2008Year June 14thQQ, No. 1499*****, nicknamed "soft * * bug", said a gentleman: we owe sb a project 3, to creditors write an IOU, finally 3 people signed up, specifically as follows: you like this* * * * gate iron works is less: Qiwansan thousand Sibai yuan. Arrears: A, B, C, time is written "-- 2007.3.15". Now creditors sued out ious blacked out C, to prosecute only two of us to repay 73400 yuan, I was the one who owe A, how can we respond, can say the ious are not I write? There is a solution: if the Internet after the modification content changed the true meaning of the original, the modified content is invalid if altered; after the content has nothing to do with the real meaning, does not affect the validity of the original bill -- which I can say this IOUS is invalid, and no longer recognize this money from?

   Answer: first, can you explain in court: the malicious alters the IOUs, illustrate the debt belongs to the common debt of 3 individuals, shall be composed of 3 individuals to assume the responsibility to repay.

   Second, you can't say that you completely ineffective, because you do owe each other's works, but not the two of you but 3 people owe.

   Third, you can't say you not you write, because the signature handwriting can be identified, the general appraisal fees shall be borne by the liar.

   Fourth, you can ask for correction marks identification of altered after the IOUs, may also request the polygraph, put forward at the same time, the polygraph appraisal fee costs borne by the altered ious or liar, the altered trace identification or lie is not difficult.

   Fifth, the Internet you said is right, that is to say the correction will be borne by the 3 person's debt by 2 people take the content alteration is invalid, not to say that the whole of this debt is invalid, so you cannot say you two don't owe you any money.