Zhu Suli Ho Man? Dean Chinese highest institution of Peking University Law school. See a report by Zhu Suli, know a Zhu Suli, alas!
    "Chinese contemporary legal constraints and challenges", with certainty, thought to what constraints on Chinese law, what challenges have a more sober understanding, but Professor Zhu logic that we do not understand. Professor Zhu from the milk powder incident of mining the deep-seated reasons, not from the criticism and supervision on the exemption system itself, it will boil down the fundamental reason for the strange environment of modern people! China vast territory and abundant resources, people much miscellaneous, so not good tube, more strangers face, probability of delinquency is greater. So, Professor Zhu, draw a conclusion, small acquaintance, not good governance law, Chinese too large, unlike Singapore so easy tube, so Chinese more needs the rule of law! Root of vast territory and abundant resources, never rule by law since the ancient times, Chinese population numerous, world and difficult, the downtown Jiangnan, since ancient times is the highly mobile in the area, why not the rule of law? India population numerous, but why India gave birth to no generation of the rule of law? The Swiss people less, and why the rule of law developed? Then, Professor Zhu will talk about China many population, economic development speed, with more than ten years go Europe hundreds of years of Lu Yunyun, and what constraints and challenges China contemporary rule of law?
    Speaking of Shaanxi yellow dish case, Professor Zhu, create new styles at the police. And with certainty, I Zhu Su Liwen one out, all at the police invasion of privacy as do scatter like birds and animals, the fact can't clearly on the comment, the police is not not necessarily, and enumerates several possibilities of facts. Was deeply puzzled, how the possibility of his own speculation several facts can deny others comment on unreliable? How can you determine the facts on the basis of others is not based on the facts of the case? If someone else is commented on it, then the facts on the basis of Mr Chu in where? It is not to comment? Does Mr. Zhu know the truth but did not say it? But I'm Mr. Zhu's speech only to hear a series of possibility! Alack!
   Professor Zhu think "unified judicial examination does not have any meaning, is the biggest failure Chinese rule", why? Professor Zhu is the logic of judicial examination of national unity, so that the talent level is high, the media can earn 100000 judges to the East, why stay earn 10000 a year in the west, so remote and underdeveloped areas will keep the judge, so the uniform judicial examination to China level more differentiation, 100 harm and no case. Alack! Professor Zhu, no uniform judicial examination, China judge from inside gunpolitical power, holding a gun to the soldiers into the court to play the life; no uniform judicial examination, the prosecutor Chinese, judges have little Cobain was born, who is who in...... The loss of talent, has never been unified judicial examination is wrong, wrong in economic development is not balanced, grasp the economic development is the hard truth. According to Professor Zhu logic, should be demobilized soldiers by the point of legal training, to charge the western underdeveloped area, since Professor Zhu then understand the difficult conditions, low wages, demobilized soldiers every one is a fool? Hope that Professor Zhu as a soldier in uniform judicial exam on not to act on impulse in handling things!
   Professor Zhu said "China promulgated the burden of proof in medical accident judicial interpretations, directly led to the 2004 medical talent loss more than half", alas! Medical accident why the burden of proof to inverted? Professor Zhu can be served as a civil law understanding? Professor Zhu mouth students with the abolition of the death penalty advocates for example, words real opponents must experience, "loyalty". Look, how to let Professor Zhu to do a medical accident victim? Professor Zhu also can point to any liability for medical evidence? In 2004 the words after the medical personnel for the inversion of the burden of proof to explain the loss more than half, so exaggerated and let a person be hardly worthy of belief. You know, in China, doctor complacent, Professor Zhu is the famous if it doesn't matter want to work in the hospital sector, it is difficult to strike!
    When it comes to outlying district court, Professor Zhu has always emphasized the importance of other departments to resolve disputes, and with certainty: "five thousand years of ancient Chinese without a court, is the people do not have to live?" Alack! It seems to my professor Zhu China legal history lesson! A little China history knows, Chinese ancient secretary is not divided, the magistrate is now the county is now the president of the court, the case of direct trial.
    When asked China court procuratorial system of financial independence, led directly to the procuratorate procurator to the government of the magistrate bag, when the humble appropriation of embarrassment, Professor Zhu is the first answer: "financial independent judicial not necessarily more independence, judicial independence is not necessarily financial independence", alas! Have to admire, two "not necessarily", who dare say I Professor Zhu wrong? It seems like the professor Zhu jurists such, accustomed to the use of Equivocation "not necessarily" to answer the question, you said he was wrong, he's right, you said he was right, he didn't give you the answer, it seems Professor Zhu heart very clear -- not necessarily is certain, some are not certain! Then, Professor Zhu and out: "not only Chinese court procuratorial rights is not independent, the world including America is such", alas! Isn't Professor Zhu in the us so many years no see financial problems of the court system USA? No clear America court property is directly appropriated by Congress, and China court procuratorial power is restricted by the local government such an obvious truth?! Professor Zhu stressed that local, local resources, this is not wrong, but in the concrete judgment, it is more appropriate to reason. In fact, the Congress or the National People's Congress, or parliament, too, are the people's sovereignty, no ground for blame. Financial independence is not to say that financial self says, stems from the civil rights Congress NPC is of course, but not by the Yu Pingquan government! Although the national budget needs to be approved by the National People's Congress, this is common, but at present, the proposal right and making right courts at different levels in our country procuratorial system budget is unified by the people's government administrative organs -- master. The funds management system exposed many problems in practice. Chinese 5000 years of Chinese, for politics, which two right most deadly, one is from the military, with the emperor as feudal order to the cup of wine Bingquan release, with the army, who would dare to touch? One is the financial power, no power, even the power is also difficult to sustain, Professor Zhu said the rule of law is in need of money, right. The judicial organs of property by the government Yi, the judicial organ has so dare to enforce the supervision? County Attorney to bag is a living reality, this is not a professor Zhu "financial independent judicial independence judicial independence is not necessarily, not necessarily financial independence", the two Equivocation "not necessarily" can do!
    ......
    Alack! Finally understand that some jurisprudence China, finally understand some legal scholars China, Professor Zhu put forward and so on is not terrible, terrible is Professor Zhu these views which can withstand even the slightest scrutiny?