Li Mianying "the constitution is a whole

The constitution is a whole

Author:Li Mianying2013-01-1419:24:36Released in:Blog ChineseClassification:The default classification

.

.

Some people trampling the constitution, also take some expositions of Constitution for their own Ban solution.

They take out chapters, mostly about the nature of the state representation. For example Chinese socialism, for example, led by the working class and based on the worker peasant alliance, with public ownership as the main body, the people's democratic dictatorship. They say these about the state system description, is opposed to the constitution about the freedom of speech, association, demonstrations and freedom.

In fact, this is a problem for their views, their mode of thinking and the cultural revolution, even when the Qing Dynasty that set. Our analysis will understand.

Well, Chinese constitution for socialism, but what is socialism? China is to carry out a full range of reform and opening up, the China characteristic socialist must be with the traditional, formerly socialist Soviet Union model as the standard is different, otherwise what reform?

Furthermore, China reform go is touch stone across the River Road, which means China socialism has not formed a fixed mode.

Of course, both said to be socialist, the society for the center must be good. But to society as the center also have various ways of socialism, emphasizing a distribution would solve the public ownership of the means of production way rich and uneven, with emphasis on strengthening the social welfare of the solution in the two distribution in society. Can't say who is the real socialism, because is to society as the center, is to resolve the disparity between the rich and the poor. And we said before the Soviet model as the standard of socialism has not exist, reform our own and that we are rethinking the standard, then how can we say solution through two distribution pattern is not socialism?

In fact, regardless of the mode of public ownership or two solution mode, need to give people with speech, association, demonstrations of freedom will be achieved, or the deterioration of aliasing. Public ownership, is the production of materials of all the people. National public information, to all the people involved in the allocation, the political power without the people? Who can guarantee the fair distribution.

The people want oversight, there are a fair justice requires space, these are needed to guarantee freedom of speech. No freedom of speech, there is no freedom of the press, who will speak for them, they say who can hear it? These years the loss of assets, state-owned enterprises and serious unfair distribution, are people have no speech freedom, thus unable to exercise supervision by. It was the definite freedom, the Constitution did not give the people caused by the loss of public assets, including a loss to his pocket, still take the public ownership of socialism, to deny the freedom of the people should be give! This is not a big joke? After the analysis is very clear, why the Constitution in representation of state socialism, stressed the need to give people the right to freedom of. The constitution recognizes no such freedom, socialism is false, it will spoil!

As for the two time allocation model, more people participate in the distribution of need. Without the people's participation, the high tax, did not increase the welfare of the people, and will only be fattened a group calling itself the professional distributor vested interest. Chinese nowadays tax is the world highest administrative overhead, is the highest in the world, and the welfare is the lowest in the world, the two high and one low strange phenomenon is that. How can this phenomenon? The people have no right of supervision! Why do the people have no oversight, no freedom of speech, association, not on the demonstrations, which cannot realize the supervision. You see, how important constitutional freedom to achieve constitutional polity have.

.

Come and see, led by the working class and based on the worker peasant alliance. The workers and peasants are the majority of the people, is the people's main body. What is the people's most basic political power? To speak, is said anyone could hear. Words can not say he can express what political requirements? It is how to achieve leadership? That's not a deceitful person? Only to people with speech, that version of the free, let the workers and peasants themselves, or entrust the free speaking media to talk, the workers and peasants to achieve leadership. Don't say the leadership or, even can live in peace are difficult. Can not say that was laid off, the house was removed, this cannot say, or say no one can hear, because there is no freedom of speech.

And since the workers and peasants are the majority of the people, let them to elect a representative, or even directly elected leaders, is the realization of their leadership. Since the election is the most wins. So the democratic election is also used to realize the important terms of physical constitution. The election of Representatives and leaders of understanding, which requires the freedom of speech, to let the media from each side to reflect the candidate status; elected representatives, the leadership in their political behavior, whether can really reflect the workers and peasants will also need to understand, reflect the media, which also requires that the right of freedom of speech version. So the constitution of the workers and peasants is set to the leadership class and base of the country, it must give the people a speech out version of freedom, these are the physical conditions. Do not give, what class the state representation of the leadership is false. It is not allowed to talk, then say so is to represent the people. This approach is very stupid, but they understand, you are with the people in the guise, but did not say that does not exit.

.

Public ownership of socialism in front of a section of the said. Talk about the people's democratic dictatorship. What is the people's democratic dictatorship? As the name implies, is clear: the people's democratic dictatorship against the people's enemies. Who is the enemy of the people? Also very clear: don't let the people be in power, it is anti democracy, not to give the people democracy power, including do not give the people a constitutional right of freedom of person several. For they have to exercise dictatorship. This is a concise clear, from the word can use the explanation? But I wonder, those who trample on the constitution, not to the people of freedom of speech and other people, how to use this word to make signs, from the inside to find not to the constitutional freedom of reason, their logic is how to interpret? Democracy, clearly written in the dictatorship, the object is not anti democratic dictatorship of the people? His anti democratic, also by the democratic dictatorship for signs, too will flicker person? Trick?

.

A careful analysis of their tricks, but also a concept.

One is the past old are read one, such as the socialist, he used the Soviet model to set. In fact, the former Soviet Union pattern has made their own demise. Our previous study because their pattern, so also in the reform, but these people are still in this mode as a socialist concept is confused, I still want to give the confused.

The two is to use the wrong concept and historical events at the time of the concept of change, such as the people's democratic dictatorship. Mao Zedong wrote an article called "on the people's democratic dictatorship". This article is for the anti rightist struggle. The right has been rehabilitated, the anti rightist struggle have been proven wrong or at least problem. The anti rightist struggle is with this article as the basis, the concept of this article can be used? Use this concept to explain about the state system of the constitution, not since the reform and opening up to the party on historical events to the founding of? The people's democratic dictatorship should have the intention.

The three is false, no system set concept simply not possible to change. For example, the leadership of the working class and based on the worker peasant alliance. The front have said, the workers and peasants as the majority of the people, realize the leadership only through the democratic political system, not to the democratic system, no vote, most have no way to achieve leadership.

Four is used as the sign of Marx theory. Previously seen, not freedom for the people of the working class can not achieve real leadership, leadership and some are trying not to give people including the workers and peasants freedom of the people, but they say they are the working class, the reason is they believe in Marx, but Marx is speaking. In fact, they believe in is Marx early class struggle theory, they hide Marx late on working class through the parliament, as to achieve the ultimate ideal. Marx's early and no experience about working class how to seize power after operation and theory, and the advanced theory and they hide, which continued revolution under the dictatorship of the Proletariat Cultural Revolution of the theory provides space, is the theoretical basis of the tragedy of the cultural revolution. Try the eight two constitution is based on the reflection of the tragedy of the cultural revolution made out, it is the most important way is to realize the leadership of the working class, the democratic and constitutional law. And these to deprivation of liberty, democracy of the people, it is against this key, which means they are not under the leadership of the working class, but they represent the interests of group leadership.

.

From the above we can see that the constitution is a constitution on the whole, the expression and regulation of expression, expression is unified and indivisible. Logic has indicated that the realization of constitution, constitution only by specific regulations and operating procedures to ensure that it can realize. The people demand reform and opening up, along with the social economy development request system changes, also depends on the specific regulations and operating procedures, not confusion. So these about democratic freedom, rules of constitution is the soul, is more important than the state system of representation. State system of representation to use specific things to test, you are the people of the country, and based on the worker peasant alliance, it should be clear what the power of the people. These provisions about people's power, is the true test description standard. With these provisions and the implementation of the constitution, expression is true. Do not implement these Provisions, violations of these terms to the freedom of the people, that is trampling the constitution, but also on our motherland.

These about people's free right, or the important achievements of human civilization, is not clear how many men and women with high ideals China since since shed, shed blood to pursuit. Those who trample on the constitution, often put these results as the west. Yes, the west is, but they forgot his heads Marx signs are western. Not learning from the west, that I was to the Qing Dynasty, we also comb long braids, robe, met with the leaders to kneel. Since nineteenth Century the progress China all cannot do without the reform and opening up, all cannot do without fusion of us and Western civilization. For these China people have much sacrifice. If in the nearly 1.5 centuries later, people have used the Qing Dynasty thought not to stop China people's requirement to keep up with the pace of development of human civilization, it should take them, to sacrifice those martyrs.

With the West have, to judge things right; with foreign forces to strains of black people. This logic is they dare to trample on the constitution thought foundation, but also they fool the people always do. But now it is twenty-first Century, the more than a hundred years ago the old Buddha used things can still deceive people? Tell them, certainly not!

.

The constitution as a whole has its own logic, soul, will never allow any split!