In the constitution of the planning terms when to modify, abolished?

    Chinese has always been a country with a large population, due to the "men and women could not communicate between man and woman" caused by the lack of cultural development, as well as "unfilial descendants", "multi Fu" the traditional thought influence, the population problem has not been to control the masses consciously been.
  
In July 15, 1957, "people's Daily" published Ma Yinchu's "new population theory". He pointed out: it is a great resource, but also a great burden, if not control the blind expansion, it will seriously affect the development of national economy and the improvement of people's lives. But his proposal did not get the hair led authorities, but by the fierce criticism. In the early seventy, the authorities clearly realize the over rapid growth of population on economic, social development, and in 73 years in the country to carry out family planning, and the population development plans into the national economic and social development planning, 78 years, the family planning policy was written into the constitution. The current constitution of twenty-five stipulates: the state promotes family planning, population growth and economic and social development plans to adapt.
  
Control the population, mainly in order to the needs of survival, survival to development. Future development to a certain extent, family planning is not very significant, many developed countries in the family encouraged, the more developed our city, only one and childless "DINK" crowd has been rapidly expanding.
  
After eating problem solving, national development to a certain extent, leading technology will become the main tool for sustainable development. Science and technology leading, decided by three aspects, one is the high level of knowledge, the two is the accumulation of advanced technology, two is the capital equipment advantage. A general increase in which plays the decision role or the national level of knowledge. Here, let's get sufficient education is a factor, but let go of family planning, and even encourage the birth to make countries more brain resources, thus has the development potential and competitive cost more.
  
The existing constitution "the country to carry out the family planning", show that China's one-child policy in the compulsory stage. Thirty years of reform and opening up, the national economy has developed rapidly, and, this development seems to continue. The problem of food and clothing has been resolved, the problem has been solved basically well-off, now our goal is the middle of this century to reach the level of moderately developed. At that time, perhaps no child will become mainstream, like Japan, an ageing society. Before the state should arrive early in the aging society, the amendment to the constitution, to encourage fertility. In fact, after thirty years of planning, the aging society has left us very close.
  
Because the constitution of planning mandatory terms, caused some mandatory provisions of the law, in the implementation process, more savage violence is banned repeatedly more than, the local planning commission into many people heart dangerous acts. And the constitution of "the state respects and safeguards human rights", "the personal freedom of citizens are not violated", "the dignity of citizens are not violated" clause in the conflict, the humanist spirit based on the mandatory implementation, after so many years, can consider to modify or repeal of this provision, at the appropriate time. Perhaps, changed to "the State encourages" or "the State encourages" can better embody the people's will and interests.
  
What kind of conditions we can amend or repeal planning terms? According to 8% of the growth rate of GDP and the trend of population, maybe not twenty or thirty years? Now I hope children can make it.