Kos is an idiot and Marx's new institutional school

The Mises principle can be logical transaction cost theory;
Kos theorem of abuse and Zhang Wuchang's mistake;
Professor Kos is a don't understand economics idiot;
Kos advocated socialist public ownership;
The new institutional school in fact is the Marx doctrine;
Marx's pursuit of the medieval slavery society;
Http://cid-36d976e82bb7123d.spaces.live.com/blog/cns! 36D976E82BB7123D! 2222.entry

The Mises principle is (Evolution -- > human integrity is the universal values of human rights -- > exchange value) the inevitable conclusion logic flow, its logical foundation also logically the proof of the Kos theorem. The disciples of the generation in terms of Coase cheung,Kos's theorem is an assertion fails to prove, (Kos himself did not prove the theorem, Williams simply summarizes this theorem), soZhang Wuchang will say "China low human rights (slavery Chinese) to reduce the transaction cost".

The premise of Kos theorem,Bargaining is the human right of inviolabilityOptimization of the market, to achieve the Kos theorem; otherwise the low human rights itself, is a market damped Kos theorem "". Kos theorem in the new system school of "Cheung" (that is, Marx's public school) became economics theorem of public ownership "optimization" "" (authoritative assertions),The key lies in changing the concept of "optimization of optimized". In other words, "is not defined optimization" standard, the interests of the individual transfer optimization.

If the "optimization" as the "leaders are most satisfied", then obviously Zhang Wuchang Kos (Gauss) to explain the policy is correct, "low human rights to Chinese workers low wages, can reduce the cost of (export),Let the leadership and America private consumers are most satisfied with the"-- >, let Chinese people as slaves, in addition to Chinese people themselves, estimates of the world did not what other people will not be pleased.This is Zhang Wuchang to teach Chinese "economist" of the new school "of Economics".

But if the "optimization" is defined as the individual experience (Pareto product, it is often said that the suit and, let the national most satisfactory for the people), the answer is quite the opposite, low human rights mean treason, treason, an enemy of the people! America wanted Zhang Wuchang can say suspected of a crime;The Chinese wanted Zhang WuchangMaster Zhang, let him very admiring Korean Jin took refuge, is absolutely in line withOutstanding contribution of Zhang Wuchang to the "economics" to.Have a look to North Korea if Coase efficiency of socialist starving people, I do not know will not praise "the dead really low transaction cost"! 　

Once claimed that "socialism must give way to the capitalist" Zhang Wuchang, was reduced to the most naked hair left! Who would have thought? "Coase" name "Coase Theorem", Coase you wouldn't understand, who can think? Kos is actually a don't understand economics"Enterprise management" professionalThe Nobel winner. Kos was the first to put forward the concept of "transaction cost" of scholars,Williams is the first summed up the "transaction cost theory (Kos theorem)"Economist.Zhang Wuchang is a political scholar at the abuse of Coase Theorem.

Mises principle"Capital is the essence of natural loss, but is not the natural gainIn fact, "Denial of the Kos idea of "enterprise management to reduce the cost of market transaction market". Because of the enterprise management is just the market exchange into internal self-produced self marketing pricing capital, and (in any sense) capital are natural loss, in the enterprise on the performance for the rise of management cost.Kos "idea of enterprise management to reduce market transaction costs"In fact, Marx's socialist public ownership synonyms.Coase is in fact a fool!

Kos in the "the nature of enterprise" is a fool, but in "the problem of social cost" in the statement, close toThe author of the economics and management definitionPoint of view, difference, Kos seems to be causes of "transaction cost" without any explanation,For the law "and" initial definition (probably refers to property) standard EquivocationSo, Mr. Kos (RH.Coase) is actually a great writer a splendid speech without any substantive point of view; but Kos did not make any clarification!!!A lack of empirical standard Philosophy!

In contract economics attainments, Kos was less than RA.Posner, even so,Domestic economists including Zhang Weiying (not to mention Cheung), esteem to the Persian nor he advocated "ruling by law to reduce the transaction cost", while theHe is the "enterprise management to reduce the transaction cost".Therefore, the author of the truth about whether Kos fool is not interested in, like the Marx Is it right? A bastard of a bit is not interested in the truth. Kos is an idiot and use those Kos (like Zhang Wuchang) is shrewd, their effect is completely equivalent.

The Mises principleLinked to the International SongIn fact, economics wisdom to human made a great joke! Marx advocates the pursuit of communism, "fruit" to the labor of laborer social is in fact they oppose the capitalist system,And they think that fair "public ownership",In fact is the capitalism was born out of a feudal caste social class!The Marx doctrine is the pursuit of medieval theocratic slavery!

"Exchange to create value: liquidity law""Exchange to create value: flow laws of social speculation"
"Mises capital principle; the essence of capital is the natural loss, but is not the natural gain; what is lost?"
"The Mises principle can be logical transaction cost theory; the Coase Theorem of abuse and Zhang Wuchang's error; the new institutional school in fact is the Marx doctrine"