Since the beginning of 2008, our country appears the bank acceptance bill is applied for the public summons, causing a large number of negotiable instruments disputes, and even many of the so-called speculative reselling of tickets to companies and individuals were investigated and dealt with according to law, the arrest of the amount of litigation, some of the hundreds of millions of. Causes this dispute is stipulated in our country's current negotiable instrument law is not perfect, but also because in some units or individuals to use loopholes in the law to draft earn high profits. Below the case that this counsel together very typical bill malicious loss, is the public summons disputes.

   The dispute is the plaintiff claimed that the bill is lost, and then apply to the court for public summons, notice during the holder of a bill rights advocate, after the public summons the Court confirmed the bill right to disputes over the right of negotiable instruments. The case after a trial of second instance court verdict,, are now losing negotiable instrument holder. I shall now the bill holder the retrial to the Shandong Provincial Higher People's court, the last three times after the trial, the court finally support my view to cancel the original agent, a second instance civil verdict, dismissed the public summons the applicant's claim.