Chinese interpretation USA Simpson case

   About the law, on the court, I have not too many insights, only that the fair image hanging libra. I think everyone like me, this stereotype is very difficult for us to accept some seemingly wasn't fair case. Of course, this is why I still take years ago Simpson murder out to reason. When finished the sports law, the law I also have a new idea, namely, the constitution is higher than all. That is, in the face of moral and law, we can stand on the side of law enforcement.

A cursory glance at the Simpson case, I also very angry, angry American jury stupid penalty, unexpectedly let such a heinous villain. But the thin see proof and defense related testimony, legal literacy I had to shout USA people's high. Why do you say that? Because the jury in the legal perspective is just to make a rational decision, they were not swayed by his feelings. Although the penalty said many people sick of his the doings, but they are just carried out its legal mission as a jury.

The reason why there is such a fine not because Simpson did not kill the fact, but because of the legal steps in legal and relevant evidence in a lot of negligenceA: the police officer responsible for the collection, the samples were not strictly in accordance with the procedures to collect specimens, he did not wear gloves, blood specimen collection fails to put into the freezer but freely in the car. Thus, this important evidence is the defense lawyer attack and lost the evidence qualification. Secondly, the most important witness the police, is also the first to the scene of the police, was the defense lawyerThe burden of proof as a racist. With these two major mistakes, the police lost the most important witnesses and material evidence. With great suspicion by the jury returned a verdict of not guilty of symplectic, lucky escape legal sanctions.

Can not say that Simpson is innocent. He can only say that the Losangeles police too many flaws, but the lawyer is too clever. This can be seen, America is a country under the rule of law, all decisions are highly in accordance with the constitution, in accordance with the equality of law. These qualities are what we Chinese lack. Our next 5000 years civilization is about morality, many times the pressure of public opinion and the universal values are about our decision. For example, Yao Jiaxin event, not long ago, my father is Li Gang events, these cases if the execution of the law, strictly in accordance with the traffic accident crime to fine words, is not so severe, but when we micro-blog, blog and other public media participation recently, then everything changed. The social public opinion constantly backlog, eventually led to the death penalty. Does this result really fair? Perhaps the public opinion is the gas, is not denying that cause harm to the society are damn it, but our laws? Our constitution dignity? We are also very realistic by legal society into a more terrible human society. In other words, our future decisions can be arbitrarily by people to change, as long as we follow the principles of mass is the law, everyone has a bar their call, then the society will lose its balance. Because in most cases, each person's moral standards are not the same, and your standards often with a lot of personal feelings color. Sensibility can be used to sympathy, and to make rational thinking. But in the Chinese often emotional and moral will defeat the rationality of the law. I think here is not like the case of Simpson.

Although Simpson's case may be a misjudged case, but for Simpson's penalty in the law is not wrong. Only with high legal literacy countries, fully in accordance with the constitution of the country in order to have a more perfect fairness. Calls for the legal society in real Chinese coming soon!