Chinese lawyer: one and ten thousand

The blogger comments:

Write the title, is inspired by Yang Jinzhu's lawyer. Recently, he was busy on article 306th of the criminal law judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court and request for lawyers signature, and vowed that on May 25th if not collected 10000 lawyers signature, he will quit law altar......

Therefore, I can be filled with a thousand regrets......

He is an old lawyer, but he still has the passion of young people, straightforward and naive;

He is a legal person, but he always does not lose the traditional literati sincere, romantic and bookish;

He is a Xingqingzhongren, but he has been adhering to the different from the ordinary legal thinking and professional thinking.

He was a "strange", strange that you want to scold him but also to scold not to come out, finally feel helpless and had to become inured to the unusual;

He was "bored", tired to make you feel this person's ideas and practices are measured, the pursuit of truth, and even some lovely;

He is "wrapped" around, let you in anger more imperceptibly to appreciate his heroic spirit, noble spirit, courage and chivalry, atmosphere;

He is "detour", think of to let you feel he Is it right? Born in the wrong time, wrong occupation but he is familiar with explicit rules and unspoken rule now.

So, he became the "law of the altar knight".

In my opinion, you can disagree with him the name, you can also do not agree with it, but you have to move to his lawyer career, love, passion, love passion and pride.

We see, as if an arithmetic problem, 1 and 10000 are able to get a lot of answers. If only by addition or multiplication in between, the answer is actually little difference. However, if the 1 and 10000 between the increased with addition or multiplication, so, the answer will be a very spectacular, very beautiful and very attractive results. So, from this point of view, he hoped to collect 10000 lawyers signature, there is a certain truth, reason and the reasoning.

But, I will tell him, judicial interpretation of article 306th of the criminal law appealed to the Supreme Court, whether we need the lawyers signature way? If you really need a lawyer signature, whether they will need to collect 10000 lawyers signature? If set to 10000 lawyers signature, whether will be able to reach the final destination? If the collection of 10000 lawyers signature target has not completed, whether they will need to withdraw from the law the altar? Because if you really need the lawyers said, I believe that the vast majority of lawyers will approve and support. However, some lawyers to support your idea, but may not support your approach; even some lawyers peer support your approach, but may not support your way; some lawyers may support your method, but not necessarily support you.

Of course, after all is said and done, I may not be able to convince him. But, think it over and over again, I also feel that regardless of the outcome, we need to seriously study his opinions and suggestions, need comprehensive attention to his ideas and practices, all need to support the full understanding of his intention and desire.

Asked the Supreme Court to "criminal law" the 306th interpretation, Yang Jinzhu invited China 170000 lawyers signature

Blogger Yang Jinzhu lawyers note:Request the Supreme Court judicial interpretation of "criminal law" article 306th, is closely linked with the 170000 Chinese lawyers, not for Yang the oneself or one person for. Lawyers Yang Jinzhu invited blogs at sina.com.cn forwarding this signature, and support.

All the lawyers:

In April 19, 2010 I in Sina blog "blog" law altar Knight Yang Jinzhu and major domestic Internet forum published "on the advice of the Supreme People's Court of people's Republic of China Criminal Law > 306th make the judicial interpretation of the legal opinion", request the Supreme People's Court on the "criminal law" article 306th of the following four questions the judicial interpretation:

1, the first paragraph of article 306th is the behavior of crime or the crime?

2, judicial practice that the defense lawyers in the meet the defendant when using the "blink" "implied" abetting accused of perjury, then "blink", "shake head" and other series of behavior can be recognized as the objective behavior in the crime?

3, "lawyer law" stipulates that the thirty-third "defense lawyer met the suspect was not listening", according to the legislative intent of the article, the lawyer meets with all the conversation defendants are entitled to immunity from legal occupation. So, the lawyer in the interview conversation the defendant can be recognized as constituting a crime evidence?

4, a lawyer at the trial stage to the meet the defendant, the defendant whether to read other accomplice confession to verify? Whether to the accused person to read its own confession to verify? Whether the documentary evidence to the defendant, to verify the evidence, the identification data and other evidence?

I also solicit domestic million lawyers signature, the deadline for signing in May 25, 2010. I will in May 28, 2010 will be a legal opinion and lawyers signature books I submitted to the Supreme People's court.

The signature, signature and see note attached: "Yang Jinzhu's policy on seeking 000 lawyers signature, suggest the Supreme Court on < > 306th that criminal law judicial interpretation"

Yang Jinzhu lawyers asked Chinese 170000 lawyers signature for the following reasons:

One, "criminal law" article 306th has become suspended in the China lawyer head of a sword, China lawyers suffer. Legal opinion I mentioned four judicial interpretation is closely linked with the 170000 China lawyers, not for myself or someone for.

Two, China lawyer for many years there have been proposed to abolish the "criminal law" article 306th, but it could not repeal of this provision, it requests the Supreme People's court limited judicial interpretation should be the best choice for the clause.

Three, the National Lawyers Association in Ning president in this year's NPC and CPPCC not prepared a formal proposal submitted by Yu Ning, President of the proposal is to modify, so it has not been submitted to the Supreme court. The lawyers submissions my four point in the judicial interpretation than in Ning President Bill is more concrete and practical (please colleagues compared).

Your colleagues to sign in support of!

Yang Jinzhu lawyer