Eleven thirty in the morning of September 14, 2008, a market Xi Li to A, B two insurance companies reported a warehouse fire, resulting in two car and inventory in the warehouse fire was burning.

   A, B two insurance companies take the survey personnel rushed to the scene of the preliminary investigation, the fire department also went to the scene the fire, after the fire officers and soldiers to rescue, the scene only the remaining part of the warehouse inventory, warehouse roof has been the fire burnt down, part of the stock in the warehouse and two cars have been the fire burning all.

  The fire was put out, the scene was the public security fire department of martial law, and on-site survey evidence by the technical department of the public security fire protection, identification of the cause of the fire in order to facilitate the.

  After two months, by the Shandong provincial police fire brigade technical appraisal issued by the Department of fire cause identification results, when Audi because: A6 car ignition B insurance company after ignition warehouse roof, resulting in Jiang Ling truck and warehouse warehouse fire and burning of A insurance company in the rest of the goods.

    Contract:

  A6: Audi insured: Lee opened a clothing company. Underwriting car caustic danger in B company; the third comprehensive liability insurance; the vehicle officers liability insurance; the vehicle ignition loss insurance.

   Jiang Ling: the insured: Lee himself, underwriting car caustic danger in A company; the third comprehensive liability insurance; the car personnel liability insurance.

   Warehouse: Lee rented warehouse, uninsured any insurance.

The problemDo you think Mr. Li: how to claim compensation from the insurance company? If you are the insurance company claims personnel, do you think that the cause of the company bear the responsibility, what is the reason?

     Please take the case as the subject, title, write an essay, explain your point of view.

       Requirement: 1 view is correct, the relevant professional knowledge argument for curriculum learned, argumentation, clear logic, language expression is accurate.

            2.2009 years before 1 completed, asked to print edition. 13376338672