Cao Shunyi said the case of the eight

[Cao Shunyi] saidEight, the case is the first case number is (2011Jin min two word article)2102Civil judgementThe final is in Henan Province, Zhengzhou City Intermediate People's Court (2012)Zheng Min four with the word no.710Judgment, this caseDoubts too much, main is, you have to see the functional departments issued before and after the file date on the program, and I speak mainly two key, with regard to the case of the court of final details of judge Cui Hangwei deliberately pretended not clear, the case undertakers are four court of Zhengzhou City Intermediate People's court of people of Cui hang micro, plaintiff parties not to court proceedings, but first to Zhengzhou City Consumers Association of complaints, complaints directly related to the content of the mediation agreement, the complaint form both sides signed, written in very clear, I am really confused Chu, judge is why so big of courage, who in the hell is to give them the judges to support, in fact in many facts do silly case, this is also a way of earning money may be the judge, or the judge will is what drives her to do so confused case, the first thing I'll talk about the party in Zhengzhou City Consumers Association of complaints, the reason is for consumers should have the right to know, the Zhengzhou Mobile Corporation agreed to accept the opinions of consumers return the mobile phone consumers display fee for eleven months66Yuan, handling Zhengzhou Mobile Corporation raised a total of three,The first is to accept the customer complaint doesn't call don't money mobile phone packages to China05Packages, please look at the picture of "complaint form", then the caller ID display fee is not received, but began to collect the user's monthly fee, users again find consumer association, the association relevant responsible person said you took this agreement to the court they, typical fraud.

The second point is the national three ministries (Ministry of information industry, the Ministry of finance, the national development and Reform Commission, jointly issued)2004Years12Month31The file "hair day telephone number, occupation fee collection management procedures" and "telephone number, occupation fee standard" notice!

Department of finance of all provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the central government, Communication Management Bureau (bureau), development and reform committee, Price Bureau, China Telecom group company, Chinese Network Communications Group Corporation, Chellona Mobile Communications Corporation Cmcc, Chinese United Telecommunications Corporation, China Satellite Communications Corporation, China Tietong Group Limited, the relevant units; according to the "Telecommunications Regulations" of the people's Republic of China the Ministry of industry, Ministry of finance, development and Reform Commission formulated the "Interim Measures" collection management occupation fee "telephone number, and telephone number, occupation fee standard", has been approved by the State Council, are hereby printed and distributed to you, please follow.

Fifteenth; code resource occupancy expenses (rent, stop the fee, and other matters referred to as number) by possession, use number, telecom operators bear, telecom operators shall not charge to telecom user code resource occupation fee.

Ministry of Information Industry of the People's Republic of China

Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China

The people's Republic of China National Development and Reform Commission

Two00Released in December 31st of four2005Years1Month1On the implementation.

The two judges "Cui Hangwei" deliberately not adopted, the laws of our country is based on the facts as the basis, take the law as the criterion, the judge "Cui Hangwei" deliberately trample our country to the power of the people, rejected the appellant's request, the judge "Cui Hangwei" above the law, law enforcement should be doubly guilty.

The first is our country civil procedure law stipulated a trial six months must be closed, it dragged on for a year before closing, violating discipline.......

   Because of the limited time to write it!

                       Yours sincerely!

                            Cao Shunyi20013Years4Month9On the evening of