How to distinguish between genuine and fake lawyer

   White coat are not necessarily doctors, and nurses. In the whole is not the teacher colleges, and the school. These are all common sense. But in the legal service work is not necessarily a lawyer, this problem is really a lot of people do not understand.
   For example, "Wuzhou daily" recently January 8th front page "refusal to pay the waste disposal fee collection of illegal lawyers interpretation in legal basis", this paper only carries on the explanation to the legal basis for the collection of work in the XX legal affairs center and office, as the perennial legal counsel to a unit, the agent related litigation Wu XX. The reader will ask: if XX Wu is not a lawyer, the title is "lawyers explained collection of legal basis"? Ask reporters and editors are unable to ascertain whether the interviewee is a lawyer, so how many readers to distinguish between genuine and fake lawyer?
   Similarly, "Wuzhou daily" last "lawyer mailbox" column, many period is from Yu XX presided over the reply letters from readers. It is like it is Zuozhen experts, chaired by the results and Zuozhen are nurses. Who has reason to believe: if yu XX is not a lawyer, how can reply "lawyer" presided over the mail letters? So last October 8th, net name is "who" if my lawyer in the red net post "Wuzhou daily and copy public", following the 141 posts of. From the beginning that Yu XX plagiarism, became identified Yu XX is a lawyer, even if someone speak out that Yu XX is not a lawyer, is still unable to stop some of the lawyers to pour dirty water.
   Just that Wu XX, Yu XX is not a lawyer is not enough. For life is not with the lawsuit relevant people, lawyers for their significance is legal, consulting, against the legitimate interests have been infringed upon. While the need for a lawyer to provide legal aid and legal service for the clients, how to distinguish himself entrusted Is it right? Real lawyer, this is very necessary, a lot of people because of a lawsuit and the impact of life. On the legal profession and for the team, not innocent as not a lawyer who carry unwarranted stigma.
   How to distinguish Is it right? Lawyer, must have three conditions: first, the lawyer is examination to pass national lawyer qualification or the national uniform judicial examination, has obtained the qualification of lawyer or judicial qualification examination. This is the essential condition of lawyers employed (colleges and universities engaged in teaching of law major and has a senior professional title can be qualified through examination); second, the lawyer is through the province (autonomous region) registration approved by the judicial administrative organ at the level of a lawyer and through the annual person. This is a lawyer, judge, prosecutor qualification through the judicial examination, does not mean they have lawyers, judges, prosecutors, lawyers, a former judge, prosecutor is not equal to the life in the industry as the reason; third, the lawyer must be a lawyer in a law firm specific institutions or the Legal Aid Center of (or as the company law approved in the pilot company).
   Verify whether lawyers in three ways: first, the lawyer I channel show the examined by a registered lawyer license; second, the query to the lawyer institution, every lawyer had been in the significant local publicity photos, the lawyers of the name and number of practicing certificate; third, the query to the local judicial administrative organ or lawyers association.