Inner Mongolia police drunk driving accident liability who should assume?

In August 18, 2009, due to serious traffic accident in Sonid Zuoqi border brigade police drunk driving related in Sonid Zuoqi, due to the local police. The procedure of handling a case, cause no one suffered unrighted wrong responsibility.
On August 18, 2009, Liu Hongsheng driving Ji No. G54397 "Auman" brand heavy half hanged Caijun trucks and AO driving Beijing No. GZC351 "Toyota - Highlander" brand small SUV collided, serious traffic accident resulting in Beijing SUV car killed 3 people, injured driver Ao Caijun. The police in handling cases of Ao Caijun blood alcohol content of 100 ml of blood alcohol content of 200 mg, belong to drunk, the alcohol content. However make parties bear the responsibility of 50% local police.
This story occurs at the intersection with highway in Sonid Zuoqi white with full two highway (full line highway 2KM+500M). According to the scene of the accident, Liu Hongsheng driving a vehicle route is from full line the highway from south to north, the road has just completed, the road without any reduction of speed limit signs, so when Liu Hongsheng driving vehicles travelling from south to north through the crossroads has normal running through the full two highway center yellow line 2 meters multiple, Ao Caijun driving Beijing No. GZC351 "Toyota - Highlander" brand small SUV is from east to West run fast no measures taken to slow down into the truck right front wheel.
According to the point of impact of the two cars that driver Liu Hongsheng driving the vehicle did not violate the "Regulations" the provisions of article fifty-second of the people's Republic of China road traffic safety law. Made direct cause of cost accident is due to Ao Caijun no motor vehicle driving license, driving the vehicle in a drunken speeding, its after crossroads did not slow down, hit the car right front wheel, so the illegal behavior of Ao Caijun is directly caused by the heavy traffic accident case. The police in handling cases of Ao Caijun blood alcohol content of 100 ml of blood alcohol content of 200 mg, belong to drunk, the alcohol content.
Because it does not have a driver's license, drunk driving, speeding and Caijun is the direct reason to cause the serious traffic accident, because of its serious illegal behavior, causing passengers, Yang Xiaolong, Xu Jiefeng Niu Zhiguang, Ao Caijun death badly wounded serious traffic accident responsibility, according to the facts of the case that Ao Caijun for the accident.
No 1 Caijun motor vehicle driving license, Ao, Ao Caijun undocumented driving is illegal serious, its behavior is the root cause of the accident. The Ao Caijun no motor vehicle driving license, so it does not have the driving "Toyota - Highlander" SUV's basic skills and abilities, so Ao Caijun without full responsibility for a motor vehicle driving license to drive the vehicle should bear the accident.
2, Ao Caijun at the time of the accident is drunk driving. The owner to the accident the police know about Ao Caijun blood alcohol content of 100 ml of blood alcohol content of 200 mg, belong to drunk, the alcohol content. The Ministry of public security in August 15, 2009 on the drinking, drunk driving of the special rectification action, Ao Caijun during this special action is still against the wind driving, which not only disregard for his own personal safety will also leave the car safety, illegal Ao Caijun to yourself and the passengers and other people's lives and property caused great the loss of its own, not only seriously and caused serious consequences passengers three people death, punished the should be subject to the law, and assume full responsibility for the accident.
3, Ao Caijun driving vehicle serious speeding. In this case the Ao Caijun vehicles driving crashed into a truck right front wheel truck, will be on the spot right front wheel hit out, the fact that Ao Caijun vehicle speed fast. In addition, Caijun driving "Toyota - Highlander" SUV serious damage, according to the damage degree of the vehicle can also determine the cause of the consequences of the speed is too fast. Route road speed limit Ao Caijun travelled 50 km per hour, and the Chinese Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade was not on the "Toyota - Highlander SUV accident" occurred when the speed is not detected, so that the accident had not recognized Ao Caijun driving vehicle overspeed illegal facts. In order to ensure the objective and fair treatment of the accident, the applicant requests your organs on the "Toyota - Highlander" off-road vehicle speed detection, so just to determine the accident responsibility on both sides.
From the illegal behavior of the Ao Caijun can confirm all Ao Caijun should bear the responsibility of traffic accident, and the Chinese Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Brigade in determination of the accident is not based on facts, injustice, serious violations of the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant. The certificate is a certificate not according to objective facts, your authority shall revoke.
Three, the owners that the traffic police team in Sonid Zuoqi the case, illegal procedure.
The owners know that after the accident, in August 19, 2009 to August 24, 2009 in Sonid Zuoqi, Sonid Left Banner, the traffic police team made the accident responsibility confirmation, confirmation is made, the traffic police team reflects the case to the people's Procuratorate Sonid left banner. But the traffic police team fails to notify the owners responsibility confirmation has been made. The owner to Chinese police team in August 24th, the traffic police team of investigators to the owners of service will Liu Hongsheng criminal detention notice. Accident owners in August 28th at around 10 in the morning traffic police brigade police to find, at that time they did not inform the owners and drivers have been Procuratorate approved the arrest of Liu Hongsheng. The owner received the book, in 2009 August 31 to the Xilinguole Meng Public Security Bureau police detachment for review, the Xilinguole Meng Public Security Bureau police detachment accepted the owners to apply for review, but in September 2nd the Xilinguole Meng Public Security Bureau police detachment informed the owner to quickly find their trip, the owners in September 4th to the Xilinguole Meng Public Security Bureau police detachment found the handling a case police officer Milo, Milo notify the owner in the case in August 27, 2009, based on Liu Hongsheng approved the arrest of a people's Procuratorate has, so according to the "Regulations of road traffic accident procedures", fifty-second 2 the provisions of item, the Xilinguole Meng Public Security Bureau police detachment of the case that has no right to review, so the revocation of the owners of the case for review.
The fact that the traffic police detachment, Sonid Left Banner in August 24th traffic accident report sent to the owner, and inform the owner for review of rights, but the capability of traffic police team deliberately will accident report delivery time delayed 4 days, in the Procuratorate approved the arrest of Liu Hong has been the case, the traffic accident report service without notice owner Liu Hongsheng has been approved the arrest of the circumstances, by the end of September 4, 2009 Liu Hongsheng's relatives and the owners have not received the decision approved the arrest of Liu Hongsheng. So the owners still lost to the traffic accident for review of the rights, so the owners that the Sonid Zuoqi traffic team program in handling the traffic accident is illegal, therefore, 90004th traffic accidents based traffic police brigade make confirmation of no legal effect. Therefore, the owners reflect the illegal traffic police brigade Sunit Zoy to your organs, request your organs on the Sunit Zoy Police Brigade violations be corrected, and ordered Sunit Zoy to the traffic police brigade to revoke its made 090004, traffic accident, the accident to be determined.
Four, the owners hope that your department attaches great importance to the case, the accident to hire professionals to conduct a comprehensive investigation, in order to ensure fair treatment of the case.
Because the accident caused serious consequences, killed three people, injured one person, serious traffic accident, belonging to another, the accident resulted in the death of a border police leadership, a border police injured, significant social impact, so the fair treatment to the case, it is necessary to hold a hearing, and organize the relevant experts, professional people of the comprehensive case investigation, by the relevant parties to the case of the relevant evidence materials open, fair to cross examination, authentication, to ensure the impartial handling of the case, safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties to the case.