American law is to protect the who?

  American law is to protect the who? Is it still a problem? American the law does not protect USA people, also to protect the China people not to become? A conclusion, we are static next hearts come have a look on the other side America law.

   See a female lead China party was sentenced in jail China USA articles occasionally, the man named Gao Zhan, anti Communist and anti government than the current domestic well-known are more powerful, but in 2001 because of selling information to Taiwan, was sentenced to ten years Chinese , see their way, to sit Chinese prison, when Dad nature does not dry up, the rescue, the final decision by the name after a medical parole release (National weak is bullied ah, who said the country strong and the fate of individuals without off?).

   It is up to American, but by 2000 had to give a scientific research unit to sell contraband Chinese high-tech chip was American prosecution, eventually sentenced to 7 months in prison, America immigration think she is America danger , take her back China, she is not willing to, and the movement of people a lawsuit, the final result is not need to be repatriated, but because it is dangerous USA, so can only stay not in immigration prison, so still sitting prison (this is the Internet that article published on time, whether now or change don't know).

   The way to this, is the need for.

   My focus is not on the fate of Gao Zhan, revealed a true side America in law but in this article, below is the full text of the excerpt i:
[
   In America, obscure law lies not only in its content, but also in the text. The characteristics America law is: the classical Chinese words, obscure, aristocratic, also emerge from time to time a latin. Think of look, if the law passes Chinese is the Tang and Song Dynasties, literary style, with the pre Qin ancient, but "I turn two turn, plus three pie", ordinary people would read what is the feeling?

American government provisions of English is the official language, so in the government documents if non English sentences should be translated into English, parentheses appended to the statement. But the legal documents, the government promulgated the law, he can be directly inserted into Latin, not available in English translation. This is the way the law said offbeat, not for ordinary people. What is more, the judge's decision also often appear in Latin, and Latin in the general English Dictionary also cannot find the solution, so that ordinary people and even to his judgments have difficulty. Instead of letting people time-consuming effort to search the corresponding English translation, why not use English? That's a serious point, legal documents with pull Latin and not available in English translation, is a Latin Training School of law graduates to never learned Latin people flirt and discrimination.

Because the legal knowledge has been monopolized by the few special Lee, plus USA legal case law, the law can not be universal knowledge hard, causing legal illiteracy countless; people do not know how to use the law to protect themselves, causing serious social disease. As the public for legal knowledge daunting, anything to find a lawyer, and the formation of a special law that powerful interests.
]
   Read the above, my first feeling is, no wonder America's lawyers then dilated and rich, the second problem is America law exactly why people service?

   Artificially to legal provision obscure, understanding the gap between manufacturing law and ordinary people, is essentially a legal protection for people's weakening, to engage in a lawsuit, only employed to understand obscure legal lawyer, which do means to spend a lot of money, means that only the rich can to better protect themselves by law, those who do not have enough money, be forever excluded to beyond the protection of law.

   I understand not know universalist agree? Universal sent every day to teach us America is model free and equal democratic rights, why the reality is always a difference and we know?

   In addition to the above thoughts, and I thought of the China, China is always the object universal pie attack, despotic, authoritarian, no human rights, darkness, corruption and so on, I admit, and can realize Chinese many problems, but Chinese system is essentially to protect wealthy people like American law like that? I think the Chinese pinyin and simplified characters.

   Chinese in pinyin, now the criticism is not much, universalist rarely criticized, they are more on the simplified character criticism but, so that why we should develop Chinese pinyin and simplified characters?

   In order to reduce the difficulty of learning, let Chinese hundreds of millions of Chinese Pinyin literacy illiteracy as soon as possible, greatly reduces the difficulty in learning pronunciation, Pinyin, China also adopt a variety of ways to implement China traditional ways of phonetic notation, but the effect is not good, after the Chinese Pinyin, a lower illiterate people learning Chinese characters threshold.

   The simplified character is reducing the illiteracy have difficulty writing Chinese characters, but also greatly reduces the learning curve, making hundreds of millions of people from not know a single word to read, I think this is the basis of Chinese modernization development foundation.

   Contrary to traditional characters China traditional structure is more complex, from a practical point of view, cultural knowledge is monopolized by the few, and most people because of the lack of cultural competence, become the bottom of society. To change a person's fate, should start from his knowledge of culture change.

   Why do people America legal service, which is very important for us to understand American freedom and equality and democracy and human rights, not all people can enjoy the same rights. At the same time, it also helps us to understand some of the problems Chinese now, such as to our Ma Nan shoe throwing and fights Wu Fatian is justice, while Han Deqiang hit the old man should be condemned, its essence and American laws tend to protect the rich is a logic.

   No unified standard for all fair, and law, there can be no real freedom and equality of democracy and human rights.