Han Baoru, male, the Han nationality, born in 1964, the legal profession undergraduate national higher education self-study exam, member of the Communist Party of china. He obtained the lawyer qualification in 1997 2004, Capital Normal University law professional graduates. The director of the Urumqi City Criminal Bar Association Professional Committee, Xinjiang Hengrui Law Firm lawyer, partner. 1981.10-2005.7 36149 served as soldiers, students, Nanjing Artillery Academy 36141 forces command artillery command staff, 69025 army, 69038 army political deputy director general (regimental level, the rank of Colonel, retired in 2005); 2005.5-2008.1Xinjiang Tianyu lawyer (of which 2006.1-2008.1 in the city of Urumqi Lawyers Association); 2008.1- Xinjiang Hengrui lawyer.

OnceIn the long-term military institutions work, good at learning, study assiduously business, with strong writing and language expression ability, solid legal knowledge and rich social experience. Humble, good quality, work conscientiously, mature steady, hard-working, down-to-earth style of work. A lawyer for several years, everywhere for the sake of the party, and always adhere to the interests of the parties in the first place, have good occupation morals, learning and accumulated a certain amount of handling skills and experience; keen on criminal defense,Dedicated professional, quick thinking, clear thinking. Case analysis to review the evidence before the court, to highlight key points, grasp the essence, hold a key, have a definite object in view; pay attention to the techniques, dare argue eloquence, obvious effect in the trial.To win the respect and recognition.

1.Pakistan China Merchants a smuggling case of precursor chemicals (joint with Wang Chengbing in 2005, the first case of lawyers, to practice after the suspect bail, already settle a matter by leaving it unsettled, essentially innocent). A 2005 October in Urumqi buy Chemicals Potassium Permanganate 2000 kilograms, by Urumqi customs anti smuggling Bureau seized on suspicion of smuggling and criminal detention of precursor chemicals, the lawyerAnd Wang Chengbing lawyerAnd the unit of communication,A detained for about a month after the bail (release, the final is to withdraw the case).

2.Wearing a $5100000 embezzlement case (2006, lawyer Wang Chengbing once with a trial court, after the withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent). The lawyers took over the case the defendant's family hired third attorney. Based on the evidence carefully study, lawyers in court for the prosecution organ charges facts of a crime are not clear and the evidence is insufficient, defended the accused cannot be established. The case after two times after the hearing, the prosecution to withdraw, made the subject and occupation specific amount insufficient evidence to decide not to prosecute,The defendant was released after 18 months in detention.

3.Humou robbery (2006, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent).The lawyers took over the three days after the trial, for lack of evidence, the prosecution after withdrawal, decide not to initiate a prosecution.The defendant was held for 6 months after release.

4.Wang contract fraud (620000, 2008, does not arrest, suspects for real innocent, neither shall be investigated for criminal responsibility, nor bear civil liability).The lawyer receives, quickly collect evidence, communicate actively with the procuratorial organs, procuratorial organs to not to approve arrest after closing.Wang was detained for nearly a month of bail (release, the final is to withdraw the case).

5.Xiaomou illegal business case (MLM, 2008, the procuratorate nonprosecution, suspects for real innocent).The case of the main leaders have, say, xiaomou et al on suspicion of the crime of illegal business operation under criminal detention, and by the industrial and commercial bureau in 2007 as the ten major cases of illegal TV, newspapers and other media have reported, it was a great impact. Lawyers take the case, the timely submission of the defendant guilty evidence to the prosecutor, after the prosecution organ to evidence is insufficient to make the decision not to initiate a prosecution.The defendant was released after 8 months in detention.

6.Zhang case of misappropriation of public funds (in 2008, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent).The case in 2008 May after the hearing, the prosecution evidence and the facts change withdrawal,In 2009 June, the procuratorial organs decide not to initiate a prosecution.

7.Lin Mou Xukai value added tax special invoice case (The tax amount to about 47000000 yuan, 2008-2009, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant was innocent) essence.The lawyer in court for lack of evidence, the defense accused cannot be established. The city's application for two deferred trial, finally in 2009 February withdrawal,The defendant in custody 19 months later, in 2009 March the bail (release), was a decision not to initiate a prosecution.

8.Tian damage case of public telecommunications facilities2008 years, defense process of this case evidence collection, more important than the result of innocence). The prosecution organ to field a criminal damage the public telecommunications facilities and the crime of theft to the court. The case after the first trial, the lawyer is entrusted to defense for the accused in the second trial. The lawyers in the collection of relevant documents of evidence, the re trial, the defendant does not constitute a crime of destruction of public telecommunications facilities, only constitute the crime of theft, the defense opinion. If the public prosecutor's sentencing facts and evidence, the defendant Tian will be sentenced to ten years in prison. But the Court adopted the defence lawyer, eventually to field a theft,Sentenced to four years in prison.

9.Flexion of a corruption case (2008).The prosecution of a crime of embezzlement in flexion (80000 yuan) to the court, if this conviction, the accused will be sentenced to five years in prison. The lawyer, the defendant does not constitute the crime of corruption, and the embezzlement of public funds and have surrendered plot, the defense opinion. Final court decision defendant guilty of the crime of embezzlement of public funds, exempted from criminal punishment.

10.Wang and other fraud (2008).The prosecution to the court to Wang Mou of the accused person commits crime of fraud, crime of amount to 200000. If this conviction and sentencing, the judicial interpretation of the provisions of (gang crime, flow on), Wang Mou of the accused person will be sentenced to ten years in prison. The lawyer defended the views that the main aspects of the crime amount. The court found that the amount of fraud in 100000 the following, the defendant was sentenced to six years in prison.

11.The tiger a robbery of housebreaking (anesthesia, 2008). The accused man was sentenced to eleven years in prison. The defendant appealed, a lawyer for the written appeal, from the robbery of housebreaking elements, the defendant does not constitute a robbery of housebreaking, constitutes only the general robbery. City Intermediate People's court to adopt legal advice, the defendant is commuted to five years in prison.

12.A bribe, bribery case (2009).The prosecution to the defendant a commit bribery crime, bribery crime (involving nearly 1000000), to the court. The lawyer made a defendant only constitutes the defense opinion of the crime of bribery. The court finally to the defendant a commit bribery crime (bribery amount 190000 yuan) and sentenced to one year and zero six months, suspended for two years.

13.Gregory a forged the seal of the company case (2009).The prosecutor accused Ge as a sales of false invoices and forged the seal of the company in 38, but the public security organ only sampling one of seal identification. The prosecution to seal a forgery, which identified the seals were forged. In the trial, the prosecution lawyer thinks, with a seal identified as forged seal, on the other seal not one were identified under the condition of tax registration data, combined with the seal on the defendant to prove other seals were forged, insufficient evidence, in accordance with the law should not be recognized. The first trial after the adjournment, the prosecution organ to make changes to the indictment, the defendant is forged the seal of the company as a. After the court to the defendant a Ge to make counterfeiting the seal of the company was sentenced to 10 months in prison.

14.Huang embezzlement case(in 2009, nearly four years, bail has been settle a matter by leaving it unsettled, the public security organ may revoke the case, the suspect has been the essence of innocent results). In 2009 May, Huang was Guiyang City Public Security Bureau Nanming branch on suspicion of embezzlement in online and wanted, captured in May 19th by a division of Huang Xinjiang Corps police station. The lawyer entrusted, because of can not find Guiyang to UTTI people's police officer, 25 directly with no crime evidence to guiyang. The police repeatedly and GuiyangCommunication, show evidence of innocence, Guiyang City, Nanming branch soon as Huang for bail, and inform to the police officerThe release of Huang (and eventually to withdraw the case). The lawyer competence has been fully affirmed and highly appraised the Huang family.

15.Xu, the illegal acquisition of rare wild animal products (in 2009, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent). In 2008 July, the public security organ to Xu suspected of illegal possession of firearms criminal detention, August to the illegal acquisition of rare wild animal products of sin be arrested. In 2009 February the prosecution to Xu guilty of illegal acquisition of rare wild animal products of sin (snow leopard skin two, the value of 200000 yuan) to initiate a public prosecution. The case after the two supplementary investigation, four sessions, two time delay. If the prosecution organ charges and evidence of conviction and punishment, Xu should be sentenced to ten years in prison (the more than ten years, and recidivism). The Court adopted the lawyer proposed for lack of evidence, accused of a crime can not be established the defense opinion. August 28, 2009, public prosecution withdrawal.

16.Wang negligence causing death case (2008).The lawyer and prosecutor discussed repeatedly, exchange views, the prosecution organ to Wang committed the crime of negligence causing death to the court. The lawyer active coordination on compensation to the victim family member, after the court to Wang Mou commits the crime of negligence causing death sentenceThree years in prison, three years probation. Wang Mou of the accused person was detained for three months after release.

17.Wang and other illegal business (marketing, 2008). The case involving 5 accused persons, the "victim" hundreds of people,Involved in the caseAmount of moneyAbout 10000000 yuan. The active defense lawyer, to the court to provide a large number of cases, the final principal Wang was sentenced toTwo years.

18 Cao and illegal detention (2010, does not arrest, the suspect for real innocent).In 2010 February, Cao a suspicion of the crime of illegal detention under criminal detention, the lawyer entrusted, to communicate with the public security organs and procuratorial organs, and finally a district Procuratorate made not among decision.Cao was released from custody of criminal detention for nearly a month later (and eventually to withdraw the case).

19 Li intentional injury case (2010, the case is not guilty of criminal private prosecution cases).In 2009 November, Wang Mou in 2009 private prosecution Lee the crime of intentional injury after withdrawal, again prosecute Lee, asking the court to the crime of intentional injury shall be investigated for criminal responsibility Lee, the lawyer again entrusted, the trial proposed Wang accused Lee of intentional injury crime evidence. The court verdict that, Wang had not evidence of its right hand injury caused by the defendant lee,Then ruling Lee innocence!

20 Qiu hard bribery case (2010, in this case because the torture to extract confessions and the exclusion of illegal evidence forced to withdraw after the procuratorate, the defendant for real innocent).Qiu X in 2009 July on suspicion of bribery crime have been a District People's Procuratorate approved the arrest of criminal detention and. The people's Procuratorate to Qiu Mou commits bribery crime prosecution, to a district court in October 13, 2009, the law to apply to the courts, reflect certain period of investigation has been high in the procuratorial personnel torture to extract confessions, request the court to investigate and verify. During the recession, Qiu x family also to hire a lawyer. The case after the two trial,Finally in 2010 August withdrawal public prosecution. The release of Qiu Moumou was detained for 13 months after. As the court to support the public prosecutor for prosecution, Qiu MOU will be sentenced to at least 10 years.

21 as a contract fraud (in 2010, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent).In October 29, 2009, a by the Public Security Bureau of a district with suspected contract fraud criminal detention, in November 20th by the Procuratorate approved the arrest. In May 28, 2010 a district court hearing the case. Hearing the lawyer told the court, submit relevant evidence, prove that as a company and as one does not have the purpose of illegal possession, the prosecutor accused of insufficient evidence, requested the court to make the accused cannot be established as a judgment of acquittal. During the trial in the prosecution to the court for an extension, the withdrawing. In September 7, 2010, the court agreed to withdraw.Ren Mou in custody for more than 11 months after the release of.

22 Dongmou fraud (in 2010, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent).In 2009 July, Dong a suspected fraud by the City Public Security Bureau bail.2010 years in August, a district procuratorate accused the defendant Dongmou and Lee, for the purpose of illegal possession, the use of forged bank loan contract, for small and medium-sized enterprises liquidity loans 240000 yuan, the prosecution to the court, asked to fraud accused Dongmou and Li's criminal responsibility. In the trial, the lawyer as Dongmou counsel, the prosecutor accused Dongmou fraud insufficient evidence to the court, requesting the court to Dongmou make accusations of crime cannot be established the not guilty verdict.After the procuratorate to Dong Mou the withdrawing.

Liu Shi Moumou 23, drug transport case (2010, organized, and Wang Chengbing's Procuratorate final withdrawal, the defendant was innocent of this case is exceptional nature, respect for the law, judge of character admirable). Common Liu the defenders as the lawyer and lawyer Wang Chengbing. The defendant Liu due to the transport of drugs, drug possession case in January 30, 2010 was criminal detention, in February 26th the same year was arrested. The prosecution of a procuratorate railway transport branch, accused the defendant Liu committed the crime of transporting drugs, possession of narcotics, sue to a railway transportation intermediate court. Liu Moumou suspected drug trafficking methamphetamine 335.6 grams, 19.28 grams of methamphetamine possession of drugs. The first trial, lawyers in the case without drug weighing transcripts, cannot determine the exact weight defense opinions involved in drugs. After the procuratorate for postponement of the hearing, second hearing, lawyers said that although the drug weight leave quarantine approval second appraisal report, but the source of the drug was questioned. Procuratorate re apply for postponement of the hearing, third hearing, counsel submitted to the public prosecutor evidence suggests the existence of the problem from ten aspects, that the prosecutor to produce evidence, still can not prove that the reasons for the change of drug. The case finally for main fact of case that changes of drug evidence, and "inconsistent seized items list" records, leading to two times the appraisal conclusion cannot be accepted.After the prosecution to the court to withdraw, court ruled in December 1, 2010 that, agreed to withdraw. The accused held for nearly a year to be released.The court such as supporting the indictment charges, Liu is such and such may be sentenced to death.

24In a State-Owned Company staff dereliction of duty(2009-2010, procuratorate nonprosecution, criminal suspects for real innocent). In a case before the Department of Baosteel Group Xinjiang eight one Steel Corp under the company's engineer and labor insurance. Because usually busy with work, there are several months to put in charge of the labor insurance audit work to the unit responsible for a colleague. But the colleague with seal, himself in the blank insurance payment single stamp, who many receive hundreds of thousands of yuan of PPE in others. After the incident, in a by procuratorial organs, criminal detention, the detention center custody after a week, the bail. As to a lawyer, to the procuratorial organs repeated communication, one is reflected in the work of some others prior to the leadership had confessed, two is in a company does not belong to the criminal law of the State-Owned Company.After the procuratorial organs, to decide not to initiate a prosecution.

25 Wei a production, sales and shoddy products(In 2011, a trial convicted, remand for retrial after the withdrawal, procuratorate, the defendant was innocent) essence.The defendant Wei so and so in 2006 in a Henan pesticide factory name, the number of pesticides to a company in Urumqi sales, contract price 68 yuan. Effective pesticide for two years, a Urumqi company still owed more than 30 yuan. The company in 2009 August to buy pesticides to report to the public security organ pesticide Wei and sales of fake and shoddy products, demand investigation. Wei X in March 7, 2010 was a public security bureau of criminal detention, in April 23rd the same year was a people's Procuratorate approved the arrest of producing and selling fake or substandard products. A district court issued by the adoption of national pesticide quality first instance pesticide quality supervision and inspection center of the sign, so that Wei guilty of producing and selling fake or substandard products, Wei and sentenced to prison for one year to zero three months. Wei x appeal, appeal, court of second instance according to the facts unclear, insufficient evidence on remand. The focus of this controversy is whether, according to the pesticide testing more than shelf-life for unqualified conclusion, and presumption in the warranty period of pesticide quality is substandard. The lawyer in the trial, second instance and retrial, firmly grasp the controversy focus on defense, and ultimately in the retrialThe prosecution to the court, the court ruled to approve the withdrawal withdrawal.The defendant Wei so and so has finally been essentially innocent results.

26,Cold x smuggling precious wild animal products (2010).The case involved the precious animal products antelope horn were identified, amounting to 79000000 yuan. On suspicion of smuggling precious wild animal products of sin the defendant cold x two, Kashi intermediate people's Court of first instance was sentenced to twelve years in prison, sentenced to another defendant Luo Moumou reprieve. The lawyer trial served cold Moumou counsel and pleaded not guilty, the court finally in the autonomous region of attempted crime due to cold, a period of seven years in prison, Luo x commuted to fifteen years in prison. But in the case of insufficient evidence.

In the summer of 27, intentional injury (wounded) case. The lawyer in court, to take innocent plead guilty, pointed out that summer as a crime, the accomplice, and plot. Strictly from the evidence cognizance, Xiamou behavior does not constitute a crime. But the court decided, Xiamou has surrendered plot, and actively compensate the victim's damage, get the victim forgiveness, Xiamou committed the crime of intentional injury, sentenced to nine months.

28, the sea of a suspected robbery (2011).The sea and the lawyers in the trial, any charges are charged in the indictment, believed that the case shall constitute the crime of blackmail and impose exactions on. At the same time, the defender pointed out, such as the confirmation of robbery, three in the indictment charges, in accordance with the provisions of the judicial interpretation of the will and the specific situation of the case, should not be regarded as the three robbery. According to the three robbery of sentencing, the defendant may be sentenced to ten years in prison. The Court adopted the defence lawyer, finally according to the sentencing opinions, to robbery (two) the defendant to the sea for a period of six years in prison.

29, Bi Moumou corruption, bribery case (2010-2011).A trial after the case, the lawyer as the defendant trial counsel pleaded not guilty. In the case of first instance three times (two times, three times the second instance trial), a total of five trial, a written hearing. The original trial that the defendant has committed the crime of corruption, sentenced to ten years in prison, the combined punishment for several crimes committed the crime of accepting bribes sentenced to ten years in prison, execution, with thirteen years in prison. Because in the field and other reasons, the defender in the three trial. The trial court found the defendant guilty of embezzlement, sentenced to ten years in prison. The issue in this case is whether the defendant with corruption, bribery crime subject qualification and unit collective decisions retroactive pay how to identify behavior problems, very special, never seen. At present, the defendant may is appealing.

30, Yu Mou transporting narcotic drugs (2012).The defendant Yu Department of drug addicts, after the urine test positive. The confession of the accused, the purchase of 226 grams of methamphetamine in Guangdong, to urumqi. Documented evidence also aircraft, train tickets to prove. But the court trial, the defendant Yu Mou and defender of the indictment charges have objection, think should constitute the crime of illegal possession of drugs. The main reason is, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Supreme Court (Dalian minutes), the defendant holds drug, not during transport, seized on the spot, although the numbers, significantly more than their normal use, but not in conformity with the provisions of the crime of drug transport to the determination of drug addicts to seek. The court did not accept an argument, but the sentence was not refutation. Finally to the defendant has committed the crime of transporting drugs, sentenced to fifteen years in prison. The sentencing the defendant did not appeal, to. Otherwise, sentenced to no period can be quite large.

31, the Huang Moufei national staff bribery case(2010-2011). Huang Department of procurement center buyer supplier, suspected of accepting cash 181000 yuan. At the same time, investment about 200000 yuan a supplier, common to the steel supply material, its essence is the use of supplier's platform, and their units to do business profit. The public prosecution authority, Huang investment provider and obtained about 800000 non profits, which belongs to the convenience of duty, Department accept bribes. The first instance court adopted the defence lawyer, identified the indictment accused the other of about 800000 yuan, is not in conformity with the non national workers taking bribes crime, shall not be recognized. Finally by Huang receive 181000 yuan, constitute the crime of bribery of non national staff, sentenced to five years in prison. Huang said not to appeal. But a district procuratorate to protest, the Urumqi intermediate people's court after trial, dismissed the appeal, upheld the. In the case of early 2012, a District People's Procuratorate and the city's application for autonomous district procuratorate again appeal, autonomous district procuratorate final did not support the protest.

32,Zhu Li (a contract fraud in 2012, after the hearing, withdrawal, the defendant for real innocent).The actual operator Zhu Li Department of a footbath shop, the shop in the Bureau of industry and commerce registration owners for his brother Zhu Wei. Zhu Wei ran after a few years, in the field of cooperation with others, will let brother Zhu Li a footbath shop to do. In 2011 September, Zhu Li for his wife will give birth to a child, asked his brother Zhu Wei to agree, will shop feet to transfer 100000 yuan Zhao (female), but the transfer transfer agreement on human Zhu a rather than a Zhu Wei. Zhao Mouxian paid the transfer of 80000 yuan to the store that the assignor and not Zhu Wei sometime, since that be deceived. Second days will report to the public security organs. The public security organ for, after when Zhu Wei some understanding of the situation to withdraw the case. But a certain district procuratorate investigation supervision department thinks, Zhu Li Mou behavior belongs to the fraudulent use of the name of others to sign the contract, diddle other property, their acts constitute the crime of contract fraud, written supervision of the public security organ for investigation. In 2012 February, Zhu Li Mou by public security authorities arrested in Gansu, and have been under criminal detention, arrest. The counsel to the trustee Zhu Wei some understanding of the situation, and concludes that do not constitute a crime. Through the meeting, marking the facts and evidence case, quickly submitted defense opinions to the procuratorate, court, procuratorate the case that withdrawal, suggested the court not to file. But prosecutors insist on trial procedure. The case after trial,Procuratorate finally withdrew the prosecution. The defendant Zhu Li a detained for nearly 6 months to release. The people's Procuratorate have decide not to initiate a prosecution.

33, Peng x fraud (2012, transferred to the prosecution's investigation, retreat, during which the public security organ bail, essentially Peng XX has acquitted).Peng X line forces retired cadres, from 2009 to 2011, successively to the work unit colleague Zhao loans totaled 500000 yuan, and to the Zhao a loan document, agreed repayment period to the end of 2012 7. But Zhao in the repayment period not to the case to the police station case, said Peng to conceal the truth, for its 500000 yuan. In 2012 May, Peng x under criminal detention, arrest. Zhao due to conceal the loan agreement with the fact, refused to report to the public security organs to produce an IOU, the public security organ nor that Peng XX behavior constitutes fraud. The lawyer to the investigators and the branch office of legislative affairs leadership to show Zhao clear telephone recording, to prove the existence of both agreement and agreed interest, repayment time facts, but investigators to Zhao does not recognize the recordings on the grounds, refused to adopt legal advice about Peng does not constitute fraud, the case is a civil dispute. Many consultations to no avail, case prosecution, procuratorial organs will soon return cases supplementary investigation, the public security organ to Peng XX, bail. Now, the result is certainly, settle a matter by leaving it unsettled, or revoke the case. Release Peng XX detained nearly four months after the.

34, Liu fraud, fraud, credit card fraud (Liu on decision very satisfied with the results, the lawyers said the court's decision in accordance with the principle of suiting punishment to crime, the results can be accepted, should be considered together to successfully defend case).Liu in 2007 in response to the government call, self funded start-up "our father, our mother" nursing homes. Because of the large investment, the effect is slow, low occupancy rates, rental housing many factors during the operation, a serious shortage of funds, difficult to continue. In this case, in order to make the nursing homes can continue to maintain, Liu Mou with nursing homes (registered as a company) name, and lived in the old man and society is not the specific staff dozens of people in the investment cooperation agreement, in the form of bed savings, borrowing a total of nearly 1200000 yuan, interest rate agreement ranged from 8%-14%. The old man in charge is low, loss is severe, difficult to repay the interest, pay the rent, in the case of cornered, Liu left the nursing home (his statement to avoid court rent, the public security organ that fled). After the incident, the government to the temporary placement of the elderly, the public security organ to Liu online pursuit. In 2011 December the "escape" nearly a year of Liu Mou is seized in Jiangsu. Procuratorate cognizance, Liu articles fraud 1900000 yuan fled, commit fraud; the Civil Affairs Bureau grants 7 yuan, illegal have been accounted for, fraud; malicious overdraft bank 45000 yuan, make the crime of credit card fraud prosecution. The lawyer through many meet the defendant to understand the case, carefully study the evidence, the trial the defendant's conduct did not constitute a crime of fraud, fraud innocent defense opinions, as the light to defend the credit card fraud crime. In this case the court 4 months after the final determination by the court, Liu Mou commits the crime of illegal absorbing public deposits, sentenced to three years in prison; accused Liu fraud is not established; crime of credit card fraud and sentenced to one year, and execution for a period of three years. In the case that procuratorate charges such as all set up, only fraud a sentence of at least 12 years, two other sins, Liu Mou the light of results should be not less than twelve years in prison with its.

In addition to the above cases, there are some cases by the court on charges of qualitative change, change, the defendant was sentenced to probation, fines, prison (detention time card sentenced to long time) decision. In short, the defendant got what it wanted, got a lighter punishment.