Li NianjunLawyerShaanxi flat mirror law firmTelephone.15029081695QQ:1429826252
2011Years5Month16DayDistrict People's court to Xi'an City, Shaanxi Qin ※ Cement Group Co. Ltd., Xi'an cement sales contracts and disputes in the Construction Group Limited company Fifth Construction company.
2008The project of cement sale January Shaanxi Qin ※ ※ Company Ltd and in China the company contracted construction agreement, by the Shaanxi Qin ※ company for the project site to provide cement company.2008Shaanxi Qin ※ company successively for the construction of the company's multiple construction projects in the supply of cement, the cement company, in accordance with the contract, the monthly payment to Qin ※ company.But2009Because in the process of supply, Shaanxi Qin ※ ※ company project manager in the company should be asked, for the construction of the company site transport cement ※ tons.The change in the relationship after the company and the company internal organization, the number of tons of cement, Shaanxi Qin ※ company who pay not financially settled.
2010Years5Month16DayShaanxi Qin ※ company in and the company many times without consultation fruit case, to the proceedings, request the company to pay the arrears and default payments, total cost:136205Element.2011Years5Month22By the company commissioned by the Japanese, to deal with the case.In the court, the other financial understanding to verify the situation, the accounts check.Between the party and the company in the company accounts to verify, Qin ※ company, the company's financial representatives coordination, by the company on the cement with square ※ company pay, Qin ※ company received the money, give up the penalty and other legal rights, no longer the matter the other the company filed a lawsuit.The three party agreement, from Qin ※ company to the people's court extraction withdrawal.
2011Years6Month10DayIn the company to the company to pay a cheque cement Qin, Qin ※ company submitted a withdrawal application to Xi'an Yanta District People's court, the three party of the contract between the trade dispute ended.
Conclusion: in this case, the lawyer why simple sale contract will years cannot solve?With the development of economic construction under the background of the times, between the economic dispute cases in many years.The company between the contracts of sale, when it comes to the third party company economic dealings must enter into a written document, in order to prevent legal relations for the unnecessary, causing the company to pay too much energy and money.The legal representative of the same, but the same person, but not the same.In this case, the proof of delivery in Qin company money, submit the invoice to prove delivery payment.Between the invoice and firm delivery receipt is not the same, because between the company and the invoice amount, most of the time and the actual economic exchange amount is different.The invoice amount is not as direct evidence of delivery amount in court.