America anti immigration policy is a big success

USA is a nation of immigrants, immigrants from around the World War II Jewish, Germany, to India, Chinese immigration later, skilled migrants to USA development, laid the foundation. However, nowadays America government policy, is not to hate these technical knowledge, science, all back to their home, so they don't contribute to the USA. It is not, let them take Americans jobs.

Since the H-1B quota from 2003 federal fiscal year (of immigration began to accept in the April 1, 2002 H-1B application) 195000 to 65000 after 2004 year, until 2008, the immigration quota of 65000 H-1B, are full in April 1st each year. In 2009 April, because America economic crisis, the immigration office received 45000 applications; in 2010 April, the immigration office received 16000 applications. In April this year, immigration only received 8000 applications. The figures for 2009 down, probably as excusable, because the economic crisis of 2007, 2009 has not recovered. (even so, in the economic crisis peak, the 2008 H-1B application or immediately full.) However, in the job market for good in 2011, H-1B applications continue to decline, this is a problem.

The people in the industry, the truth is very simple. Although America Congress has not through the new immigration laws, but America administrative authorities to succumb to political pressure, especially the Obama government to capitulate to union pressure, trying to use the existing immigration law, discrimination, obstruct the skilled migration.

First of all, USA administration by increasing the difficulty and cost of H-1B application. In 20 years ago, when we had American immigrants, the government cost only 100 yuan, can be ignored, the main cost is about $1000, the lawyer fees. More than 20 years later today, because we are willing to help the newly graduated students, our law firm lawyer fee to $1200 acceptance H-1B case. (if we whether those with cheap win lawyer, the price than the normal market price is much lower.) But the government's expenses, have according to the status of different, up to $1575, $2325, or $4325 to. Moreover, the immigration wanton out long fill material requirement (RFE), to spend a lot of time to prepare the material force of our guests, and then have to pay lawyers to deal with RFE. (some law firms with risk sharing approach, $2500 lawyers, including RFE. According to our customers here reflect a lot, as these firms get RFE, their attitude is to deal with the past wrong, let the customer to resign oneself to one's fate. So, it did not get the RFE client, should they pay the cost of RFE, unfair to them. To get RFE's customers, because law firms no longer make money, they deal with people, unfair to them. The result of this unfair to everyone.)

Secondly, H-1B employers need to pay the so-called the average wage, the average wage, formulated by the Department of labor. In the high rate of unemployment in recent years, the average wage, in many industries, will increase year by year. For employers, these foreign graduates although promising, but the beginning is always have no experience, can only be relatively low-level work, so the employer is required to immediately pay the average wage, itself is not reasonable. In the high unemployment rate, the labour market pile up in excess of requirement of the past few years, a substantial increase in the average wage labor department, I do not know is what Ann heart. The government has such a policy, forcing the company to H-1B application fee, the average wage is too high to be reached to the Department of labor. And the H-1B for the cost, probably because the beneficiary (foreigners) for work and draw water with a sieve. The company is concerned, is undoubtedly a big problem.

In any country, companies can only take into account the current situation, because the company wants to make money, there must be various costs (to purchase raw materials, purchase and so on); and each boss are very clear mind, they always face the next month's wages, rent, electricity, water fee, insurance premium and so on. Relatively speaking, the state can for the country's future long term. In American, not what people stand up and say no immigration contribution to USA. However, with a population of more than 300000000 America, one year into 65000 graduates, even if the wrong, what loss? Why, and these have a good education child not to go? Why the long-term future and American too not to go? Why do Americans to answer this question, take out the answer is Obama? This is a very thought-provoking questions.