In the face of accident analysis, analysis of vehicle is more meaningful than

The tragic accident on the highway in Fujian Quanzhou, let people in horrified, started a debate on the auto safety. The accident is the protagonist of a Nissan Qashqai, the body is cut apart, the occupants of 5 dead and 1 injured, about this accident, old topic netizens debate is still the most is "Japanese cars are safe", but also clear media and netizen attention is focused on the hedge row car problem how to.

 

There are quite a few netizens accident casualty Qashqai disintegration due to the Japanese car "thin", "energy absorbing structure" and "jerry". These three points have been some netizens think is the three Secret Japanese cars, they will want to condemn both in speech and in writing, and hates to some people dead don't begin to understand, actually the man's life and family possessions behind, to buy the "paper" Japanese car.

 

In fact, as long as the static under heart to come, to car safety knowledge just doing my lessons, not on the topic of interest to slobber. A car's thin skin not thin to be of no great importance on safety, the key lies in the body frame; and the body before and after the "absorption" structure, is a compulsory course in all automobile manufacturers, is also the most can manifest the automobile passive safety skill part; as for the Japanese car made in China is higher than the German, American system, law system, Korean cars can "Jerry", this kind of thing is not conclusive evidence is not good to comment, from a personal point of view, I think that is not necessarily the case.

 

For whether the automobile safety judgment, many people pursue is "don't look at the advertisement effect", believe that their feelings and don't believe the crash test results compared with the authority of the. For example, some people had faith car hard, the hit, but the Japanese car soft, collapse at the first encounter, the impression from the car look, touch and the feeling of driving, or from the accident scene or picture. In fact, if a person has a certain scientific spirit, not identified by their feelings can be judged by the safety car how, crash test results will not blindly deny professional bodies.

 

So far, in the automobile safety has right to speak or professional crash test, the European version of E-NCAP, J-NCAP and IIHS version of the US version can reference, even if the Chinese version of the C-NCAP reputation less, than those "genzhaoganjiaozou" guy reliable.

 

If a buyer pays special attention to the safety car or not, the best reference collision test scores of the professional bodies, no matter you have felt the "soft" car, choose five-star certainly more than four good. If you think the test room crash test can not completely represent the actual situations, indeed, but you can believe, collision test room can not achieve good results of the car, will create a miracle in the real environment?

 

After a tragic accident, of course, to security issues on the car itself to be explored, but if the stop in the "thin", "light", "absorbing" like the layman topic, no little significance; and if by chance as intolerance, is the harbor evil intentions, pure chaos.

 

In a word, if the safety car is good, can put forward their own views, but even if the "absorption" oppose, please first learn the basic knowledge and then cut in, otherwise, slobber flying, there will be many rookie Huyou must be at a loss what to do, one not careful a bait and switch poison "blind, then joined the team," by "two refers to the safety of Zen" to judge a car crash test, and the authority of the sniff at.

 

Most users are not experts in automobile safety, perhaps in an accident, do not see many automotive safety gateway, but to avoid the occurrence of the accident and emergency measures in case of emergency, it is very necessary to do some review.

 

For example, cause of the Quanzhou accident is burst, driving people to pay attention to this festival, should run at high speed tire safety extra vigilance, reflect on their own Is it right? Can often pay attention to the tire Is it right? Damaged, tire pressure, tire wear Is it right? Normal Is it right? Normal? Is it right? Can do every high speed can check the tires?

 

And for the treatment of blowout, Is it right? Do not panic, know the score? If the high-speed moving vehicles suddenly burst, the brakes may let the car out of control, send you to hell, you Is it right? Know to tighten the steering wheel, and then rely on downshifts like approach to slow down the car?

 

Then check your driving habits, Is it right? Weekdays on the highway total too slowly? As long as there is no overspeed monitoring is to express?

 

Quanzhou accident, details of a tingling picture in the US: the car safety belt is not normal use, in the base of the position in a kind to be called "safety belt latch". The plug only role is to deceive "the safety belt is not a reminder system", can let the occupants from the acousto-optic disturb vehicle issued in don't fasten the safety belt. This is Chinese characteristics of things is very popular, can be seen everywhere automobile apparel store and online shopping mall in the user quite extensive, visible. This is really a disastrous things, its harm is not inferior to "kill you 3000", lost the protection of the safety belt, in the event of a collision, then the safety car is white tear.

 

The Chinese people on the car itself safety concerns, far greater than for their safety awareness and driving skills, attention, a car accident, the design and manufacture of the most heated debate is around the car Is it right? Security deployment. Pay attention to the safety car is not wrong, can urge the manufacturers to improve vehicle safety, however, our country automobile market has been basically with the international synchronization, the traffic safety consciousness, safety of people's knowledge is far behind the automobile era.

 

Design and manufacture of automobile can provide much degree of security, it is beyond the scope of our knowledge, this does not matter, a C-NCAP can also let us have a basic judgment, and doesn't have a look like E-NCAP. And how to use the car to safety equipment, the correct operation of your vehicle, how do the driving your compliance, how to improve their driving ability and emergency ability, is an owner's part, and we drove the fundamental obstacle avoidance. Rather than focusing on the car hard turning soft, rather more than a few times back "carefully make the boat million years" Zuxun, look through the traffic regulations, not in safe hands, no safety car, put your safety is the most important in their own hands.

 

Then a car accident, topic analysis of vehicle can be, and the analysis of human factors issues should be subject to the present, Chinese, whose significance is far greater than the former.

 

(the authorized Sina car)