the investigation.

Twenty-fifth of the twenty-fifth NPC Standing Committee, the House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committees in specific work to undertake case supervision, may apply to the people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organ about the circumstances of the case, the people's court, the people's Procuratorate to take, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs the report, ask questions, supervise the handling.
 The Standing Committee of the NPC internal and Judicial Affairs Committee or the relevant special committee urged the people's courts, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative organs are not dealt with in accordance with the law, or do not return for results and not to explain the situation, the people's Congress of the House Judiciary Committee or the relevant special committees shall put forward opinions supervise and report to the NPC Standing Committee meeting.

Twenty-sixth NPC Standing Committee in the implementation of case supervision, can according to the relevant departments and personnel carries on the inquiry, inquiry, interview.

Article twenty-seventhThe case of the Standing Committee of the NPC supervision by the people's Congress at the corresponding level and supervision on the level of the people's Congress and its standing committee.

Article twenty-eighthThe judicial organs and their staff in any of the following acts, by the NPC Standing CommitteeAccountability Committee, by the judicial organsGiven the serious punishment of the responsible person, if the circumstances are serious or intentional violation of laws and regulations, handle cases caused by wrong, give expelled punishment; constitute a crime, criminal responsibilities shall be investigated by judicial organs according to law. The administrative punishment law otherwise provided, from its provisions.

(a) in violation of these Provisions, make a false report, false reply and providing false materials;

(two) the implementation of the relevant personnel to take revenge on the individual case supervision by NPC Standing committee;

(three) intentionally conceals the facts, evidence;

(four) intentional violation of laws and regulations, handle cases caused by wrong.

(five) do not cooperate with the investigation;

(six) does not provide relevant materials and relevant case file;

(seven) do not perform hearing opinions;

(eight) does not perform the provisions of this law.

Note: This article is the key to ensure the law.

Article twenty-ninthNPC Standing Committee on theArticle twenty-eighthThe column behavior, can also be treated as follows according to circumstances:

(a) to the judicial organ or the responsible personnel to check, or a notice of criticism;

(two) to the judicial organ for investigation of responsibility and leadership responsibility personnel administrative responsibility or legal liability;

(three) to the National People's Congress Standing Committee appointed personnel, if the circumstances are serious, replacing or revoke its duties according to law;

(four) to the people's Congress elected personnel, if the circumstances are serious, shall be presented to the people's Congress of the recall;

(five) constitutes a crime, criminal responsibilities shall be investigated by judicial organs according to law.

According to the provisions of the preceding paragraph shall be processing personnel, such as processing of the NPC Standing Committee's decision disaffected, can reflect the higher authorities, but also can plead to the upper level people's Congress or the Standing Committee of National People's Congress or the defense or appeal.

Article thirtiethThe NPC Standing Committee in the implementation of case supervision, participation in the work of personnel shall be in accordance with the law, abide by discipline, according to the circumstances to give education, criticism, administrative sanctions, which constitutes a crime, criminal responsibilities shall be investigated by judicial organs according to law.

Article thirty-firstThe people's court, the people's Procuratorate, the public security organ, the state security organs, judicial administrative personnel, to participate in the hearing personnel, other administration (enterprise) personnel in violation of this Law and the Ministry of justice "to" the hearing procedures, serious circumstances of responsibility given marks above the disposition,, be dismissed; constitutes a crime, shall be investigated for criminal responsibility by the judicial organs according to law. The administrative punishment law otherwise provided, from its provisions.

Note: This article is the key to ensuring the law enforcement, to ensure that the hearing is accurate.

Thirty-second judicial administrative organsThe staff, to participate in the hearing personnel, other administration (enterprise) personnel in violation of this Law and the Ministry of justice "to" the hearing procedure, the judicial administrative organ at or above the provincial level shall be 50000 yuan to 200000 yuan, the illegal income confiscated of the illegal income; if the circumstances are serious, punishable by 200000 yuan 1000000 yuan fine. Note: Note: This article is the key to ensuring the law enforcement, to ensure that the hearing is accurate. Note: this method is the last relief channels, to strict liability, let interested personnel dissipate one's fortune. This is the key to ensure the law.

Article thirty-thirdThese Regulations shall be implemented as of the date of publication