Insurance accident vehicle damage - fighter style

Last year five one of the author to help a friend get married, the team of shadowless Hill Road downhill, because in front of vehicle brakes; operation not resulting in rear end. So the alarm, alarm, the responsibility, the loss. The author mainly responsible for the rear of the vehicle, to advocate set loss center damage; inspection, photographing, add the table, a series of programs and surveyor shouted out compensation price -230 yuan. A day later the Runhua 4S shop repair, the repair costs for the 1200 round. The cost gap big stick out a mile, the loss with the controversial but be of no avail. Several days later I go to the insurance company for insurance premium 230 circle. (there are no franchise clause in the insurance contract, the author without this with payment is 80%) which the author draws the following conclusions:; first set loss procedures, method is not reasonable, is a human behavior, say how much is how much.

Second: the compensation is not according to the actual repair costs, the difference is huge.

Such examples have meet the eye everywhere in car; imagine if and loss will be what is the relationship between words, what is the result!

Just please friend gentie, review.