Chen x bright rape case supplementItalySee

                             -According to some opinions of the prosecutors retort

Guangdong Provincial Higher People's court:

I am ChenXBright rape complaint case agents Huang Lihong lawyers,2012Years6Month12Day, I made a special trip to Yangjiang prison met ChenXBright, a few problems to ChenXLight to understand the situation.

Q: ChenXBright, why are you in the investigation, prosecution, trial, the second trial court statement some access?

Answer: one was the intense fear, they asked two is not clear, so my answer is not complete.  

Q: to banana, you say someone call you in the past, but you in a different time, say people who call you up are not the same, why?

Answer: because they made a phone call to me at that time, concrete is who, I was not very impressive, so there is a different answer.

Q: ChenXBright, you say you didn't rape victim, then how do you prove that you are not?Who always be with you?You said you from somewhere else to others called to banana, who tell you a piece of the past, whether the person has been with you?

Answer: "deep" is always with me, I received a phone call at the time, I and "deep" rode a motorcycle to banana garden road. "Deep" always on my side.

    Q: how long to stay in the banana plantations by the side of the road?

Answer: two or three minutes, get together and they go home.

Q: have you into the banana?

Chen: no inside.

The relevant opinions of the prosecutors behind the lawyer will also include procurators.

To sum up, the lawyer thought:

1Chen, regardless ofXHow bright is inconsistent, but one thing is consistent, that is he from first to last all deny the rape of the victim. The court must not because some of the details of the entry at th.

2Prosecutors think, ChenXBright in some detail statement is not consistent, so the guilty plea not credible. Agent think, this view is completely wrong inspector. ChenXBright details stated inconsistency is normal. A person whether or not you are committing a crime, once the compulsory measure is taken, the psychology can be very nervous, it will naturally to avoid behavior. So the details out without what good strange, this is entirely consistent with a person in custody (with or without his crime) normal psychological reaction. In the compulsory measures adopted by the case, any person including the prosecutor psychological quality estimation is no better.

3Opinions of the prosecutors, prosecutors think, CO and the victim has testified against ChenXBright rape. Agent think, the judge procurators too arbitrary, even nonsensical. Why procuratorial opinions cannot be objectively recognized these CO and the victim in that ChenXWhen the light is still a lot of problems and flaws? Why the prosecutor to co denying Chen in courtXLight a victim of rape fact indifferent? Why the police investigators many illegal place to turn a deaf ear to, without investigation and ordered the police to correct illegal behaviors? In the process of handling cases, prosecutors, first, second to consider whether or not some should not consider the outside factor inside. If is because of worry about the correct the wrong and make some people bear while ignoring the ChenXLight shall be investigated for criminal responsibility is wrong despite the fact that, so justice where! Where the judge, the prosecutor's conscience!

4Procuratorial opinions, prosecutors will burden of responsibility to ChenXThe bright side, call recording the call not to take, the collection of the testimony of witnesses do not collect, completely contrary to the principle of burden of proof of criminal procedure, but also a manifestation of the prosecution of serious irresponsibility.

Suggestions:

1On the same day, the provincial high court ChenXCall recording light, if any case person call Chen on the rape of second timeXBright, so that ChenXLight does not lie. Because ChenXIf always and CO in banana plantation site, there is no need to call him.

2, province high court has been and ChenXLight were investigated with "deep", if the "deep" indeed and ChenXLight always together, then the "deep" natural enough to prove the truth of the case.

The above views, for provincial reference, hope court can handle cases impartially, find out the truth of the matter, also ChenXA bright clean. If so, that is the legal victory, the victory of justice.

(Liang Kaishen, ID number:4408251992071xxxxxRegistration address: Xuwen County, Xi Lian Zhen Ying Qiu CunXXXNumber, the information from the investigation of public security organs to identify transcripts)                         

Agent: Guangdong legal Shengbang law firm lawyers Huang Lihong

                     2012Years6Month12DayNight