Barge American barrister anti-dumping view -- complex blog rating (14)

America barrister:The theoretical basis of antidumping people do lose money in order to open the market or earn foreign exchange business. If it is to open up the market, once occupied the market, prices should rise, so that enterprises will get back to the cost......

Huang Ming.Although you in the field of law of foreign economic professionals, but do not know Chinese conditions. Even if there are many serious Chinese businessmen want according to market rules and the laws of the country to do business, but because these an evil member of the herd, making them either to withdraw from the competition, or to play with them......

USA barrister in"Chinese type dumping, harm others and oneself"Published: 2006-07-26 03:11:05 Homepage
Yellow: as often help China enterprises in American to protectionist trade stick (and success) of the American lawyer, I really don't want our opponent to see your article, you please do their expert witnesses. You said, "you are by the consumption of the bank loans, by national tax rebate special, all aspects of the subsidies and so on to maintain." If so, that is the country's overall policies need to adjust. Mainly engaged in corporate purpose is for their own profit, the policy of subsidies, as long as they can make money what is there against it? The theoretical basis of antidumping people do lose money in order to open the market or earn foreign exchange business. If it is to open up the market, once occupied the market, prices should rise, so that enterprises will get back to the cost. But, in fact, Chinese products in the influx of USA, prices are still falling. But, now the international circulation of convenient, if you increase the price, the Buyer immediately transfer orders. So, in a way to occupy the market doesn't make sense in theory and practice. As for that kind of money to earn foreign exchange at practice, in today China strong foreign exchange reserves, dollar tired condition, was there really necessary?

Barge "USA counsel" anti-dumping view

Huang Ming: from the text we can see you are a Chinese, at least a sympathy Chinese americans. I and you go into it deeply, otherwise, the thing in the home is not to tell anyone.
First, I don't do their expert witnesses, I'm Chinese.
Second, our country should not only adjust the tax rebate policy, subsidies, and should be in the domestic market competition rules and the enterprise exit mechanism of legislation, such as the "anti dumping law", the new "bankruptcy law" (preferably includes a "personal bankruptcy law"), improve the social credit system, strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, so that the China into a real market economy, with international standards as soon as possible, eliminate the source of anti-dumping case from the system and the law.
Third, another important theoretical basis of antidumping is to prevent the non market mechanism, national or economic group long term for less than the cost of the impact of the country's market. You might say that business people are not willing to long-term loss! But I tell you, there are many not real merchants to participate in international trade China Company. (1) state companies, the real interests of shareholders representative vacancy. Their leaders but 5 years, as long as the surface is booming done 5 years, can people rich promotion two not mistake. The local government as enterprise stock rights, their main consideration instead of money but achievement: tax revenue, employment, false prosperity and image project etc.. (2) part of the private owner not integrity, hits the price war the company long-term losses, but because the service virtual high, so a large sum of money from the bank loan, finally evading, a registered company to do. Personal fortune, bank, national damaged (fortunately, major banks and countries as a backing, not hurt savers). (3) many enterprises to unsustainable resource such as cheap labour (without social medical insurance), more severe damage to the expense of the environment and resources, in exchange for the unfair low price, occupy the foreign market and earn improper profit. So, you say "once occupied the market, prices should rise, so that enterprises will get back to cost" is untenable. That you even in the field of law of foreign economic professionals, but do not know Chinese conditions. Even if there are many serious Chinese businessmen want according to market rules and the laws of the country to do business, but because these an evil member of the herd, making them either to withdraw from the competition, or to play with them. The more Bubbles Company or garbage company. In the world history, because the government mechanism defects, the so-called bad money hard out good money the phenomenon, both theory and practice makes sense.

As for the problem of foreign exchange reserves, this is a historical retardation. After the reform and opening up for a long period of time in the trade deficit larger cases (since it is a deficit, of course, there are few anti-dumping case, we hate not dumping their), exemption of export tax, subsidy policy that is very natural, has the opinion they don't. But as you know, any regulations and policies will lag behind the practice. Who also have never thought China economic development so fast, surplus come so soon so hard for so long. Of course this lag will slowly change. Our country has been adjusted once the export tax rebate rate, I think the future will transfer.

International trade is at any time in a game, believe China the dumping phenomenon along with the international economic legislation and mechanism gradually normal. At that time, you will help China Company agent antidumping case, not only do not need to prove their Is it right? Market mechanism and big nerve racking, but will help China Company to win the anti foreign to the case of dumping Chinese!
On the other, ask you to make the current anti-dumping case in the China Company, as professional identity, remind them from the innovation of products and services to win the competition, rely on price war can't last long. At the same time, give them a lot of market mechanism enlightenment lesson, Chinese enterprise after all what is the real market competition, lack of basic knowledge. C'mon.

FlashcardsIn the"China" Ah Q "and USA" Agam ""Published: 2006-07-25 16:40:04 Homepage: do we face is more important than the lining? Hope you will talk about lining problem
Huang Ming: most blog posts I have said is "lining", only a few "face".
Welcome to visit my blog, you will read a lot of interesting "lining".
My blog entry mode:Http://blog.sina.com.cn/m/huangmingOr search "Huang ming"
Defy laws human and divine in"China" Ah Q "and USA" Agam ""Published: 2006-07-25 16:44:53 HomepageEastern and Western cultural traditions are not the same, the values are not the same, more important is the level of economic and political system is different, resulting in a lot of things can not express. Even if can be expressed, others will not see. Take it easy, believe that will be good! Everyone is good at field, Zhang Yimou is a good director, his age and life experience makes his film style, not to shoot, but can't shoot it!
Huang Ming: in the online rare feel the peace of mind, in fact, this case said "take it easy." it is really hard "to" people. And then you send you: "believe" everything will be all right -- our nation be dogged by bad luck in the most difficult (time) are such comfort each other, and our country now than in the past has been unprecedented.
[anonymous] Henan Zhang Ya? We don't put in the western media to "why? Published: 2006-07-25 16:02:32 " Media is the news effect, the enterprise to the advertising effect, entrepreneurs need is faith. Advertising effect, your beliefs?
Huang Ming: my beliefs expressed in my the blog article, interested welcome to have a look.
Come around in the"China" Ah Q "and USA" Agam ""Published: 2006-07-25 17:47:08 Homepage

Huang Ming: hello! See some of your name and message, as relevant and "Himin Solar Energy", seems like you have a lot of chance to get outside, but I want to had nothing to do with it, but about you "Chinese" OQ"And American" Agam "-- Sino foreign image building where the difference?Article.
I agree with your point of view is part of, say, do not agree with is also available.1, you emphasize the film, missionaries and so on, say a lot of contrast is. I think you said is not different, but in the said gap. But the difference is not the gap. Several China foreign image of the construction of the conclusion is not a few films, American impression, stereotypes, in the world?2"Why, you mentioned the film is not so consistent with Chinese status, but also far". "Well", "Red Sorghum", "raise the red lantern" these I also doesn't love, why in foreign countries and foreign awards, I feel to China culture, values of fear, so will be banned many will impact their values of film. They will broadcast the "sword", "Liu Qiaoer", "Armageddon", "Nanjing road" eight?3I haven't read, "Agam story", but I am familiar with Mr. Lu Xun's "OQGump ", aQIs the true portrayal of that part of Chinese life, I emphasize that the "part", not what you say'...... "OQGump ", the same is the performance of national character themes,... ' Whether the "part", that is very necessary, even if "part of the relatively large proportion of. We take "OQGump "is intended as a warning to this part of the people, not to show performance of" national character".4I agreed to strengthen communication, private domestic celebrities to state what you say ", increase exchanges with foreign people,Change them to China mistakes, including values, use the folk force on their government." But I don't agree with "now we simply can't spread of values that a level, the actual situation Chinese now introduced to others is to burn incense high", "you don't look down upon their parliament, foreign parliament represents the people". You emphasize the USA parliament is representative of the people,That is to say our people's Congress no representative democracy? The world has different values, there is communication, also refused to. If blindly emphasizes communication, was overbearing, blindly emphasizes accept will lose self.

Huang Ming reply

The sword was Sir, thank you for your patronage! Your comment to let me feel this article I or meaning. We can according to your order is discussed:
1, I agree with your statement, "gap" is more suitable than the contrast. China image construction since it is a big project, so in a short essay not covered, only a few typical examples to make the point, this is blog (not big head).
2, about the impact banned because of the values, I have a different point of view and you. They are not so strict cultural product inspection, this is a completely market-oriented, why "Red Sorghum", "raise the red lantern" can go out to win the prize? Very simple, have the market, to meet the dark psychological part of the audience's curiosity and mentioned above. While the "sword", "Armageddon", hit in the domestic and foreign not "fire" reasons, or because there is no corresponding audience demand (no market) or no good communication (or no external promotional). I don't think they will broadcast problem, we will broadcast his "Saving Private Ryan", "platoon", "brothers", to the same war films will be stabbed them that nerve? (our movies such as "bright sword" take a little less than the war piece of their difference.) The key problem lies in the "communication", is to shape the overall image of the nation, have to admit they do much more civilized, more effective, this point is to learn from them, not a bit. Like many of our domestic brand enterprises, nor are the introduction of learning "positioning" 5P, 4S, VI, CIS and other exotic method, a successful brand image building (such as Huawei Haier, etc.), and equal competition of multinational corporations? We put the national image as a corporate image to do not a truth?
3, about the "A Q Gump" I also have different opinions with you (please refer to another blog "my A Q is Lu Xun"), here I just want to say that, "A Q story" may shoot the screenwriter and director, have you said "warning this part of people" the intention, but I believe that Mr Lu Xun should have no such intention, because Mr. Lu Xun that "these people" do not read, can not read "A Q story" this article (Mr. Lu Xun wouldn't expect to be made into a film), and Mr. Lu Xun to write each article has a strong purpose and the sense of hardship, he can't just in order to show to let other people laugh at our "national character". So his true intention where? As I in "Ah Q is that Lu Xun" in one article, is this the bottom with Ah Q, who is stronger than him to stimulate, stimulate people even laugh at those who have education, status but no fighting coward. If we can use the film will be Mr. Lu Xun, that means take out, don't you think more excite people's mind than Cervantes's "Don Gicord"?
4, don't you agree that "now we can get the spread of values that a level, the actual situation Chinese now introduced to others is to burn incense high", "you don't look down upon their parliament, foreign parliament represents the people". You emphasize the America parliamentary representative of the population, that is to say, our people's Congress no representative democracy?" People all over the world in addition to the culture of the Chinese nation in the value of some don't understand, don't you think the people of the world can really understand the great changes China today? It greatly changed after a hundred years old photos to their "sick man of East Asia" deep memory brand? (we modern people still continuously from the "raise the red lantern", "Red Sorghum" to deepen this ugly brand?) , can't we shouldn't change our past stupid image communication method?
As for the "foreign parliament represents the will of the people" mean, foreign parliament those anti China or to the bad bill, at least not representative of individual members of the personal point of view, they are a mass base, has a certain market, which I thought you wouldn't mind. Well, if so, we should put the national image communication and construction into a broader foreign nationals to see and do, this and our NPC have representative democracy is no relationship. So I also deputy to the National People's Congress, would you please have a look many blog posts I Is it right? Represents people's wishes and interests, if there is one thing, your ideas into paradox.

In addition to correct a little logic mistake to you, "you stressed USA parliament is representative of the people", and cannot draw your "that is to say our National People's Congress without democracy", as some people say that I am good, doesn't mean they tell you you're no good. The last sentence some embarrassing, Chinese images of the building there is a big gap, "stressed the need to", but emphasizes the bully, and America image construction has been very successful, but does not need again, but he has been handed to go, should be changed to the spread of doing was overbearing, accept is still far from enough, much to lose self (we emphasize, it is due to receive in the past too little).
One point should be clear, what is acceptable, is other publicity too much, to reject the. If the other party good doctrine, it The more, the better. Don't be afraid to lose self, spread Taoism as fine, national image is developed, more self.

Baarmoeder laugh when you don't know"China" Ah Q "and USA" Agam ""Published: 2006-07-25 15:59:08A fearless ignorance, "yellow land > >, > movie like that you think is junk, you do polytechnic was born? Do not know what is your so-called fine ah?
Huang Ming: the movie I really know little about, but we know anything of value, will change along with the times and occasions of different. When we say "Red Sorghum", "yellow", "raise the red lantern" and other films at home, whether it is from the art or practical significance are fine, to a foreign country, if there is no modern China image matting and balance, if China image is fully embodied in the the film image and lifestyle with her, and the role of value not only to be devalued, but caused by the negative impact of the whole. What is quality problem, I China "" Ah Q "and the" Agam American""The intention is not to discuss the merits of the movie, but calling on the whole society to pay attention to the construction of comprehensive influence in the world the hearts of the people of the country, national system, in this sense, the system can make an important contribution (outstanding) works are fine.

You are right, I am a school of science and technology background, the ignorant fearless, if I were to film really "know", I really dare not speech.

The knight in Kyushu"China" Ah Q "and USA" Agam ""Published: 2006-07-25 13:54:16 HomepageWe are not to promote our values, our current system of values as USA, what we should do is to improve our values, to do our own thing, when our society is strong, our values are more advanced, natural can spread. But should strengthen exchanges, or abroad to our misunderstanding will be deeper.
Huang: 5000 civilization values may not be less than only 200 years of history, colonial countries, but we need the value system, in theory. Even now, we do not spread, because a country's values system construction and propagation is already a days and months multiplying process, as America used time of 30 years, through the movie in the hearts of the people, especially the young heart piled up one of America's mental image. They are also a step by step, made a year. We also should start as early as possible, which can refer to another blog post "I Confucius thought and Lushang spirit".

Baarmoeder humanities scholars in"Chinese" Ah Q "and" Agam "-- America Sino foreign image building of the difference in where?"Published: 2006-07-25 11:44:53Yellow total humanism still need further study, because you don't know how to study and evaluation of a country's cultural characteristics. Only the problem from the image of the superficial view, but also opened up be opinionated about, surface very patriotic, is actually misleading. You don't understand the theory and practice of modern and tradition, also do not understand the relationship between the two, do not know or modest.
Huang Ming: China image is "superficial"?
Excuse me for a nation's cultural characteristics is to what? Objective to nothing less than two points: one point from the internal culture carry forward; two is the foreign propaganda. China culture broad and profound, both ancient and modern have so many scholars in the study of short articles, asked me this article covers such a broad and profound content, you are really hard on me, if I could only Chinese image in this "superficial view" achievement is to one's heart's content. If the national image perspective is a "superficial view," the world so many great brand image construction than the national image perspective is more superficial? Excuse me, Jack Traut, Ai Feng, Ye Maozhong, Francis Maguire (two America president image consultant) many books the world and China famous image planning theory and practice master most only "image perspective", and how to evaluate the extent of shallow?

As for the theory and practice of modern and tradition, I have to admit that my article is not written in their relationship, relative to the scholars and practitioners, I only modestly said I prefer when the latter. I only in practice a little voice, that is the theory of all modern and tradition as well as the two, is to a country, a nation to inherit and carry forward the fine traditional culture, discarding its dross on the foundation with modern international trend (at least not falling) the country's culture, powerful enough to not only become our country wealthy and powerful way, but also by the government and the national deliberately spread (even if you say "superficial view") form the influence and control of powerful, about the global cultural trend. Even the "humanist" Sir to a national cultural characteristics from the relationship between theory and practice of the modern and tradition of have deep knowledge, also should not be banned even entering your way from the published statements of a school "superficial view"!