"Criminal law" article 275th

  • Created:
  • / Author: Aaron Lewis
Recently more attention on news removal, the following is a report from the Oriental Morning post:
 
   "Criminal law" there is a sin called "rape", its key depends on, my body belong to me, I don't, you can't grab. The major portals have recently turned one about the news, look after, I think is no longer the "property law", is no longer the "City Housing Units Regulations", but the thought of the "criminal law", and then thought of rape.
 
  See first report: July 15th, Chongqing Boda District of Wanzhou City real estate development company did not apply for demolition in the processing of cases, openly to the Tourism Bureau of Wanzhou district office buildings mandatory removal. (in July 29th, "the Beijing News")

Reports an interesting detail, responsible person that Boda company has repeatedly called "to talk about compensation for demolition". What you want, do not belong to you, but others do not give, "bow", want to create an established fact, then force each other into submission. This means, in fact, nothing new.

Forced to infringe upon the right, we all know that the crime of rape. Then forced to infringe upon the property? Mentioned in the report, "(wrecker) publicly smashed office building", "is on the six floor...... The meeting room is a mess, there are several giant hole in the roof". The demolition so robbery, do not have to move out of what "property law", "City Housing Units Regulations", should take "criminal law" wait. "Criminal law" article 275th clearly wrote: "the deliberate destruction of public or private property, the amount is large or if the circumstances are serious, is less than three years imprisonment, criminal detention or a fine; if the amount involved is huge or other especially serious circumstances, three to seven years in prison."

According to the determination of Wanzhou district government, the demolitions of events for the illegal demolition. The source said: Boda company for demolition procedures a no, two with no demolition units to reach a settlement agreement, three did not obtain the map red line delineated construction planning departments, so the house is typical of the "three noes demolition". Popular point said, Boda company is forcibly smashed the unit to be the roof, induced by removal units and the units of property losses. According to "the crime of intentional destruction of public or private property" elements, the subjective aspect, Boda company is intentionally; the objective aspect, the fact is the destruction of public and private property; the amount, although the report did not disclose the specific amount of property damage, but the result, believe also reached the lowest line roughly case (the provinces of the "big" standard no one, at 500 yuan to 2000 yuan). Even for the minimum standards are not, said of peaceful times. under forced destroys public or private property, but also can be regarded as "serious circumstances". Even if that is not enough, escaped criminal regulation, there is a "Public Security Management Punishment Law"!

So, see online someone will Boda company named "history of the cattle developers", I am not to regard it as right, it is "most cow the suspect"! The report said: "Qiangchai incident, highly valued by Wanzhou district government and related departments. Wanzhou Project Construction Committee Office relocation, housing department person in charge to on-site processing, identification of Boda company jiangca action is illegal. Wanzhou district government responsible person also instructions, ordered an immediate halt to the Tourism Bureau of Boda company office building demolition, to ensure the safety of staff."

See, public destruction of public or private property, is still considered relocation disputes, rather than as a criminal case in the treatment. In addition to the "demolitions" (actually the deliberate destruction of public or private property) act to stop, and no suspects what things, reports do not see signs of local criminal investigation.

If these evictions for rape, the result is: rape incident, caused the attention of the relevant aspects; some departments rushed to the scene, found that the act of rape is illegal; a leadership instructions, ordered to immediately cease to rape victims of rape, to ensure the safety of.

Laugh out of it? Just think, in demolitions of events being raped "criminal law" article 275th, a cry in a corner of the night.

Related links:

275th Whoever intentionally destroys public or private property, the amount is large or if the circumstances are serious, is less than three years imprisonment, criminal detention or a fine; if the amount involved is huge or other especially serious circumstances, three to seven years in prison.